Government looking at reducing minimum apartment size
The measures are designed to reduce costs by between €50,000 to €100,000 per unit.
Advertisement
It comes amid frustration and criticism of the Government's response to a slowdown in apartment building.
The changes look at the mix of apartment types, the layout and design of individual of units, and the provision of communal facilities.
It also includes measures around dual-aspect windows and the ratio of units to lifts and stairs.
The new guidelines reduce the minimum size of studio apartments from 37 square metres to 32 square metres.
Advertisement
In an attempt to improve delivery costs of apartment schemes, they will also remove any restrictions on apartment mix.
Currently, guidelines restrict the number of one-bedroom apartments within a scheme to 50 per cent, with no more than 20 to 25 per cent consisting of studio apartments.
It is also proposed to remove any limitation on the number of units per lift and stair core per floor, subject to compliance with building regulations.
This will allow developers to exceed the current maximum of 12 units.
Advertisement
Minister James Browne's proposals would also reduce the amount of apartments required to be dual aspect in new developments to at least 25%, down from 33% in urban locations and 50% in suburban areas.
Elsewhere, the guidelines contain easing of restrictions on providing private open space and specify that communal facilities shall not be required on a mandatory basis.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
8 minutes ago
- The Guardian
It's not just about building houses – communities need infrastructure to grow
There is a very real danger that, in its bid to reform the planning system and build 1.5m homes across England at pace, the government will neglect the basic requirements of livable communities ('No shops, no schools': homes in England built without basic amenities, 27 July). As your article makes clear, already 'thousands of homes across England are being built without urgently needed community infrastructure'. The planning system cannot allow such fundamental aspects of quality, sustainable placemaking to be neglected. It would do well to recognise the solution offered by a landscape-led approach to development. Landscape is everywhere – not just in protected countryside, but in every high street and cul-de-sac. It is the setting in which we all live, study, work and play. By thinking landscape first and engaging landscape architects early, planners and developers can design-in essential community infrastructure from the outset, creating resilient places that deliver what people need. So, let's build quality as well as quantity by prioritising GöhlerPresident, Landscape Institute One of the problems with the way we build homes in England is that local people have no role beyond complaining and objecting. In one case in your article, the community offered to finish off and run a community centre if the developer would just build the shell. But the idea that communities could roll up their sleeves and build, own, run these things just isn't considered by our housing and planning systems. The developer considered and rejected the idea; the community had no say. In a small but growing number of places this opposite is happening. Communities are gaining a seat at the table in the design and build-out of new homes, and taking ownership of shops, playgrounds, open space, community centres and affordable homes. Developers have to work with, and negotiate with, local people over what is built. This little bit of leverage and agency, achieved through a community land trust, builds better places with a stronger sense of community. The Labour government has talked a lot about supporting communities. The prime minister recently spoke of people tired of being excluded from decisions about their own lives. Here's your chance, Sir Keir, to include them in decisions about housing by wiring community agency and ownership into the planning ChanceChief executive, Community Land Trust Network
The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
Car finance scandal victims to get less than £950 each in compensation
The financial regulator estimates the compensation scheme for those impacted by the car finance scandal could cost between £9 billion and £18 billion, a significant reduction from the £45 billion initially projected. Individuals eligible for compensation are forecasted to receive less than £950 each. The statement from the FCA comes after the Supreme Court ruled that hidden commissions from lenders to car dealers on car loans were not unlawful, impacting millions of potential compensation claims. The decision means the majority of claims for mis-sold car loans will not proceed, with only the most serious cases eligible for compensation. The FCA plans to launch a consultation for payouts by early October, with the first payments expected in 2026, advising consumers against using claims management companies.
Daily Mail
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
These two stocks have DOUBLED since I tipped them. Here are two more British firms you should invest in before they soar, reveals our money guru
The UK has been on a losing streak for too long. But the clouds seem to be lifting and Britons are beginning to win again. The Lionesses roared to victory in Europe, the British and Irish Lions dominated the Australia rugby test series and the International Monetary Fund says the UK will be the G7 's third fastest growing economy this year and next.
