UK ramps up scrutiny of Apple and Google in push for mobile services changes
On Wednesday, the Competition and Markets Authority proposed designating the U.S. tech giants as having a "strategic market status" or SMS, after opening an investigation into the matter in January.
This designation is given to a large company that has "substantial and entrenched market power" and a "position of strategic significance" with respect to a digital activity in the U.K.
The CMA can force firms that are branded as having SMS to change or stop specific behaviors or practices in order to address competition concerns.
Britain's regulator focused on investigating Apple and Google's mobile operating systems, app store and browser. One aspect of the investigation looked at whether there are barriers that may prevent other competitors from offering rival products and services on the U.S. tech giants' mobile platforms.
Another part of the probe examined whether Apple and Google are using their position in operating systems, app distribution or browsers to favor its own apps and services.
And the final aspect of the investigation studied whether Apple and Google require developers to sign up to "unfair terms and conditions" in order to distribute their apps via the respective app stores.
Google's Android operating system commands just over 61% market share in the U.K., while Apple's iOS has just over a 38%, according to Kantar data. Google runs the Google Play store and Chrome browser, and Apple has its App Store and Safari browser.
Apple and Google's regulatory problems on the continent of Europe continue to deepen.
In April, European Union regulators hit Apple with a 500 million euro ($587 million) fine for breaching the Digital Markets Act (DMA) — a landmark law aimed at tackling tech competition issues.
Apple has been forced to make a number of changes to the way it operates in the EU this year. These include allowing developers to tell their users about cheaper alternatives and bypass Apple's in-app payment system.
However, some of the changes have yet to satisfy the EU regulators. Apple in June revealed a complex system of App Store fees in a bid to comply with the DMA and avoid the 500 million euro fine. Apple plans to appeal the fine.
Apple has long argued that forced regulator-led changes to its operations could lead to privacy and security issues for users and confusing business terms for developers
In March, Google parent Alphabet meanwhile was accused by the EU of failing to comply with the DMA. The European Commission, the EU's executive arm, said Google is treating its own search services more favorably than those of rivals. The Commission added that Google's app store is preventing developers from steering consumer to other channels for better offers.
The search giant is also looking to fight a 4.1 billion euro fine that has stemmed from an antitrust case dating back to 2018.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNET
25 minutes ago
- CNET
Trump's AI Action Plan Is Here: 5 Key Takeaways
The Trump administration on Wednesday laid out the steps it plans to take to ensure "global AI dominance" for the US, with an AI Action Plan that calls for cutting regulations to speed up the development of artificial intelligence tools and the infrastructure to power them. Critics said the plan is a handout to tech and fossil fuel companies, slashing rules that could protect consumers, prevent pollution and fight climate change. Though the plan itself isn't binding (it includes dozens of policy recommendations), Trump did sign three executive orders to put some of these steps into action. The changes and proposals follow how the Trump administration has approached AI and technology over the past six months -- giving tech companies a largely free hand; focusing on beating China; and prioritizing the construction of data centers, factories and fossil fuel power plants over environmental regulations. It's seizing on the moment created by the arrival of ChatGPT less than three years ago and the ensuing wave of generative AI efforts by Google, Meta and others. "My administration will use every tool at our disposal to ensure that the United States can build and maintain the largest and most powerful and advanced AI infrastructure anywhere on the planet," Trump said during remarks Wednesday evening at a summit presented by the Hill and Valley Forum and the All-In Podcast. He signed the three executive orders at the event. The administration and tech industry groups touted the plan as a framework for US success in a race against China. "President Trump's AI Action Plan presents a blueprint to usher in a new era of US AI dominance," Jason Oxman, president and CEO of the tech industry trade group ITI, said in a statement. Consumer groups said the plan focuses on deregulation and would hurt consumers by reducing the rules that could protect them. "Whether it's promoting the use of federal land for dirty data centers, giving the FTC orders to question past cases, or attempting to revive some version of the soundly defeated AI moratorium by tying federal funds to not having 'onerous regulation' according to the FCC, this is an unwelcome distraction at a critical time for government to get consumer protection right with increasing AI use and abuse," Ben Winters, director of AI and privacy at the Consumer Federation of America, said in a statement. Here's a look at the proposals in the plan. Slashing regulations for AI infrastructure The plan says AI growth will require infrastructure, including chip factories, data centers and more energy generation. And it blames environmental regulations for getting in the way. In response, it proposes exemptions for AI-related construction from certain environmental regulations, including those aimed at protecting clean water and air. It also suggests making federal lands available for data center construction and related power plants. To provide energy for all those data centers, the plan calls for steps to prevent the "premature decommissioning of critical power generation resources." This likely refers to keeping coal-fired power plants and other mostly fossil-fuel-driven infrastructure online for longer. In his remarks, Trump specifically touted his support for coal and nuclear power plants. The administration also called to prioritize the connection of new "reliable, dispatchable power sources" to the grid and specifically named nuclear fission and fusion and advanced geothermal generation. Earlier this month, the president signed a bill that would end many tax credits and incentives for renewable energy -- wind and solar -- years earlier than planned. Wind and solar make up the bulk of the new energy generation being added to the US grid right now. "This US AI Action Plan doesn't just open the door for Big Tech and Big Oil to team up, it unhinges and removes any and all doors -- it opens the floodgates, continuing to kneecap our communities' rights to protect ourselves," KD Chavez, executive director of the Climate Justice Alliance, said in a statement. "With tech and oil's track records on human rights and their role in the climate crisis, and what they are already doing now to force AI dominance, we need more corporate and environmental oversight, not less." Fewer rules around AI technology Congress ended up not including a moratorium on state AI rules in the recently passed tax and spending bill but efforts to cut regulations around AI continue from the executive branch in the action plan. "AI is far too important to smother in bureaucracy at this early stage, whether at the state or Federal level," the plan says. The plan recommends that several federal agencies review whether existing or proposed rules would interfere with the development and deployment of AI. The feds would consider whether states' regulatory climate is favorable for AI when deciding to award funding. Federal Trade Commission investigations and orders would be reviewed to determine that they don't "advance theories of liability that unduly burden AI innovation." Those rule changes could undermine efforts to protect consumers from problems caused by AI, critics said. "Companies -- including AI companies -- have a legal obligation to protect their products from being used for harm," Justin Brookman, director of tech policy at Consumer Reports, said in a statement. "When a company makes design choices that increase the risk their product will be used for harm, or when the risks are particularly serious, companies should bear legal responsibility." Ideology and large language models The plan proposes some steps around ensuring AI "protects free speech and American values," further steps in the Trump administration's efforts to roll back federal policies around what it refers to as "diversity, equity and inclusion," along with references to the problems of misinformation and climate change. It calls for eliminating references to those items in the National Institute of Standards and Technology's AI Risk Management Framework. Federal agencies would only be allowed to contract with AI developers who "ensure that their systems are objective and free from top-down ideological bias." The Trump administration has recently announced contracts of up to $200 million each to developers Anthropic, Google, OpenAI and xAI. Grok, the model from Elon Musk's xAI, has recently come under fire for spouting antisemitism and hate speech. Dealing with workforce challenges The plan acknowledges that AI will "transform how work gets done across all industries and occupations, demanding a serious workforce response to help workers navigate that transition" and recommends actions by federal agencies including the Department of Labor intended to mitigate the harms of AI-driven job displacement. The plan calls for the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Census Bureau and Bureau of Economic Analysis to monitor how AI affects the labor market using data already collected. An AI Workforce Research Hub under the Department of Labor would lead monitoring and issue policy recommendations. Most of the actual plans to help workers displaced by AI involve retraining those workers for other jobs or to help states do the same. Other jobs-related recommendations are aimed at boosting the kinds of jobs needed for all those data centers and chip manufacturing plants -- like electricians and HVAC technicians. These plans and others to encourage AI literacy and AI use in education drew praise from the Software & Information Industry Association, a tech industry trade group. "These are key components for building trust and ensuring all communities can participate in and benefit from AI's potential," Paul Lekas, SIIA's senior vice president of global public policy, said in a statement. More AI in government The plan envisions more use of AI by the federal government. A talent exchange program would allow employees with experience or talent in AI to be detailed to other agencies in need. The General Services Administration would create a toolbox of AI models that would help agencies see models to choose from and use cases in other parts of the government. Every government agency would also be required to ensure employees who could use AI in their jobs have access to and training for AI tools. Many recommendations focus specifically on the Department of Defense, including creating a virtual proving ground for AI and autonomous systems. AI companies have already been signing contracts with the DOD to develop AI tools for the military.
Politico
26 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump's 'massive' deal with Japan is giving US automakers heartburn
And Elon Musk's Tesla on Wednesday posted another quarter of meager profitability and revenue, in part due to the tariffs. Tesla said its profitability decreased for the quarter because of lower regulatory credit revenue, a decline in vehicle deliveries and a lower cost per vehicle due to 'mix and lower raw materials partially offset by lower fixed cost absorption and an increase in tariffs.' Those losses will be tougher to swallow if other major trading partners succeed in negotiating better tariff rates for their own automakers. Reuters reported Wednesday that stocks in Japanese car companies Toyota and Honda soared on the news of the deal, but so did shares of South Korean and European carmakers, as hopes rise that their leaders could strike similar deals. Trump's auto tariffs have been a sticking point in trade negotiations with the EU for months, with Germany vocally pushing the 27-member bloc to make major concessions to Trump in hopes of winning a reprieve for its large auto manufacturing sector. 'The costs for our companies are already in the billions — and the sum is growing every day,' said Hildegard Müller, president of VDA, the German automobile association, which represents companies such as Volkswagen, BMW and Mercedes. 'The damage to the previously functioning supply chains is enormous and must not be allowed to increase any further.' German auto companies are reporting double-digit declines in exports to the U.S. in April and May, and they aren't the only ones. Volvo, the Swedish car company, has had to pause sales of some of its cars in the U.S. South Korean car companies Hyundai and Kia will announce their second quarter financial results later this week and both companies are projecting significant losses from the tariffs, as well. Auto exports from South Korea to the U.S. have exploded over the past 20 years, from $8.7 billion in 2005 to $37.3 billion in 2024, according to data collected by the Census Bureau. As with Japan and the EU, the duties have been a focal point of trade talks with the Trump administration, which has grown frustrated by the lack of progress. Trump sent a letter to new South Korean President Lee Jae-Myung on July 7 threatening a 25 percent tariff on all its exports to the U.S. — a sign of dissatisfaction with the state of the talks. (He sent a nearly identical letter to Japan's prime minister the same day.) After imposing the auto tariffs this spring, the administration assured American automakers that they would not become a bargaining chip in other trade negotiations, a person familiar with discussions between the administration and Detroit's 'Big Three' auto companies, granted anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the talks, told POLITICO at the time. The president sought to cast the UK deal, which reduced duties on auto and auto parts to 10 percent for the first 100,000 cars entering the U.S., as an exception. 'I won't do that deal with cars' for other countries, Trump said when announcing the terms of negotiation on May 8. The British auto brand Rolls-Royce is 'a very special car and it's a very limited number, too. It's not one of the monster car companies that makes millions of cars,' he noted, although some British brands like Land Rover compete with American SUVs. A White House official, granted anonymity to discuss the trade talks, struck a similar note on Wednesday, downplaying the prospect that Trump will agree to lower the car tariffs for any more countries. 'It's a negotiation,' the person said, pointing to the $550 billion investment Japanese businesses pledged as a sign that the country had made an unparalleled offer. In Japan, embattled Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba celebrated the agreement, saying it was focused on 'prioritizing investment over tariffs.' But others were less enthusiastic about the outcome, given the double-digit tariff rate still hitting Japanese goods. 'If 15 percent is applied to autos and auto parts, Japan did not get what it was aiming for,' said former Japanese Vice Minister Tatsuya Terazawa. Ari Hawkins contributed to this report.
Business Insider
26 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Google CEO Sundar Pichai shrugs off Silicon Valley's raging AI talent wars
Google CEO Sundar Pichai brushed off concerns about the company's ability to attract and keep top AI talent during the tech giant's second-quarter earnings call, calling its retention metrics "healthy." On Wednesday, Pichai publicly addressed the latest wave of AI talent wars raging across Silicon Valley. These wars have been supercharged by Meta's announcement of a 'superintelligence' division and the poaching of some researchers with multimillion-dollar pay packages. The competition has become so intense that some analysts worry it could increase the growing costs of staying at the cutting edge of AI. Bernstein analyst Mark Shmulik asked Pichai about recruiting top researchers in the context of "AI-related resource costs" at Google, and how the competition affects the company's ability to retain talent. In response, Pichai said that Google has been through moments like this before and touted that its core metrics remain "healthy." "We continue to look at both our retention metrics, as well as the new talent coming in, and both are healthy," Pichai said on the earnings call. "I do know individual cases can make headlines, but when we look at numbers deeply, I think we are doing well through this moment." Business Insider asked Google if it could share some of those metrics; the tech giant didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. Several members of Meta's new superintelligence team used to work at Google. For example, Meta poached Pei Sun, a researcher who worked on improving Google's Gemini AI assistant and its self-driving car, Waymo. It's not just Meta poaching Googlers. Newer AI startups like OpenAI and Anthropic have also siphoned top talent from Google's DeepMind division, according to a SignalFire report. For example, the report found that it's 11 times more likely that a researcher leaves Google for Anthropic than the other way around. During the earnings call, Pichai said that Google knew what it took to keep top AI researchers happy — and it wasn't all about the money. For example, Pichai said Google is investing more in access to compute, meaning the latest and greatest computer chips. Also, top researchers want to be "at the frontier driving progress, and so the mission, and how state-of-the-art the work is, matters. So that's super important to them," he said.
