UK ramps up scrutiny of Apple and Google in push for mobile services changes
On Wednesday, the Competition and Markets Authority proposed designating the U.S. tech giants as having a "strategic market status" or SMS, after opening an investigation into the matter in January.
This designation is given to a large company that has "substantial and entrenched market power" and a "position of strategic significance" with respect to a digital activity in the U.K.
The CMA can force firms that are branded as having SMS to change or stop specific behaviors or practices in order to address competition concerns.
Britain's regulator focused on investigating Apple and Google's mobile operating systems, app store and browser. One aspect of the investigation looked at whether there are barriers that may prevent other competitors from offering rival products and services on the U.S. tech giants' mobile platforms.
Another part of the probe examined whether Apple and Google are using their position in operating systems, app distribution or browsers to favor its own apps and services.
And the final aspect of the investigation studied whether Apple and Google require developers to sign up to "unfair terms and conditions" in order to distribute their apps via the respective app stores.
Google's Android operating system commands just over 61% market share in the U.K., while Apple's iOS has just over a 38%, according to Kantar data. Google runs the Google Play store and Chrome browser, and Apple has its App Store and Safari browser.
Apple and Google's regulatory problems on the continent of Europe continue to deepen.
In April, European Union regulators hit Apple with a 500 million euro ($587 million) fine for breaching the Digital Markets Act (DMA) — a landmark law aimed at tackling tech competition issues.
Apple has been forced to make a number of changes to the way it operates in the EU this year. These include allowing developers to tell their users about cheaper alternatives and bypass Apple's in-app payment system.
However, some of the changes have yet to satisfy the EU regulators. Apple in June revealed a complex system of App Store fees in a bid to comply with the DMA and avoid the 500 million euro fine. Apple plans to appeal the fine.
Apple has long argued that forced regulator-led changes to its operations could lead to privacy and security issues for users and confusing business terms for developers
In March, Google parent Alphabet meanwhile was accused by the EU of failing to comply with the DMA. The European Commission, the EU's executive arm, said Google is treating its own search services more favorably than those of rivals. The Commission added that Google's app store is preventing developers from steering consumer to other channels for better offers.
The search giant is also looking to fight a 4.1 billion euro fine that has stemmed from an antitrust case dating back to 2018.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Apple Q3 Earnings Beat Estimates, Services Drive Top-Line Growth
Apple AAPL reported third-quarter fiscal 2025 adjusted earnings of $1.57 per share, which beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 10.56% and increased 12.1% year over sales increased 9.6% year over year to $94.04 billion and beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 5.75%.Overall, product sales (70.8% of sales) climbed 8.2% year over year to $66.61 billion. Services revenues grew 13.3% year over year to $27.42 billion and accounted for 29.2% of sales. The figure beat the consensus mark by 1.74%.Apple TV+ viewership soared double-digit year over year in the fiscal third quarter. Both paid accounts and paid subscriptions grew double digits year over year. The company has more than 1 billion paid subscribers across the Services business. Apple Inc. Price, Consensus and EPS Surprise Apple Inc. price-consensus-eps-surprise-chart | Apple Inc. Quote Apple shares were up almost 2% in pre-market trading following the results. Year to date, AAPL shares have dropped 17.2%. Apple's Top Line Rides on Strong iPhone and Mac Sales iPhone sales increased 13.5% year over year to $44.58 billion and accounted for 47.4% of total sales. iPhone sales beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 9.78%. Apple saw iPhone sales growth in every geographic segment and double-digit growth in emerging markets, including India, the Middle East, South Asia and Brazil. Strong demand for the iPhone 16 family drove sales of $8.05 billion increased 14.8% year over year and accounted for 8.6% of total sales. The figure beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 12.33%. Solid demand for M4 Macbook Air drove top-line growth. Apple saw double-digit sales growth in emerging markets as well as double-digit growth in both the number of upgraders and new Mac customers. iPad sales of $6.58 billion decreased 8.1% year over year and accounted for 7% of total sales. The figure lagged the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 2.94%. Wearables, Home and Accessories sales decreased 8.6% year over year to $7.4 billion and accounted for 7.9% of net sales. The figure beat the consensus mark by 0.85%.Non-iPhone revenues (iPad, Mac and Wearables) decreased 1.1% year over year on a combined basis. Apple's China Sales Recover, Japan and the Rest of Asia Jump Greater China sales increased 4.4% year over year to $15.37 billion and accounted for 16.3% of total sales. Japan revenues increased 13.4% year over year to $5.78 billion and accounted for 6.1% of total sales. Rest of Asia sales soared 20.1% year over year to $7.67 billion and contributed 8.2% of total Europe's sales grew 9.7% to $24 billion, Americas' sales were $41.2 billion, up 9.3%. Europe and Americas accounted for 43.8% and 25.5% of total sales, respectively. Apple's Gross & Operating Margins Expand Y/Y The gross margin of 46.5% expanded 20 basis points (bps) on a year-over-year basis. The gross margin contracted 60 bps sequentially due to tariffs. Apple incurred $800 million in tariff-related costs in the reported gross margin contracted 140 bps sequentially to 34.5% due to unfavorable mix and tariff. Services' gross margin was 75.6%, down 10 bps expenses rose 8.3% year over year to $15.52 billion due to a 10.7% increase in research & development expenses and a 5.2% improvement in selling, general & administrative expenses. Operating margin expanded 40 bps on a year-over-year basis to 30%. Apple's Balance Sheet Remains Strong As of June 28, 2025, cash & marketable securities were $132.99 billion compared with term debt of $91.78 billion. Apple had cash & marketable securities worth $132.92 billion compared with term debt of $92.2 billion as of March 29, 2025. Including commercial paper of $9.92 billion, total debt was $101.7 billion as of June returned nearly $27 billion in the reported quarter through dividend payouts ($3.9 billion) and share repurchases ($21 billion). Apple's Q4 Revenues to Grow Amid Tariff Headwinds Apple expects the September quarter's (fourth-quarter fiscal 2025) net sales to grow mid to high single digits on a year-over-year basis. The company expects the Services year-over-year growth rate to be similar to that of the June margin is expected to be 46-47% in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025, including a tariff impact of $$1.1 billion. Operating expenses are expected to be between $15.6 billion and $15.8 plans to spend $500 billion in the United States over the next four years and expects to source 19 billion chips during calendar year Zacks Consensus Estimate for fourth-quarter fiscal 2025 revenues is pegged at $96.43 billion, suggesting 1.58% growth over the figure reported in the year-ago quarter. The consensus mark for fourth-quarter fiscal 2025 earnings is pegged at $1.61 per share, indicating a 1.83% year-over-year decline. Zacks Rank & Stocks to Consider Currently, Apple carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). Arista Networks ANET, Bumble BMBL and DoorDash DASH are top-ranked stocks in the broader Zacks Computer & Technology sector. Each of the three stocks sports a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) at present. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank stocks Networks is scheduled to report its second-quarter 2025 results on Aug. 5. Both Bumble and DoorDash are scheduled to report their respective second-quarter 2025 results on Aug. terms of share price movement, DoorDash and Arista Networks have returned 48.5% and 11.5%, respectively, year to date. Bumble shares have dropped 4.5% over the same timeframe. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Apple Inc. (AAPL) : Free Stock Analysis Report Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) : Free Stock Analysis Report DoorDash, Inc. (DASH) : Free Stock Analysis Report Bumble Inc. (BMBL) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Tom's Guide
37 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
I tested Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs. iPhone 16 Pro Max in a 200-photo shootout — which camera phone wins?
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 against the iPhone 16 Pro Max puts Samsung's most expensive phone versus Apple's most expensive iPhone. And there is a huge quantity of differences. Although the iPhone 16 Pro Max is deservedly thought of as one of the best phones around, the Galaxy Z Fold 7, with its folding design and even higher price tag, is on a different level. But users expect these phones to still cover the essentials, including taking great photos. To see how these two phones compare, I took them both out for a long snapping session. And below you can see my results, which will demonstrate that the major differences between these phones doesn't stop at just their shape or software. We begin with this parish boundary marker as the subject for our phones' main cameras. The Galaxy Z Fold 7's take on the scene has more color, while the iPhone's shot has more natural tones, in line with how I saw the scene on the day. A short distance away, looking up at a church through the phones' ultrawide cameras, we can see the iPhone's image is way brighter than the Samsung's, aside from the clouds, which are similarly bright and colored. This makes sense considering the size and resolution of the iPhone's 48MP ultrawide camera, while the Galaxy Z Fold 7 uses a smaller 12MP one. The Galaxy Z Fold 7's weaker ultrawide camera also impacts its macro photography abilities. Its image of a yellow flower is much darker than the iPhone's, even if it's still detailed. Perhaps the lower light level will be preferable to some users, but it's not to my liking at least. Moving now to the telephoto cameras, we begin with the optical zoom level of the Galaxy Z Fold 7's telephoto camera. To hit this zoom, the iPhone 16 Pro Max has to use a cropped main camera image. You can tell from the softness of the iPhone image that it's not using a proper zoom lens, along with its weirdly dull coloration of this sign. The Samsung shot isn't particularly interesting, but it's definitely the better-looking one of the two with more contrast. Upping the magnification puts us into the native territory of the iPhone's telephoto camera. And its increased sharpness over the Z Fold's image is plain to see. The Galaxy Z Fold 7's flatter colors make for an interesting visual difference, too. Using the front-facing cameras on these two phones (the outer one in the Z Fold 7's case), we can see how the phones depicts a person and applies a portrait effect. The iPhone has given me exaggerated highlights in my hair and the brightest parts of my skin, and a warmer overall tone compared to the Z Fold 7, which has gone for a more natural coloration. The portrait effect in both photos is well applied, but interestingly the Samsung's blur is noticeably gentler. A Lego minifigure keyring posed on a dark shelf shows us how these phones deal with night mode/low light photography. The iPhone has turned in the brighter image, which isn't surprising given it took a seven-second exposure to the Galaxy's three-second one. But as a result, lighter parts of the shot look over sharpened with exaggerated highlights. As a result, I think I like the Z Fold 7's photo in this particular example. Looking across a park, we have a variety of colors for the two phones to depict. The brighter iPhone image brings elements like the purple flowers, the green lawn and the blue shopfronts in the distance to the fore, while the Z Fold 7 is using a flatter color tuning. It's especially noticeable in the sky, which comes across as a plain grey from the Galaxy Z Fold 7 but a more lively blue on the iPhone. The iPhone's pic is a brighter but a bit overexposed, while the Z Fold 7's shot is darker and a bit more evenly exposed. So it comes down to your preference. Putting the color difference aside, this coffee cup gives us a good demo of the two phones' ability to handle extreme light and dark in the same shot. The Galaxy Z Fold 7 gives us a shot that is not that different from the iPhone in terms of highlights, but there is a little more to see in the darker areas of the iPhone image, like the texture of the ceramics, or the chocolate powder spilling over the edge of the cup. Lastly, I took a shot with the phones' main cameras again, but set to their maximum resolutions - 48MP in the iPhone's case, and 200MP for the Galaxy. The iPhone image of this street scene is brighter, which helps make the dark-colored elements like the road, the trees or the buildings pop out more. But the Samsung, thanks to having over four times the pixels, gives you more detail when you zoom in, such as the clock near the center of the image. It's hard to make out in the small previous window above, but having more pixels to play with can be helpful for editing or reframing a shot after you've taken it. Personally, I think the iPhone 16 Pro Max comes out on top in this comparison. But much of what determines the winner of this comparison for anyone examining these images is going to be personal taste, due to the different ways these phones process images. Apple's focus on brightness and more intense colors is often a smart route to take, but Samsung's generally less exaggerated take on scenes can be the better one a lot of the time. There's not a huge amount splitting these phones apart in terms of image quality really. The iPhone is therefore the better value of the two, if you can call a $1,200 phone a "value" device. The Z Fold 7 still capturees excellent photos a lot of the time though, which some buyers may find tempts them to go for a foldable rather than a regular flagship.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Leaked images reveal Google's new budget earbuds
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Quick Summary A new leaked render has appeared which shows off a new set of earbuds from Google. Those could be the Google Pixel Buds 2a, and may launch at the upcoming Google event. With the Google Pixel event now just a matter of weeks away, it should come as no surprise that the rumour mill has been spinning furiously. Fans are eager to understand what is coming, to try and get a feel for just how much of an upgrade is coming. We've already seen leaked renders of the Google Pixel 10 Pro, as well as those for the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold. Those Android phones are likely to be among the most highly anticipated at the event, with the brand's offering growing substantially in recent years. Now, the same leaker has shared an image of a new set of earbuds. That is listed as the Google Pixel Buds 2a, which would make them a successor to the brand's current budget buds – the Google Pixel Buds a. The image was shared by Android Headlines, and shows the buds in a pale Lilac hue. The colour – which the report suggests is called 'Iris' – is seen in the innards of the case, which has a white outer casing. It looks like the case is designed to reveal a little sliver of that colour when closed, too. There appears to be a band which will be visible on the outside, ensuring your carefully chosen style can still be seen. You might have noticed I'm dwelling slightly here, dear reader, and that's because there isn't an awful lot more to tell you. While the leaked render gives us a good look at the device, there is no accompanying information to make any suggestions about the specs or pricing. With little else to go on, we'll just have to wait for the official launch to offer further comment. Still, with that set to take place in just a few short weeks, we shouldn't have long to wait.
