Cambridge group pleads for help to repair River Cam locks
The organisation had started a project to temporarily stabilise Baits Bite Lock island, which was forecast to cost between £1.3m and £1.5m.
But Helen Cleary, its chief executive, said a full rebuild was needed at some point on both locks.She said the organisation was limited by its funding model, which came from fees paid by boaters on the Cam."We have been walking that tightrope in order to get the Baits Bite Lock open as soon as we can and that's where our financial focus is," she said.Ms Cleary has called on other organisations to step in to provide more help."It's almost unfair that in a wealthy environment such as Cambridge, [boaters] are the people we're solely reliant on for getting an income to resolve these problems," she said.
'Pick up the tab'
Ian Farrell, a boat owner near Baits Bite Lock, said the situation was "deeply frustrating".He said the Conservators had allowed the locks to fall into disrepair, but sympathised with the lack of funds."Their funding model is clearly inadequate," he said."It's not a new problem, that's what's frustrating, why weren't they talking about this ages ago?"
Martin Smart, the city council's cabinet member for nature, open spaces and city services, ruled out the authority stepping in to provide money."They clearly need help, but it's not for us to pick up the tab," he said.He said the council had provided two of its "top officers" to work with the Conservators to come up with a plan.A spokesperson for the Environment Agency said it was aware of the situation."We are working closely with [the Conservators] who lead on this, as part of a multi-agency group supporting them with this issue to ensure a coordinated and effective response," they said.
Follow Cambridgeshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Why part-time job may not be enough for university students to meet basic standard of living
University students in England must undertake more than 20 hours of paid work a week to meet the basic standard of living, a new report has suggested. The pressures of part-time work are 'squeezing out' the other elements of a university experience such as studying, sports, societies and socialising, according to the Higher Education Policy Institute (Hepi) think tank. University sector leaders have suggested that cost-of-living pressures are affecting young people's choices – with more opting to stay living at home for university and more taking on part-time work alongside their studies. Hepi has called for maintenance support to be increased so that all students can reach a 'minimum socially acceptable standard of living'. The findings come as students in England, Wales and Northern Ireland receive their A-level and Level 3 BTec results on Thursday, with many finding out if they have secured a university place. A report from Hepi, TechnologyOne and the Centre for Research in Social Policy (CRSP) at Loughborough University has suggested how much first-year students need for a 'minimum socially acceptable standard of living' that covers the basics and full participation in university life. It estimated a student in England will need around £61,000 over the course of a three-year degree, or around £77,000 if studying in London, to reach a minimum socially acceptable standard of living – all excluding tuition fees. For students in England, the maximum annual maintenance loan (up to £10,544), which is available only to people from low-income households, covers just half the costs faced by first-year students, the report said. It also found that even with the highest levels of maintenance support, students in England must work more than 20 hours per week to meet a basic standard of living. Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson has said the government is 'looking at all of the options' for how to support university students facing costs. When asked about the cost-of-living pressures facing university students, Ms Phillipson said the government recognises that there is 'still more to do' to tackle some of the disparities that young people experience. She said: 'I do want all students to be able to get the full benefits of their time at university, to be able to take up internships, study trips (and) other work experience opportunities. 'I don't want students from less well-off backgrounds to be deterred from doing that because of having to take on more hours of paid work.' Last year, the government announced that undergraduate tuition fees in England, which have been frozen at £9,250 since 2017, will rise to £9,535 for the 2025-26 academic year. It also announced that maintenance loans will increase in line with inflation in the 2025-26 academic year to help students with their living costs. The latest report from Hepi has suggested students might be expected to undertake some part-time work, such as 10 hours of paid employment a week, but the remainder should be covered by maintenance support. It has also called for maintenance support to be 'pegged to inflation' and for the household income thresholds to be increased so parents do not need to contribute to their child's living costs until they have enough money to meet a basic standard of living for themselves. Nick Hillman, director of Hepi, said: 'Maintenance support is currently woefully inadequate, leading students to live in substandard ways, to take on a dangerous number of hours of paid employment on top of their full-time studies or to take out commercial debts at high interest rates. 'We hope our results will lead to deeper conversations about the insufficiency of the current maintenance support packages, how much the imputed parental contribution should be and whether it is unreasonable to expect most full-time students to have to find lots of paid work even during term time.' Josh Freeman, one of the authors of the report, said: 'These findings demonstrate three serious risks to UK higher education: access to higher education becomes more unequal, the quality of the student experience suffers and the sustainability of the sector is put at risk. 'The harm students currently face cannot be overstated. 'Too many students are struggling to cover their basic costs, let alone participate fully in higher education. 'It is not only good policy: there is a moral imperative to give students a fair chance of succeeding and thriving in higher education.' A spokesperson for Universities UK said: 'Going to university is an investment in your future, and no-one should have their experience of higher education limited due to financial pressures. 'Universities already offer scholarships, bursaries and hardship support for students who are struggling, but this research shows that the maintenance package just doesn't go far enough. 'This is why we are calling on the government to increase maintenance support offered to students to better track inflation and living costs, so that everyone with the potential to succeed can do so, whatever their background.'
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Letter reveals how wartime codebreakers were told jobs had ended after VJ Day
Letters released by GCHQ have revealed how wartime codebreakers were granted holiday and told their jobs were over after VJ Day. The intelligence agency has published historic documents to mark the 80th anniversary of Victory in Japan Day, shedding light on what happened to staff who deciphered Nazi messages during the Second World War. A first letter dated August 12 1945 was sent to staff at GCHQ's wartime headquarters, Bletchley Park, days before VJ Day was declared on August 15. It said: 'All staff except the absolute minimum necessary to maintain essential services, will be granted two days paid holidays to mark the end of hostilities in Asia.' According to GCHQ, extra holiday would not have been usual for staff working at the agency, then called GC&CS (Government Code and Cypher School). The document added: 'After the VJ holidays, it is hoped that there will be no further shift working at B/P except for 'essential services'.' GCHQ staff were bound by the Official Secrets Act and were unable to talk about their secret work they carried out during the war. The second letter documents a template for telling staff their employment had ended. Their managers would have filled in the correct dates and sent it to their teams. It reads: 'Owing to the cessation of the hostilities, there is no further work for you to do in this organisation. In these circumstances there is no object in continuing to report here for duty, and with effect from ****** you are free to absent yourself. 'This letter is to be taken as formal notice of the termination of your employment in this department.' The documents show what happened to British war efforts in the days surrounding the surrender of Imperial Japan in the Second World War. At the once-secret site, wartime codebreakers used early forms of computer intelligence – cryptanalytical machines called bombes – to break the Enigma code used by the Nazis to encrypt messages, changing the course of the war and saving millions of lives. Their work enabled British intelligence to move more quickly and act on the information the Bletchley team gave them, contributing to a number of key military victories. It also sparked the industrialisation of codebreaking and helped pave the way for the first forms of the computers used today. After the war, in 1946, GC&CS became GCHQ and moved out of Bletchley Park, developing into the intelligence and cyber agency it is today. GCHQ director of technology futures Marsha Quallo-Wright said: 'As someone working at the forefront of new and emerging technology for GCHQ, understanding our rich history is as important to me as looking to our future. 'We have a lot to thank our predecessors for, and the dedication and innovation shown by those working at Bletchley Park, GCHQ's wartime home, never ceases to amaze me. 'These documents help us to understand what happened to that workforce after six long years when VJ Day was declared. I'm pleased that we're able to offer this insight into their world.'
The Sun
4 hours ago
- The Sun
Lottery results LIVE: National Lottery Set For Life draw tonight, August 11, 2025
THE National Lottery Set For Life numbers are in and it's time to find out if you've won the top prize of £10,000 every month for 30 years. Could tonight's jackpot see you start ticking off that bucket list every month or building your own start-up as a budding entrepreneur? 1 You can find out by checking your ticket against tonight's numbers below. Good luck! The winning Set For Life numbers are: 24, 27, 03, 34, 06 and the Life Ball is 05. The first National Lottery draw was held on November 19 1994 when seven winners shared a jackpot of £5,874,778. The largest amount ever to be won by a single ticket holder was £42million, won in 1996. Gareth Bull, a 49-year-old builder, won £41million in November, 2020 and ended up knocking down his bungalow to make way for a luxury manor house with a pool. £1.308 billion (Powerball) on January 13 2016 in the US, for which three winning tickets were sold, remains history's biggest lottery prize £1.267 billion (Mega Million) a winner from South Carolina took their time to come forward to claim their prize in March 2019 not long before the April deadline £633.76 million (Powerball draw) from a winner from Wisconsin £625.76 million (Powerball) Mavis L. Wanczyk of Chicopee, Massachusetts claimed the jackpot in August 2017 £575.53 million (Powerball) A lucky pair of winners scooped the jackpot in Iowa and New York in October 2018 Sue Davies, 64, bought a lottery ticket to celebrate ending five months of shielding during the pandemic — and won £500,000. Sandra Devine, 36, accidentally won £300k - she intended to buy her usual £100 National Lottery Scratchcard, but came home with a much bigger prize. The biggest jackpot ever to be up for grabs was £66million in January last year, which was won by two lucky ticket holders. Another winner, Karl managed to bag £11million aged just 23 in 1996. The odds of winning the lottery are estimated to be about one in 14million - BUT you've got to be in it to win it.
