Sevilla: Without Sustainable Development, There Is Neither Hope Nor Security
Development benefits all countries because it is linked to other areas of activity and society, including basic security itself. Without it, there is no hope – and no stability.
That is the key message from the Director of the UN Development Programme's Bureau for Policy and Programme Support (UNDP), Marcos Neto, to all other nations gathered in Sevilla who have signed up to the plan of action, which gets underway immediately.
The Sevilla Agreement is the centrepiece of the 4th International Conference on Financing for Development, and it has been adopted by 192 of the 193 UN members.
The United States withdrew citing fundamental disagreements with many policy approaches and is absent from the summit taking place amid scorching temperatures in the southern city of Sevilla, Spain.
No lack of money
In his interview during the conference, we asked Mr. Neto to explain in plain language what the Seville Commitment is all about.
This interview has been edited for length and clarity.
Marcos Neto: We are five years away from the Sustainable Development Goals [SDGs]. One of the biggest obstacles to this shared agenda of global solidarity is financing. In other words: where is the money? Where will the money come from?
The Sevilla Commitment is a document that makes it clear that this is not about a lack of money – it's about aligning public and private capital flows toward those Goals, toward the Paris Agreement, and toward all other international commitments.
The commitment outlines what to do with every kind of money – national, international, public, and private. It is a roadmap that was agreed upon through consensus among UN Member States, involving the private sector, civil society, and philanthropy.
UN News: One of the major absences at this Conference was the United States, which left the negotiations on the Undertaking. How did Washington's withdrawal influence the Conference?
Marcos Neto: A consensus among 192 countries was reached and approved here. Now, clearly, the United States is one of the world's largest economies and holds significant weight. I believe it's crucial to keep the dialogue open and continue engaging all Member States, each according to their own needs.
For example, development financing is directly linked to security. Without development, you cannot have a stable society – one without conflict. What's your level of poverty? What's your level of inequality? Development is a security strategy. Development is hope. A people without hope is a people in trouble.
UN News: In conferences like this, documents are adopted, but often people feel they are just empty words that don't really affect their daily lives. What would you say to those citizens to convince them that these decisions actually make a difference?
Marcos Neto: I'll give you a very clear example. At the last Conference on Financing for Development ten years ago in Addis Ababa, there was a phrase that envisioned the creation of what we now call Integrated National Financing Frameworks (INFFs). We at UNDP developed this concept in 86 countries. This is real: 47 billion dollars were aligned and mobilized through that mechanism.
50 billion dividend
So, in practice, I can say we have helped put more than 50 billion dollars into the hands of countries. We've also helped them reform their national budget processes so that the money reaches where it's supposed to go.
Our current commitment is to implement the Seville Commitment. We are committed to delivering on it.
From Seville to Belém
UN News: In addition, the Sevilla Platform for Action will also serve to implement various initiatives…
Marcos Neto: Yes, we are leading 11 of the initiatives under the Seville Platform, and I think it was a great move by the Government of Spain to have created this action platform in Sevilla to turn this into implementation.
It's very similar to what Brazil wants to do at the end of the year at COP30. There is a direct connection between Seville and Belém – the host city of the UN Climate Change Summit in Brazil later this year. These connections are important.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
9 hours ago
- Scoop
NZ Is Trailing Its Allies Over Palestinian Statehood – But There's Still Time To Show Leadership
It's now a week since Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced his government had begun to formally consider New Zealand's position on the recognition of a Palestinian state. That leaves three weeks until the United Nations General Assembly convenes on September 9, where it is expected several key allies will change position and recognise Palestinian statehood. Already in a minority of UN member states which don't recognise a Palestinian state, New Zealand risks becoming more of an outlier if and when Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom make good on their recent pledges. Luxon has said the decision is 'complex', but opposition parties certainly don't see it that way. Labour leader Chris Hipkins says it's 'the right thing to do', and Greens co-leader Chloë Swarbrick has called on government MPs to 'grow a spine' (for which she was controversially ejected from the debating chamber). Former Labour prime minister Helen Clark has also criticised the government for trailing behind its allies, and for appearing to put trade relations with the United States ahead of taking a moral stand over Israel's actions in Gaza. Certainly, those critics – including the many around the country who marched during the weekend – are correct in implying New Zealand has missed several opportunities to show independent leadership on the issue. The distraction factor While it has been open to New Zealand to recognise it as a state since Palestine declared its independence in 1988, there was an opportunity available in May last year when the Irish, Spanish and Norwegian governments took the step. That month, New Zealand also joined 142 other states calling on the Security Council to admit Palestine as a full member of the UN. But in a subsequent statement, New Zealand said its vote should not be implied as recognising Palestinian statehood, a position I called 'a kind of muddled, awkward fence-sitting'. It is still not too late, however, for New Zealand to take a lead. In particular, the government could make a more straightforward statement on Palestinian statehood than its close allies. The statements from Australia, Canada and the UK are filled with caveats, conditions and contingencies. None are straightforward expressions of solidarity with the Palestinian right of self-determination under international law. As such, they present political and legal problems New Zealand could avoid. Politically, this late wave of recognition by other countries risks becoming a distraction from the immediate starvation crisis in Gaza. As the Israeli journalist Gideon Levy and UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese have noted, these considered and careful diplomatic responses distract from the brutal truth on the ground. This was also Chloë Swarbrick's point during the snap debate in parliament last week. Her private members bill, she noted, offers a more concrete alternative, by imposing sanctions and a trade embargo on Israel. (At present, it seems unlikely the government would support this.) Beyond traditional allies Legally, the proposed recognitions of statehood are far from ideal because they place conditions on that recognition, including how a Palestinian state should be governed. The UK has made recognition conditional on Israel not agreeing to a ceasefire and continuing to block humanitarian aid into Gaza. That is extremely problematic, given recognition could presumably be withdrawn if Israel agreed to those demands. Such statements are not exercises in genuine solidarity with Palestinian self-determination, which is defined in UN Resolution 1514 (1960) as the right of peoples 'to freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development'. Having taken more time to consider its position, New Zealand could now articulate a more genuine statement of recognition that fulfils the legal obligation to respect and promote self-determination under international law. A starting point would be to look beyond the small group of 'traditional allies' to countries such as Ireland that have already formally recognised the State of Palestine. Importantly, Ireland acknowledged Palestinian 'peaceful self-determination' (along with Israel's), but did not express any other conditions or caveats. New Zealand could also show leadership by joining with that wider group of allies to shape the coming General Assembly debate. The aim would be to shift the language from conditional recognition of Palestine toward a politically and legally more tenable position. That would also sit comfortably with the country's track record in other areas of international diplomacy – most notably the campaign to abolish nuclear weapons, where New Zealand has also taken a different approach to its traditional allies.
RNZ News
11 hours ago
- RNZ News
Israel approves major West Bank settlement project
Israeli far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich holds a map of an area near the settlement of Maale Adumim, a land corridor known as E1, outside Jerusalem in the occupied West Bank. Photo: AFP / Menahem Kahana Israel has approved a major settlement project in an area of the occupied West Bank that the international community has warned threatens the viability of a future Palestinian state. Israel has long had ambitions to build on the roughly 12-square-kilometre (five-square-mile) parcel known as E1 just east of Jerusalem, but the plan had been stalled for years amid international opposition. The latest announcement also drew condemnation, with UN chief Antonio Guterres saying the settlement would effectively cleave the West Bank in two and pose an "existential threat" to a contiguous Palestinian state. Last week, Israel's far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich backed plans to build around 3,400 homes on the ultra-sensitive tract of land, which lies between Jerusalem and the Israeli settlement of Maale Adumim. "I am pleased to announce that just a short while ago, the civil administration approved the planning for the construction of the E1 neighbourhood," the mayor of Maale Adumim, Guy Yifrach, said in a statement on Wednesday. A group of Israeli settlers gather in Hebron's old city, West Bank on August 16, 2025. Their entry into Palestinian neighborhoods was carried out under army protection. Photo: AFP / Mosab Shawer All of Israel's settlements in the West Bank, occupied since 1967, are considered illegal under international law, regardless of whether they have Israeli planning permission. The Ramallah-based Palestinian Authority (PA) slammed the latest move. "This undermines the chances of implementing the two-state solution, establishing a Palestinian state on the ground, and fragments its geographic and demographic unity," the PA's foreign ministry said in a statement. It added the move would entrench "division of the occupied West Bank into isolated areas and cantons that are disconnected from one another, turning them into something akin to real prisons, where movement is only possible through Israeli checkpoints and under the terror of armed settler militias". Israel heavily restricts the movement of West Bank Palestinians, who must obtain permits from authorities to travel through checkpoints to cross into east Jerusalem or Israel. An Israeli military vehicle fires teargas during a raid on the Al-Amari refugee camp near Ramallah, in the occupied West Bank, on 18 August. Photo: AFP / Zain Jaafar Guterres repeated a call for Israel to "immediately halt all settlement activity", warning that the E1 project would be "an existential threat to the two-State solution", his spokesperson said. British Foreign Secretary David Lammy also rejected the plans, saying it would "divide a Palestinian state in two (and) mark a flagrant breach of international law". Jordan's King Abdullah II denounced the project as well, adding that "the two-state solution is the only way to achieve a just and comprehensive peace." Violence in the West Bank has soared since the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel that triggered the Gaza war. Since then, Israeli troops and settlers have killed at least 971 Palestinians in the West Bank, including many militants, according to health ministry figures. Over the same period, at least 36 Israelis, including security forces, have been killed in Palestinian attacks or during Israeli military operations, according to official figures. Aviv Tatarsky, a researcher at Ir Amim, an Israeli NGO focusing on Jerusalem within the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, condemned the greenlighting of the E1 project. "Today's approval demonstrates how determined Israel is in pursuing what Minister Smotrich has described as a strategic programme to bury the possibility of a Palestinian state and to effectively annex the West Bank," he said. "This is a conscious Israeli choice to implement an apartheid regime," he added, calling on the international community to take urgent and effective measures against the move. Far-right Israeli ministers have in recent months openly called for Israel's annexation of the territory. Israeli NGO Peace Now, which monitors settlement activity in the West Bank, said last week that infrastructure work in E1 could begin within a few months, and housing construction within about a year. Excluding east Jerusalem, the West Bank is home to around three million Palestinians, as well as about 500,000 Israeli settlers. - AFP
Scoop
15 hours ago
- Scoop
Terror Threat Posed By ISIL ‘Remains Volatile And Complex,' Security Council Hears
20 August 2025 While multiple Da'esh leaders have perished in the past few years, 'the group has managed to retain its operational capacity ', Vladimir Voronkov, head of the UN Office of Counter-Terrorism (UNOCT) toldthe Security Council Wednesday. Da'esh makes use of regional and domestic affiliates and continues to receive substantial global donations, operating through regional hubs and cross-border financial networks. The threat the extremist group poses is notably exacerbated in Africa's Sahel region, where ISIL affiliates such as Islamic State West Africa Province have emerged as prolific producers of terrorist propaganda, which continues to attract foreign recruits. Despite significant national and international efforts to counter Da'esh – which rose to prominence in 2014 after taking over large swathes of Iraq and Syria – the continuing threat posed, underscores the urgency of sustained global cooperation. Security gaps In Afghanistan, ISIL-Khorasan continues to represent one of the most serious threats to Central Asia and beyond, with the group continuing to target civilians, while exploiting discontent with the de facto authorities in the country. Meanwhile, Da'esh remains active in Iraq and Iraq – despite the military defeats in Mosul and Raqqa in 2017 – attempting to restore its operational capacity in the Badia region and renewing efforts to destabilise local authorities. In Syria, where the situation remains fragile since the takeover led by Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham, ISIL continues to exploit security gaps, conduct covert operations and incite sectarian tensions in the country. Detention camps ' The security, humanitarian and human rights situation in the camps and other facilities in the northeast of Syria remains deeply concerning,' said Mr. Voronkov. Camps such as al-Hol are currently hosting tens of thousands of individuals, primarily women and children – many with alleged ties to ISIL – who remain in prolonged detention under unsafe and undignified conditions. These environments present serious risks of radicalisation to terrorism and are contrary to obligations under international law,' he said. Mr. Voronkov called for the 'safe, voluntary, and dignified repatriation of all concerned individuals, with a particular focus on children.' New technology 'There is a marked increase in the interlinkage of diverse methods and the integration of digital technologies with conventional techniques,' Elisa de Anda Madrazo, President of close UN-partner the Financial Action Task Force, told ambassadors. The use of new and emerging technologies and artificial intelligence by Da'esh remains a growing challenge, notably as the group is increasingly employing these tools to raise funds and establish a broader communications network. ' As we stand at the crossroads of technological transformation and geopolitical uncertainty, the threat of terrorism is more diffuse and complex,' said Nathalia Gherman, head of the Counter-Terrorism Committee Executive Directorate (CTED). Prevention still best cure ' Prevention remains our best response to terrorism and violent extremism conducive terrorism,' said Mr. Voronkov. He emphasised the importance of prioritising long-term, principled responses that tackle the drivers of terrorism and its enabling conditions. 'It is more effective – and cost efficient – to prevent terrorism than to remedy its impact,' he said.
