'Outright hostility' between Wab Kinew, Obby Khan unbecoming of their offices: experts
The heated exchange at an estimates meeting has been denounced as inappropriate behaviour by political experts who have observed Manitoba politics for decades.
They say the episode underscores the acrimony between the governing NDP and the Opposition Progressive Conservatives that derailed legislature business during the recently completed spring sitting.
The NDP threatened during the last week of the session to extend the sitting into the summer if the PCs wouldn't fast-track the government's interprovincial trade bill, while the Progressive Conservatives kept MLAs awake through the night on Monday, the last sitting day, when they demanded recorded votes on bills the NDP's majority government would certainly pass.
Christopher Adams, an adjunct professor of political studies at the University of Manitoba, said there appears to be "deep-seated antagonism" between the party leaders.
"When we see this banter and hostility — it's actual outright hostility — it's tough on Manitobans to see that," he said.
While aggressive, rigorous questioning of government and heckling are routine parts of question period in the legislature, the exchange between Kinew and Khan came at a May 21 estimates meeting, where more substantive exchanges around policy are expected and media attention is minimal.
And unlike question period, the Speaker of the House, whose duties include keeping the peace in the chamber, doesn't preside over meetings in the committee rooms. That meant the heckling and personal attacks at the estimates meeting persisted, with only the occasional interruption by the chairperson.
While these meetings can be charged — former premier Brian Pallister called Kinew an "asshole" during a 2021 committee meeting, before apologizing that same meeting — the behaviour in this case lasted for several minutes at a time.
Paul Thomas, professor emeritus of political studies at the University of Manitoba, said the discussion was "reduced to hurling personal insults at one another and ad hominem arguments based on the character of your political opponent across the aisle in the committee room."
"I just found it disappointing."
'Low blows' at committee meeting
The estimates meeting began with Khan rattling off statistics that, he argued, demonstrated a slowing economy.
"All signs that this premier has officially killed the economic horse," said the PC leader, putting his spin on one of the premier's regular talking points: "the economic horse pulls the social cart."
Khan's pointed criticism led Kinew to start heckling and laughing.
The Tory leader then turned to one of the cameras in the room, which was broadcasting the meeting on YouTube.
"You can probably hear him laughing with his arrogance and his demeanour, where Manitobans are actually serious about the economy. Premier thinks it's a joke. We don't," Khan said.
"No, I think the leader of the Official Opposition is a joke," Kinew said.
Many of Kinew's heckles were hard to hear on the broadcast, but some were included in the Hansard transcription.
"It's unfortunate that the premier wants to use such language, but it's OK," Khan said, according to Hansard.
Later, the NDP leader called Khan a "joke" again.
"If he wanted to talk about what is a joke, I think the premier just needs to look in the mirror," Khan said.
"If we want to talk about records and we want to talk about the past, then we can talk about the premier's criminal record," Khan added, before the chairperson asked for the discussion to return to legislative business.
Thomas said the comments from both leaders were "low blows."
"If anything, it turns the public off" from politics, he said.
"It deepens their cynicism about politicians, weakens their trust and confidence in the governing process, and that's not healthy in a democracy."
Later in the May 21 committee meeting, as Kinew kept trying to talk over Khan, the Opposition leader responded by saying he hoped Manitobans watching on YouTube could hear how the premier is "nothing but a bully."
"Like when you cried in the scrum," Kinew blurted, likely a reference to 2023, when a tearful Khan described a tense handshake with Kinew.
"The premier is trying to, I don't know, emotionally attack me for saying that I've cried in the House," Khan said.
"So what? There's nothing wrong with a man having emotions."
The verbal clashes continued.
Khan dismissed the premier as a "pit bull attack dog" and a "toxic, bullying leader" — demonstrated, he said, by Kinew's previous run-ins with the law.
The now 43-year-old has openly admitted to a conviction for impaired driving and for assaulting a cab driver in his early 20s — offences for which he has received pardons. He was given a conditional discharge in 2004 for an assault in Ontario, and was charged with assaulting his partner in 2003. The latter charge was stayed, although his former partner maintains Kinew threw her across the room.
At the May 21 meeting, Khan also called Mark Rosner, Kinew's chief of staff, a "nightmare," reframing a comment Kinew once made calling Rosner the "Tories' worst nightmare."
Kinew called for a point of order, saying his comments were misrepresented.
Later, when the Opposition leader made a comment referring to the premier, Kinew responded by saying, "call me dad," according to the meeting transcription.
"Maybe that's what he gets, you know, people around Manitoba to call him — maybe staffers call him 'dad,'" Khan said.
Tense exchange in 2023
The feud between Kinew and Khan may have started in 2023 with a handshake at a public event in the legislature.
They have different explanations of the encounter. Though it was captured on security video, that hasn't put to rest what happened.
Khan, who was then a cabinet minister, alleges Kinew — the opposition leader at the time — swore and shoved him. Kinew denied that, calling it a "tense verbal exchange."
|
This past April, when Khan became leader of the Progressive Conservatives, Kinew didn't phone to congratulate him.
Asked by reporters why he didn't try to speak with Khan, Kinew responded that "no one ever reached out and congratulated me," when he became NDP leader.
That excuse, Thomas said, amounts to a "schoolyard approach," with both men figuratively arguing over who hit the other first.
"It just shows the lapse in respect and civility across the aisle," Thomas said.
Kinew also didn't congratulate Khan in the chamber during their first question period as opposing leaders, although he, as Official Opposition leader, congratulated new premier Heather Stefanson in 2022.
When Kinew became NDP leader in 2017, he was congratulated by Pallister. In 2012, then premier Greg Selinger welcomed Pallister during his first question period as Tory leader.
The University of Manitoba's Adams said the perceived animosity between Kinew and Khan essentially gives each party's caucus permission to snipe at one another, which doesn't set a good example.
"We need our politicians, both on the Opposition benches as well as in the government, to behave with decorum and also not to take the bait," he said.
The hostility has reached the point where the NDP is having difficulty launching something as basic as a promised all-party committee on local journalism, Thomas said.
Asked about his conduct at the recent estimates meeting, Khan said he could "always try to act better," but argued the premier started it.
"Manitobans need to see this side of the premier," Khan said. "They need to be concerned with the language he uses."
Khan, however, denied having any ill will toward Kinew.
CBC News tried for a week and a half to interview Kinew about this story, but his office declined.
This week, CBC News asked his spokesperson, Ryan Stelter, when Kinew would have time for an interview, but was told he wouldn't be made available.
Stelter said the premier was in Ottawa to meet with federal ministers when the request was made, and shortly after, a provincewide state of emergency was declared because of wildfires. Kinew has had a few media availabilities, Stelter said. However, they were focused on the emergency.
A request for a statement from the premier's office was returned this week, but it didn't answer questions about Kinew's behaviour or the concerns about his and Khan's conduct.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
MANDEL: Lawyer temporarily suspended over allegations of "reprehensible" conduct
Toronto lawyer Andrew Rogerson once made headlines for launching a $5.5 million lawsuit against Havergal, claiming the private girls' school failed to protect his daughter from bullying. Six years later, the Toronto lawyer's reputation is in tatters with allegations he ignored a court injunction to return a $90,000 retainer and even helped a client move $1 million in gold bars that were ordered frozen. While he denies their findings and appeals the decision of the Northwest Territories court and the Law Society of Ontario investigates the allegations against him, Rogerson has been suspended from practising in Ontario. 'We have reasonable grounds to believe there is a significant risk of harm, both to members of the public and to the public interest in the administration of justice, if the respondent continues to practise law while these investigations continue,' says a recent decision by the Law Society Tribunal. The tribunal quoted from the NWT Supreme Court's 'scathing' judgment that called Rogerson's behaviour 'reprehensible:' 'Refusing to be cross-examined by a female member of the bar, for an invented and meritless reason, and then dismissing her with a sexist remark, is reprehensible,' the court wrote. 'Refusing to properly account for the dissipation of trust funds, much less ones restrained by Court Order, is reprehensible.' Rogerson didn't respond to a request for comment. In 2023, Lutsel K'e Dene First Nation in the Northwest Territories accused Ron Barlas of funnelling millions of dollars that should have gone to the First Nation into companies he controlled, allegations he denied. Just two days before Barlas knew his worldwide assets were going to be frozen over the alleged fraud, he wired the $90,000 retainer to Rogerson. The NWT court found Rogerson not only refused to return the money frozen under the Mareva order issued on April 28, 2023 but he spent it, and not on any legal work invoiced to, or approved by, his client. 'I find as a fact that the purported fees were contrivances to justify draining the retainer,' wrote Justice N.E. Devlin in a March decision. 'Even more troublingly, in May 2023, Rogerson facilitated the shipment of more than $1 million worth of gold and silver bullion (since returned) from Barlas' possession in the Northwest Territories to his offices in Ontario. I find as a fact that he did so in knowing breach of the Mareva Order.' Rogerson was ordered to return the retainer and pay almost $47,000 in legal costs. The judge also sent his ruling to the Law Society of Ontario. A few months later, the LSO applied to the tribunal to have Rogerson's licence temporarily suspended while they investigate. It wouldn't be the first time. Earlier this year, the Law Society Tribunal suspended Rogerson for a month for sexual harassment of a female employee. Recommended video As for the Havergal lawsuit, he's been repeatedly criticized by Ontario judges for flouting court orders, continually delaying the process and not paying $145,000 in legal costs awarded to the other side. He blamed financial and health problems. Last year, Superior Court Justice William Chalmers finally stayed the lawsuit for Rogerson's 'complete disregard' for court processes. In this case, the tribunal found there are enough red flags to warrant suspending Rogerson while the law society investigates the findings in the NWT court decision. 'The allegations of misappropriating or misapplying trust funds are serious. So are the allegations that the respondent consciously defied a court order and obstructed a court process. If proven, they would demonstrate that the respondent profoundly lacks integrity as a lawyer,' concluded Paul Aterman on behalf of the three-member panel. 'The concerns around integrity would be compounded if it is also shown that the respondent treats women colleagues in a sexist manner.' So for now, this lawyer is indefinitely out of office. mmandel@


Forbes
29 minutes ago
- Forbes
Trump's Capitol Takeover: National Guard Hits D.C. Streets (Photos)
The National Guard was officially deployed in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday night, joining hundreds of federal law enforcement agents in the Capitol during the second day of President Donald Trump's controversial crime crackdown, which was launched amid a 30-year low in violent crime for the D.C. WASHINGTON, DC - AUGUST 12: Military vehicles with the Washington, DC National Guard are parked near the Washington Monument. (Photo by) Getty Images The National Guard was deployed in D.C. on Tuesday afternoon, according to the U.S. Army. Around a dozen National Guards members deployed near the Washington Monument, according to The New York Times, which reported the Guardsmen refused to answer questions about their mission or how long they would remain on assignment. Agents made a total of 23 arrests Monday, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said, for serious crimes including homicide, possession with intent to distribute narcotics and possession of a high capacity magazine—but also more common crimes, including fare evasion, driving under the influence, and reckless driving. Forbes was unable to confirm these numbers, though local police separately reported a homicide arrest that they made—the Metropolitan Police Department did not immediately return a request for comment. They also made arrests for firearms offenses, Leavitt said, and seized six illegal handguns. The Trump administration will 'reevaluate and reassess' the situation in D.C. after 30 days, the press secretary said—after then, the Home Rule Act of 1973 requires the White House to seek Congressional approval to maintain control over the city's police force. Leavitt said only two homeless encampments remained in D.C. after Trump issued an executive order in March aimed at making the city 'safe and beautiful.' Park Police are scheduled to remove the remaining encampments this week, Leavitt said, and people living there would be required to leave for homeless shelters or face 'fines and jail time.' Democratic leaders denounced the takeover—Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer called the takeover a 'political ploy and attempted distraction from Trump's other scandals,' while Rep. Jamie Raskin, a Maryland Democrat who represents a district bordering the city, called the move in a statement a 'phony, manufactured crisis if I've ever seen one.' Trump has repeatedly floated the idea of similar takeovers in cities like Chicago and New York, but Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker brushed off the idea before connecting it to one of the administration's largest ongoing controversies: 'By the way, where are the Epstein files?' D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, also a Democrat, called the move 'unsettling and unprecedented,' but struck a calmer tone while addressing Washingtonians at a press conference on Monday. Other mayors from the cities identified by Trump joined in their criticism—Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott told CNN it was 'very notable that each and every one of the cities called out by the President has a black mayor, and most of those cities are seeing historic lows in violent crime.' Oakland Mayor Barbara Lee also rejected Trump's characterization, calling it 'wrong and based in fear-mongering in an attempt to score cheap political points' and noting that overall crime was down 28% from last year in the California city. Some protests have already been organized, and about 150 people rallied near the White House at a rally organized by the Free D.C. group, local station FOX 5 reported. Secretary of the Army Dan Driscoll speaks to soldiers and airmen from the National Guard in D.C. Sgt. 1st Class Christy L. Sherman/U.S. Army National Guard via AP National Guardsmen near the Washington Monument. Photo byNational Guardsmen arrive at the D.C. Armory on August 12. Getty Images Border Patrol agents wait to be deployed on August 12. Getty Images Members of the National Guard walk from the DC Joint Force Headquarters to the DC Armory on August 12. AFP via Getty Images FBI and Border Patrol agents make an arrest along the U Street corridor on August 10. Getty Images Federal agents patrol a near The Wharf on August 11. AFP via Getty Images Federal agents from the FBI, Department of Homeland Security and Border Patrol were spotted on the streets of Washington on Monday night. The Trump administration reportedly reassigned about 120 FBI agents to patrol the city. The president also deployed about 800 national guardsmen to the city, and a provision Home Rule Act of 1973 to take over the Metropolitan Police Department, placing it under the control of Attorney General Pam Bondi. Bondi said she had a 'productive meeting' with Bowser on Tuesday, and confirmed the Justice Department would 'work closely with D.C. city government' and police department. Over the weekend, the Trump administration previously deployed about 450 federal agents to the streets of D.C., where they reportedly made arrests for crimes including gun possession without a license and driving without a license, while also seizing three firearms. Has Crime Risen In D.c.? Violent crime in D.C. hit a 30-year low, the Department of Justice said in January. Homicides are down 32%, while robberies fell by 39% during that time period. Trump's focus on crime in D.C. began after a 19-year-old former DOGE employee—Edward Coristine, who goes by the online nickname 'Big Balls' —was assaulted during an attempted carjacking last week. However, even armed carjackings are down 53%, according to prosecutors. The Trump administration disputes this narrative, noting that the police department reported 1,588 violent crimes this year so far. However, the department's own data notes this is a 26% year-over-year decrease from 2024. The Trump administration also pointed to reports that a police commander was placed on leave in May while under investigation for changing crime data—an allegation also made by the DC Police Union. Tangent Administration officials are also evaluating plans to create a 'Domestic Civil Disturbance Quick Reaction Force,' according to documents reported on by The Washington Post on Tuesday. The Department of Defense plan would station 300 National Guard troops in Arizona and 300 more in Alabama, which could deploy in response to protests or civil unrest on either side of the country in as little as one hour. A similar plan was put in place before the 2020 presidential election, the Associated Press reported at the time, after Trump previously deployed the Guard to D.C. in response to that summer's George Floyd protests. It was not immediately clear if Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had reviewed the plan yet, and the earliest it could be implemented was fiscal year 2027, the Post reported. FBI and Border Patrol officers patrol in D.C. on August 10. Getty Images DEA agents patrol near the Washington Monument on August 11. Getty Images


CBS News
29 minutes ago
- CBS News
NYC's Central Park Conservancy calls for ban on carriage horses in the park
For the first time, New York City's Central Park Conservancy is calling for a ban on carriage horses in the park. Conservancy President and CEO Elizabeth W. Smith wrote to Mayor Eric Adams and City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams to voice concerns about the treatment of the horses, as well as the safety of pedestrians. "We do not take this position lightly, but with visitation to the park growing to record levels, we feel strongly that banning horse carriages has become a matter of public health and safety for Park visitors," Smith wrote. She said the Conservancy is supporting the passage of Ryder's Law, which would prevent new carriage licenses from being issued and end carriage operations altogether, starting June 1, 2026. Ryder's Law is named for a carriage horse that collapsed in 2022 and died of cancer a few months later. His handler was found not guilty of animal abuse in a trial last month. The Conservancy's letter comes one week after a carriage horse collapsed and died on 11th Avenue. Among her concerns, Smith cited two recent incidents where horses got away from their handlers and ran free down the roadway before they were caught. "These events underscore the unpredictable nature of horses in an increasingly crowded and dynamic urban environment, and the risk to public safety can no longer be responsibly overlooked," Smith said. Another issue, Smith said, is the damage she says carriages are causing to the park's roadways. "It is not fair that this relatively tiny subset of commercial operators is allowed to do such damage to the park at the expense of the millions of joggers, cyclists, walkers and other visitors to the park each year," she said. She also accused carriage drivers of failing to clean up after their horses and ignoring no-parking signs. "Our paramount concern is for the health and safety of the people who love the park, and it is in their name that we respectfully request that we turn the page on horse carriages, just as other major cities across the globe already have. It is time," Smith wrote. The Transport Workers Union called the Conservancy's support for Ryder's Law outrageous and accused the organization of "desecrating the park's storied history." TWU International President John Samuelsen said in a statement that Smith calling horse-drawn carriages a public safety concern "is absolutely ridiculous." "The Conservancy has failed miserably to manage the swarming hordes of unlicensed and illegally motorized pedicabs, e-bikes, and electric scooters that pose the real threat," Samuelsen wrote. "Its redesign of park drives with new markings directing the different modes of travel is a complete disaster and universally despised. It fails to designate a mixed-use lane for carriages to use as there had been. No wonder it's even more chaotic than before." He said the union is calling for a horse stable in Central Park on land that is not currently open to the public so horses would not have to walk on city streets, adding that it could also be used for educational and therapeutic purposes. The union says the passage of Ryder's Law would impact about 200 workers in the carriage horse industry. There are currently 68 carriages with city-issued medallions that are operated by a total of about 170 drivers and owner-drivers. The stable for carriage horses employs about 30 staff members to care for about 200 city-licensed horses.