logo
A nascent backlash against Musk sharpens risk for Trump and GOP

A nascent backlash against Musk sharpens risk for Trump and GOP

CNN26-02-2025
CNN —
The resistance may be stirring.
Elon Musk's chainsaw is not only slashing away at the bureaucracy but is generating the first warning signs that it could eventually cut deep into the political standing of President Donald Trump and his MAGA allies.
Political risks are rising for Republicans as court defeats pile up for the administration and as confusion is fomented by conflicting instructions from the SpaceX chief-turned-government cost cutter and the rest of the administration.
Trump often prospers in the chaos that he foments, and the erratic swathe that Musk is slicing through the civil service is a direct response to the fury many voters expressed in last year's election. And for some in Trump's base who embrace the president's anti-elite rhetoric, the act of subjecting federal workers to fear and pain may be a political end in itself. Among conservatives more generally, meanwhile, cutting government is perennially popular.
So, Musk's onslaught may still be a winner – at least for now.
But pushback from some of the most authentic Make America Great Again Cabinet secretaries to Musk's email to federal workers asking 'what did you do last week?' hints at another possibility – concern that confusion and morale-busting assaults on staff could make it harder to enact Trump's agenda.
Two dozen and counting court challenges to the constitutionality of the administration's dramatic personnel and cost cutting purges could be similarly chilling to the president's goals. As could several cases testing whether Musk is acting legally in assuming more power than any private citizen in modern history.
Some GOP members of Congress are meanwhile beginning to experience a backlash over Musk's frenzy — including in rowdy town hall meetings that have gone viral. While it's unclear whether these represent the first roots of a political uprising, or just canny progressive organizing, they're a reminder that the federal government is not limited to Washington but is also a huge red state employer.
And while Musk's wild anti-government theater fits Trump's shock-and-awe application of raw power since his White House return, some lawmakers are wondering whether the sheer velocity of his effort could be politically counterproductive.
'Things are happening so fast and furiously,' Rep Nicole Malliotakis told CNN's Manu Raju on Tuesday. 'We need to take a step back and make sure that we're doing things in a way that we are rooting out the waste, the fraud and the abuse and the mismanagement, making programs efficient but not resulting in unintended consequences,' the New York Republican said.
Musk's action is laying bare one key question about Trump's second term
Some recent polls have shown majority public disapproval of Musk's Blitzkrieg through the federal government and concern about his potential overreach. In a CNN/SSRS poll last week, 51% said Trump had gone too far in cutting federal programs and 53% thought it was bad that Musk is so prominent.
If attitudes towards Musk harden, they could crystallize into broader opposition to what many critics see as an unprecedented and unconstitutional attempt to destroy the rule of law and the federal government. This would deepen the intrigue over the friendship between the world's richest man and its most powerful man. Their capacity to preserve their relationship under stress could also shed light on one of the key unknowns of the president's second term: If his plans for the most far-reaching shake-up of US governance and society in decades make him unpopular — will he press on or take it down a notch?
So far, Trump has shown no sense of disengaging from Musk or that he's whipped up an incoming political storm. 'I thought it was great,' the president said Monday of his friend's demand for federal workers to reply to an email justifying their productivity last week. For now, the Tesla pioneer is the personification of his determination to ensure that this term, no one will rein in his power grabs.
The White House will attempt to dispel any suggestions of concern within the administration over Musk's role when he shows up to the first Cabinet meeting of the president's second term on Wednesday.
'The president and Elon and his entire Cabinet are working as one unified team,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said.
Another day of Musk-inspired disruption
Tuesday brought another dizzying spate of developments in the high-speed effort to dismember the US government and in the drama surrounding Musk.
— Twenty-one United States Digital Service technology staffers, including skilled engineers, designers and data scientists resigned. The staffers complained of hostile interviews from DOGE employees and said that in the current extreme circumstances they could no longer honor their oaths to serve the people and uphold the Constitution. Their gesture threatens to severely hamper government operations through the loss of experts who best understand its operating system.
But Paul Barrett, deputy director of the Center for Business and Human Rights at New York University's Stern School of Business, said that the symbolic value of the resignations of public servants who intimately understand the government's operating systems, would outstrip any operational risk their departures posed. 'The federal government is a big workforce, a couple of million. So, 20 people leaving is not going to change the situation in some dramatic way,' Barrett said. 'What's important here is that, like some of their brother and sister civil servants who have resigned or been willing to be fired rather than cooperating with the Musk-DOGE rampage, these people are saying, 'We will not cooperate. We will not obey. This is not legitimate.''
— In another development likely to exacerbate concerns about crushed legal and personnel protections, the Office of Management and Budget, along with the Office of Personnel Management, are expected to issue a memo that will direct agencies to prepare for large-scale firings, CNN's Alayna Treene reported.
— Trump meanwhile sowed new confusion about Musk's directive to federal employees to detail their productivity after the tech mogul several times said a failure to respond would be tantamount to a resignation. 'Well, it's somewhat voluntary, but it's also, if you don't answer, I guess you get fired,' Trump said in the Oval Office. 'What it really is, what it is, is – do people exist?' he added, underscoring the baffling logic and execution of his government gutting plan.
— A federal judge indefinitely blocked the administration from freezing federal loans and grants. That move, in the first days of the administration caused nationwide uproar as vital services were shuttered, showing for the first time how the loss of federal services could impact daily life and be a political liability. 'Defendants' actions were irrational, imprudent, and precipitated a nationwide crisis,' said US District Judge Loren AliKhan.
— Another federal judge halted Trump's executive order that indefinitely suspended refugee admissions, while a second ordered the administration to pay foreign-aid related funds owed to government contractors and nonprofits by Wednesday following Musk's evisceration of USAID.
— Hostility towards government runs deep in America's DNA. But the callous treatment of thousands of government employees who've been fired, including probationary workers, often with little notice or compensation, seemingly at the whim of Musk and his young followers, has been callous. Some of those workers spent Tuesday going door to door in the Senate demanding action. 'Our goal is to just start putting some faces and names to all the federal workers who have been impacted by the furloughs, layoffs, immediate firings by Musk and DOGE,' said Elizabeth Glidden, who was fired as a technical program officer in USAID's Bureau for Humanitarian Assistance. 'It's been terrible. I've cried everyday,' Glidden said. 'I go through waves of crying, anger, frustration.'
Early signs of political tension
The human toll of the firings, as well as the concern among Americans over potentially lost government help is beginning to crest into political momentum, CNN's Annie Grayer reported. Several House Republicans pleaded with leadership Tuesday for guidance on handling a deluge of questions from constituents about recent cuts, multiple sources said. GOP lawmakers are on a tightrope between pro-Trump base voters and constituents being hurt by Musk's destruction.
Malliotakis said Trump had appointed 'very smart people' as Cabinet secretaries and they should be empowered to make cuts. 'This idea that they were going to just fire people via Twitter, Elon Musk, that to me, seems rash,' she said. The New York lawmaker is far from the most endangered Republican in next year's midterm election, so her concern is notable.
But so far, House Speaker Mike Johnson, who is already hampered by a tiny majority, is holding the line. 'I think the vast majority of the American people understand and applaud and appreciate the DOGE effort, the goal to scale down the size and scope of government,' the Louisiana Republican said.
GOP Senate Majority Leader John Thune was more mindful of the humanity of the federal workers let go, while sharing the goal of trimming government, saying 'It needs to be done in a respectful way.'
Respectful is the antithesis of Musk's approach – one reason why it's worth watching whether he develops into a political liability for Trump.
Revolts often start from a small pile of political kindling – for instance, the Tea Party movement that reached critical mass in response to the early policies of President Barack Obama. Barrett believes that significant political pressure on even a small number of GOP members in Congress could slow the DOGE purge. He said: 'I think there's every chance in the world that a handful of members of Congress will summon the courage to confront Trump and suffer his wrath if they get enough constituents back home telling them 'Hey, we sent you to Washington and we've had enough of this. This is this is chaos, craziness.''
Should such a backlash develop, Musk's swinging of a chainsaw above his head at the Conservative Political Action Conference will be seen less as an exuberant emblem of disruption and more an act of hubris that presaged a political fall.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Johnson: GOP will ‘defy history when we grow the majority in the House'
Johnson: GOP will ‘defy history when we grow the majority in the House'

The Hill

time13 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Johnson: GOP will ‘defy history when we grow the majority in the House'

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said Wednesday that his party will 'defy history when we grow the majority in the House' in next year's midterm elections. 'We have a solid, hardworking Republican majority in the House right now — and the Senate — we're delivering for the people. And I'm very excited to go out and tell that story,' Johnson told CNN's Jake Tapper on 'The Lead.' 'I'm very excited about the midterm election. You know that we're going to defy history when we grow the majority in the House, because it's only twice in the last 90 years that a sitting president has picked up seats for his party in that first election cycle, but we're going to do it this time,' the Louisiana Republican added. While Republicans currently hold the House, Senate and White House, Democrats are gunning for the reins of power in the two chambers of Congress after devastating losses in last November's election. On Wednesday, Texas Republicans introduced a proposed group of fresh House lines, placing the party closer to snagging five seats next year. The new suggested map will likely mostly directly impact lawmakers situated close to or in the Dallas-Fort Worth area, Austin, Houston and near the southern border. Democratic strategist James Carville said in an interview earlier this month that President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' is going to be seen as a 'mass extinction event,' predicting his party will gain over 40 House seats in the 2026 midterms. 'And I like the unified party — every Democrat voted against this. Every Democrat, regardless of the ideology, their ethnicity … we can all rally around this, and we can run on this single issue all the way to 2026. And Paul is right, we're going to pick up more than 40 House seats,' Carville said on CNN's 'Anderson Cooper 360.'

Abortion shield laws are under fire
Abortion shield laws are under fire

The Hill

time13 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Abortion shield laws are under fire

A total of 15 GOP attorneys general signed and sent a letter to congressional leadership this week requesting federal action be taken to preempt abortion shield laws, arguing they interfere with states' ability to enforce criminal laws. The group of attorneys general also argues that Congress should get involved with shield laws because they potentially conflict with two Constitutional clauses: the 'full faith and credit' clause and its extradition clause. Abortion shield laws are state laws meant to protect abortion providers and patients from civil and criminal actions. There are currently 18 states, along with the District of Columbia, that have an abortion shield law, according to Rachel Rebouche, dean of Temple University Beasley School of Law. Shield laws in eight of those states protect abortion providers regardless of patient location—acting as a safeguard for abortion providers who send medication via telehealth. The letter is the latest effort from Republican-led states to stop abortion pills from being shipped to parts of the country where the procedure is restricted. Signees include Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) and Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill (R), both of whom have taken legal action against a New York doctor for allegedly prescribing and mailing abortion pills to women in their respective states. Paxton sued the doctor—Margaret Carpenter—late last year for allegedly sending abortion pills to a patient in Texas, and a judge ordered her to pay more than $100,000 in penalties for violating the law. A grand jury in Louisiana indicted Carpenter for allegedly doing the same thing, leading to state authorities requesting she be extradited. New York Governor Kathy Hochul has repeatedly said that she will not allow Carpenter to ever be extradited, citing the state's shield law. And a New York county clerk has refused to enforce Texas's civil judgment, also citing the state's shield law. Separately, a Texas man is suing a California doctor for allegedly prescribing his girlfriend abortion medication. The lawsuit was filed in federal court, opening a new avenue for challenges to state shield laws, and could potentially give Republican-led states the win they want.

Trump's latest tariff deadline is approaching. Here are the trade deals the US has announced so far.
Trump's latest tariff deadline is approaching. Here are the trade deals the US has announced so far.

Boston Globe

time13 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Trump's latest tariff deadline is approaching. Here are the trade deals the US has announced so far.

Advertisement But three months later, only two deals emerged: with the U.K. and Vietnam. A separate 'framework' for a deal was hashed out with China. And by early July, Trump began sending warning letters that higher tariffs would be imposed against dozens of countries on Aug. 1. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Since then, the U.S. has announced more trade frameworks. But, key details remain sparse — or not immediately captured in writing. Here's what we know about the agreements so far, in the order of those most recently announced. South Korea The U.S. president said he The countries have also agreed for South Korea to buy $100 billion in energy resources from the U.S. and for South Korea to give to the U.S. $350 billion for 'investments owned and controlled by the United States, and selected by myself, as president,' Trump said. Advertisement European Union The U.S. and the EU announced a trade framework But some key details require more work. The headline of the agreement, unveiled July 27, is that the 15% tariff rate will apply to 70% of European goods brought into the U.S. — with the EU later confirming that that rate applies to pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and car and car parts. But the remaining 30% of those imports is still open for negotiations. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said that both sides had agreed to zero tariffs for a range of 'strategic' goods. Meanwhile, Trump pointed to heightened investments from European companies in the U.S. — including what Trump said was $750 billion (638 billion euros) worth of natural gas, oil and nuclear fuel over three years, as well as an additional $600 billion (511 billion euros) under a political commitment that isn't legally binding, officials said. Japan On July 22, Trump announced a trade framework The newly-agreed on 15% tariff rate also applies to Japanese cars — marking a welcome relief for automakers like Toyota Motor Corp. and Honda — which, like other automakers, have faced a 25% levy on key parts and finished vehicles going into the U.S. since earlier this year. But car companies in other countries, including U.S. competitors, worry that this could put them at a disadvantage. Advertisement Philippines Shortly after a July 22 meeting with Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos, Jr., Trump announced that he would In return, Trump said on Truth Social, the U.S. would not pay tariffs on American goods it shipped to the Philippines. But additional details remained unclear. Marcos said his country was considering options such as having an open market without tariffs for U.S. automobiles, but emphasized details were still left to be worked out. Indonesia On July 15, Trump again took to social media to announce that he's agreed to lower his planned tariffs on Indonesian goods to 19% — down from a previously-threatened levy of 32% — while American goods sent to the southeast Asian country will face no tariffs. A fact sheet from the White House later confirmed that 'over 99% of U.S. products' exported to Indonesia would be sent duty-free. Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto said he will continue to negotiate with Trump, in hopes of further lowering the coming U.S. tariffs. Vietnam On July 2, Trump announced a trade deal with Vietnam that he said would allow U.S. goods to enter the country duty-free. Vietnamese exports to the U.S., by contrast, would face a 20% levy. That's less than half the 46% 'reciprocal' rate Trump proposed for Vietnamese goods back in April. But in addition to the new 20% tariff rate, Trump said the U.S. would impose a 40% tax on 'transshipping'' — targeting goods from another country that stop in Vietnam on their way to the United States. Washington complains that Chinese goods have been dodging higher U.S. tariffs by transiting through Vietnam. Advertisement United Kingdom On May 8, Trump When the deal was announced, for example, the British government notably said that the U.S. agreed to exempt the U.K. from its then-universal 25% duties on foreign steel and aluminum — which would have effectively allowed both metals from the country to come into the U.S. duty-free. But the timing for when those cuts would actually take effect stayed up in the air for almost a month. It wasn't until early June, when Trump hiked his steel and aluminum tariffs to a punishing 50% worldwide, that the U.S. acknowledged it was time to implement the agreement. And even then, U.S. tariffs on British steel and aluminum did not go to zero. The U.K. was the only country spared from Trump's new 50% levies, but still faces 25% import taxes on the metals. China At its peak, Trump's new tariffs on Chinese goods totaled 145% — and China's countertariffs on American products reached 125%. But on May 12, the countries agreed to their own 90-day truce to roll back those levies to 30% and 10%, respectively. And in June, details began trickling in about a tentative trade agreement. Advertisement U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that China had agreed to make it easier for American firms to acquire Chinese magnets and rare earth minerals critical for manufacturing and microchip production. Meanwhile, the Chinese Commerce Ministry said that the U.S. would 'lift a series of restrictive measures it had imposed on China.' Other key details of the deal remain murky — including the timing of implementation for these terms. On July 29, China's top trade official said the two sides had

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store