logo
Trump's latest tariff deadline is approaching. Here are the trade deals the US has announced so far.

Trump's latest tariff deadline is approaching. Here are the trade deals the US has announced so far.

Boston Globe2 days ago
Advertisement
But three months later, only two deals emerged: with the U.K. and Vietnam. A separate 'framework' for a deal was hashed out with China. And by early July, Trump began sending warning letters that higher tariffs would be imposed against dozens of countries on Aug. 1.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Since then, the U.S. has announced more trade frameworks. But, key details remain sparse — or not immediately captured in writing.
Here's what we know about the agreements so far, in the order of those most recently announced.
South Korea
The U.S. president said he
The countries have also agreed for South Korea to buy $100 billion in energy resources from the U.S. and for South Korea to give to the U.S. $350 billion for 'investments owned and controlled by the United States, and selected by myself, as president,' Trump said.
Advertisement
European Union
The U.S. and the EU announced a trade framework
But some key details require more work. The headline of the agreement, unveiled July 27, is that the 15% tariff rate will apply to 70% of European goods brought into the U.S. — with the EU later confirming that that rate applies to pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and car and car parts. But the remaining 30% of those imports is still open for negotiations.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said that both sides had agreed to zero tariffs for a range of 'strategic' goods. Meanwhile, Trump pointed to heightened investments from European companies in the U.S. — including what Trump said was $750 billion (638 billion euros) worth of natural gas, oil and nuclear fuel over three years, as well as an additional $600 billion (511 billion euros) under a political commitment that isn't legally binding, officials said.
Japan
On July 22, Trump announced a trade framework
The newly-agreed on 15% tariff rate also applies to Japanese cars — marking a welcome relief for automakers like Toyota Motor Corp. and Honda — which, like other automakers, have faced a 25% levy on key parts and finished vehicles going into the U.S. since earlier this year. But car companies in other countries, including U.S. competitors, worry that this could put them at a disadvantage.
Advertisement
Philippines
Shortly after a July 22 meeting with Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos, Jr., Trump announced that he would
In return, Trump said on Truth Social, the U.S. would not pay tariffs on American goods it shipped to the Philippines. But additional details remained unclear. Marcos said his country was considering options such as having an open market without tariffs for U.S. automobiles, but emphasized details were still left to be worked out.
Indonesia
On July 15, Trump again took to social media to announce that he's agreed to lower his planned tariffs on Indonesian goods to 19% — down from a previously-threatened levy of 32% — while American goods sent to the southeast Asian country will face no tariffs. A fact sheet from the White House later confirmed that 'over 99% of U.S. products' exported to Indonesia would be sent duty-free.
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto said he will continue to negotiate with Trump, in hopes of further lowering the coming U.S. tariffs.
Vietnam
On July 2, Trump announced a trade deal with Vietnam that he said would allow U.S. goods to enter the country duty-free. Vietnamese exports to the U.S., by contrast, would face a 20% levy.
That's less than half the 46% 'reciprocal' rate Trump proposed for Vietnamese goods back in April. But in addition to the new 20% tariff rate, Trump said the U.S. would impose a 40% tax on 'transshipping'' — targeting goods from another country that stop in Vietnam on their way to the United States. Washington complains that Chinese goods have been dodging higher U.S. tariffs by transiting through Vietnam.
Advertisement
United Kingdom
On May 8, Trump
When the deal was announced, for example, the British government notably said that the U.S. agreed to exempt the U.K. from its then-universal 25% duties on foreign steel and aluminum — which would have effectively allowed both metals from the country to come into the U.S. duty-free.
But the timing for when those cuts would actually take effect stayed up in the air for almost a month. It wasn't until early June, when Trump hiked his steel and aluminum tariffs to a punishing 50% worldwide, that the U.S. acknowledged it was time to implement the agreement. And even then, U.S. tariffs on British steel and aluminum did not go to zero. The U.K. was the only country spared from Trump's new 50% levies, but still faces 25% import taxes on the metals.
China
At its peak, Trump's new tariffs on Chinese goods totaled 145% — and China's countertariffs on American products reached 125%. But on May 12, the countries agreed to their own 90-day truce to roll back those levies to 30% and 10%, respectively. And in June, details began trickling in about a tentative trade agreement.
Advertisement
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that China had agreed to make it easier for American firms to acquire Chinese magnets and rare earth minerals critical for manufacturing and microchip production. Meanwhile, the Chinese Commerce Ministry said that the U.S. would 'lift a series of restrictive measures it had imposed on China.'
Other key details of the deal remain murky — including the timing of implementation for these terms. On July 29, China's top trade official said the two sides had
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fed spearheads effort to ease 'Basel III endgame' capital requirements, Bloomberg News reports
Fed spearheads effort to ease 'Basel III endgame' capital requirements, Bloomberg News reports

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Fed spearheads effort to ease 'Basel III endgame' capital requirements, Bloomberg News reports

(Reuters) -The Federal Reserve has begun developing a new risk-based capital rule aimed at easing the burden on the largest U.S. banks than a Biden-era plan, Bloomberg News reported on Friday, citing people familiar with the matter. Regulators are largely scrapping the original 1,087-page proposal from two years ago and plan to unveil a new one as early as the first quarter of 2026, the report added. Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman is leading efforts to develop the new rule, that would aim to simplify how banks calculate their capital requirements, according to the report. Representatives of the Federal Reserve declined to comment, when contacted by Reuters. The "Basel III" standard was agreed after the 2007-09 global financial crisis. It includes numerous capital, leverage and liquidity requirements. Regulators across the world have worked for years to implement many of those standards, and the so-called "endgame," agreed in 2017, is the final iteration. These capital requirements serve as a financial cushion to enhance the resilience of these big banks against economic stress and safeguard the broader financial system. The banking industry lobbied for a significantly weaker version of the "Basel Endgame" capital rule under the Trump administration, which was viewed as more favorable compared to the Biden-era approach. The proposed rules, which would apply to banks with more than $100 billion in assets, would overhaul how the largest banks manage their capital, with potential ripple effects on their lending and trading activities. The rules aim to prevent another financial crisis by requiring the largest U.S. banks, including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and Goldman Sachs, to collectively set aside nearly $1 trillion to absorb potential losses from loans and trading activities. However, banks say additional capital is unnecessary and will hurt the economy, and have aggressively lobbied against the project. Sign in to access your portfolio

EU banks can weather recession driven by global trade war, stress test shows
EU banks can weather recession driven by global trade war, stress test shows

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

EU banks can weather recession driven by global trade war, stress test shows

By Valentina Za and Balazs Koranyi MILAN (Reuters) -Banks across the European Union are strong enough to weather an economic shock driven by geopolitical and trade tensions, the European Banking Authority said on Friday as it presented the outcome of its latest health check of the sector. The EBA tested how 64 European banks, including 51 euro zone lenders, would react to a prolonged recession across the EU and other advanced economies, finding none would breach their core capital requirement, and only one would breach its leverage requirement. "The results indicate that the EU banking system could withstand a severe but plausible macroeconomic scenario, reflecting the resilience built up by banks in recent years," the EBA said, urging lenders to maintain adequate capital. European and U.S. banking authorities introduced formal, comprehensive stress tests after the global financial crisis of 2008 led to costly state bailouts of banks. Some elements of this year's adverse scenario had begun to materialise, the EBA said, pointing to U.S. trade tariffs and escalating tension in the Middle East. Lenders accounting for three quarters of EU banks' total assets took part in the exercise, which simulates the losses banks would incur by analysing their performance over a three-year period under a baseline and an adverse scenario. Under the adverse scenario, worsening geopolitical tensions and protectionist trade policies lift energy and commodity prices, disrupt supply chains and hurt consumption and investment, driving a cumulative 6.3% contraction in EU economic output over 2025-2027. That would translate into combined losses of 547 billion euros for the sampled banks, the EBA said, higher than the 496 billion euros envisaged in its 2023 stress test. While the hit to capital reserves is particularly severe for some European subsidiaries of major U.S. banks, all the lenders remained able to meet core capital requirements, the EBA said, although one would breach the requirement on the leverage ratio. For 17 lenders, the adverse scenario would entail limits or adjustments to bonus and dividend payments for at least one of the three years. In terms of capital reserves - calculated using the current 'transitional' regime that tightens progressively through 2033 - the adverse scenario would knock 3.7 percentage points off the sample's aggregate core capital ratio, pushing it to 12.1% in 2027 from 15.8%. When looking at individual countries, Irish, Danish, French, German and Belgian banks experienced the biggest capital impact, EBA data showed. For individual banks, Landesbank Baden-Wuerttemberg and two other German regional banks, as well France's Credit Agricole and La Banque Postale, saw the largest capital depletion effect. While there is no pass/fail threshold in the EU-wide stress test, its outcome feeds into the risk assessment of lenders carried out by supervisors every year, setting bank-specific capital requirements and guidance known as 'Pillar 2'.

'Little confidence' US Gaza delegation would see full picture
'Little confidence' US Gaza delegation would see full picture

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'Little confidence' US Gaza delegation would see full picture

The visit to Gaza by Trump's envoy was an important gesture to show America cared about the humanitarian situation there amid mounting pressure at home and abroad. It was also "to learn the truth", according to US Ambassador Mike Huckabee, who accompanied Mr Witkoff to an aid site. They gave themselves around five hours to do this. The American delegation will report their assessments back to Washington and "help craft a plan to deliver food and medical aid to the people of Gaza". There's very little confidence in either of those objectives. Images of Mr Witkoff sitting around a table at a calm and ordered aid site in Gaza does not suggest Donald Trump will hear a full picture of the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. And America's plans to deliver aid to Palestinians in Gaza has proved deeply flawed in recent months. When Mr Witkoff last visited Israel in May, it was a very different picture. Palestinians were suffering in Gaza and getting killed in airstrikes but deaths were not largely a result of hunger. It was around that same time the controversial Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) was launched as the new way of distributing food in the enclave by America and Israel. "GHF delivers more than one million meals a day, an incredible feat!", wrote Mike Huckabee after his visit to site 3 with Trump's envoy. It paints a very different picture to the images and reports we receive on a daily basis of Palestinians getting killed and injured attempting to reach aid at these sites close to areas of conflict. Read More: People in Gaza have told me regularly going to these sites is a last resort because they're so scared - but food is now so scarce for many there is little choice. Not enough aid is getting through and we're hearing reports every day of deaths due to hunger. A UN-backed authority on food crises this week reported the "worst case scenario of famine" is now playing out in Gaza. The UN has decades of experience as humanitarians distributing aid in Gaza yet it seems America is still backing its GHF model run by inexperienced armed security contractors. In light of this, reports that a new plan is being formed for Gaza between the US and Israel don't instill a huge amount of confidence.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store