Ukraine drone attack kills one, damages industrial facility in Saratov, Russia says
Roman Busargin posted on the Telegram messaging app that residents were evacuated after debris from a destroyed drone damaged three apartments in the overnight attack.
Also read | European leaders urge more 'pressure' on Russia ahead of Trump-Putin summit
"Several residents required medical assistance," Mr. Busargin said. "Aid was provided onsite, and one person has been hospitalised. Unfortunately, one person has died."
Russian air defence units destroyed 121 Ukrainian drones overnight, including eight over the Saratov region, the Defence Ministry said. It reports only how many drones its defence units down, not how many Ukraine launches.
Mr. Busargin did not specify what kind of industrial site was damaged.
Social media footage showed thick black smoke rising over what looked like an industrial zone. Reuters verified the location seen in one of the videos as matching file and satellite imagery of the area. Reuters could not verify when the video was filmed.
Ukrainian media, including the RBK-Ukraine media outlet, reported that the oil refinery in the city of Saratov, the administrative centre of the region, was on fire after a drone attack.
Reuters could not verify those reports. There was no official comment from Russia.
The Rosneft-owned refinery in the Saratov city was forced to suspend operations earlier this year for safety reasons after Ukrainian drone attacks, industry sources told Reuters.
Russia's SHOT Telegram channel, which often publishes information from sources in the security services and law enforcement, reported about eight explosions were heard over Saratov and Engels, cities separated by the Volga River.
Russia's civil aviation authority Rosaviatsia said on Telegram that flights in and out of Saratov had been halted for about two hours early on Sunday to ensure air safety.
Both sides deny targeting civilians in their strikes on each other's territory in the war that Russia launched with a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
Kyiv says its attacks inside Russia are aimed at destroying infrastructure that is key to Moscow's war efforts, including energy and military infrastructure, and are in response to Russia's continued strikes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
8 minutes ago
- News18
Trump 'Considers' Holding Trilateral Meeting With Putin, Zelenskyy In Alaska: Report
Trump 'Considers' Holding Trilateral Meeting With Putin, Zelenskyy In Alaska: Report | News18 Last Updated: Videos World The White House is reportedly considering extending an invitation to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to join President Donald Trump in Alaska, where Trump is scheduled to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin on August 15, according to NBC report cited a senior US official and three individuals familiar with the internal deliberations. 'It's under discussion," one of the sources reportedly said. n18oc_worldNews18 Mobile App -
Hindustan Times
8 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
UK police arrest 474 people at largest Palestine Action protest
London: The Metropolitan Police said it made 474 arrests during the UK's largest protest in support of Palestine Action, which was recently banned by the government, making it a criminal offence to show any backing for the group. Police officers detain a protester during a rally organised by Defend Our Juries, challenging the British government's proscription of "Palestine Action" under anti-terrorism laws, in Parliament Square, in London. REUTERS/Jaimi Joy(REUTERS) While 466 of those arrested during a demonstration in London on Saturday were detained under the UK's Terrorism Act for showing support for a proscribed group, eight others were held for other offences including assaulting police officers. Many of those arrested were displaying placards expressing support for Palestine Action. The Met Police, the country's largest police force, said it marked the most arrests made in a single operation in a decade. 'Our role in the context of protest remains as it always has been – to police without fear or favour, to enforce the law, to keep the peace by ensuring groups with opposing views do not come together and to prevent serious disorder and serious disruption to ordinary people going about their lives,' said Deputy Assistant Commissioner Ade Adelekan, who led the policing operation. UK Home Secretary Yvette Cooper expressed her gratitude to the police for working over a busy weekend of demonstrations by those protesting Israel's actions in the conflict in Gaza. "Palestine Action was proscribed based on strong security advice following serious attacks the group has committed, involving violence, significant injuries and extensive criminal damage," said Cooper. Amnesty International UK's chief executive Sacha Deshmukh said the protesters in Parliament Square were not inciting violence and it is entirely disproportionate to the point of "absurdity" to be treating them as terrorists. "Instead of criminalising peaceful demonstrators, the government should be focusing on taking immediate and unequivocal action to put a stop to Israel's genocide and ending any risk of UK complicity in it," he said. Those arrested were taken to processing points at Westminster in central London and those whose details could be confirmed were released on bail on condition they must not attend further Palestine Action support events. Others whose details could not be verified, many refusing to give them to the police, were taken to custody suites across London. Legislation to ban Palestine Action came into force on July 5, carrying a prison sentence of up to 14 years for showing support for the group. "Palestine Action and people holding cardboard signs present no danger to the public at large," said a spokesperson for Defend Our Juries, one of the organisers of the protests.
India.com
8 minutes ago
- India.com
Why the India–U.S. Trade War Isn't A Lover's Spat — And Why History Says America Will Blink First, Leaving Trump's Successor To Pay A Bigger Price To Woo New Delhi
New Delhi: In early August 2025, President Donald Trump sharply escalated trade tensions with India by doubling the existing 25 percent tariff on Indian goods to a punishing 50 punishing. This included an additional 25 percent 'secondary tariff' announced on August 6, set to take effect on August 27, 2025. The decision came in response to India's continued purchases of Russian oil, which Washington views as indirectly funding Moscow's war in Ukraine. The tariffs target some of India's most valuable export sectors to the U.S., including textiles, gems and jewellery (worth about US $8.5 billion in 2024), and auto parts, while sparing pharmaceuticals (US $8 billion), smartphones and electronics (US $14.4 billion), and energy goods. Seafood (US $2 billion) and machinery (US $7.1 billion) are also key exports. In total, India sold US $87.3 billion worth of goods to the U.S. in 2024, against imports of US $41.5 billion from America—leaving the U.S. with a US $45.8 billion goods trade deficit. The United States has avoided applying similar tariffs on India's service exports—such as IT outsourcing, software, consulting, and back-office work—because these are governed by different WTO rules and directly benefit American companies by lowering operational costs. However, high goods tariffs risk serious geopolitical fallout. India is a critical partner in the Indo-Pacific strategy, central to balancing China's rise. Harsh trade measures could weaken trust, disrupt defence and intelligence cooperation, and strain the Quad alliance (U.S., India, Japan, Australia). They also risk pushing India toward deeper economic and security ties with Russia and China, reducing America's leverage in Asia. This is not the first time U.S.–India relations have been tested. In 1998, India's Pokhran-II nuclear tests triggered U.S. sanctions under the Glenn Amendment, including aid bans, technology export restrictions, and blocked loans. Those tensions eased only after strategic talks in 1999–2000, paving the way for the landmark 2005–2008 civil nuclear deal, when Washington bent its non-proliferation rules to allow nuclear cooperation with a non-NPT state. That deal was a major concession, aimed at drawing India closer as a democratic counterweight to China. Today, with trade disputes replacing nuclear concerns, Washington faces a similar choice: punish New Delhi for policies it opposes, or preserve a long-term partnership built over decades. The risk is clear—short-term economic retaliation could cost the U.S. long-term strategic influence in one of the world's most important bilateral relationships.
