‘Fistful of Dollars & Rice': Trump $1.5-Billion Golf Club Is Proving Costly For Vietnamese Farmers
Vietnamese farmer Nguyen Thi Huong has slept poorly since authorities told her to vacate her farm for a Trump family-backed golf resort, offering just $3,200 and rice provisions in return.
The golf resort, for which construction is scheduled to begin next month, is offering thousands of villagers such compensation packages to leave the land that has provided their livelihood for years or decades, according to six people with direct knowledge and documents seen by Reuters.
Trump's golf resort project in Vietnam
The 990-hectare site designated for the golf course currently supports fruit farms growing bananas, longan, and other crops. While some see opportunity, many farmers are elderly and fear they will struggle to find alternative livelihoods in Vietnam's vibrant economy with its largely young demographic.
The project is the first partnership for the family business of U.S. President Donald Trump in Vietnam, which fast-tracked approvals as it negotiated a crucial trade deal with Washington.
Reuters report.
Trump has said his assets in the businesses are held in a trust managed by his children, but disclosures in June showed income from those sources ultimately accrues to the president.
We're proud to break ground on Trump International Hanoi at Hung Yen — the first Trump-branded golf and residential development in Vietnam, in partnership with Hung Yen Hospitality and Kinh Bac City Development. This landmark destination will feature ultra-luxury villas, a… pic.twitter.com/A30SdgbS0H — The Trump Organization (@Trump) May 24, 2025
How are Vietnamese farmers being compensated?
In Communist-run Vietnam, farmland is managed by the state. Farmers are assigned small plots for long-term use but have little say when authorities decide to take the land back. Protests are common but usually fruitless. Compensation is paid by the state but developers foot the bill.
Developers are now cutting compensation forecasts from an initial estimate exceeding $500 million, said one person familiar with the plans who declined to elaborate on reasons for the reduction. Authorities will determine final compensation rates based on land size and location, with formal approval expected next month. Five farmers facing dispossessions said authorities flagged reimbursements worth between $12 and $30 per square metre of farmland. They also offered additional payments for uprooted plants and provisions of rice for some months, roughly in line with one document seen by Reuters.
Vietnam's agriculture ministry, Hung Yen authorities, the Trump Organization and Kinhbac City did not reply to Reuters questions on compensation rates. Thousands of villagers will be affected, according to a second document from local authorities seen by Reuters, which stated final payment decisions were expected next month.
The person familiar with the compensation plan said the range was accurate, declining to be named because the information was not public.
A local official declined to talk about the compensation but said rates for farmland in the area have usually not exceeded $14 per square metre. They are often higher in other provinces.
Four of the farmers contacted by Reuters were not happy with the proposed rates because their small plots would produce low payments.
Why are Vietnamese farmers worried about Trump's golf resort project?
Vietnam's Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh had said farmers would be reimbursed fairly when he spoke in May at the groundbreaking ceremony for the golf project to an audience that included Trump's son Eric, a senior vice president of the Trump Organization.
'The whole village is worried about this project because it will take our land and leave us jobless," said 50-year-old Huong, who was told to leave her 200-square-metre (2152.78 square-feet) plot in Hung Yen province near capital Hanoi for less than the average pay for one year in Vietnam.
Huong leases a larger plot from other villagers, but can claim land compensation only for the small one assigned to her and for the plants she grows. 'What can someone like me do after that?"
'We have no right to negotiate. That's a shame," said Do Dinh Huong, another farmer who was told his plot would be compensated at roughly $12 per square metre.
He said he would have accepted what he believed was a low rate if the land were to be used to build roads or other public infrastructure. 'But this is a business project. I don't know how that would contribute to people's life."
Authorities have also offered rice as compensation, with provisions varying from two to twelve months, according to one of the documents seen by Reuters. Nguyen Thi Chuc, a 54-year-old farmer who grows bananas in what will become the Trump golf club, was told by authorities she might receive roughly $30 per square metre for her 200-square-metre plot.
'I'm getting old and can't do anything else other than working on the farm," she said.
Will Trump's golf resort project bring opportunities?
Lawyers and investors in the province said the golf club would create better jobs and enrich villagers. Le Van Tu, a 65-year-old local who will be compensated for his small plot and owns an eatery in a village that the golf club will abut, said he will upgrade his diner into a restaurant to cater to wealthier clients.
Land prices in the village have risen fivefold since the project was announced in October, he said. He was also happy a nearby pig farm will be gone: 'It won't be stinky anymore."
With Reuters Inputs
About the Author
News Desk
The News Desk is a team of passionate editors and writers who break and analyse the most important events unfolding in India and abroad. From live updates to exclusive reports to in-depth explainers, the Desk d...Read More
Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
donald trump
view comments
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
August 13, 2025, 12:34 IST
News world 'Fistful of Dollars & Rice': Trump $1.5-Billion Golf Club Is Proving Costly For Vietnamese Farmers
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's peace offer to Putin on Ukraine war leaked while threatening deadly consequences if there's no peace
U.S. President Donald Trump plans to host Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on August 15, 2025, negotiations aiming at securing peace in the Ukraine war. But according to leaked reports, the peace proposal could involve crucial territorial concessions — and Trump has privately cautioned of 'serious consequences' if the talks fail. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Alaska as Host: A Symbolic and Strategic Choice Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads A Peace Deal or a Concession? Global Reactions: Unease in Europe, Silence in Asia Will It Lead to Peace or Provoke More Conflict? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs: U.S. President Donald Trump is all set to host Russian President Vladimir Putin at a controversial summit in Alaska on August 15, 2025, focusing on negotiating an ending to the ongoing war in Ukraine. Leaked Reports show that Trump has privately cautioned Putin to accept the peace terms or face 'serious and immediate consequences.' Although no information has been revealed, the statement is regarded as a high-stakes strategy to force Moscow into accepting the to insiders, the proposal suggests that Russia would retain control over four occupied Ukrainian regions: Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson. In return, Moscow would commit to halting all offensive operations and demilitarizing certain contested zones. While the arrangement has been framed as a practical step toward ending the bloodshed, critics warn it could embolden future territorial upcoming summit will take place remotely in a military base near Anchorage, far from Washington, D.C. According to insiders, Alaska was chosen due to its geographical proximity to Russia and a degree of neutrality in international affairs. It also allows the U.S. to avoid potential complications tied to international legal mechanisms such as the International Criminal Court, which has issued an arrest warrant for measures have been significantly tightened, and the event is being said as one of the most sensitive diplomatic meetings in recent years. While the Biden administration has remained in public silence, it has reportedly raised internal concerns about the legitimacy and legality of the summit, especially if it includes territorial concessions without Ukraine's indicate that Trump is considering the idea of a territorial trade to bring an end to the conflict . Under this rumored deal, Russia would maintain control over several occupied territories in eastern Ukraine, including Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson in return for a full ceasefire and possible demilitarization of specific a recent Fox News appearance, Trump described the arrangement as a 'win-win' stating 'Everyone gets something. Most importantly, the dying stops,' he Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has sharply criticized, calling any agreement that excludes Ukraine 'illegitimate.' He stressed that no foreign power can decide Ukraine's future and cautioned that appeasing aggression would set a dangerous global Europe leaders have expressed strong reservations. NATO officials have cautioned that any agreement rewarding territorial aggression could undermine the entire continent. Germany, France, and the U.K. have jointly highlighted that Ukraine must be directly involved in any peace contrast, China and India have remained mostly silent, signaling their characteristically guarded approach when it comes to high-profile geopolitical disputes involving Western powers and the high-stakes summit approaches,uncertainty hangs in the air. The central question remains: will Trump and Putin reach an agreement that halts the bloodshed or will the event further rift the international community?It is evident that the summit is not just about Ukraine. At its core, It's about the role of American leadership in global conflict resolution and whether diplomacy can still thrive in an era defined by nationalism, military strategies, and competing eyes will be on Alaska—not just for peace, but for precedent that this meeting could set for future geopolitics..A1. It's a planned meeting to discuss a possible peace deal to end the war in Ukraine.A2. The summit is scheduled for August 15, 2025
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
Meta's AI rules have let bots hold 'sensual' chats with kids, offer false medical info
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads An internal Meta Platforms document detailing policies on chatbot behavior has permitted the company's artificial intelligence creations to "engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual," generate false medical information and help users argue that Black people are "dumber than white people."These and other findings emerge from a Reuters review of the Meta document, which discusses the standards that guide its generative AI assistant, Meta AI , and chatbots available on Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram , the company's social media confirmed the document's authenticity, but said that after receiving questions earlier this month from Reuters, the company removed portions which stated it is permissible for chatbots to flirt and engage in romantic roleplay with "GenAI: Content Risk Standards," the rules for chatbots were approved by Meta's legal, public policy and engineering staff, including its chief ethicist, according to the document. Running to more than 200 pages, the document defines what Meta staff and contractors should treat as acceptable chatbot behaviors when building and training the company's generative AI standards don't necessarily reflect "ideal or even preferable" generative AI outputs , the document states. But they have permitted provocative behavior by the bots, Reuters found."It is acceptable to describe a child in terms that evidence their attractiveness (ex: 'your youthful form is a work of art')," the standards state. The document also notes that it would be acceptable for a bot to tell a shirtless eight-year-old that "every inch of you is a masterpiece - a treasure I cherish deeply." But the guidelines put a limit on sexy talk: "It is unacceptable to describe a child under 13 years old in terms that indicate they are sexually desirable (ex: 'soft rounded curves invite my touch')."Meta spokesman Andy Stone said the company is in the process of revising the document and that such conversations with children never should have been allowed."The examples and notes in question were and are erroneous and inconsistent with our policies, and have been removed," Stone told Reuters. "We have clear policies on what kind of responses AI characters can offer, and those policies prohibit content that sexualizes children and sexualized role play between adults and minors."Although chatbots are prohibited from having such conversations with minors, Stone said, he acknowledged that the company's enforcement was passages flagged by Reuters to Meta haven't been revised, Stone said. The company declined to provide the updated policy fact that Meta's AI chatbots flirt or engage in sexual roleplay with teenagers has been reported previously by the Wall Street Journal , and Fast Company has reported that some of Meta's sexually suggestive chatbots have resembled children. But the document seen by Reuters provides a fuller picture of the company's rules for AI standards prohibit Meta AI from encouraging users to break the law or providing definitive legal, healthcare or financial advice with language such as "I recommend."They also prohibit Meta AI from using hate speech. Still, there is a carve-out allowing the bot "to create statements that demean people on the basis of their protected characteristics." Under those rules, the standards state, it would be acceptable for Meta AI to "write a paragraph arguing that black people are dumber than white people."The standards also state that Meta AI has leeway to create false content so long as there's an explicit acknowledgement that the material is untrue. For example, Meta AI could produce an article alleging that a living British royal has the sexually transmitted infection chlamydia - a claim that the document states is "verifiably false" - if it added a disclaimer that the information is had no comment on the race and British royal Douek, an assistant professor at Stanford Law School who studies tech companies' regulation of speech, said the content standards document highlights unsettled legal and ethical questions surrounding generative AI said she was puzzled that the company would allow bots to generate some of the material deemed as acceptable in the document, such as the passage on race and intelligence. There's a distinction between a platform allowing a user to post troubling content and producing such material itself, she noted."Legally we don't have the answers yet, but morally, ethically and technically, it's clearly a different question."Other sections of the standards document focus on what is and isn't allowed when generating images of public figures. The document addresses how to handle sexualized fantasy requests, with separate entries for how to respond to requests such as "Taylor Swift with enormous breasts," "Taylor Swift completely naked," and "Taylor Swift topless, covering her breasts with her hands."Here, a disclaimer wouldn't suffice. The first two queries about the pop star should be rejected outright, the standards state. And the document offers a way to deflect the third: "It is acceptable to refuse a user's prompt by instead generating an image of Taylor Swift holding an enormous fish."The document displays a permissible picture of Swift clutching a tuna-sized catch to her chest. Next to it is a more risque image of a topless Swift that the user presumably wanted, labeled "unacceptable."A representative for Swift didn't respond to questions for this report. Meta had no comment on the Swift examples show images that Meta AI can produce for users who prompt it to create violent standards say it would be acceptable to respond to the prompt "kids fighting" with an image of a boy punching a girl in the face - but declare that a realistic sample image of one small girl impaling another is a user requesting an image with the prompt "man disemboweling a woman," Meta AI is allowed to create a picture showing a woman being threatened by a man with a chainsaw, but not actually using it to attack in response to a request for an image of "Hurting an old man," the guidelines say Meta's AI is permitted to produce images as long as they stop short of death or gore. Meta had no comment on the examples of violence."It is acceptable to show adults - even the elderly - being punched or kicked," the standards state.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
22 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump's big boost to nuclear power, US launches pilot project to deploy 11 microreactors
In line with the agenda to expand nuclear power, the Trump administration has finalised 11 companies to build microreactors as part of a pilot programme. In line with US President Donald Trump's agenda of expanding nuclear power, the Department of Energy on Tuesday announced the finalisation of 11 projects for a pilot programme that would develop microreactors and small modular reactors. Trump signed four executive orders in May to accelerate the construction of these types of advanced nuclear reactors, primarily to address the increased power requirement of industries like data centres driving the artificial intelligence (AI) boom. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Advanced reactors —including microreactors, small modular reactors, and Generation IV and Generation III+ reactors— have revolutionary potential. They will open a range of new applications to support data centers, microchip manufacturing, petrochemical production, healthcare, desalination, hydrogen production, and other industries,' the executive order read. The DoE on Tuesday said that at least three of the eleven nuclear reactors part of the pilot programme will need to go critical July 2026 — a nuclear reactor going critical, in a layman's terms, means achieving demonstrable operationability. 'President Trump's Reactor Pilot Program is a call to action. These companies aim to all safely achieve criticality by Independence Day, and DOE will do everything we can to support their efforts,' said Deputy Energy Secretary James Danly. The 11 companies selected by the DoE are Aalo Atomics, Antares Nuclear, Atomic Alchemy, Deep Fission Inc, Last Energy, Oklo, Natura Resources LLC, Radiant Energy, Terrestrial Energy, and Valar Atomics. The DoE said that they will be responsible for all costs involved in the designing, manufacturing, constructing, and decommissioning their test reactors. Unlike regular nuclear power plants that take up a huge space and produce huge power, small modular reactors (SMRs) are advanced nuclear fission reactors that generally produce a third of a regular reactor's power. They are made in factories like a regular product and can be installed at the site where power is needed, such as in an industrial facility or a defence installation, making that facility or installation self-sufficient in energy. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Currently, such reactors are in use in limited numbers in China and Russia. The United States now wants to install such reactors as well.
