Speedy Hire warns over ‘challenging' conditions amid depot closures
The Merseyside-based business said it was impacted by 'challenging market conditions' after the Government delayed spending on major infrastructure projects, such as Network Rail's development programme.
Speedy Hire said these challenges underpin its commitment to its accelerated transformation plan in order to return to growth.
As part of its turnaround efforts, the company said it shut eight of its depots, leading to a reduction in staff numbers.
It said its headcount dropped by 74 at the end of March compared with a year earlier.
On Wednesday, the company reported that revenues for the year slipped by 1.2% to £416.6 million for the year to March 31.
It said its hire business saw sales edge up 0.6% for the year.
Meanwhile, the group also swung to a £1.5 million pre-tax loss from a £5.1 million profit a year earlier. It also saw its net debts grow by £11.8 million to £113.1 million.
Dan Evans, chief executive of the business, said: 'Despite the macro-economic challenges, we have remained committed to, and in parts accelerated, the implementation of our velocity transformation strategy during its latest phase, which is setting the foundation for growth opportunities for the benefit of our customers and people, whilst maintaining shareholder returns.
'We are focused on what we can control, and we will continue to manage our cost base and balance our investment decisions through the economic cycle.
'Our transformation is key to our business, ensuring service excellence, innovation and ease of transacting for our customers, from an efficient and systems driven operating model.'
Mark Crouch, market analyst for EToro, said: 'It's been anything but a smooth ride for Speedy Hire.
'Grappling with spiralling costs and softening demand, the tool and equipment rental firm has found itself under mounting pressure as challenging economic conditions have pushed the business close to its limits.
'With both revenue and profit falling short of estimates, Speedy Hire's full-year results will have done little to shore up investor confidence.
'The broader trend of businesses tightening their belts is already troubling, but Network Rail's decision to delay spending on its £45.4 billion five-year infrastructure programme has delivered yet another hammer blow.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
7 minutes ago
- The Independent
Is Keir Starmer just one crisis away from a Labour coup?
On the Whitehall grapevine, Wes Streeting is seen as a rare success story for the government: a good communicator who is starting to deliver the change Keir Starmer promised. The chatter in Streeting's health department predicts his next stop will be 10 Downing Street. However, the health secretary might face an uphill battle to win over the Labour grassroots in the 'one member, one vote' ballot that chooses the party's leader. Even some of his admirers suspect he might be too right-wing, or 'Blairite', for many of them. Whitehall officials are less flattering about other cabinet ministers. Rachel Reeves 's autumn Budget is described by some as her 'last shot'. In other words, if she can't break out of the doom loop of 'one-off' tax rises to meet her fiscal rules, followed by exactly the same medicine in her next Budget, Starmer might be looking for a new chancellor next year. The prime minister is not immune to speculation about his future. Even his allies admit he cannot afford a repeat of his bad first year on the domestic front. 'Another crisis like the welfare climbdown and it would surely be curtains,' one Labour MP told me. Angela Rayner told last month's meeting of Labour's national executive committee that 'announcements are not enough: people have to see real improvements in their lives, soon.' Significantly, the deputy prime minister added: 'The next 12 months will decide whether Labour wins a second term.' She wasn't talking behind Keir Starmer's back; he was in the room. Few ministers would disagree with her 'one more year' theory. Starmer's problem is that first impressions of a government, prime minister or party leader usually stick, and Labour and his party's dire ratings are getting worse. Although Rayner didn't say it, the logical consequence of her statement is that if Starmer hasn't turned things round by next summer, the question of whether he should lead the party into the next general election will become a live one. The spark might be poor results in next May's mid-term elections, when Labour could lose out to the SNP in the Scottish Parliament, to Reform UK in the Welsh Parliament, and to the Greens and Jeremy Corbyn's new socialist party in English local authorities. Indeed, there's already gossip in Labour land about Starmer's future, which is fully in line with Labour's traditions. The party doesn't kill its leaders like the Conservatives, but makes up for that by debating endlessly in private who would take over if their leader fell under a Number 12 bus in Whitehall. Labour has more in common with the TV series Succession than it would admit. Despite Streeting's Whitehall fan club, the current strong favourite to succeed Starmer is Rayner. Although she insists she doesn't want the top job, it would be very hard to stick to that if it were likely to land in her lap. Rayner is performing a delicate balancing act well. She has carved out a position slightly to the left of Starmer, which is where Labour's heart beats. At the same time, she is publicly loyal to the PM; rocking the boat could damage her succession prospects. In theory, jittery Labour backbenchers, fearing they will lose their seats, could mount a coup against Starmer. In practice, they would need cabinet-level support. How loyal would the cabinet be if the PM came under real pressure? One largely forgotten factor is that only eight of today's 22-strong cabinet nominated Starmer in the 2020 Labour leadership contest – in other words, he was their first choice. They were: Hilary Benn, Yvette Cooper, John Healey, David Lammy, Ed Miliband, Bridget Phillipson, Steve Reed and Jonathan Reynolds. That doesn't mean other ministers would dump Starmer in the event of a leadership crisis. When a leader is in real trouble, any politician is bound to consider self-interest. If Rayner still looked a shoo-in, it would suit those who don't want her to succeed Starmer to rally behind him rather than pull the rug. 'Wes [Streeting], Yvette [Cooper] and other big beasts would bolster Keir rather than let Angie [Rayner] take over,' one Labour insider told me. Despite that, it is no longer certain that Starmer will lead his party into the next election. Starmer will soon reflect on his planned fightback during a much-needed holiday, which, knowing his wretched luck when it comes to taking a break, will probably be interrupted by the need to talk to other world leaders about Ukraine and Gaza. The first test of whether Starmer can turn the domestic tide will come in what is becoming an increasingly important speech to the Labour conference in Liverpool next month. 'It's going to be a hard slog from now on,' one close ally admitted.
The Sun
8 minutes ago
- The Sun
How to unlock thousands of pounds of cash just from your garden – and you don't need to raid your pension or savings
YOU could unlock thousands of pounds in extra cash without dipping into your pension or savings. It won't be for everyone, but if you have a large garden or a plot of unused land that you're willing to give up you could make money off it. 1 Developers are often searching for space to build new homes and that demand has gone up even more as the Government has plans to build 1.5million homes in five years. Alternatively, your extra land could be used for business or farming, or your neighbour may even want to buy it off you. So if you don't mind letting go of the land (or just a portion of it), there's plenty of money to be made. It can free up cash for you to spend on you and your family, or be put towards your retirement, without you needing to move to downsize your home. Plus, it can also save you time and money on garden maintenance. You should be aware that some properties are more suitable than others for this. For example, post-war homes built in the 1940s and 1950s often sit on generous plots of land - but you might be more restricted if the land is of historical significance. A study by The Grass People of 50 locations across the UK found the average price per square metre of gardens was £1,526. That means you could stand to make tens of thousands of pounds potentially. But this can vary a lot depending on where your land is located, its condition, the value of any house next to it and whether there's parking space. We made our boring new build garden a Love Island style haven with bar & hot tub, but trolls say detail 'ruined our day' There isn't a land value calculator available online but you could get a valuation or look at how much similar plots of land sold for. What should you check first? First you should check whether selling all or part of your garden is actually viable for the purpose you're selling it for. If you're selling to a developer, it would need to be big enough for purpose and you'd also need to consider whether it would be suitable for a building plot or to be farmed. For example, you could consider whether it's easily reachable and whether it would have access to essential services like electricity, gas and water. There isn't an actual restriction on the minimum amount of land you can sell but it should be big enough for at least one property similar to other homes in the area. So if the housing is small or dense near you, the size of the land you're selling can be smaller. You should also check the deeds to your house for any restrictive covenants, which are restrictions or conditions on land attached to a property. Your land might be located within a conservation area, for example, and so you might need to follow extra regulations. Or your buyer might need approval from your local authority. If you have a mortgage on your house, you'll need to get permission from your lender before selling part of your garden. You won't be able to sell otherwise. Mortgage lenders might turn you down if they believe the sale will decrease the value of your property. They might ask you to provide evidence, such as a formal valuation, that demonstrates the sale won't decrease your home's value. How you could sell your land If you've decided to try selling, you could advertise through a land agent. Some bigger estate agencies have specialised land services that will value your land, apply for planning permission on your behalf and connect you with developers. Of course, the agent will likely take some commission for this. Another option is to look online for developers who build in your area and contact them directly. Or - if you have the time - you could scout around for sites under development in your area to see who is building. The HomeOwners Alliance strongly recommends using a conveyancing solicitor, so you'll need to factor this cost in. You don't need planning permission to sell your garden but if you have permission already sorted it can increase its value. If you sell without permission, you can get hold of your money quicker and with less hassle but you'll likely get a lower offer. You could agree with the developer that they will buy your garden for a higher price on the condition they can get planning permission to build on it. If you opt for this, the process will take about a year and you'll have to sign a legally binding contract with the developer. The third option is to obtain full planning permission yourself. This means you take on all the risk and expense of getting the planning permission, but you'll get the highest price for your land if you're successful. Bear in mind that planning costs can range from £50,000 to £100,000 for a one to two-acre site.
The Herald Scotland
9 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Glasgow-run Maven Renovar VCT reveals result of bid to oust board
Mr Jourdan and other shareholders requisitioned a general meeting of Maven Renovar VCT. They put forward resolutions seeking to remove the board of the trust and appoint four replacement directors, including Mr Jourdan, in their place. The management contract for the venture capital trust, formerly known as Amati AIM VCT, was moved by the board from Amati to Glasgow-based private equity house Maven Capital Partners with effect from May. The board of Maven Renovar VCT then faced shareholder opposition at the trust's annual meeting on June 19. Bill Nixon, managing partner of Maven, said last month in an interview with The Herald that the private equity house had 'a proven track record to turning round a VCT in a near-identical situation'. He said then: 'It is clear that the last time there was a disproportionately small number of shareholders - about 100 - voted against the board at the AGM which arguably created a distorted outcome relative to the [total] number of shareholders. 'All we would say is whatever way you vote, get out and vote.' Speaking to The Herald, Mr Jourdan said last month: 'There are a significant group of shareholders who were upset at what happened and they want a capital return strategy. 'This is not about me. It is not about trying to get the contract back. It is just about what is the best strategy to pursue from here for the shareholders.' He highlighted his view that the situation 'shouldn't have got as heated as it has'. Announcing the outcome of the meeting today, Maven Renovar VCT said: 'Approximately 60% of the total votes cast were voted against the requisitioned resolutions. The votes against totalled approximately 29 million and were cast by approximately 1,500 shareholders. This represents a voting margin of over 8.6 million shares and approximately five times the number of shareholders voting against the requisitioned resolutions than those who voted for the requisitioned resolutions. 'The total number of votes cast in respect of each requisitioned resolution was more than double the number of votes cast in respect of the resolutions proposed at the company's recent annual general meeting. As far as the board is aware, this represents the highest turnout at any general meeting of the company and is among the highest for general meetings held by AIM VCTs with comparable shareholders numbers in recent years.' The trust added: 'The board is pleased that so many shareholders, both large and small, have taken the opportunity to protect their interests by exercising their right to vote and that they have done so to support the board and defeat the requisition. It is particularly pleasing that the voices of many smaller shareholders have been reflected in the voting results, the combined effect of which has helped to prevent the requisitioners from taking control of the company.' Maven Renovar VCT declared it was 'noteworthy that, following constructive engagement with the board and its advisers, some signatories to the requisition ultimately voted against certain of the requisitioned resolutions or abstained'. The trust said the board 'recognises that some shareholders, including the requisitioners, may not want to stay invested and may wish to seek liquidity in respect of their shares.' It added: 'In this respect, the board re-confirms its commitment to continuing to buy back shares and to exploring other options which may enable those shareholders who wish to sell their shares to do so.'
