
Nagasaki hopes atomic bombing will be the last on Earth as it marks anniversary
The United States launched the Nagasaki attack on August 9 1945, killing 70,000 by the end of that year, three days after the bombing of Hiroshima that killed 140,000.
Japan surrendered on August 15 1945, ending the Second World War and the country's nearly half-century of aggression across Asia.
About 2,600 people, including representatives from more than 90 countries, attended a memorial event at Nagasaki Peace Park, where mayor Shiro Suzuki and prime minister Shigeru Ishiba spoke, among other guests.
At 11:02am, the exact time when the plutonium bomb exploded above Nagasaki, participants observed a moment of silence as a bell rang.
Dozens of doves, a symbol of peace, were released after a speech by Mr Suzuki, whose parents are survivors of the attack.
He said the city's memories of the bombing are 'a common heritage and should be passed down for generations' in and outside Japan.
'The existential crisis of humanity has become imminent to each and every one of us living on Earth,' Mr Suzuki said. 'In order to make Nagasaki the last atomic bombing site now and forever, we will go hand-in-hand with global citizens and devote our utmost efforts toward the abolition of nuclear weapons and the realisation of everlasting world peace.'
Survivors and their families gathered Saturday in rainy weather at Peace Park and nearby Hypocentre Park, located below the bomb's exact detonation spot, hours before the official ceremony.
'I simply seek a world without war,' said Koichi Kawano, an 85-year-old survivor who laid flowers at the Hypocenter monument decorated with colourful paper cranes and other offerings.
Some others prayed at churches in Nagasaki, home to Catholic converts who went deep underground during centuries of violent persecution in Japan's feudal era.
The twin bells at Urakami Cathedral, which was destroyed in the bombing, also rang together again after one of the bells that had gone missing following the attack was restored by volunteers.
Despite their pain from wounds, discrimination and illnesses from radiation, survivors have publicly committed to a shared goal of abolishing nuclear weapons.
But they worry about the world moving in the opposite direction.
Ageing survivors and their supporters in Nagasaki now put their hopes of achieving nuclear weapons abolition in the hands of younger people, telling them the attack is not distant history, but an issue that remains relevant to their future.
'There are only two things I long for: the abolition of nuclear weapons and prohibition of war,' survivor Fumi Takeshita said.
'I only see a world where nuclear weapons are never used and everyone can live in peace.'
In hopes of passing on the lessons of history, Ms Takeshita visits schools to share her experience with children.
'When you grow up and remember what you learned today, please think what each of you can do to prevent war,' Ms Takeshita, 83, told students during a school visit earlier this week.
Teruko Yokoyama, an 83-year-old member of a Nagasaki organisation supporting survivors, said she feels the absence of those she has worked, which fuels her strong desire to document the lives of remaining survivors.
The number of survivors has fallen to 99,130, about a quarter of the original number, with their average age exceeding 86.
Survivors worry about fading memories, as the youngest of the survivors were too young to recall the attack clearly.
'We must keep records of the atomic bombing damages of the survivors and their lifetime story,' said Ms Yokoyama, whose two sisters died after suffering illnesses linked to radiation.
Her organisation has started to digitalise the narratives of survivors for viewing on YouTube and other social media platforms with the help of a new generation.
'There are younger people who are beginning to take action,' Ms Yokoyama said.
'So I think we don't have to get depressed yet.'
Nagasaki hosted a 'peace forum' on Friday where survivors shared their stories with more than 300 young people from around the country.
Seiichiro Mise, a 90-year-old survivor, said he is handing seeds of 'flowers of peace' to the younger generation in hopes of seeing them bloom.
Survivors are frustrated by a growing nuclear threat and support among international leaders for developing or possessing nuclear weapons for deterrence.
They criticise the Japanese government's refusal to sign or even participate in the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons because Japan, as an American ally, needs US nuclear possession as deterrence.
In Mr Ishiba's speech, the prime minister reiterated Japan's pursuit of a nuclear-free world and pledged to promote dialogue and cooperation between countries with nuclear weapons and non-nuclear states at the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons review conference scheduled for April and May 2026 in New York City.
Mr Ishiba, however, did not mention the nuclear weapons ban treaty.
Nagasaki invited representatives from all countries to attend the ceremony Saturday.
China notably notified the city it would not be present without providing a reason.
The ceremony last year stirred controversy due to the absence of the US ambassador and other Western envoys in response to the Japanese city's refusal to invite Israel.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Spectator
6 hours ago
- Spectator
Is Hollywood's woke era ending?
On reading that Dean Cain (the actor who played the television Superman) had become an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent, I felt a thrill of insurrection – so hot on the heels of the revelation that naughty Sydney Sweeney is a registered Republican! I imagined Rosie O'Donnell crying into her morning decaf, Lizzo swearing at her gender-fluid cat, Ellen DeGeneres taking it out on the help from sheer liberal frustration. Because celebrities aren't allowed to be right-wing ('right-wing' now being dunce-speak for anyone against limitless illegal immigration and transvestite men colonising women's spaces.) Undaunted, Cain told Fox News: I'm actually a reserve police officer…so now I've spoken with some officials over at ICE, and I will be sworn in as an ICE agent, ASAP. This country was built on patriots stepping up, whether it was popular or not, and doing the right thing. I truly believe this is the right thing. We have a broken immigration system. Congress needs to fix it, but in the interim, President Trump ran on this. He is delivering on this. This is what people voted for. It's what I voted for and he's going to see it through, and I'll do my part and help make sure it happens.' Cain has previous on stepping up, whether popular or not. I think we can safely say that being a 'liberal' (a liberal in the modern sense, being a censorious nag, rather than the old sense, one who is inclined to live and let live) has been for a long time the only political stance acceptable in showbusiness and entertainment, especially in Hollywood. Often, especially when used by men, this is merely a 'wokescreen' – think of Harvey Weinstein, of whom Rebecca Corbett (the journalist who oversaw the New York Times investigations into allegations of rape and sexual abuse by Weinstein) said in the 2020 Reuters Memorial Lecture: At the beginning of the Weinstein investigation, we had no idea whether the producer had done anything wrong. He cast himself as a champion of actresses, a Democratic Party fundraiser, a feminist who joined marches —a man considered reliable enough that Barack Obama's older daughter had worked as a summer intern at his studio. Dean Cain needs no wokescreen from behind which to conduct evil deeds and is therefore refreshingly honest. He recently came out as a Hollywood outsider for mocking the latest Superman film as 'woke' after director James Gunn described the character as an immigrant, telling TMZ: 'How woke is Hollywood going to make this character? We know Superman is an immigrant – he's a freaking alien… the 'American way' is immigrant-friendly, tremendously immigrant-friendly. But there are rules… there have to be limits, because we can't have everybody in the United States.' Cain is an interesting man. He's partly of Japanese descent, a Democratic voter as a youngster, teenage boyfriend of Brooke Shields when they were at university, dater of Playmates and swimsuit models, he also trolled Dylan Mulvaney in a spectacular fashion when he commented on a video of Mulvaney and another cross-dresser, saying 'Neither of you are girls.' 'You were never Superman either,' snarked an 'ally'. 'Correct. I pretended,' Cain replied. In 2021 he gave a sparky interview after DC Comics had Superman's son come out as a bisexual: I say they're bandwagoning…Robin, of Batman & Robin, just came out as bi or gay recently. And honestly, who's really shocked about that one? The new Captain America is gay. My daughter in Supergirl where I played the father, she was gay… So I don't think it's bold or brave or some crazy new direction. If they had done this 20 years ago, perhaps that would have been bold and brave. Brave would be having him fighting for the rights of gay people in Iran, where they'll throw you off a building for the offense of being gay… They're talking about him fighting real-world problems like climate change, the deportation of refugees and he'll be dating a 'hacktivist', whatever a 'hacktivist' is… Why don't they have him fight the injustices that created the refugees whose deportation he's protesting? That would be brave.' Cain has a hinterland, it's fair to say. What he doesn't have – unlike most celebrities, are 'luxury beliefs', the phrase created by Rob Henderson as 'ideas held by privileged people that make them look good but actually harm the marginalised.' These can be found in many professions, but it's probably when they're propagated by the massively-privileged showbiz 'community' that they irritate most, preaching defunding of the police from their privately-policed gated communities. Regrettably, the stars who aren't left-wing these days are a mixed bag. I was cheered to hear that we have Kelsey Grammar, Chris Pratt, James Woods, Alice Cooper, Gary Sinise (who, in parts both poignant and amusing, started up Friends of Abe, a support group for Hollywood Republicans) and the iconic ex-Runaways singer Cherie Currie. I am less happy with Mel Gibson, Kid Rock and Vince Vaughn. Still, beggars can't be choosers, and Pratt and co. are a veritable banquet compared to what we've got over here in the UK. Who of a certain age can forget cringing when Kenny Everett, at a 1983 pro-Thatcher rally, shouted 'Let's bomb Russia!' as well as suggesting that Michael Foot's walking stick should be manhandled? It was the polar opposite of Tony Blair managing to attract the ineffably cool Noel Gallagher to No. 10. At least now we've got the gorgeous Holly Valance, who fundraises for Reform and has said with admirable Aussie forthrightness: 'Everyone starts as a leftie and then wakes up at some point after you start either making money, working, trying to run a business, trying to buy a home, and then realise what crap ideas they all are – and then you go to the right.' While those two great working-class renegades Lydon and Morrissey have been vocal on their dislike for what passes as left-wing politics today. But does which way entertainers swing politically really matter anymore? The last American election indicated not. As I wrote here in May, 'How dim would a political party need to be to understand that not only do celeb endorsements/involvements not work, but have an actual repelling effect? Beyonce and 'The Boss' sure helped cook Kamala's goose; when the rich and famous swank around telling hoi polloi who to vote for, the masses have a habit of doing exactly the opposite.' When that wily old fox the tax-avoiding Mick Jagger allegedly said 'My heart is Labour but my money is Conservative' he was being honest in a way most pop stars (see the financial behaviour of U2) would never dare to, lest their fans turn on them. Entertainers follow the path they do because they want attention and they want to be rich. If they really cared about making things better for people, they'd have trained to become nurses or firefighters. Still, celebrity Democrats could learn a lesson from Republicans like Cain and Sweeney, who don't see the non-famous as Deplorables put on earth to be preached at.


Daily Mail
14 hours ago
- Daily Mail
MAIL ON SUNDAY COMMENT: We wish Trump well in his valiant bid for a just and lasting peace
Borders can change. When Presidents Trump and Putin meet in Alaska on Friday, they will be on territory which was once part of the Russian Empire. Moscow sold it to Washington in 1867 for a bargain price, partly because they were afraid that either Britain or the USA would grab it anyway if they did not. But since the aggressive horrors of the Second World War, there has been a general agreement that we should leave borders – above all in Europe – where they are. Most especially, we should not reward the illegal seizure of ground by armed force. This is a good principle, though it has been bent, if not actually broken, since the founding of the UN in San Francisco 80 years ago. Now it is being tested very severely. Vladimir Putin's criminal invasion of Ukraine was, and remains, a bloody and destructive action which should live in infamy. Thanks to wartime secrecy on both sides, we do not know the true scale of the horror, only that it is great. War deaths and other casualties are state secrets, and we can only guess at their size by looking at satellite pictures of the vast graveyards on either side of the frontline. Civilians, too, have suffered appallingly. Multitudes have become destitute refugees. Ukraine's economic sinews have been mangled and maimed by cynical Russian bombing, clearly intended to drive a once-prosperous country back into the pre-industrial age. Donald Trump, very reasonably, wants to stop these miseries and he has made it plain to Putin that he will hit the Russian economy where it hurts if he carries on with his aggression. But the lonely despot in the Kremlin is demanding a heavy price in return, especially the surrender of large slices of territory and the end of Ukraine's Nato ambitions. Mr Trump has spoken rather bafflingly of 'some swapping of territories to the betterment of both'. But Ukraine does not hold any significant Russian territory, while Russia has seized large portions of Ukraine and continues to eat away at its land each week. Even now, no more than 38 per cent of Ukraine's population would even consider ceding some of that land for peace. This is a big softening since 2023, but many of the remaining 62 per cent will always remain resolutely opposed to any such thing, and Ukraine's President Zelensky is among them. He is rightly suspicious of any talks which exclude him from the table. It is rumoured that Putin has offered a ceasefire in return for Ukraine handing over the eastern territories of Donetsk and Luhansk. But this is plainly not the end of his demands. Any such armistice would trigger more talks on the rest of the land Russia has grabbed – talks which Zelensky would rightly fear. Ukraine cannot easily fight off new Russian gains without the support of the USA and Europe's Nato powers. But America and Europe alike are worried that they must choose between a shabby deal or a much more intensive and dangerous war with Russia. It is a nasty mess. Credit must go to Donald Trump for continuing to try to resolve it. We must all wish and hope for a just and lasting peace. But with the current balance of forces, it is very hard to see how such a compromise can be reached.


Daily Mail
14 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Anti-abortion campaigner is being probed for praying outside a clinic... for the THIRD time
An anti-abortion campaigner is being investigated after taking part in a silent prayer outside an abortion clinic. Isabel Vaughan-Spruce, a Catholic pro-life advocate, has been arrested twice before by West Midlands Police for campaigning outside the Birmingham clinic. She received a payout and apology on both occasions and earlier this year lodged a complaint against the police force. The campaigner accused them of harassing her for standing too close to a clinic in and praying in silence. But now she is being investigated for a third time, the Telegraph reports. Ms Vaughan-Spruce was arrested in November 2022 for silently praying in a 'buffer zone' around an abortion clinic in the Kings Norton area of Birmingham. In February 2023, the charity-worker was acquitted of all charges at Birmingham magistrates' court when the prosecution was unable to offer evidence to support the charge. But just weeks later the director of anti-abortion group March for Life UK was arrested for a second time and was told her silent prayer was an offence. After a six-month investigation, the police dropped the charges and she received a payout of £13,000 and an apology. Last year, a new law was introduced making it an offence for anyone within a 'buffer zone' to do anything that could influence someone's decision to use abortion services. They could not intentionally or recklessly obstruct, harass, alarm or distress anyone visiting or working at the clinics. Despite the new law, Ms Vaughan-Spruce, who has won support from US politicians including vice president JD Vance, has continued to pray silently outside the Birmingham clinic every week. She insisted her actions did not break the law and instead brought a formal complaint against the force. Ms Vaughan-Spruce issued a claim for two wrongful arrests and false imprisonments; assault and battery in relation to an intrusive search of her person; and for a breach of her human rights in 2022 and 2023. Her complaint was rebuked by the police force's Department for Professional Standards because she was the subject of a live investigation. The force also said officers were liaising with the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), with an update expected next week. She told the publication: 'Despite being fully vindicated multiple times after being wrongfully arrested for my thoughts, it's unbelievable that two and a half years later, I am still being harassed by police for silently praying in that area, and yet again find myself under investigation for the same prayers I have said for twenty years. 'Silent prayer cannot possibly be a crime – everyone has the right to freedom of thought.' The anti-abortion campaigner is being supported by Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) International, a charity committed to protecting freedom of expression that has campaigned against the buffer zones - areas around clinics cordoned off from anti-abortion campaigners. They claim to expand Christian religious stance through faith-based legal advocacy. The group claimed that the police were censoring Ms Vaughan-Spruce's beliefs. She has also met with lawyers from the US House Judiciary Committee to discuss restrictions being imposed on others silently pray outside clinics. The Daily Mail has approached ADF International and West Midlands Police for comment.