
Nvidia supplier SK Hynix plans to boost spending after record Q2 profit
SEOUL
:
SK Hynix
flagged plans to boost spending this year after posting on Thursday a
record quarterly profit
, as the
Nvidia supplier
seeks to alleviate investor concerns about slowing growth for
artificial intelligence chipsets
.
The South Korean chipmaker said demand growth would be driven by new model launches by customers and that it was on track to double high-bandwidth memory (HBM) chip sales for the full year compared to 2024.
Its shares climbed more than 3% in early trade, compared to the 0.8% rise in the benchmark South Korean KOSPI index
Hynix did not quantify its new investment plan for 2025. Ryu Young-ho, a senior analyst at NH Investment & Securities, said its proactive response to customer demand for next year appeared to reflect its confidence, as it faces major competition from
Samsung
Electronics.
At an earnings conference, SK Hynix also said it was in talks with a major customer regarding sales next year which are "proceeding as planned". It did not elaborate.
In March, SK Hynix said it planned to finalise sales with customers for 2026 within the first half of this year.
"SK Hynix foresees that increasing competition among big tech companies to enhance inference of AI models would lead to higher demand for high-performance and high-capacity memory products," it said in a statement.
Chaotic U.S. policy and turbulence over tariffs have overshadowed the outlook for many companies, and SK Hynix said its earnings were helped by demand from customers to increase inventory ahead of potential tariffs.
Earlier this month, U.S. President Donald Trump threatened to soon introduce tariffs on semiconductors. SK Hynix said in April that the proportion of its exports to the United States was not high, but analysts said the company could face pricing pressure from customers squeezed by U.S. tariffs.
A much-anticipated meeting between U.S. and South Korean officials scheduled for Friday to discuss tariffs was cancelled. Hopes for a deal had risen after Japan and the United States reached a deal on tariffs this week.
Hynix reported a 9.2 trillion won ($6.69 billion) operating profit for the April-June period, up 69% from 5.5 trillion won a year earlier.
That compared with a 9.0 trillion won average forecast by LSEG SmartEstimate, which is weighted toward analysts who are more consistently accurate. Revenue rose 35% to 22.2 trillion won during the quarter.
HYNIX VS SAMSUNG
Its profit is double the quarterly operating profit expected by crosstown rival Samsung Electronics, which this month projected a worse-than-expected 56% plunge in second-quarter operating profit due to weak AI chip sales.
SK Hynix overtook Samsung Electronics as the world's top memory chipmaker in the first quarter due to its leadership in HBM chips, a crucial component of AI chipsets designed by the likes of
Nvidia
that assist the processing of vast amounts of data to train AI models.
After posting a series of record profits boosted by strong AI demand, SK Hynix is bracing for potential U.S. tariffs and rising competition from rivals in supplying advanced chips to Nvidia, analysts say.
Last Thursday, SK Hynix saw its shares close about 9% lower after Goldman Sachs downgraded the stock to "neutral", expecting HBM prices would decline for the first time next year.
Shares of SK Hynix are up 54.7% so far this year, outperforming the KOSPI's 32.7% rise.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
3 hours ago
- Economic Times
Former RBI Governor Raghuram Rajan isn't impressed by India's growth story; Here's what he thinks we're getting wrong
Agencies Former RBI Guv Raghuram Rajan "There is no room for another China." That's Raghuram Rajan's blunt assessment of India's industrial aspirations. In a recent interview with Frontline, the former RBI Governor made it clear that the world has changed. The conditions that allowed China to rise through mass manufacturing simply no longer labour is not the advantage it once was. Automation has moved into even the most basic factory roles. "What companies need now is people who can tend the machines, repair the machines—not those who do the manual work machines have replaced," Rajan said. In short, the manufacturing jobs India is chasing might already be to that the rise of protectionism. Countries are building domestic industries, shutting doors that were once open to global supply chains. "Everybody wants their own little manufacturing industry," Rajan said. India cannot expect to export its way to prosperity in this has been betting heavily on manufacturing as a way to absorb its young workforce. But Rajan cautions that the numbers just don't add up."We cannot expect that number of jobs in manufacturing," he said. Tariffs have gone up, production-linked incentives are scattered, and policies contradict themselves. For example, tariffs are applied not only to final goods but also to the intermediate goods needed to make them. "Then people complain, 'Oh, I can't make this effectively here because the intermediate goods are tariffed.'" This isn't just a policy hiccup. It signals a lack of strategic clarity. And without that, Rajan believes, manufacturing will remain a political slogan, not a real solution."Get a job wherever, create a job wherever you can." That, Rajan says, should be the guiding already commands a 4.5 percent share of global service exports. That includes everything from high-end software to back-end support. While these sectors can't employ everyone, they signal a clear competitive importantly, Rajan sees untapped potential in domestic, mid-skill service jobs—plumbers, drivers, technicians, healthcare workers. These jobs may not make headlines, but they could lift millions. All it takes is better skilling and targeted support. He also dismissed the idea that you need a strong manufacturing base to build high-end service sectors. "This canard, which is floated sometimes, that you need the manufacturing in order to do the associated services, is not necessarily true," Rajan said. Citing companies like Nvidia and Apple, he pointed out that design and innovation can flourish even when production is outsourced. The days of the free trade consensus are over. Rajan traced America's shift back to Trump and his economic advisers, who viewed trade deficits as signs of weakness. That thinking has stuck around. "Is he undermining the basis of US prosperity and its dominance of the post-Second World War economic system with this view? I think we are turning the tables on what worked," he said. Today, protectionist tariffs are not a blip. They are part of a permanent, structural shift in global politics. For India, it means the space to plug into global supply chains has shrunk. Trying to follow China's route now is like running for a train that already left the is growing at 6 to 6.5 percent a year. On paper, that sounds solid. But as Rajan points out, this pace is not enough to lift per capita income fast enough to avoid a demographic squeeze."We are the fastest-growing country in the G20," he said. "But also the poorest on a per capita basis. That has to change."Time is running out. India's young population won't stay young forever. If opportunities don't arrive soon, the demographic dividend could turn into a has long been vocal about the need for decentralisation. Giving more power to local governments, he argues, improves both accountability and outcomes."The village community can see when the funds transmitted from the State government or Central government are misspent or line the pockets of the village elite," he said. "State after state should give more power to the municipalities, to the villages. That will both enhance commitment to democracy but also allow for better governance."He contrasted this with the Centre's tendency to prioritise flashy schemes without follow-through. "We announce a campaign, but never actually determine whether it's working. It becomes an announcement rather than effective rollout."Rajan criticised the growing trend of suppressing inconvenient data or changing methodologies to suit political needs. That, he warned, is a recipe for bad policy."Suppressing data eventually hurts the government itself," he said. "Your critics are sometimes your best friends because they will identify what's going wrong and then you can make the changes and then get credit for it."Honest, reliable data is not just for economists. It is the foundation of public is spending big on infrastructure. But Rajan warns that not all investment is equal."Every small town wants a metro," he said. "That's overbuilding, and those will be white elephants."What matters more, in his view, is building up capabilities. This means investing in schools, research labs, skilling programmes, and targeted industrial policy. "We have to have a few national labs where you've got state-of-the-art equipment where you can actually be competitive."The message Rajan is sending is clear: Stop chasing China. That moment is gone. India needs a strategy rooted in its own strengths, challenges and people. That means backing services, not slogans. Empowering local governments, not hoarding power at the top. And investing in people, not just not glamorous. But it might just work.


Time of India
12 hours ago
- Time of India
Huawei shows off AI computing system to rival Nvidia's top product
China's Huawei Technologies showed off an AI computing system on Saturday that one industry expert has said rivals Nvidia's most advanced offering, as the Chinese technology giant seeks to capture market share in the country's growing artificial intelligence sector. The CloudMatrix 384 system made its first public debut at the World Artificial Intelligence Conference (WAIC), a three-day event in Shanghai where companies showcase their latest AI innovations, drawing a large crowd to the company's booth. The system has drawn close attention from the global AI community since Huawei first announced it in April. Industry analysts view it as a direct competitor to Nvidia's GB200 NVL72, the U.S. chipmaker's most advanced system-level product currently available in the market. Dylan Patel, founder of semiconductor research group SemiAnalysis, said in an April article that Huawei now had AI system capabilities that could beat Nvidia. Huawei staff at its WAIC booth declined to comment when asked to introduce the CloudMatrix 384 system. A spokesperson for Huawei did not respond to questions. Huawei has become widely regarded as China's most promising domestic supplier of chips essential for AI development, even though the company faces U.S. export restrictions. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang told Bloomberg in May that Huawei had been "moving quite fast" and named the CloudMatrix as an example. The CloudMatrix 384 incorporates 384 of Huawei's latest 910C chips and outperforms Nvidia's GB200 NVL72 on some metrics, which uses 72 B200 chips, according to SemiAnalysis. The performance stems from Huawei's system design capabilities, which compensate for weaker individual chip performance through the use of more chips and system-level innovations, SemiAnalysis said. Huawei says the system uses "supernode" architecture that allows the chips to interconnect at super-high speeds and in June, Huawei Cloud CEO Zhang Pingan said the CloudMatrix 384 system was operational on Huawei's cloud platform.


Mint
17 hours ago
- Mint
US and China to talk tariffs. Hopes are rising that truce lasts.
The hope, and the expectation, is that when U.S. officials meet their Chinese counterparts in Stockholm to talk economics and trade next week, they will build on a recent lessening of tensions as the U.S. tries to set up a fall meeting between the countries' leaders and lay the groundwork for another loosely defined trade pact. While the Trump administration has the hardest of hard-liners who want to decouple from China, as well as those who want to cut big deals, some of the hawks now look to be on the run, says Kurt Campbell, formerly the top Asia advisor in the Biden administration and co-founder of the strategic advisory firm The Asia Group. The more commercially oriented faction now hold more sway, he says, although it is impossible to tell how the balance of power will develop. Campbell expects moves from Commerce and Defense Departments that could run counter to the more commercially-oriented efforts, adding to the fragility of the relationship.. A second positive indication is that the administration is looking for President Donald Trump to visit with Xi in China, possibly alongside U.S. corporate chiefs, in a trip akin to those in the 1990s, Campbell says. That was a time when globalization was in vogue and the relationship on a better footing. The recent truce between the two countries has calmed investors, allowing the S&P 500 to reach record highs, even as many Chinese imports still face levies of 55%—including 20% related to fentanyl flows imposed early in the administration. Another 34% in tariffs loom if an Aug. 12 deadline to reach a deal isn't extended. Analysts expect the two countries to not revisit the level of escalation seen in April, when China retaliated against Trump's far-reaching tariffs. The tit-for-tat spiraled into three-digit tariff rates that stifled trade and cut U.S. industrial companies off from critical rare-earth minerals such as those used to make magnets. After two meetings, officials were able to walk back the tensions. China agreed to allow export licenses that would give U.S. companies access to the magnets they need. The U.S. eased restrictions to allow Nvidia, for example, to sell its H20 AI chips to China. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who will take part in the Stockholm talks, said on Fox Business this week that the two sides would discuss extending the Aug. 12 tariff deadline, as well as China's purchases of sanctioned oil from Russia and Iran. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said this week that discussions would include export controls, which have become a focal point for tensions. The web of controls the U.S. has put into place to limit China's access to advanced technology, starting with the first Trump term and tightened during the Biden administration, has been a sore point for Beijing. 'They tell us every time that this is what they want—and they are getting traction," says Mary Lovely, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. 'China flexed its muscle [with its own export controls on magnets]. It has other cards to pull." It's possible Beijing may not have to in the near term. In recent weeks, U.S. officials have taken a softer tone. Bessent this week described the relationship as reaching a 'very constructive" level and Lutnick spoke talking about kicking off a bigger trade discussion. 'The odds of a trade deal with China — while still low — appear to be rising," says Andy Rothman, head of the China-focused research firm Sinology, noting Trump's consistently positive comments about Xi and his relationship with the Chinese leader. He formerly served as a U.S. diplomat in Asia. Rothman sees little incentive for Xi to sign any trade pact where China is stuck with levies higher than others, considering Japan just signed a deal for 15% tariffs. 'If Trump wants a 25% or higher tariff on Chinese goods, Xi can't stop him, but would decline to sign a deal," Rothman says. Trump though may have something else on offer—retreating from other export controls if it gets to a 'big, beautiful trade deal," says Rothman, arguing that the president views export controls as form of negotiating leverage, rather than as a critical tool to protect national security. Indeed, in the first term, Trump canceled sanctions that had been imposed by his Commerce Department on the Chinese telecom ZTE, noting at the time that the company bought many of the parts it uses from U.S. companies. The takeaway at this point is that the administration could eventually emerge with a deal similar to the one it struck with Beijing in the first term. For now, most analysts are looking for the two sides to kick the can down the road, keep tariffs from going higher—and possibly lower the 20% fentanyl-oriented tariffs Trump imposed early in this term. One possible way the tariffs could be reduced emerged in the latest U.S.-Japan trade pact, in which Tokyo agreed to invest $550 billion in the U.S. Many trade watchers are focusing on Trump's suggestion Friday that countries may be able to 'buy down" their tariff rate with commitments to invest in the U.S. or buy U.S. goods. While there are questions about the nature of Japan's investment and purchase commitments, analysts say Trump would likely welcome Chinese offers to buy U.S. goods—whether that is Boeing planes, liquefied natural gas, soybeans, or pork. One caveat is that Beijing didn't make good on similar purchase agreements during Trump's first term.