Fires, tariffs and high interest rates: L.A. housing construction plunged at start of year
Developers pulled permits for 1,325 new homes in the city of L.A. during the first three months of 2025, down nearly 57% from the same period a year earlier.
In a report released Tuesday, research firm Hilgard Analytics blamed the sharp decline on a variety of factors that have made it more difficult for developers to turn a profit, including high interest rates, tariffs and economic uncertainty, as well as city transfer tax Measure ULA.
Hilgard principal Joshua Baum said the January wildfires likely also played a role by causing widespread business disruptions.
Declines in the first quarter were reported in most areas of the city but the steepest drop offs were in council districts that cover the west and northeast portions of the San Fernando Valley, as well as South Los Angeles.
Though the fire impact could be temporary, housing construction had been falling before January, with city wide permits down 23% in 2024 from 2023, according to Hilgard which analyzes data from the Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety that includes permits for new single family and multifamily buildings, but not ADUs.
A sustained pull back in housing development could have big implications for a city in the throes of an affordability and budgetary crisis.
In general, economists say building more homes reduces upward pressure on home prices and rents, and new development also tends to boost tax revenue.
On Monday, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass announced plans to eliminate more than 2,700 city positions to help close a nearly $1-billion budget hole.
"If we aren't building now, from a long run perspective, that says higher prices and higher rents at some point in time in the future," said Christopher Thornberg, founding partner of consultancy Beacon Economics.
A decline in development isn't unique to the city.
Housing developers have been starting fewer projects nationwide, as they deal with high interest rates and the more recent phenomenon of tariffs.
Some developers say Measure ULA, a new Los Angeles city tax on large property sales, has made the environment worse in L.A. — compared to the rest of the county and nation — and caused even more projects to be killed.
Hilgard Analytics did not examine housing construction outside the city of L.A. in its report.
However, a recent analysis from researchers at UCLA and the Rand Corp. estimated housing construction is likely falling more in the city than elsewhere in L.A. county, citing a steeper reduction in the sales of properties where developers tend to build multifamily housing.
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
5 days ago
- Los Angeles Times
Our town's Rite Aid went away and we're a little poorer for it
It's where you'd go to grab a last-minute birthday card. Or buy your tweezers, vitamins or a cheap and tasty ice cream cone. When your kid had a school project, you could count on finding a poster board and coloring pens. Now our local Rite Aid in South Pasadena, like many across California, is gone. And most people in our town say they're a little sad about it. It's not the death of just one store, but another marker on what seems like the slow, inexorable demise of retail. The local mall remains open but stands in an eerie quiet, even on weekends. The only department store nearby seems to have less on its shelves every month. None of us want to live in an Amazon-only world. But it feels like we're headed in that direction. Do we really have to order our razor blades from one of those bro-ish mail-order 'shaving clubs?' In the spirit of keeping neighborhood-friendly commerce alive, Essential California is asking for your nominations: What's the beloved local shop or store your town can't live without? It could be a chain store, but more likely its locally owned and unique. What makes it so special? Email EssentialCalifornia@ and we may write about your favorites. Meanwhile, what's happening to Rite Aid? The company once operated 5,000 stores nationally, before paring back to about 2,100 in 2023, the same year it declared bankruptcy. The firm cited a crushing debt load and high rents for underperforming stores. Rite Aid announced another round of store closures that same year, shuttering 31 locations in California. In Los Angeles County, stores in Glassell Park, Mar Vista, Alhambra, Burbank, and Long Beach's Bixby Knolls shut down. Orange County lost half a dozen stores — including ones in Costa Mesa, Dana Point, Santa Ana and Yorba Linda. Over the last year, it was hard to miss the signs that the South Pasadena store was on its way out. The most basic items went out of stock. Shelves slowly emptied. On the last day of July a text to loyal patrons made it final: 'Rite Aid at 914 Fair Oaks Ave. has closed.' The boxy brick building, sunk below street level, was hardly an architectural gem. A couple of people focused on its sad final months and said 'good riddance.' But dozens of others answered my social media query to talk about what they'd miss about the store, which now stands empty. The ice cream — which dated to Rite Aid's predecessor, Thrifty — got heaps of love. People lived for the Black Cherry, or Coconut Pineapple or Chocolate Malted Krunch. They liked the low prices, with one local recalling a time when a cone went for just 25 cents. Angie Walker took her kids for flu vaccines, knowing she could soften the blow with an ice cream cone 'immediately afterwards.' Fans particularly liked the short guy who always hustled to the counter, working as if scooping that next cone really meant something. 'I will mostly miss the awesome ice cream clerk,' said Kari Afschar. 'He was there for as long as I can remember.' Many people recalled that the pharmacists would actually pick up the phone and answer questions, unlike other chains that shunted you into voicemail-hell. They talked about how many employees remembered your name and your needs. Becky Rios called one pharmacist 'an absolute gem.' In a pinch for one last stocking-stuffer for my wife one Christmas a few years ago, I rushed out and found a pair of plush winter gloves. They were fuzzy and purple. Alison wondered where I found such a treasure. 'At the House of Incredibly Nice Gloves,' I said. I later conceded they'd come from Rite Aid, and she still loved them. It may have been just a chain store. But it was our chain store. Today's great photo is from Times contributor Catherine Dzilenski, who captured a local band, Left on Cypress, performing at Glendora Continental. The Basque-owned restaurant is one of the last of its kind left in California, but its 45-year history may be coming to an end soon. Jim Rainey, staff reporterDiamy Wang, homepage internIzzy Nunes, audience internKevinisha Walker, multiplatform editorAndrew Campa, Sunday writerKarim Doumar, head of newsletters How can we make this newsletter more useful? Send comments to essentialcalifornia@ Check our top stories, topics and the latest articles on
New York Post
05-08-2025
- New York Post
California, here we come: A new Post is racing to the rescue
Great news for the left coast: California. As the Golden State's decline accelerates, the New York Post Media Group is launching The California Post to expose the causes of the rot. Based in Los Angeles, our new edition will contain daily content in print and online, offering the same intrepid, level-headed, reader-focused journalism that's made the New York Post so indispensable. Advertisement It'll report on news, entertainment, politics, culture, sports and business from a California perspective — and call out the lunatic policies dragging the state down, sending businesses and residents fleeing. For the first time ever, California is shrinking compared to the nation overall: from 12.1% of the US population in 2010 to just 11.9% a decade later, costing it a seat in Congress — and it's looking at losing up to five more seats after the 2030 Census. Since just 2020, more than 500 companies ditched the state or shrank operations while expanding elsewhere, per the Center for Jobs & the Economy. Advertisement Why? Life in California has worsened, thanks mostly to unchecked lefty pols. Taxes are off the charts (the top income-tax rate, 13.3%, is the nation's highest), yet poverty is everywhere. Regulatory rules and litigation block development, leading to sky-high housing costs. Last year, the California Policy Center found the state had America's highest unemployment, lowest income growth and highest poverty rate. Advertisement It highlighted Cali's ranking by Chief Executive magazine as the worst state in America to do business — for the 10th year in a row. Notable, too, are the huge costs of the left's green agenda. Meanwhile, armies of the homeless rule the streets; crime runs rampant. Lefty pols like LA Mayor Karen Bass and Gov. Gavin Newsom actually defend criminal illegal migrants. Advertisement The recent LA riots, and the fires months before, highlight the duo's feckless incompetence. But media there just can't (or won't) manage to call out the pols responsible. Count on The California Post to fill that role. 'Los Angeles and California surely need a daily dose of The Post as an antidote to the jaundiced, jaded journalism that has sadly proliferated,' quips Chief Executive Robert Thomson of News Corp, parent of the New York Post Media Group. Relax. The new paper will still be fun, and appreciative of the state's many allures: its stunning natural beauty, idyllic weather, diverse demographics — as well as the unique spirit that drove California's growth for so long, and still makes it almost a country in its own right. The new Post will honor the state's proud history — as the world capital of film and music and a leader in technology, military production, agriculture and tourism. And, of course, sports. The paper's set to debut in early 2026. Keep an eye out: There's hope for California yet.
Los Angeles Times
04-08-2025
- Los Angeles Times
Proposed ballot measure could force a citywide vote on L.A. 2028 Olympic venues
L.A.'s plan to host the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games was already facing a thorny set of challenges, including the scramble to secure lucrative sponsorships and the search for buses to shuttle athletes and spectators across the region. Now, organizers could soon be faced with yet another threat: a proposed ballot measure that, according to city officials, could force at least five Olympic venues to go before voters for approval. Unite Here Local 11, which represents hotel and restaurant workers, filed paperwork in June for a ballot measure requiring L.A. voters to sign off on the development or expansion of major 'event centers' such as sports arenas, concert halls, hotels and convention facilities. The measure takes aim not just at permanent projects but also temporary structures, including those that add more than 50,000 square feet of space or 1,000 seats. Former City Councilmember Paul Krekorian, who heads Mayor Karen Bass' Office of Special Events, identified five Olympic venues that could be subjected to a citywide election, including the Los Angeles Convention Center, the John C. Argue Swim Stadium in Exposition Park and the Sepulveda Basin Recreation Area in the San Fernando Valley, which is set to host skateboarding, 3-on-3 basketball and other competitions. 'The proposed measure would make vital projects essential for our city and these Games potentially impossible to complete,' Krekorian said in a statement to The Times. 'It would also require costly special elections before even relatively small projects could begin.' A representative for LA28, the nonprofit organizing the Games, declined to confirm whether any Olympic venues would be affected by the proposal, saying only that it is monitoring the situation. Unite Here has billed the proposal as one of its responses to a business group that is seeking to overturn the so-called Olympic Wage passed by the City Council in May, which hikes the minimum wage for hotel and airport workers to $30 per hour in 2028. The union has not begun gathering signatures for the proposal, which is under review by the City Clerk's office. If it qualifies, it likely wouldn't appear on a ballot until June 2026. Nevertheless, it has already raised alarms at City Hall, where some elected officials have portrayed it as irresponsible. Councilmember Traci Park, who represents coastal neighborhoods, said she fears the measure will force a citywide vote on an Olympic venue planned at Venice Beach, which is set to host road cycling, the marathon and the triathlon. She said it would also be more difficult for the city to attract new hotels and possibly expand its Convention Center. 'This is an absolute assault on our local economy. It's spiteful and politically motivated,' she said. Park, who voted against the $30 tourism minimum wage, has been at odds with Unite Here for more than a year. Councilmember Tim McOsker, whose 2022 election was backed by Unite Here and who supported the minimum wage hike, also voiced concerns, calling the proposed ballot measure 'an attack on workers.' McOsker, whose district includes the Port of Los Angeles, said he believes the proposal would force a vote on a plan to create a temporary viewing area for Olympic sailing at Berth 46 in San Pedro. He also fears it would trigger a citywide election for a 6,200-seat amphitheater planned in San Pedro's West Harbor, a project that is not connected to the Games. 'This is bad for people who build things, bad for people who operate things, bad for people who work in buildings like these,' he said. '[The proposal] harms real people and it harms the economy.' Ada Briceño, co-president of Unite Here Local 11 and also a candidate for state Assembly, declined to answer questions about the criticism of the proposal. Two other Unite Here representatives did not respond to The Times' inquiries. The union's proposal, titled 'Ordinance to Require Voter Approval of Major Development Projects,' argues that sports arenas and other major event venues 'do not always justify their cost.' Unite Here spokesperson Maria Hernandez told The Times earlier this year that the proposal would apply to Olympic venues that reach a certain size, but declined to give specifics. She said it was not clear whether the ballot proposal would impede efforts to expand the Convention Center, saying in an email that 'it depends on the timing.' The ballot proposal would not apply to athletic venues planned by LA28 in other nearby cities, such as Long Beach, Carson, Inglewood, Anaheim and El Monte. As a result, L.A. could face the potentially humiliating prospect of hosting a Games where only a handful of venues are within city limits. 'If it makes it on the ballot, there are projects and events that will be moved out of the city of Los Angeles rather than trying to win at the ballot box,' said Stuart Waldman, president of the Valley Industry and Commerce Assn., a business group. The city's future economic health could depend on the success or failure of LA28. Under its host agreement, the city would be on the hook for the first $270 million in losses if the Olympics end up in the red. Critics have also voiced concern that the quadrennial athletic event could displace low-income tenants, particularly those who live near Olympic venues. Voters should have been given the opportunity to decide whether L.A. should host the Olympics from the very beginning, said Eric Sheehan, spokesperson for NOlympics, which opposes the 2028 Games. Nevertheless, Sheehan voiced little enthusiasm for the union proposal, saying it doesn't go far enough. 'What would be stronger would be the chance for Angelenos to vote on whether or not we want the Olympics at all,' he said. The proposed ballot measure from Unite Here states that hotels can have harmful effects on a city, impeding the construction of new housing and creating a burden on social services. It goes on to offer similar warnings about large-scale development projects, saying they 'often involve significant expenditures of taxpayer money' — an argument disputed by some city officials. Those projects 'may take the place of other projects that otherwise could have more directly benefited city residents,' the measure states. Times staff writer Thuc Nhi Nguyen contributed to this report.
