
Kargil Democratic Alliance announces 3-day protest from Aug 9 to press for demands
The strike will begin coming Saturday in Kargil town and the leaders of Leh Apex Body (LAB) have also been requested to join the protest and send a message to the central government that the people of Ladakh will not stay silent on their 'genuine' demands, KDA co-chairman Asgar Ali Karbalai told reporters here.
Kargil, Aug 6 (PTI) The Kargil Democratic Alliance (KDA) on Wednesday announced a three-day hunger strike here from August 9 alleging delay by the Centre in holding the next round of talks concerning the demand for statehood and Sixth Schedule for the Union Territory (UT) of Ladakh.
'The last meeting of KDA and APEX with the Ministry of Home Affairs took place almost two months ago. And in that last meeting, the issues of domicile, reservations and recruitment were sorted out and we were told that the next meeting will be held within a month to discuss our main agenda (statehood and Sixth Schedule) but they (Centre) are using delaying tactics by not holding the meeting,' Karbalai, flanked by other members of the KDA, said.
He said the KDA and the LAB have decided to launch an agitation from Kargil to convey a clear message to the country, especially Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah that the people of Ladakh will not stay silent.
'The KDA core group, in consultation with LAB, has decided to go for a three-day hunger strike from August 9 at 10 am and will culminate on August 11 at 4 pm with a massive public rally,' Karbalai said, inviting people across Ladakh to join the hunger strike.
He said the leadership of LAB were also requested to join the hunger strike so that the next course of action would be chalked out jointly and made public at the rally.
'We believe in peaceful agitation to raise our genuine, justified and constitutionally right demands. We have put forth the four-point agenda and the government addressed the issue of reservation, domicile and recruitment issues.
'With regard to two parliamentary seats, we were told that it cannot be done due to a freeze on the delimitation process till 2026, leaving only two main demands of statehood and the Sixth Schedule,' he said.
He said the people of Ladakh will resist any attempt to put the main demands in the cold storage. PTI TAS TAS KSS KSS
This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Farmers rally in protest of land pooling policy in Ludhiana
Ludhiana: In a strong show of dissent against the Punjab government's land pooling policy, a large number of farmers gathered at Jodhan village near Ludhiana on Wednesday for a massive "Zameen Bachao" (save land) rally. The rally was organised under the leadership of Sanyukt Kisan Morcha (Non-Political), with a united call to protect the state's fertile agricultural land from being handed over to corporate interests. The rally was held at the grain market in Jodhan, drawing large crowds of farmers who arrived in tractors, buses, cars, and motorcycles. The gathering disrupted traffic on roads leading from Raikot to Ludhiana and Mandi Ahmedgarh to Jodhan, forcing commuters to seek alternate routes. Authorities tightened security arrangements in and around the venue. Prominent farmer leader Jagjit Singh Dallewal, who addressed the rally, accused the Punjab government of siding with corporate houses. He described the proposed land pooling policy as a "black law" aimed at transferring over 65,000 acres of fertile agricultural land—used for growing wheat, paddy, and vegetables—to private corporations. Dallewal warned that the policy could precipitate a severe food crisis. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Rude Neighbor Freezes When He Discovers What's Inside A Tree He Was Asked Not To Cut Down Undo "This is not just about land—this is about our survival, our future generations, and food security. The government is bypassing the Land Acquisition Act and bringing in land pooling to benefit big businesses," said Dallewal. Farmer leaders argued that this policy was part of a broader strategy by both state and central governments to weaken the farming community. Drawing parallels with the now-repealed farm laws, they said this was another indirect attempt to take control of farmers' livelihoods and resources. They also criticised the track record of land pooling policies implemented in the past. According to the speakers, numerous plots acquired by the Punjab government decades ago remain undeveloped, and original landowners have not yet received compensation or the promised residential plots. Many of these farmers, they claimed, have been pushed to the brink of poverty—some even forced to take up jobs like hawking or working as security guards to survive. The rally served as a launchpad for a series of upcoming protests. Leaders announced that on August 16, a larger gathering would be held at Baba Bakala in Amritsar to intensify the movement. On August 25, farmer unions from across India will converge in Delhi for a one-day peaceful protest, demanding that the Centre respect their rights and fulfill promises made during earlier agitations. Farm leaders thanked local residents for organising langar (community meals) during the rally. Speakers at the event came from various states, representing different farmer organisations, including Bharatiya Kisan Union (BKU) factions from Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, and Telangana. Those who addressed the rally included Jagjit Singh Dallewal, Baldev Singh Sirsa, Satnam Singh Behru, and representatives of unions like BKU Ekta Sidhupur, BKU Mahatma Tikait, and the Doaba Farmers Welfare Committee. The demands raised at the rally included: Legal guarantee for Minimum Support Price (MSP) Implementation of the Swaminathan Commission report Complete farm debt waiver Restoration of the Land Acquisition Act of 2013 Withdrawal of police cases filed during the previous farmers' movement Rollback of Free Trade Agreements harmful to farmers Justice for victims of the Lakhimpur Kheri violence in Uttar Pradesh MSID:: 123166046 413 | Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and s ilver prices in your area.


NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
'Shields minors': Centre Defends Statutory Age Of 18 Years For Consent In Top Court
New Delhi: The Centre has defended in the Supreme Court the statutory age of consent of 18 years, saying the decision was a "deliberate, well-considered, and coherent" policy choice aimed at shielding minors from sexual exploitation. The Centre, in its written submissions through Additional Solicitor General Aishwaraya Bhati, argued diluting the age of consent or introducing exceptions under the guise of adolescent romance would be not only legally unsound but also dangerous. The government said it would provide a defence mechanism even to those abusers who exploit a child's emotional dependence or silence. The Centre further said the existing statutory age of consent must be strictly and uniformly enforced. "Any departure from this standard, even in the name of reform or adolescent autonomy, would amount to rolling back decades of progress in child protection law, and undermine the deterrent character of statutes like the POCSO (the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences) Act, 2012 and the BNS (Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita).' Moreover, the Centre argued that the discretion on case-to-case basis must remain judicial and must not be read into the statute as a general exception or a diluted standard. 'Introducing a legislative close-in-age exception or reducing the age of consent would irrevocably dilute the statutory presumption of vulnerability that lies at the heart of child protection law. A diluted law risks opening the floodgates to trafficking and other forms of child abuse under the garb of consent,' it said. Lowering the age of consent, the Centre said, would open the "floodgates" to trafficking and other forms of child abuse under the garb of assent. The case before the top court raises the point of age in adolescent relationships. 'The legislative determination to fix the age of consent at eighteen (18) years, and to treat all sexual activities with a person below that age as an offence irrespective of purported consent, is a product of a deliberate, well-considered, and coherent statutory policy,' the Centre said. The law does not treat the age limit as arbitrary and rather, it reflects a constitutional and legislative recognition of a minor's vulnerability, especially in a socio-economic context marked by deep inequalities and power imbalances, it added. A child's inability to report or resist is exacerbated when the perpetrator is a parent or close family member, it said, adding in such cases, presenting 'consent' as a defence only victimises the child, shifts the blame onto them, and undermines the very object of POCSO to protect children from exploitation regardless of whether they were 'willing'. The existing age of consent ought to be retained in order to give full effect to the legislative intent, protect the bodily integrity of children, and uphold the constitutional and statutory safeguards accorded to them, it said. 'The Supreme Court along with high courts across the country have always maintained the sanctity of legal age of consent as 18 years of age. This statutory yardstick has been upheld on numerous occasions, keeping in view the legislative intent and the pre-eminent constitutional mandate of protecting young children,' it said. Earlier, amicus curiae and senior advocate Indira Jaising had urged the bench to read down the statutory age of consent from 18 to 16 years. Jaising, who is assisting the top court in the case, then said the current law criminalises consensual romantic relationships among adolescents and violates their constitutional rights.


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Indian economy not dead but in ICU, says Abhishek
Kolkata: Wading into the "dead economy" debate, Trinamool Congress general secretary Abhishek Banerjee on Thursday said that the country's "economy wasn't dead but in the ICU" due to flawed policies in the last decade. Banerjee launched a scathing attack on Prime Minister Narendra Modi, saying the US imposition of a 50% tariff on Indian goods reflected the Centre's failed foreign policy. Banerjee, while leaving for Delhi, told reporters, "Whose failure is this? Who brought (US President) Donald Trump here and campaigned for him in Gujarat just a month before Covid hit? Who went to Texas to campaign for him? BJP politicians held prayers for Donald Trump and his long life. The Prime Minister also campaigned for Trump in 2019 in Texas." "The govt that used to boast about its '56-inch chest' has been snubbed by China, the US, and many other countries. Let alone putting pressure on Pakistan, they did not even issue a statement condemning Pakistan's actions," said Banerjee, who is also a member of the parliamentary external affairs committee. You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata "I also strongly condemn what Trump said about India. He said that India's economy is dead. I disagree. No one has the power to kill the Indian economy . by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Family Adopted A New 'Dog', But When The Vet Sees It He Calls The Police Undo It is surviving on the love and affection of 140 crore Indians. I can say that the Indian economy is in the ICU. From bad, it has become worse in the last 10 years. Due to the 50% tariff, there will be substantial job losses. Exports will come down. This is all because of the Centre's poor foreign policy," he added. The Trinamool MP claimed that the Election Commission was acting "beyond its jurisdiction". "The EC's responsibility begins only when the Model Code of Conduct is in place. After that, it can take over the state's civil and criminal/police administrative machinery. But for the past 3-4 months, they have not allowed an elected govt to function. It has been done to give favours and advantages to BJP," he said. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and s ilver prices in your area.