
What's it like to deal with brutal US tariffs? Ask Malaysia
China
, coveting the American market but blocked by tariffs, do an end run. They pour into a country, opening factories and filling supply chains. They invest billions of dollars and create jobs and business opportunities. The local economy prospers.
President Donald Trump wants to stop that trade. On Friday he unveiled a new layer of tariffs -- set at a global rate of 40% -- on all goods that move through a third country before they get to the United States. The tariffs are aimed at stopping transshipment, a practice the administration says has allowed Chinese-made goods to skirt punitive tariffs.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Please select course:
Select a Course Category
Design Thinking
Public Policy
Others
Project Management
Data Science
MCA
Cybersecurity
Finance
Leadership
Technology
Healthcare
CXO
Data Analytics
Degree
Management
Artificial Intelligence
Data Science
PGDM
Product Management
Digital Marketing
MBA
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
25 Weeks
IIM Kozhikode
CERT-IIMK PCP DTIM Async India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
22 Weeks
IIM Indore
CERT-IIMI DTAI Async India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
22 Weeks
IIM Indore
CERT-IIMI DTAI Async India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
22 Weeks
IIM Indore
CERT-IIMI DTAI Async India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
The policy landed with a thunderbolt in Southeast Asia, where Chinese investment has helped the economies of poorer neighbors grow more quickly. A crackdown on transshipment will be an economic blow. It also complicates the supply chain in Southeast Asia, which depends heavily on Chinese raw materials and components. From Vietnam to Cambodia to Indonesia, officials and executives are rushing to assess the consequences.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Meet The Lover Of Cliff Richard - Try Not To Gag
Outlier Model
Undo
The new tariffs raise hard questions for countries that have long used Chinese components to make the final products they ship to the United States. Does the Trump administration, which has yet to detail how it would enforce the new transshipment tariffs, want to tax it all?
One country offers a case study others could follow for what to do next:
Malaysia
.
Live Events
Over the past decade, Malaysia rose to become one of the world's biggest makers of solar panels. Ten companies, most of them Chinese, shoveled $15 billion into factories around the country, creating tens of thousands of jobs. Then, under President Joe Biden, the United States put tariffs on solar equipment coming from Malaysia of as much as 250%. Today, just two solar panel makers remain and one of them has ceased much of its production.
The upheaval has been a wake-up call for Malaysia, a nation of more than 35 million people that is rethinking how to power its future economic growth.
"We're trying to think about ourselves not just as recipients of investment, but actually creators of technology," said Liew Chin Tong, the deputy minister of investment, trade and industry. "We want to think of ourselves not as a production site, but also as a consumer site with a sizable middle class."
Officials in Malaysia, who had been trying to work out a trade deal, had said they were ready to work with the Trump administration to stop companies from passing off Chinese-made goods as their own. But they learned Friday they would be hit with a base tariff of 19%. An additional 40% would be added for any goods deemed to have originated in China. Those are set to take effect this week.
The country finds itself caught squarely between the United States and China.
Malaysia believes that Chinese solar companies can play an important role in its attempts to increase renewable power sources. Its goal over the next five years is for half the country's energy consumption to use clean sources like solar power. Warehouses are stuffed with solar equipment that can no longer be exported to the United States, and the government wants companies to sell it to local solar farms.
One challenge for Malaysia is that it still needs China's solar industry on its side. More than 75% of the solar panels that Malaysia uses locally are imported from China, where prices are much cheaper because of Beijing's industrial policies that encourage exports.
Longer term, Malaysia wants the Chinese companies to restart their mothballed factories to make solar panels for the domestic market.
More than any other region, Southeast Asia has felt the brunt of the trade war between the United States and China that began in earnest during Trump's first presidency.
Southeast Asian countries profited as Chinese and global multinationals relocated their factories out of China to avoid Trump's first-term tariffs.
For Malaysia, the aim now is to blunt the collateral damage from the battle between the world's two largest economies.
"I don't like to see us just having to choose between U.S. and China," said Liew, adding "I want to see us strengthening ourselves."
Both superpowers have loomed large in Malaysia. American tech companies Nvidia, Intel and
Texas Instruments
built huge facilities to make semiconductors, seeing the country as a good location to hedge against the risks of doing business in China. More than 600 American companies invested in Malaysia last year, said Siobhan Das, CEO of the American Malaysian Chamber of Commerce.
Chinese investment, meanwhile, has shaped Malaysia's manufacturing sector, and China has ranked as a top investor in the country for the past decade. Malaysia's imports from China have nearly doubled over the past decade, according to Lee Heng Guie, executive director of the Socio-Economic Research Center, a Malaysian think tank.
It was also about a decade ago when Chinese solar companies began to invest in factories in Malaysia. The factories made everything for export to the United States and other major markets like Europe.
"We knew we could not compete with the Chinese companies in the long run," said Lisa Ong, CEO at Malaysian
Solar Resources
, a solar company that shut its panel production facilities in 2013. After seven years, the company found it was being outperformed on price and production capacity. Today it has switched its focus to building solar farms and importing panels from China.
After the Biden administration initiated an investigation into unfair practices by Chinese solar companies in Malaysia, Cambodia, Vietnam and Thailand, Chinese companies began to slow some of their operations. The investigation led to steep tariffs on a handful of Chinese solar companies operating in these countries, and prompted most of them to abandon their factories in Malaysia.
The only Chinese company still making some solar panels in Malaysia is Longi, an industry giant. When it opened its third Malaysian factory on the outskirts of Kuala Lumpur in 2023, it heralded the opening as a "pivotal moment in Longi's global endeavors." Its executives boasted of creating 900 jobs and promised to increase the openings to 2,000.
Instead of expanding, Longi has shut down several production lines at the facility. Today, much of the space at Longi's plant is unused. On one weekday last month, the parking lot was less than half full. Longi declined to comment for this article.
Longi has met with Malaysian officials to discuss how to support more of the local supply chain, according to Justin Sim, the president of the Malaysian Photovoltaic and Sustainable Energy Industry Association. He is pressing the government to rebuild a domestic solar panel industry by harnessing the knowledge of Chinese companies like Longi.
"All the Chinese companies came here when there was not really any capacity or interest in building the local market," Sim said. "And then they all went bust or left because they were hit with tariffs from the U.S. and Europe."
Ong of Malaysian Solar Resources said she would not rule out her company going back to solar panel manufacturing, especially after the Chinese government announced plans to scale back subsidies to companies. Still, she is hesitant, citing the intense competitiveness of Chinese firms.
"I'm worried and a bit concerned about our future," she said. "Many Chinese nationals are migrating to Malaysia and they are a lot more industrious than many of us."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
13 minutes ago
- Hans India
Trump Signals Upcoming Tariffs on Pharmaceuticals and Semiconductors Within Days
Trump President Donald Trump said that US Pharma tariffs and semiconductor imports will to be revealed "within the next week or so," as the administration is preparing to target the most important industries in its efforts to restructure the world trade policy. "We'll be putting a initially small tariff on pharmaceuticals, but in one year -- one and a half years, maximum -- it's going to go to 150% and then it's going to go to 250% because we want pharmaceuticals made in our country," Trump stated Tuesday in an interview with CNBC. He didn't specify the tariff rate that would be in place for pharmaceuticals. Trump stated earlier this month that the phased tariff escalation to 250% Trump has also announced that he will to declare semiconductor tariffs and chips within the "next week or so," but he did not provide additional details. The United States has been conducting an assessment of national security concerns in the pharmaceutical industry and the industry is preparing for potential specific tariffs for the sector. The administration has not yet announced when the findings of that review will be released. A framework agreement between United States and the EU stipulates that the tariffs on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals are currently at zero. However, in the event that they are raised by the United States raises tariffs following a Section 232 investigation into its imports the tariffs will be capped at 15 percent. Trump disclosed the timeline of tariffs just days after signing an executive order that imposed the new U.S. duties on a variety of imports from countries as well as some trading partners facing significant hikes. Taiwanese items are scheduled to see an update on tariffs of 20% beginning this week. However, this is lower than the 32% rate Trump was previously threatening in his 2 April "liberation day" levies. Trump's comments during a discussion on CNBC early Tuesday highlighted the fact that his tariff plan is not yet complete. In the same interview that the tariffs on domestic manufacturing boost could eventually rise to 250 percent. He previously stated that the tariffs could reach 200%..


Hindustan Times
13 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
India's economic resilience guards against tariff threats
The impact of the US's 25% tariff on imports from India appears to be far less catastrophic than what some had predicted. Meanwhile, the trade deal with the US remains in negotiation, and there is every reason to expect that once talks advance, the tariff rate could be scaled down. Estimates suggest that the 25% tariff might translate into an annual impact of just $10-11 billion — a relatively modest impact. While the India-UK FTA negotiations were multifaceted, the agreement was not solely about lowering tariffs or increasing trade volumes; it was also about redefining economic diplomacy in a multipolar world. (Bloomberg) With the American delegation scheduled to visit New Delhi later in August, both sides have ample opportunity to recalibrate their positions. Trade deals are shaped not by threats but by diligent negotiations between officials representing institutional interests of their respective countries. In that light, US President Donald Trump's statements seem part of a broader tactic aimed at bolstering America's bargaining position rather than signalling an irreversible shift in economic policy. Therefore, there is no need to panic. India's growth story is one of rising momentum, driven by deep structural shifts and smart strategic positioning. Over the past year, India has defied global headwinds that have hindered many advanced economies. While high inflation, tightening monetary policies and geopolitical uncertainty have strained markets elsewhere, India has maintained an impressive growth trajectory. India's ability to sustain high growth is anchored in robust domestic demand, strong public capital expenditure, and the sustained expansion of its booming services sector. At the same time, there has been a deliberate policy recalibration toward achieving self-reliance, integrating global supply chains and boosting manufacturing competitiveness. Initiatives like the Production Linked Incentive (PLI) schemes across sectors such as electronics, semiconductors and renewable energy have attracted substantial foreign direct investment. Moreover, the nation's digital revolution has firmly established India as a leader in the digital economy across the Global South. In this context, the recently-signed India-UK free trade agreement (FTA) takes on added significance. While the FTA negotiations were multifaceted, the agreement was not solely about lowering tariffs or increasing trade volumes; it was also about redefining economic diplomacy in a multipolar world. For India, an ambitious FTA with the UK offers several strategic advantages. One, it sends a positive signal to global investors, affirming that India remains open for business — both strategic and reform-minded. Two, the deal provides a pathway for India to build deeper trade links with advanced economies at a time when globalisation is evolving towards regionalisation. And three, the agreement reinforces India's effort to diversify its export markets — a crucial counterbalance to the uncertainties of US trade policy and the slowing pace of growth in some of its traditional markets. The UK is currently India's 18th largest trading partner, with bilateral trade exceeding $50 billion. The FTA will serve to lower existing tariffs, ease regulatory hurdles and promote greater mobility for Indian professionals. Even contentious issues, such as agricultural trade, though politically sensitive, appear manageable. The relatively modest scale of UK agricultural exports could provide the room needed to sidestep potential disputes, easing negotiation complexities on that front. At the same time, India's impressive economic performance is underscored by several headline-grabbing trends across its major sectors. For instance, in the realm of global supply chains, India has emerged as a formidable competitor in the smartphone market. This transformation illustrates how India is successfully capitalising on new geopolitical realities and diversifying manufacturing hubs. Additionally, macroeconomic indicators have painted an encouraging picture. With retail inflation falling to a six-year low of 2.1% in June 2025, the consumer sector has found its footing amid otherwise volatile global conditions. Employment metrics reveal a healthy labour market. Exports have seen a year-on-year boost of approximately 5.9%, while remittances have reached a record $135.5 billion. The Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) in July 2025 hit a 17-year high of 59.2, reflecting robust industrial activity and strong global demand. Public health initiatives, too, have contributed significantly to the overall picture. The Jan Aushadhi Kendras, which offer affordable medicine and have saved citizens ₹38,000 crore in health care costs over the last 11 years, exemplify how policy initiatives are directly alleviating household expenses and improving standards of living. Energy and infrastructure sectors are part of this rosy picture as well. India has crossed the 1-billion-tonne mark for coal production — a symbol of its energy self-reliance — while simultaneously ramping up renewable energy capacity. With 22 gigawatts of solar and wind capacity added in the first half of 2025, India is on track to overtake the US in clean energy installations. In the digital domain, India's transformation is truly remarkable, which reinforces India's position as a hub of technological innovation. Furthermore, the growth of Global Capability Centres (GCCs) in Tier-II and Tier-III cities — now numbering over 1,700 and generating $64.6 billion in revenue — demonstrates a broader socio-economic transformation. With these centres creating tens of thousands of jobs outside the traditional Tier-I urban hubs, India is leveraging lower costs, burgeoning talent pools, and improved infrastructure to reshape its economic geography. In essence, while President Trump's statements may have generated headlines, the underlying data tells a more encouraging story. India's broad-based growth, strong macroeconomic fundamentals, and strategic policy shifts point to an economy that is far more robust and resilient than any single trade dispute could jeopardise. Rather than succumbing to external pressure, India is actively repositioning itself as a major player on the global stage, capable of turning challenges into opportunities. Ultimately, the narrative is one of confidence, adaptability and strategic foresight. India's economic resilience serves as a compelling counterpoint to any external rhetoric. The picture, then, is not one of crisis but of calculated evolution — a testament to India's ongoing journey towards becoming a robust and dynamic engine of global growth. Syed Zafar Islam is a national spokesperson of the BJP, former Member of Parliament, and former managing director, Deutsche Bank, India. The views expressed are personal.


Hindustan Times
13 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
India-US ties in the crosswires
India's blunt response to US President Donald Trump's repeated outbursts on New Delhi's trade and defence relations with Moscow highlighted the double standards of Western powers that have criticised India for purchasing discounted Russian commodities over the past three years. Trump, who follows a completely transactional and unpredictable approach to global trade and key geo-strategic relationships, has spoken more than once in recent days about levying an unspecified penalty on India for its purchases of energy and military hardware from Russia, over and above the 25% tariff that he has already imposed on exports to the US. India-US ties have evolved from the Cold War days, to achieve a relatively balanced relationship based on mutual respect, democratic values, and strategic interests. (AP) The external affairs ministry's response to Trump's latest fusillade against India has two key takeaways: One, New Delhi reserves the right to choose its trade partners and will exercise strategic autonomy to meet its security needs; and two, the West must end its hypocrisy of offering one set of principles for the rest of the world and following another set to meet its own energy imperatives. A year ago, US officials, albeit under a different administration, had assured the Indian side that Russian crude refined in a third country, such as India, is not a 'product of Russia' from a sanctions perspective. For India, Russian energy is a necessity to ensure predictable and affordable costs for Indian consumers amid volatile market conditions. At the same time, members of the EU and the US have retained their energy and other trade ties with Russia under carve-outs from sanctions packages. The EU's latest sanctions, for example, provide exemptions for Canada, Norway, Switzerland, the UK and the US from an import ban on refined products made from Russian oil. Such double standards do not sit well with Trump's sharp remarks about India. Sure, Trump's posturing may be aimed at pressuring India to conclude a trade deal that is to the advantage of the US, but this is no way to treat an important partner. While Washington has taken the moral high ground on Ukraine (one reason Trump has cited for targeting India), it appears unconcerned about Israel's war in Gaza that has claimed more than 60,000 Palestinian lives. Washington will be mistaken to take India for granted at a time when Trump is dining with the Pakistan army chief in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack. Such moves may even push New Delhi closer to Moscow, a longstanding and reliable ally. India-US ties have evolved from the Cold War days, when New Delhi was allied to Moscow and Washington patronised Islamabad, to achieve a relatively balanced relationship based on mutual respect, democratic values, and strategic interests. Trump's short-sighted and transactional approach to diplomacy threatens to disrupt that journey.