I make a comfy $170,000 per year — but I haven't filed our family's taxes for the last 5 years. My spouse has no idea
Joy, 54, has been happily married for more than two decades. Together, she and her husband make a comfortable $170,000 a year. They don't have any debt, aside from their mortgage, and they've been consistently putting money aside for retirement.
But Joy has a secret that's eating her up inside: she hasn't filed her family's taxes for the past five years. And her husband has no idea.
Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead
I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast)
Home prices in America could fly through the roof in 2025 — here's the big reason why and how to take full advantage (with as little as $10)
Now, she's wondering if there's anything she can do to get their finances back on track or if the damage is already done.
Joy never intended to get behind with paying their taxes. She's self-employed, but a major health scare caused her to become anxious and depressed, and filing taxes simply fell off her radar.
She wouldn't be the only one to go through something like this. A survey by IPX1031 found that 31% of American taxpayers procrastinate when it comes to filing taxes. The top reasons? Because it's too complicated or stressful.
Joy might want to start by opening up to her husband about what's going on. Keeping financial secrets from a spouse, whether it's a secret savings account or secret debt, is a form of financial infidelity — and that can take a toll on your relationship.
Once they're on the same page, together they can take immediate steps to rectify the situation — especially if they owe back taxes to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). If they're eligible for a refund, typically they have three years from the due date of their return to claim it.
Joy should still file their past-due returns, even if they owe back taxes and can't afford to pay them off all at once. They can request an extension of 60 to 120 days or work out an installment plan to pay them off over time. Those who meet financial certain requirements may be eligible for an offer in compromise, which allows you to settle your tax debt for less than the full amount owed.
Joy and her husband may want to consult an accountant who has experience dealing with the IRS to help them move forward.
Read more: Jamie Dimon issues a warning about the US stock market — says prices are 'kind of inflated.' Crashproof your portfolio with these 3 rock-solid strategies
The longer they wait to deal with their unpaid taxes, the more it could cost them. Interest accrues on the tax amount owed — and the current quarterly rate is 7% (as of the first quarter of 2025).
Plus, for every month you're late to file your taxes, you'll rack up a penalty equal to 5% of your unpaid tax amount, up to a total of 25%. There's also a 0.5% monthly failure-to-pay penalty, which goes up to 25% of the amount owed.
For those who fail to file and fail to pay they will pay a combined monthly penalty of 5% (the failure-to-file penalty drops to 4.5%) for up to five months. Afterward, if the tax remains unpaid, the 0.5% failure-to-pay penalty continues to accrue until it hits 25%. The maximum total penalty for failing to file and pay is 47.5% of the tax owed.
In addition, the IRS says: 'If your return was over 60 days late, the minimum failure-to-file penalty is the smaller of $510 (for tax returns required to be filed in 2025) or 100% of the tax required to be shown on the return.'
Failure to pay back taxes could result in debt collection actions (such as wages being garnished). Intentionally committing tax evasion or fraud can result in criminal charges, which is punishable by jail time and even a huge fine. But Joy's actions are likely to be deemed an honest mistake.
Not filing could also impact your retirement, since Social Security benefits are based on the earnings you report. If you're employed, the Social Security Administration (SSA) automatically receives earnings information from form W-2. But if you're self-employed, like Joy, and you don't file your return, then you could miss out on credits toward Social Security retirement or disability benefits.
By being proactive and working with the IRS to resolve the issue, it's unlikely Joy and her husband will have to pay more than a pumped up tax bill.
Cost-of-living in America is still out of control — use these 3 'real assets' to protect your wealth today, no matter what the US Fed does or says
'I like this stuff': Self-made $500M mogul and YouTuber reveals his 'essential' US portfolio that he says Amazon 'can't hurt' — here's his secret formula and how you can copy it in 2025
These 5 money moves will boost you up America's net worth ladder in 2025 — and you can complete each step within minutes. Here's how
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
4 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
First direct flight from US to Greenland since 2008 lands on Trump's birthday
NUUK, Greenland (AP) — The first direct flight from the U.S. to Greenland by an American airline landed in the capital city of Nuuk on Saturday. The United Airlines-operated Boeing 737 Max 8 departed from Newark International Airport in New Jersey at 11:31 a.m. EDT (1531 GMT) and arrived a little over 4 hours later, at 6:39 p.m. local time (1939 GMT), according to the flight-tracking website FlightAware. A seat cost roughly $1,200. Saturday's flight marks the first direct passage between the U.S. and the Arctic Island for nearly 20 years. In 2007, Air Greenland launched a route between Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport and Kangerlussuaq Airport, some 315 kilometers (196 miles) north of Nuuk. It was scrapped the following year due to cost. The United Airlines flight took place on U.S. President Donald Trump's 79th birthday, which was being celebrated in Washington with a controversial military parade that's part of the Army's long-planned 250th anniversary celebration. Trump has repeatedly said he seeks control of Greenland, a strategic Arctic island that's a semi-autonomous territory of Denmark, and has not ruled out military force. The governments of Denmark, a NATO ally, and Greenland have said it is not for sale and condemned reports of the U.S. stepping up intelligence gathering on the mineral-rich island. United announced the flight in October, before Trump was re-elected. It was scheduled for 2025 to take advantage of the new Nuuk airport, which opened in late November and features a larger runway for bigger jets. 'United will be the only carrier to connect the U.S. directly to Nuuk — the northernmost capital in the world, providing a gateway to world-class hiking and fascinating wildlife under the summer's midnight sun,' the company said in a statement at the time. Saturday's flight kicked off the airline's twice weekly seasonal service, from June to September, between Newark and Nuuk. The plane has around 165 seats. Previously, travelers had to take a layover in Iceland or Copenhagen, Denmark, before flying to Greenland. The new flight is beneficial for the island's business and residents, according to Greenland government minister Naaja Nathanielsen. Tourists will spend money at local businesses, and Greenlanders themselves will now be able to travel to the U.S. more easily, Nathanielsen, the minister for business, mineral resources, energy, justice and gender equality, told Danish broadcaster DR. The route is also an important part of diversifying the island's economy, she said. Fishing produces about 90% of Greenland's exports. Tourism is increasingly important. More than 96,000 international passengers traveled through the country's airports in 2023, up 28% from 2015. Visit Greenland echoed Nathanielsen's comments. The government's tourism agency did not have projections on how much money the new flights would bring to the island. 'We do know that flights can bring in much more than just dollars, and we expect it to have a positive impact -- both for the society and travellers,' Tanny Por, Visit Greenland's head of international relations, told The Associated Press in an email. __
The Hill
5 hours ago
- The Hill
Creating tax reform that is both pro-work and pro-family
There is growing recognition among both Republicans and Democrats that American families deserve more support. Yet, for too many low-income Americans striving to build a better life for their families, key provisions of the federal tax code penalize hard work and marriage, creating barriers where there should be reward. The ongoing discussions about tax reform present an opportunity to introduce reforms that are both pro-work and pro-family. The Earned Income Tax Credit is one of the largest sources of support for low-income families, but it could be streamlined and paired with changes to the Child Tax Credit so that the two credits are better structured to accomplish the dual goals of rewarding work and providing income support to families with children. The Earned Income Tax Credit currently provides a maximum of $7,830 a year for qualifying families with three children. Families receive no money from the program if they have no earnings. The credit then increases at low levels of earnings to encourage work. It also increases as the number of children in the family goes from one to two to three. An unintended, undesirable feature of this design is that the 'pro-work' incentives of the Earned Income Tax Credit are stronger for families with more kids — exactly opposite to common sense ideas of family wellbeing. Families with more kids likely benefit from more parental time at home. In addition, because the earnings eligibility limits do not double for married couples, the Earned Income Tax Credit discourages marriage among working low-income parents and makes it harder for married couples to get ahead by adding a second earner. Such 'marriage penalties' are found throughout the tax code. Since the progressive U.S. tax code is applied to combined household income, couples who marry can be subject to a higher overall tax rate and potentially reduced government benefits. The Department of the Treasury estimates that in 2023, 37 percent of married couples filing jointly faced a marriage penalty. Although couples can legally file separately, they rarely do, as it also almost always leads to a higher tax burden and it precludes the claiming of many tax credits, including the Earned Income Tax Credit. According to research from the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and Boston University, over 7 percent more low-income women with children would marry by age 35 without this marriage penalty. But it doesn't have to be this way. As Congress is poised to implement major changes to the U.S. tax system, we urge lawmakers to adopt a more coherent, pro-family approach to tax policy. The current tax debate presents a golden opportunity to address and modernize some of the system's most outdated features. We propose modifications to the two main federal tax credits affecting low-income families. Specifically, we propose a unified Earned Income Tax Credit that applies to any family with children. We scale the credit size and income eligibility for married couples so that fewer families see their benefits reduced when they marry or a spouse starts to work. To ensure that low-income families with children are not left worse off under these changes, we pair these Earned Income Tax Credit reforms with an expansion of the Child Tax Credit. The enhanced Child Tax Credit would provide greater support to families raising young children and help offset the rising costs of caregiving and childrearing. To ensure even the lowest-income children have access to support, families with no earnings are eligible for half of the proposed Child Tax Credit. Our proposal increases Child Tax Credit benefits quickly as parental earnings increase, providing an incentive for parents to enter the workforce. Our proposed changes prioritize low- and middle-income American families, with 58 percent of the increases in transfer payments going to families in the bottom two-thirds of the income distribution. These changes would update the U.S. tax code to be both pro-family and pro-work, supporting working parents, reducing marriage penalties, and providing impactful support to children in low-income households. At a time when there is growing bipartisan interest in better supporting children and working parents, these changes offer a clear path forward. With modest adjustments, we can create a tax system that promotes family stability, encourages workforce participation and helps more families build secure, thriving futures. Melissa S. Kearney director of The Aspen Economic Strategy Group and Luke Pardue is policy director of The Aspen Economic Strategy Group.
Miami Herald
6 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Trump approves Nippon Steel purchase of U.S. Steel
June 14 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump issued an executive order on Friday officially giving the green light to Nippon Steel Corporation's multi-billion-dollar purchase of U.S. Steel Corporation. Trump's executive order rescinds a directive issued by former President Joe Biden that blocked the Tokyo-based steel producer's $14.9 billion purchase on national security grounds. The president had been signaling he would approve such a move, stating in May that the two steel giants would form a "planned partnership." Trump previously ordered a review of the transaction by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States. "Based on the recommendation of and my review of the materials provided by CFIUS, including re-review of the prior assessment of risk, I additionally find that the threatened impairment to the national security of the United States arising as a result of the Proposed Transaction can be adequately mitigated if the conditions set forth in section 3 of this order are met," Trump wrote in the executive order. "President Trump has approved the Companies' historic partnership that will unleash unprecedented investments in steelmaking in the United States, protecting and creating more than 100,000 jobs," Pennsylvania-based U.S. Steel said in a release jointly issued with Nippon Steel. "We thank President Trump and his Administration for their bold leadership and strong support for our historic partnership. This partnership will bring a massive investment that will support our communities and families for generations to come. We look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again." Trump's executive order requires both companies to enter into a National Security Agreement, which stipulates $11 billion in new investments must be made in the United States by 2028. That includes an already-underway project not scheduled for completion until after 2028. The United States government will also be issued a golden share as part of the NSA, giving it unique voting rights. "President Trump promised to protect American Steel and American Jobs -- and he has delivered on that promise," White House spokesperson Kush Desai told CNN in a statement. "Today's executive order ensures US Steel will remain in the great Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and be safeguarded as a critical element of America's national and economic security." Confirmation of the deal comes just over a week after 50% tariffs took effect on metals imported into the United States from nearly all countries. The tariffs were enacted a day after Trump signed an executive order doubling the duties on almost all imported aluminum and steel. Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
