logo
What happens to our bodies without light?

What happens to our bodies without light?

Vox01-03-2025
In a Cold War-era bunker-turned-Airbnb situated 50 feet below ground in Arkansas, journalist Lynne Peeples conducted an experiment to better understand her internal clock. She'd always struggled with sleep — growing up in Seattle, the long, dark winters contributed to the effects of seasonal affective disorder (or SAD). From an early age, she says, she understood her circadian rhythms — the body's measure of time that drives everything from the sleep-wake cycle to appetite — were generally disrupted.
For 10 days, she cordoned herself off from all of the signals the body uses to tell time. She deprived herself of light, from both the sun and electricity, clocks, most screens and other people. (Peeples did have some light: She set all the LED lights in the Airbnb to a dim red light, which wouldn't impact her circadian rhythms.) She strapped herself up to devices that tracked her temperature, glucose levels, sleep, and heart rate and tried to live as normally as possible. To pass the time, she juggled, played the harmonica, and read on a Kindle. She documented her experience on a typewriter.
About halfway through, her internal clocks had completely flipped. Her stomach was 'distant and grumbly,' her chest heavy, and she had a general weak and woozy feeling. Unbeknownst to her, when everyone above ground was sleeping, she was wide awake. Later, while combing through her biometric data with scientists, she discovered her rhythms had fallen out of sync with one another. 'I could feel it,' Peeples says. 'I was feeling all the symptoms of sleepiness throughout the day, hot and cold at odd times, a little bit of depression. I'm not thinking clearly. My gut was a disaster. All those things happened about the same time.'
Peeples recounts the experience in her book The Inner Clock: Living In Sync With Our Circadian Rhythms , in which she digs into the science of circadian rhythms and explains how understanding our body's ebbs and flows can help us feel better when we're awake and asleep. Here, Peeples shares what she's learned and how you can better calibrate your own circadian rhythms.
This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.
Were there any surprising takeaways from your experiment in the bunker?
These inner clocks we have in our bodies are not precision timekeepers. That's why we need these regular recalibration opportunities with the light-dark cycle of our planet. But they are pretty good clocks. The first couple days, I was living pretty close to a 24-hour day without having any idea what the actual time was. I would occasionally make a guess at the time for fun, and a day-and-a-half in, I was only off by 11 minutes.
So why is light so important to our internal clocks?
We evolved outdoors. The sun, during the day, shines a full spectrum of light, and it's centered around the blue wavelengths. We evolved these cells in the back of our eyes, these photoreceptors, that perceive that blue light and send signals to our master clock in our brain that says, I see this strong blue light. It must be daytime. That's how we evolved to tell day from night.
In today's society, a lot of us in the modern world, we're hidden from both bright days and dark nights.
In today's society, a lot of us in the modern world, we're hidden from both bright days and dark nights. We're losing that contrast that we evolved with. Not only do we have this relatively dim light during the day, but we also have basically that same light indoors at night too, when we're sitting under light. It's really about that contrast that our clocks evolved to use to differentiate day and night.
Should we be trying to get more of that contrast? So, making it dim in our houses when the sun goes down and trying to get bright light during the daytime?
I would say yes. This is what I'm trying to do. Especially in the morning, if you can get outside for 15, 20 minutes of actual daylight, that really helps recalibrate your clocks and keep them synced to the 24-hour day. During the day, get outside for little bits, even if it's cloudy out, and inside, try to be close to a window.
Then at night, dim the lights. Try to use warmer hues of light. The oranger, the redder the better. In my apartment now at night, I turn off all overhead lights. I'm only using table lamps and electric candles that I have around my apartment. As you get into later evening, if you're going to bed, try to cut out absolutely every light. If you have to get up in the middle of the night to go to the bathroom, do not slip on the bathroom lights. A warm night light or carrying a candle is the best plan.
I often hear the advice of getting light in the morning. Can SAD lamps effectively mimic that light?
If you have the option to get outside, that is still the best because you can get out for a walk and that's good for you. But if you don't have that option and it's the dead of winter anywhere at a high latitude and there's not even the sun up in the morning, then SAD lamps definitely have their place.
On the flip side, how concerned should we be about blue light from our electronics?
To some degree, certain things can be overblown. The overhead lights in your apartment are probably having a bigger impact on you, especially compared to a TV. Because at that distance, that blue light coming from the TV is probably minimal if you're not right up against it. If you have an iPhone, if you dim it, it's not probably producing that much harmful light. The consensus among scientists is that blue light can have an impact on our sleep, on our rhythms. The extent of that impact is still up for debate. It can't hurt to try to limit that, but to a point. You don't want to cut out all your pleasure in your life. If you're watching something that's calming, that helps turn down your brain a little bit to help you sleep at night, the benefits may outweigh the risks.
Are there 'ideal' times of day to be doing certain tasks based on our circadian rhythms, like exercise in the afternoon, or thinking hard in the morning?
There are certain times a day, depending on your personal chronotype or how your circadian rhythms run, when you are going to be at your best for thinking, for solving a problem, for running faster, for lifting more weight, for being creative. On average, the science suggests that late morning hours are usually the best as far as your alertness. For me, I do fall into that category. Since I've learned that, I do try to use those hours to tackle my more challenging mental tasks. Then as far as physical performance, on average, most of us are at our best in the late afternoon or early evening. That's when most world records are broken for swimming, for example. It is personal, so you have to get a sense of your own rhythms to be able to time these activities.
On average, the science suggests that late morning hours are usually the best as far as your alertness.
How can we figure out when we might be better suited to certain tasks, short of locking ourselves in a bunker?
The best thing to do is when you're on vacation, let your body tick as it will. Go to bed when you're tired, get up without an alarm, when your body naturally wakes up. Then just pay attention. When am I feeling most on ? When is that dip in the day? A lot of us have that afternoon dip and that's part of the circadian rhythm, but that might fall at a different time for different people. When do you have a spring in your step and feel like running? Try to see if you have some wiggle room to allow yourself to to follow your body's schedule as closely as you can.
What practical takeaways would you give people as far as how to make sure that their systems are running efficiently?
There are three key things. The first I talked about was contrast: trying to get those bright days, those dark nights.
The second thing is what I call constrict. That has to do with eating, as well as caffeine and alcohol. Try to consolidate the hours during the day that you eat and concentrate your calories earlier in the day. Late morning, early afternoon, for most of us, is when our bodies are most able to handle incoming calories. It's the opposite of what modern society does. We tend to have our biggest meal in the evening. Try to get calories earlier, and try to cut off calories two, three hours before bed, ideally. With alcohol, if you're having a drink, have it more at happy hour than post-dinner.
Finally, consistency — trying to go to bed and get up at the same time every day. There's been more research that's come out saying the consistency of the times you go to bed and get up in the morning, seven days a week, can be more important than how long you sleep. See More: Advice
Even Better
Health
Life
Sleep
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Read Part 2 about the birth of the nuclear navy ... in Oak Ridge
Read Part 2 about the birth of the nuclear navy ... in Oak Ridge

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Read Part 2 about the birth of the nuclear navy ... in Oak Ridge

In the first part of this "Historically Speaking" series, the role of Oak Ridge National Laboratory's support for the U.S. Navy was featured. Now, we will look at the roles of the K-25 Gaseous Diffusion Plant and the Y-12 Plant (later known as the Y-12 National Security Complex). The K-25 Gaseous Diffusion Plant provided the first highly enriched uranium that was provided to the U.S. Navy. During the Cold War, the K-25 Gaseous Diffusion Plant was a significant producer of highly enriched uranium for both nuclear weapons and naval reactor fuel. The highly enriched uranium produced at K-25, along with that from the Portsmouth, Ohio plant, was essential for the U.S. Navy's nuclear submarines and aircraft carriers for the early years through the 1990s. The Y-12 National Security Complex has provided the highly enriched uranium for the Navy since 2002. From 1991 to 2002, existing highly enriched uranium that was in the production stream was sufficient, but the transition to the conversion of dismantled nuclear weapons material also began during the later years of this period. For the foreseeable future, Y-12 will continue to provide for the U.S. Navy's highly enriched uranium needs. The Y-12 National Security Complex played a significant and unique role in the USS Seawolf project, particularly concerning its propulsor (the system that propels the submarine, including the propeller itself). This was a significant opportunity for the nation to see the uniqueness of Y-12's manufacturing capabilities beyond just nuclear weapons components. In the late 1980s, the U.S. Navy designed the Seawolf-class (SSN-21) submarines intended to be exceptionally fast and quiet. One of the main elements was an innovative propulsor design. The Navy faced a significant manufacturing challenge with the complex, precision-machined components needed for this new propulsor. Through ORNL connections that existed, the Y-12 Plant's precise and advanced manufacturing capabilities needed for nuclear weapons components were recommended to the Navy. Also, no other potential contractors would undertake the schedule or technical difficulties the Navy desired. Y-12 accepted the task of manufacturing a full-scale prototype propulsor. Y-12 acquired a large five-axis, computer-controlled milling machine as well as a massive lathe, and even added a 6,500-square-foot wing to the Alpha 1 machine shop. The project began in 1989 and was delivered in three subassemblies in 1993, ahead of schedule and within budget. In recognition of this tremendous manufacturing accomplishment, the U.S. Congress designated Y-12 as a National Prototype Center. Y-12 also made the third subassembly for the second Seawolf submarine, spare parts for the propulsors, and transferred the manufacturing process to the U.S. Navy. Y-12 also contributed to the later Virginia-class submarine program. The designation, in 1997, as one of the nation's National Prototype Centers has enabled Y-12 to assist other government agencies and become recognized as one of the nation's most capable precision machining centers. Oak Ridge, with the expertise of ORNL, Y-12, and the recent emphasis on a vital role in the nation's nuclear renaissance, which is resulting in new industry related to processing nuclear fuel for small modular reactors, as well as the small modular reactors being built here, is again leading the nation toward advancements in nuclear energy. The collective efforts of Oak Ridge's scientific and industrial workforce profoundly shaped the trajectory of the nuclear navy. The seamless transfer of technology and expertise between ORNL, Y-12, the K-25 Gaseous Diffusion Plant, and the Navy fueled not only the physical development of submarines and their reactors, but also established a culture of rigorous precision and innovation. As submarines and aircraft carriers evolved, the partnerships that had proved so fruitful for the Seawolf's propulsor continued to bear fruit in new reactor designs, advanced manufacturing, and materials science. This synergy also fostered a spirit of collaboration beyond military applications, as Oak Ridge's role in nuclear energy broadened to support civilian advancements. The city's legacy is seen not only in deployed vessels, but in the ongoing education and training of engineers, machinists, and scientists who continue to push the boundaries of nuclear technology. Today, the U.S. nuclear navy consists of more than 70 nuclear-powered submarines, including ballistic missile submarines, such as the Ohio-class, equipped with Trident II missiles for nuclear deterrence; attack submarines, like the Virginia-class, which are designed for intelligence, surveillance, and anti-submarine warfare; and, 11 nuclear-powered aircraft carriers, including the Nimitz- and Ford-class carriers, which provide unmatched global reach and sustained air power. These vessels can operate for more than 20 years without refueling thanks to their compact and efficient pressurized water reactors. Modern naval reactors are designed for high-power output, long-core life, and strict containment, embodying lessons from Oak Ridge and the legacy of Admiral Hyman G. Rickover's discipline. Nuclear navy display for Oak Ridge In recognition of the importance of the birth of the nuclear navy in Oak Ridge in 1946, a prominent monument that tells that story is being planned. The USS Houston submarine has been decommissioned and is scheduled for demolition. The conning tower (known as the 'sail') of the USS Houston is being requested by the American Museum of Science and Energy Foundation for display in the city of Oak Ridge. The scheduled demolition of the submarine will be completed by October 2026. We plan to have a statue of Admiral Rickover and Alvin Weinberg located with the sail. The statues are being created by Oak Ridge High School's Wildcat Manufacturing. The intention is to 3-D print them and to have them be interactive using artificial intelligence. This is part of the 'Giants of Oak Ridge' statue project that the Wildcat Manufacturing team of high school students is undertaking. The location chosen for the display is just south of the Secret City Commemorative Walk and is being included in a master plan for the redevelopment of A.K. Bissell Park. The plans for the USS Houston sail and "Giants of Oak Ridge" statues are also being included in the current Oak Ridge Master Plan update effort. In conclusion, the birth of the U.S. Navy's nuclear navy, one of the most significant elements of nuclear deterrence for the nation, had its origin in Oak Ridge. Because of the efforts of Admiral Rickover and Alvin Weinberg, substantial advancement of the understanding of how to effectively use nuclear power resulted in advances in the use of the amazing new potential of the Nuclear Age. Both of them easily qualify as being among the 'Giants of Oak Ridge.' Other individuals who will be recognized in the future as 'Giants of Oak Ridge' will be identified, and 3D-printed statues of them will be placed in locations yet to be determined. One example of a probable location might be the history walk being considered as part of the Bissell Park redevelopment planning. D. Ray Smith is the city of Oak Ridge historian. His "Historically Speaking" columns are published weekly in The Oak Ridger. This article originally appeared on Oakridger: Oak Ridge: The birth of the nuclear navy, Part 2 Solve the daily Crossword

Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Buys Over 5 Million Shares in UnitedHealth Group (UNH)
Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Buys Over 5 Million Shares in UnitedHealth Group (UNH)

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Buys Over 5 Million Shares in UnitedHealth Group (UNH)

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH) is one of the most buzzing stocks to invest in right now. CNBC reported on August 14 that Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway bought more than 5 million shares in UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH) last quarter, coming up to a stake worth around $1.6 billion. A senior healthcare professional giving advice to a patient in a clinic. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated's (NYSE:UNH) shares soared after Buffett's latest quarterly filing was revealed, marking a 'surprising buy' due to the healthcare company's present reputation. According to VerityData, the stake purchase positions it as the 18th-biggest position in the Berkshire portfolio, standing behind Amazon and Constellation Brands. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH) provides healthcare coverage, data consultancy, and software services. It operates through the OptumRx, OptumInsight, OptumHealth, and UnitedHealthCare segments. While we acknowledge the potential of UNH as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.

Contributors to Scientific American 's September 2025 Issue
Contributors to Scientific American 's September 2025 Issue

Scientific American

time10 hours ago

  • Scientific American

Contributors to Scientific American 's September 2025 Issue

David Cheney Brain Washing David Cheney is no mere artist—he's a board-certified medical illustrator. In the Johns Hopkins University program where Cheney got his master's degree, the artists study right alongside the medical students. So when Scientific American asked Cheney to render cerebrospinal fluid entering and exiting the brain for a feature by journalist Lydia Denworth on how the organ cleans waste during sleep, he already had a strong understanding of the anatomy. Cheney filled stacks of sketchbooks as a kid but assumed he'd end up premed in college. He experimented with different paths (for a time, he was a musical theater major) until he learned about a career in medical illustration. It was an instant and lasting fit. 'The field might be niche,' he says, 'but it's so varied in terms of what you can do with the training.' On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. He's worked for medical clinics, academic institutions, and even a tech startup where he's designing 'an entire race of aliens' for a cryptocurrency game. Cheney would like to do more sculpture, specifically reconstructing 'some extinct type of creature' for a natural history museum. 'I wish more young artists who love science knew about this field where you can truly use both sides of your brain.' Dava Sobel Meter When writer Dava Sobel learned that the earliest issues of Scientific American included poetry, she wanted to bring that tradition back to the magazine. Her pitch was to publish existing poems about science; instead the editors tasked her with soliciting original work. Sobel first approached poets she knew—Diane Ackerman was the inaugural contributor to the Meter column in January 2020—and then 'the flood began,' she says. 'The backlog of submissions is now yearslong.' Sobel doesn't write poetry herself, but her long career as a science journalist and author has often involved 'unearthing people's letters, showing scientists as the real people they are.' Her first big success, she says, was her 1995 book Longitude, 'which allowed me to write all the others.' One of the best fun facts about Sobel is she served on the Planet Definition Committee that redefined the term in 2006—an endeavor that ultimately led to Pluto losing its status as a planet. That move 'was not our recommendation!' As the Meter editor, Sobel looks for poems that 'cause an emotional leap in me.' Other times she'll choose a poem because 'it attempts a tremendous challenge—and works.' Meter hopefuls take note: Sobel has a limit on limericks but likes to publish at least one humorous poem every year. 'I'm the first to admit it's totally subjective, and contributors are totally at my mercy.' Charles C. Mann Research in Reverse When we asked author Charles C. Mann to write an essay about dramatic twists and turns in science, Mann, fortuitously, was already mulling the subject. 'I write to try to figure out what I think,' he says. He teased apart genuine 180s— 'when assumptions baked into a discipline turn out not to be right after someone gives them a hard look'—from a fraught kind of pivot, 'when the normal back-and-forth of science gets pinned by people who make definitive proclamations based on exaggerated evidence.' For someone who wrote a book (entitled 1491) that rethinks the environmental history of an entire continent, Mann isn't sure he's any better at coping with uncertainty than the rest of us. 'But I would say I'm comfortable admitting that chance plays a huge role in what happens to me.' Sometimes, while working on a project, he gets 'distracted by worrying about if I actually know what I'm talking about.' The research discursions that follow often lead to satisfying revelations. 'It's good to be aware of one's own fallibility,' he says. Mann has seemingly lost track of how many books he's written ('I don't know, nine?'), but his next one, about the North American West, will be published in 2026. Andrew B. Myers Peanut Proof Photographer Andrew B. Myers (above), who shot this month's cover story on peanut allergies by writer Maryn McKenna, likes the constraint of creating big worlds at small scale. What did Myers seek in the ideal peanut model? 'You look for the very basic quality of a peanut, this eight shape with an hourglass curve,' he says. 'But the curve can't be so basic it looks fake. You want 90 percent perfect peanut and 10 percent little quirk. Just like human attractiveness.' By giving his subject a halolike light, Myers sought to make a singular, tiny peanut 'feel ridiculously heroic.' Manipulating peanut butter for the shoot was less satisfying. 'It's kind of a gross, difficult substance to work with.' Myers takes a layered and 'zany' approach to making still-life images and describes himself as more of a sculptor and designer than a photographer. 'I care a lot about building the frame and mixing processes,' he says. 'I make things in a controlled, quiet setting with a camera on a tripod. I can't remember the last time I held a camera in my hands.' Myers, who has worked for a range of editorial and commercial clients, has an affinity for shooting scientific concepts in a clever, unexpected way. He's inspired by the imagery that comes out of the lab of his spouse, who is a computational neuroscientist. 'I like when scientists and artists get together,' he says. 'Scientists are much more humble than your average artist, but both look outward and have a rock of curiosity.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store