4-car crash causes mile-long backup on I-5 in South Seattle
In total, four cars crashed on southbound I-5 at Spokane Street on June 21. The crash site and emergency responders blocked three of the leftmost lanes and the HOV lane, causing a backup stretching more than a mile.
The Seattle Fire Department reports that there were no serious injuries and that no one was trapped in their vehicles due to the crashes.
Lanes were slowly reopened about 45 minutes after initial reports of the crash came in to emergency stations.
The Source
Information in this story came from the Washington State Department of Transportation.
2 dead after car submerges at WA's Edmonds Ferry Dock following pursuit
Travis Decker update: Search teams close in on WA triple murder suspect
Travis Decker manhunt echoes 2020 hunt in same WA wilderness
Everything to know about WA laws going into effect July 1
Tacoma dad defends man at center of Amber Alert case involving 2-year-old
Seattle-based Amazon announces 'workforce reduction' due to AI
Immigrants suddenly summoned by ICE via text during Seattle-area protests
To get the best local news, weather and sports in Seattle for free, sign up for the daily FOX Seattle Newsletter.
Download the free FOX LOCAL app for mobile in the Apple App Store or Google Play Store for live Seattle news, top stories, weather updates and more local and national news.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
These are the cities where an Uber ride is going to cost you the most
Taking Ubers is getting expensive across the nation but a half-hour ride in certain states and cities is going to do far more damage to your wallet than in others, according to a new analysis. Net Credit collected the average price of a 30-minute ride in an Uber in locations across the U.S., and found ride-share passengers in Washington state are paying the most, with a half-hour drive costing on average $53.46. On the other side of the list is Indiana, where the average half-hour ride in an Uber will cost around $30.35. Other states with less expensive rides include Texas at $30.96, Utah at $30.71, and Oklahoma at $31.54. But a ride in plenty of other states is going to cost upwards of $40. The average price of a half-hour Uber ride in California, Oregon, Wyoming, Montana, Louisiana, Alabama, Delaware, New Jersey, and New York are all at least $40, and rides in several other states — South Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arkansas, and Nevada — will cost just under that mark. When it comes to individual cities, Seattle tops the list as the most expensive city for a half-hour Uber ride. In Seattle a half-hour ride costs almost $60, according to the analysis. The nine next most expensive cities for Ubers aren't necessarily each the sprawling, wildly expensive, cities one might expect. Those are Cheyenne, Reno, New York City, San Diego, Baton Rouge, Newark, Anchorage, San Jose, and Portland. The cheapest overall city for Uber for a half-hour ride is Indianapolis where it'll cost around $28.33. Following Indianapolis, the most affordable cities for taking an Uber are Fort Worth, Tucson, Mesa, Omaha, Miami, Oklahoma City, Raleigh, Houston, and Memphis. According to Net Credit, the price of Uber rides increased by 7.2 percent across the country in 2024. Net Credit noted that part of what may be driving down prices in Indianapolis is the appearance of a competitor, inDrive, which allows riders to propose a price for their ride, and drivers can counter-bid for a higher fee. 'We're giving both the driver and passenger the freedom to kind of choose their own adventure," Adam Warner, the company's head of U.S. operations, told Net Credit. 'So you get to select the driver. Are you willing to wait 10 minutes for this person to pick you up in a Tesla Model Y, or are you comfortable with the Chevy Malibu that's only two minutes away to pick you up?' Net Credit also worked out which city's Uber costs were the most and least expensive relative to the average wages of its residents. The city with the most affordable Uber rides — relative to its residents' average hourly wage — is Washington, D.C., where a 30-minute trip will still cost riders 106.5 percent of their average hourly wage. Following the nation's capital, the most affordable cities for Ubering relative to residents' average hourly wages include San Jose, San Francisco, Fort Worth, Indianapolis, Stamford, Raleigh, Boston, Mesa, and Baltimore. The least affordable city was determined to be Cheyenne, Wyoming, where a ride is 224 percent of a resident's average hourly wage. Reno, Baton Rouge, New Orleans, Jackson, Seattle, Fresno, Las Vegas, Augusta, and Buffalo made up the rest of the list.
Gizmodo
10 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Anker's 4.7-Star USB-C Car Charger Might Be Cheaper Than Your Salad Bowl, Limited Stock Available
A dying phone at the exact moment you need directions is a special kind of stress. The Anker USB-C Car Charger, 40W 2-Port is an easy antidote. It lives quietly in the 12‑volt socket, waits for the engine to start, and feeds quick power to two devices at once so maps stay bright, kids keep streaming, and you can call ahead without watching the battery bar sink. Small, sturdy, and out of the way, it is the kind of car upgrade you do once and appreciate every single day. Head over to Amazon to get the Anker USB-C Car Charger, 40W 2-Port for just $14, down from its usual price of $23. That's a discount of $9 and 41% off. See at Amazon This charger keeps a low profile. The barrel sits nearly flush with the outlet, so it does not snag on pockets or bags when you reach for the console. A soft indicator light makes the port easy to find at night without lighting up the whole cabin. Two USB-C ports sit side by side and deliver fast charging for modern phones, tablets, and small gadgets. You can top up your phone while a passenger gives a tablet a lift, and nobody argues over who gets the plug. Day to day, it feels simple in the best way. Start the car and your phone begins to charge. Skip a track, check a turn, or answer a call, and the power keeps flowing. Short errands add real battery life, not just a token tick upward, which means fewer emergency hunts for a wall outlet later. The compact size also suits rental cars and carpools, so it is easy to toss in a backpack and bring along when you are not driving your own vehicle. Build quality inspires confidence. The casing feels solid in the hand, the contact points click into place with a satisfying seat, and the finish blends with most dashboards so it looks like it came with the car. Inside, Anker's safety tech minds the details by watching temperature and voltage, dialing back power if something looks off. You get the speed you want without risking a hot connector or a cranky phone. Parents will like how it quiets the back seat on long drives. Commuters can run navigation at full brightness without worrying about the end of the route. Road trippers can leave the charger in place for months, confident it will be ready whenever the next playlist starts. The Anker USB-C Car Charger, 40W 2-Port is still available for $14 at Amazon, a nice savings compared with the regular $23 price. See at Amazon
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Analysis-US reversal on key climate finding spells uncertainty for business
By Valerie Volcovici WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The Trump administration has billed its plan to undo U.S. climate regulation as a way to cut costs for industry, but it may backfire by forcing automakers, utilities, and manufacturers into a future of regulatory uncertainty and litigation risk, according to lawyers and trade groups. Republican President Donald Trump's administration announced on Tuesday a plan to rescind the long-standing finding that greenhouse gas emissions endanger human health, removing the legal foundation for U.S. greenhouse gas regulations. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin said the move, which would end limits on greenhouse gas pollution from vehicle tailpipes, power plants, smokestacks and other sources, would save companies $52 billion in environmental compliance costs. But companies that have already invested heavily in reducing emissions to meet government limits, a move also demanded by many shareholders, are worried the proposal will lead into the regulatory and judicial unknown, lawyers said. "Industries that have GHG standards set by EPA have long been complying with them and don't want them to be stripped away," said Meghan Greenfield, partner with law firm Jenner & Block and former EPA counsel, who represents auto sector clients. "The stability of the regulatory regime is extremely important for industry as a baseline." Repealing the endangerment finding could mean that companies would need to comply with a patchwork of different state laws on climate change rather than one federal standard, said Zach Pilchen, senior counsel at Holland & Knight. "I think what the administration has missed is that most of industry has already retrofitted for regulations," said Camille Pannu, associate law professor at Columbia University. "Industry did want deregulation, but maybe not through this vehicle." One former Trump administration source said during Trump's first term, the EPA had declined to take on the endangerment finding because of strong resistance from industry and the legal risk associated with undermining federal authority on the matter. Three sources in the automaker industry told Reuters privately that the EPA's proposed repeal of vehicle efficiency standards is much broader than anticipated. In addition to tailpipe standards, the proposal would eliminate air conditioning efficiency testing and remove requirements for battery monitoring and battery durability. Albert Gore, executive director of the Zero Emission Transportation Association, said the EPA action to reverse long-settled law comes as "clean" car sales are growing steadily and powering a U.S. battery and vehicle manufacturing boom. Over the last decade, manufacturers announced $197.6 billion in investments in U.S. EV and battery manufacturing facilities, according to the Environmental Defense Fund. "Taking backward steps and adding new regulatory uncertainty harms consumers, unsettles markets, and will complicate ongoing business decisions for auto manufacturers," Gore said. LUKEWARM REACTION Industry groups have been guarded in their reactions to the EPA announcement, mostly saying they will review the proposal and offer comments in coming weeks. Edison Electric Institute, the electric utility industry's main lobby group, said it supported the EPA establishing clear and consistent regulatory policies to drive infrastructure and investment. "It is essential that EPA use its authority to craft flexible regulations that account for impacts to reliability and customer bills," said EEI spokesman Jeremy Ortiz. The power industry is responsible for around a quarter of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and has steadily reduced its carbon output over more than a decade by replacing older coal-fired generators with natural gas, solar and wind. EEI had sided with the EPA, then part of former President Joe Biden's administration, in a 2022 Supreme Court case in which West Virginia challenged the agency's authority to regulate power plants. "Voiding that authority could upend that predictability and uniformity and potentially subject individual GHG emitters to the idiosyncratic whims of individual district court judges," it said in its brief at the time. Auto industry group, the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, welcomed the tailpipe deregulation and said it was digesting the broader proposal to repeal the endangerment finding. The American Petroleum Institute and the American Trucking Associations both cheered the planned repeal of vehicle tailpipe rules. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce had also previously opposed the repeal because of its destabilizing effect on members. "While we did not call for this proposal, we are reviewing it and will consult with members so we can provide constructive feedback to the agency," Marty Durbin, president of the Chamber's energy institute, said on Tuesday.
