ASTI: 'Exponential growth' in misogynistic comments from students
The General Secretary of the Association of Secondary Teachers in Ireland has warned that female teachers are facing misogynistic comments and harassment from students in schools to an extent that is becoming increasingly "unmanageable."
In an interview ahead of a special Prime Time programme tonight, Kieran Christie said "there is quite a growth in the extent to which online content is having a negative influence on young males' perception of women and of girls. And it's very pervasive, unfortunately, in the end, very regrettable."
"Certainly in the last five years, it has grown exponentially as a problem," he said, "and it's becoming more and more unmanageable in schools."
He said ASTI members have raised concerns involving gestures, use of online accounts by students to harass teachers, and "in the more extreme cases, it involves things like videos and sexual comments and all the rest of it."
Mr Christie's comments were echoed by the Director of the National Association of Principals and Deputies (NAPD) Paul Crone.
He told Prime Time that "there are huge issues in relation to the online content that students, and particularly young males, are experiencing and the consequent attitude that they have towards girls and even female teachers.
"The worrying part for us of all of that is that these behaviors are seen as normal by a cohort of young males. They don't see anything wrong with it because it's what they're experiencing online. It's what they're being told."
In recent weeks the ASTI and NAPD circulated to their members a Prime Time survey on perceptions about the impact of related social media content in schools.
Results from that survey show more than 85% of respondents said they believe online content about gender roles and masculinity is negatively influencing teenagers' perceptions of women and girls.
The anonymous survey was sent to members at the request of Prime Time by the four main teaching unions, the aforementioned ASTI and NAPD, as well as the Teachers' Union of Ireland (TUI) and Irish National Teachers' Organisation (INTO).
1,200 responses were received in the week after it was published, in which more than 1,100 respondents described themselves as either secondary school teachers or principals. The others said they worked in primary schools.
Through the survey and interviews with teachers, union officials, and experts, Prime Time sought to ascertain whether there has been a real-world impact on the views of young people from the emergence of social media trends and influencers who promote negative forms of masculinity.
Despite many positive forms of masculinity, certain online influencers who have come to prominence in recent years argue that men's role within modern society has been unfairly suppressed, and that women should be submissive and men dominant in both personal relationships and wider society.
Respondents were provided with a short description of the views held by such influencers and asked a series of multiple-choice questions about whether they believe such views are shaping young people's perceptions of gender roles, masculinity, or misogyny.
Respondents had the option to agree or disagree, or say anything from 'not concerned' to 'very concerned' on all questions. As with all online anonymous surveys, there are limitations in how the results can be interpreted, and they should be considered more indicative than definitive.
Asked 'how concerned are you about the influence of individuals and content covered by this survey upon students or pupils?- 56% said 'very concerned' and a further 31% said 'somewhat concerned'.
Some 5% said 'not very concerned', while 2% responded 'not concerned at all'.
The survey also attempted to understand if respondents perceived that views about gender roles and masculinity held by such influencers were becoming more prevalent.
When asked 'Over the last five years, have you begun to see or hear more concerning discussions or comments linked to the topics covered in this survey within your school environment?' some 78% of respondents said 'yes, much more', or 'yes, somewhat more'.
Almost half – 48% - of respondents said they frequently or occasionally witness comments or behaviour directed specifically towards young women or female students which they perceive to be linked to such online content.
A further 21% said 'yes but rarely'.
Many respondents - some 47% - said they have personally been subjected to concerning behaviour or related comments from students in the classroom or the school environment.
The most common behaviours identified by respondents in the survey were disrespectful language, gender stereotyping, and bullying and harassment.
When asked about the prevalence of the views in the school environment, a third (34%) said the issue was limited to a small number of students, 31% said it spanned several year groups, and nearly one in five (19%) said it affected the entire school.
The results of the survey echo similar conclusions in academic and other research conducted in the Ireland, the UK, and elsewhere.
A survey published last month by UK teaching union NASUWT found that female teachers were more likely to regularly receive verbal abuse than their male counterparts. The union noted that dozens of teachers had referenced the influencer Andrew Tate as directly influencing male pupils' behaviour.
A 2024 study by University College London (UCL) and Kent University also found through interviews with young people and school leaders that "misogynist ideologies" that young people are exposed to online have become embedded in youth culture, "creating new challenges for schools".
Researchers at Dublin City University (DCU) last year also focused on the role of social media companies in pushing related content to male teenagers, and noted through the use of test accounts that algorithms consistently recommended what the study defined as "male supremacist influencers" to young men on TikTok and YouTube.
In the Prime Time survey, respondents were provided with space to add comments if they wished.
Several respondents highlighted the role of algorithms and the time spent on devices by students as concerns, saying these were key drivers of the issue and that social media companies and regulators should act on them.
"Students have said how hard it is to navigate or get away from this messaging," one respondent said, "even if they report it, it comes back in their algorithm."
"As access to pornographic material is so easy for young males, it is having a major influence in how they perceive women and how they speak about women and treat them," wrote another respondent, "social media are exposing young men to vile pornographic/violent/misogynistic content on a daily basis."
"Male misogyny amongst students isn't new. It has been brewing for years. But is now more mainstream due to the Tates... etc," said another.
"They believe everything they see online… boys increasingly view women as objects or individuals who should 'obey' them," another added.
Others provided examples of incidents in which male students made concerning remarks to other female students.
One said a male student asked a female student if she would "carry a knife to protect herself on 'World Rape Day'", referencing a TikTok hoax claiming that rape would be legal for a day on 24 April.
"I often hear male students making sexualised comments to female students," another said "we had to remove a female student from the school after targeted harassment by boys."
Kieran Christie of the ASTI says social media companies, government and regulators should work to address the problem.
"It is the experience of our members that the vast majority of young people are great people," he said, "and we can be very thankful that we have a whole new generation coming forward of wonderful young people.
"They're growing up in an online world and they need to be protected to some extent, but guided also in relation to navigating that whole world.
"Certainly government have a major role to play, in particular working with the various social media companies in bringing forward measures that safeguard young people.
"We are aware that the bulk of the major social media companies are here in Ireland. So we have a natural platform there to work with these companies, to ask them to regulate, and perhaps enforce their regulation, in relation to what they provide - and allow to be accessible - to young people," Mr Christie told Prime Time.
Paul Crone of the NAPD said it "takes a whole system response to be able to tackle this" but that "the focus does need to be on regulation."
He added that the "new SPHE curriculum, which some people have objected to, is a really important part of the school's response to this."
The Teachers' Union of Ireland also echoed calls for stronger social media regulation saying there is now an "urgent need for significantly stronger legislation and proper Government regulation in the area of social media."
"The Department of Education must also ensure that the required policies and safeguards are in place in school communities to protect students and teachers from such attitudes and behaviours."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
4 days ago
- Irish Examiner
Paul Hosford: Jim O'Callaghan making up for lost time with leadership whispers
If a week is a long time in politics, five years is equivalent to a geological era. Go back a little over five years, and Jim O'Callaghan was the forgotten man of Fianna Fáil. Overlooked for a Cabinet position — ostensibly in favour of a party interloper in Stephen Donnelly — O'Callaghan rejected Taoiseach Micheál Martin's offer of a junior role, saying he would focus of strengthening the Fianna Fáil party. 'At a time when many of our party's senior members will be pre-occupied with their ministerial duties, I want to devote more time to strengthening our great party by making it a more attractive option for young voters,' he said at the time. 'I also believe Fianna Fáil needs strong voices outside government who can ensure that our party's identity can be protected during the term of this coalition government.' The pitch was clear as O'Callaghan set off on a covid-era road trip around the country, meeting party members and trying to position himself as their voice. The man inside the tent willing to shout out However, somewhere between covid lockdowns and a lack of spotlight, the assumption that the Dublin Bay South man would emerge as the obvious successor to Micheál Martin burned out without much incident. For a party which internally argued it needed to be stronger in Dublin, the idea of a Dublin TD with huge name recognition being somewhat sidelined was odd Micheál Martin's quiet control of his party and a lack of real openings meant that, for the most part, O'Callaghan was relegated to the backbenches for the last Dáil term. As the Cabinet reshuffle in 2022 came and went, there he remained — a high-profile TD who was a good media performer, but had to work to find something to perform. Fast forward to the election campaign of 2024, however, and something had shifted. While in 2020, Micheál Martin was perceived to have effectively ended any leadership aspirations O'Callaghan would have had by publicly offering him a junior role, knowing he would refuse, he was a key player in the 2024 campaign which saw Fianna Fáil come out the largest party in the Dáil. A large part of this was his utility in justice debates leading up to polling day, even sparking a sexism row with his now Cabinet colleague and predecessor in the role Helen McEntee. 'We need to build on the good proposals that Fianna Fáil came up with before,' he told RTÉ's Prime Time, effectively dismissing Ms McEntee's work as being built on his own ideas. 'Far more effective' When McEntee shot back that she had 'turned up' and he had refused the call to the junior ministerial ranks, O'Callaghan was quick to say that he had been 'far more effective as a backbench Fianna Fáil TD… than being the minister's assistant'. It was combative and hardly collegiate, but many in his party found it energising. Many attributed, unfairly in many cases, much of the coalition's woes to McEntee's performance. But this went further, in that it showed clear water between the two parties in a campaign which forced them to run on a joint record. Yet, Even his leading role in the campaign did not make him an automatic pick for many who read the cabinet tea leaves, with then junior justice minister James Browne among those who were tipped as potentially pipping him to the justice seat at Cabinet. At one point, an agreement where O'Callaghan would simultaneously be Attorney General and a TD was floated in the press — though this was never really seen as a runner. Due to his closeness to the justice role — he is a qualified barrister — O'Callaghan was seen by many as only fitting that role in the run-up to the announcement of ministers, which ended up being both delayed by a Dáil row and truncated by the incoming Storm Éowyn, though nobody who got the call to Áras an Úachtaráin that evening seems to have minded the short victory lap. When O'Callaghan's name was confirmed as justice minister, it marked an arrival at Cabinet that some felt was delayed. He has set about making up for lost time Perhaps aware of his predecessor's last few months under the microscope, since his appointment as justice minister, O'Callaghan has worked quickly to establish a public narrative that he is on top of his brief — particularly in the area of migration. Within weeks of the Government being formed, he was keen to publicise the fact that Ireland had commenced deportation flights to Georgia. A second flight followed weeks later. While these were an initiative kick-started under McEntee, and led to relatively small numbers of people being deported, they impress upon the public the idea that O'Callaghan is on top of the issue. Of course, some of this is circumstance — data shows there has been a 43% drop in applications for Ireland's asylum system here, compared to the same timeframe for last year — and he has been helped by the fact that large scale protests around individual sites for international protection services applicants have not been much of a feature in this year's discourse. However, O'Callaghan seems aware of perception as much as reality. To that end, his language is tougher than McEntee's. In an early radio interview he said 'too many people' are coming to Ireland seeking international protection who are not entitled to it. He upped that ante last month by proposing new laws around international protection that seeks to cut processing times and majorly cuts the usage of oral hearings, as he said the existing asylum laws in Ireland were not fit for purpose. Law and order O'Callaghan has leaned into the perception that he is a man of law and order and, to a large extent, it has worked. He has not fallen out with the garda rank and file members, but an ongoing struggle to fill the Garda Commissioner's job remains. Likewise, a pair of high-profile stabbings in Dublin early in his tenure did not become the crises they might have and this week's extradition of Sean McGovern, a senior figure in the Kinahan group, from Dubai was something put in train months ago — but was good news that happened on his watch. His decision this week to give a State apology to the family of Shane O'Farrell was the right thing to do, and avoided a subject which O'Callaghan had been vocal on from the backbenches becoming a problem in Government. All of this has seen O'Callaghan re-emerge as a name mentioned as a Fianna Fáil leader in waiting, whenever Martin departs Privately, members of the party believe that O'Callaghan has shown the political instincts that the party leader would need and is considered a better media performer than his most obvious rival: Public expenditure minister Jack Chambers. Those close to Martin insist he is going nowhere for now — he has over two years left of his second term as Taoiseach — but there is also a recognition that he cannot be the leader forever. Sources in the party say that O'Callaghan's challenge is to avoid becoming a lightning rod for the coalition — easier said than done from a beefed-up justice portfolio which once again includes migration. Along the way, he has to avoid controversies in a department which has derailed potential party leaders on a number of occasions, many through scandals and controversies which nobody could have foreseen. While many consider him the current leader in the non-existent-but-still-kind-of-happening-but-also-not-happening race to succeed Martin, that is based largely on a good start to his time in justice. However, as the saying goes, a good start is half the work.
RTÉ News
4 days ago
- RTÉ News
Behind the Story: Inside Richard Satchwell's murder trial
The latest episode of Behind the Story looks at Richard Satchwell, who was found guilty of murdering his wife Tina earlier today. Fran and Katie are joined by RTÉ's Legal Affairs Correspondent Orla O'Donnell and Prime Time's Barry Cummins to reveal the inside story of the case. Back in 2017, Satchwell had claimed Tina was missing and made public pleas for her to come home. It was only the first of a flurry of lies that would continue right through his court appearances over the past weeks. Barry interviewed and met Satchwell on many occasions and he discusses his impressions of him and what it was like to interview inside the house where he and Tina lived. Orla gives an insight into what it was like attending the trial at the Central Criminal Court over the past five weeks. You can listen to their analysis on the situation on Behind the Story which is available on the RTÉ Radio Player.
Irish Times
4 days ago
- Irish Times
Teaching union votes to accept controversial Leaving Cert reforms
Members of the Teachers' Union of Ireland (TUI) have voted by a margin of 73 per cent to 27 per cent to accept a package of supports aimed at easing the roll-out of controversial Leaving Certificate reforms. The outcome of the Association of Secondary Teachers Ireland (ASTI) ballot on the same issue is due next Friday. The strength of the TUI vote, however, looks likely to avert the threat of industrial action across second level schools in the autumn. It also paves the way for curriculum changes which seek to broaden assessment and ease pressure facing Leaving Cert students. READ MORE The reforms will see students awarded a minimum of 40 per cent for project work or practicals across all subjects. Minister for Education Helen McEntee , who has pushed ahead with the reforms despite calls for a pause from teaching unions, welcomed the outcome of the TUI vote. She thanked the union for its 'positive engagement' during recent negotiations and for its 'commitment to finding a shared path forward to the continued implementation of senior cycle redevelopment for the benefit of all students'. Teaching unions' annual conferences at Easter heard concerns that laboratories were ill-equipped for the volume of new research projects for physics, chemistry and biology. It was also stated that the changes would benefit affluent schools with access to more resources. During subsequent negotiations with teaching unions, the Department of Education announced a support package aimed at easing the roll-out of the reforms, which begin for fifth year students in September next. The package clarified that pay increases of up to 5 per cent, due under the public sector pay deal, were contingent on co-operating with senior cycle reforms. It also offered pledges of flexibility in relation to so-called Croke Park hours and a shorter qualifying period for teachers to attain job permanency by way of a contract of indefinite duration. In addition, the support package pledged to address teachers' concerns over workload and authenticating students' work against a backdrop of rapid developments in artificial intelligence (AI), among other issues. The TUI's executive committee had recommended acceptance, stating that it believed the measures were the 'best that could be achieved through negotiation'. The ASTI, on the other hand, did not issue any recommendation to members. In a statement on Friday evening, the TUI said it made clear at all times that the ballot was on the 'acceptability of the implementation measures and not the actual curriculum', which the Minister has the power to prescribe under the Education Act and 'which other stakeholders have no veto over'. TUI president David Waters said its members had assessed the support package for senior cycle implementation and voted to accept it. 'However, it is clear that they still have a range of concerns around various issues related to the redevelopment process, and we will be insisting that the department honours the commitments set out in the negotiated document,' Mr Waters said. He said members still had concerns about the system capacity for the roll-out of the science subjects in schools that have been 'chronically under-resourced', the potential risks to assessment posed by AI and the additional resourcing required to ensure that 'no students, particularly those in Deis settings, are put at a disadvantage by any of the changes'. 'It is now imperative that these and any other arising issues are urgently addressed,' Mr Waters said. Earlier this week, the TUI welcomed a report in The Irish Times of a delay in the implementation of changes in English and accounting until September 2027. The reforms – including oral exams for English – were due to roll out in September 2026.
