
Supreme Court directs states to survey orphaned children denied education
A bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and K V Viswanathan further asked the Centre to consider including data of such children in the upcoming census, scheduled to be carried out in 2027.
The Supreme Court was hearing a plea raising concerns for orphans in need of care and protection.
The bench further directed the states to survey orphaned children who had been granted admission in schools under the provisions of the 2009 Act.
The petitioner said schemes of the Centre and the state governments for protection and care of orphans were inadequate, requiring consideration.
'States to make a survey of the orphan children who have already been granted admission under the provisions of the Act as well as a survey of the children who have been denied such right to free and compulsory education under the Act and if so, for what reasons,' the top court said.
The states would have to return with their respective affidavits.
With the survey and data collection going on, the bench asked for simultaneous efforts to ensure deserving children got admissions in neighbourhood schools.
The bench granted four weeks to the authorities to comply with the directions.
It came on record that several states, including Gujarat, Delhi, Meghalaya and Sikkim, had already issued notifications to include orphaned children within the 25 per cent quota for those belonging to weaker sections and disadvantaged groups as prescribed in Section 12 (1) (c) of the law.
Section 12 deals with extent of school's responsibility for free and compulsory education.
The bench said other states might also consider issuing similar notification and file a related affidavit on record. It posted the matter for September 9.
During the hearing, the petitioner sought directions to the Centre to consider having a data of orphans in the upcoming census.
'There must be a box with regard to orphans also,' the bench told Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who was appearing in some other matter.
The bench said then the government would automatically get the data of orphan children.
'It should be. I would take it up because orphans are our responsibility,' Mehta said.
When the petitioner said the Centre should be asked to file a detailed affidavit on the aspects raised in the plea, the bench said it would consider all the issues.
The bench observed there were Juvenile Justice Committee in all high courts and national consultations were also being held on these issues.
'So it is not as bad as it was,' the bench said, 'positive things are also happening'.
The petitioner contended that India gives a lot of support and lot of opportunities to children of weaker sections such as scholarships, reservations, jobs, loans, etc., but there was nothing for orphans.
She said UNICEF estimates 25 million orphans in India.
'We as a country don't even have an official number of orphans. We are right now doing a historic caste census and in that we are not counting orphans,' the petitioner said.
India's 16th Census with caste enumeration will be carried out in 2027 with the reference date of October 1, 2026 in snow-bound areas like Ladakh and of March 1, 2027 in the rest of the country.
The apex court had on July 2018 agreed to examine the plea seeking reservation in educational institutions and government jobs for orphans, who have no linkage in society, on par with those belonging to the SC/ST and OBC category.s
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Indian Express
26 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
SC seeks Centre's reply on PIL challenging validity of BNS sedition provision
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday agreed to examine a challenge to the constitutional validity of sedition law, seen as the successor to the colonial-era law, under 2023 Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. A bench comprising Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justices K Vinod Chandran and N V Anjaria issued a notice to the Centre on the PIL filed by retired Major General S G Vombatkere, an Army veteran and Vishisht Seva Medal awardee, against the validity of Section 152 (sedition) of BNS. The top court also ordered tagging of the plea with a pending petition which challenges Section 124A (sedition) under the erstwhile IPC, replaced by BNS. Section 152 of BNS deals with the "act endangering sovereignty, unity and integrity of India." "Whoever, purposely or knowingly, by words, either spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representation, or by electronic communication or by use of financial means, or otherwise, excites or attempts to excite, secession or armed rebellion or subversive activities, or encourages feelings of separatist activities or endangers sovereignty or unity and integrity of India; or indulges in or commits any such act shall be punished with imprisonment for life or with imprisonment which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine," it reads. The plea called the provision a "rebranded version" of the sedition law, previously kept in abeyance by the Supreme Court in July 2022 pending legislative review. Despite this, the new legislation reinstates sedition under a new label, with even broader and more ambiguous language, it added. In July 2022, a three judge bench headed by former CJI N V Ramana stayed the sedition provision under IPC.


India Today
26 minutes ago
- India Today
NEP vs Tamil Nadu's SEP: Key differences in exams, language, and admissions
Tamil Nadu has launched its very own State Education Policy (SEP), and it's a straight-up rejection of the National Education Policy (NEP) brought in by the Centre. Chief Minister MK Stalin unveiled the new policy with a clear message -- education in Tamil Nadu will follow its own Tamil Nadu SEP was drafted by a 14-member panel led by Justice Murugesan. The policy rejects key NEP provisions, retains the two-language policy, and prioritises science, AI, and what's different between the NEP and SEP? Here's a section-by-section breakdown:1. LANGUAGE POLICY NEP: Proposes a three-language formula, often Hindi, English, and a regional language, across all Tamil Nadu sticks to its long-standing two-language policy — Tamil and student, regardless of whether they study under CBSE, ICSE or state board, must learn Tamil up to Class state has clearly rejected any form of language imposition.2. SCHOOL EXAMINATION SYSTEMNEP: Introduces public board exams in Classes 3, 5, and 8, aiming for regular Completely scraps public exams for Classes 3, 5 and students will be promoted till Class 10, with no fail system in these will be no Class 11 exam intention is to reduce pressure and stop the early commercialisation of education.3. UG COLLEGE ADMISSIONSNEP: Encourages common entrance tests for undergraduate admissions, even in arts and science Rejects this. Tamil Nadu will base admissions for arts and science UG courses on a consolidated score from Classes 11 and 12, with no entrance exam required. 4. POSITION ON NEET AND CENTRAL EXAMSNEP: Supports standardised national exams like NEET for medical Strongly opposes NEET. Tamil Nadu has consistently campaigned against it, citing stress and state claims the Centre withheld Rs 2,152 crore in funds (Samagra Shiksha) due to its refusal to adopt NEP and Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin reiterated: 'Even if they give Rs 1,000 crore, Tamil Nadu won't implement NEP. Tamil Nadu doesn't like imposition in any form.'5. CONTROL OF EDUCATIONNEP: Keeps education in the Concurrent List, meaning both Centre and State control Recommends moving education back to the State List, giving full control to the state reflects Tamil Nadu's push for more autonomy in policymaking.6. EDUCATION FOCUS AREASNEP: Focuses broadly on digital learning and vocational Adds a strong push towards science, artificial intelligence, and English language idea is to prepare students for future job markets and global opportunities.7. POLITICAL STAND AND FUNDING APPROACHadvertisementNEP: A centralised national policy that promotes public-private partnerships and varied education models. The Centre positions NEP as a uniform framework for all A state-first policy that firmly rejects central imposition and calls for more direct state investment in public schools and colleges. Tamil Nadu sees education as a state subject and argues for greater local control and public funding to ensure quality and access without over-reliance on private Nadu's SEP is more than just a state document. It's a strong political and educational message that local needs come first, and that student wellbeing matters more than rankings or centralised exams.- Ends


Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Elgar Parishad-Maoist links case: SC to consider listing bail plea of Surendra Gadling
New Delhi, The Supreme Court on Friday took note of repeated adjournments and assured early listing of the bail plea of advocate Surendra Gadling accused in the Elgar Parishad-Maoist links case. Elgar Parishad-Maoist links case: SC to consider listing bail plea of Surendra Gadling A bench comprising Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justices K Vinod Chandran and N V Anjaria was urged by his counsel and senior advocate Anand Grover, who said his client had been in jail for "6.5 years". "The bail plea has been adjourned 11 times in the Supreme Court,' Grover added. The CJI said, 'We will list it.' On March 27, a bench of Justices M M Sundresh and Rajesh Bindal adjourned the bail hearing of Gadling and activist Jyoti Jagtap arrested in the case. It also deferred the petition filed by the National Investigation Agency challenging the bail granted to activist Mahesh Raut. Raut was given bail by the Bombay High Court but the order was stayed after the NIA sought a stay on the verdict to challenge it before the apex court. Gadling was accused of providing aid to the Maoists and allegedly conspiring with various co-accused, including the ones absconding in the case. He was booked under various provisions of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, and the IPC and the prosecution claimed Gadling provided secret information about government activities and maps of certain areas to underground Maoist rebels. He reportedly asked Maoists to oppose the operation of Surjagarh mines, and instigated several locals to join the movement. Gadling is also involved in the Elgar Parishad-Maoist links case relating to the alleged provocative speeches delivered at the Elgar Parishad conclave held in Pune on December 31, 2017. The police claimed the speeches triggered violence the next day near the Koregaon-Bhima war memorial in Pune district. The high court had said Jagtap was an active member of the Kabir Kala Manch group, which during its stage play at the Elgar Parishad conclave held in Pune on December 31, 2017 gave not only aggressive, but highly provocative slogans. "We are of the considered opinion that there are reasonable grounds for believing the allegations or accusations of the NIA against the appellant having conspired, attempted, advocated and abetted the commission of a terrorist act as prima facie true," the court had said. According to the NIA, the KKM is a front organisation of the Communist Party of India . The high court had dismissed the appeal filed by the activist-cum-singer challenging a February 2022 order of a special court refusing her bail. The 2017 Elgar Parishad conclave was held at Shaniwarwada, an 18th-century palace-fort located in the heart of Pune city. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.