logo
MoF tells PD: Power sector subsidies tied to fiscal space

MoF tells PD: Power sector subsidies tied to fiscal space

ISLAMABAD: The Ministry of Finance (MoF) has reportedly informed the Power Division (PD) that the allocation of power sector subsidies for the fiscal year 2025-26 will depend on the availability of fiscal space, well-informed sources in the Finance Division told Business Recorder.
In a letter titled 'MEFP for EFF 2024-27 – Circular Debt (CD) Target for FY 2025-26,' the Power Division had sought indicative allocations for the upcoming fiscal year to bridge the circular debt gap.
According to the Corporate Finance (CF) Wing of the Finance Division, budgetary allocations for the power sector in FY 2025-26 will be finalized through the standard budgetary process in consultation with the Budget and CF Wings of the Finance Division, keeping in view the prevailing fiscal constraints.
Energy sector reforms: Govt makes new commitments to IMF
Regarding the issue of advance subsidy, the Finance Division has already shared its stance with the Power Division to clarify its position.
Sources revealed that the Finance Ministry did not endorse the Power Division's proposal to release an advance subsidy of Rs224 billion to address power sector cash flow and liquidity concerns, arguing that adequate funds have already been provided.
On March 25, 2025, the Power Division shared a draft summary with the Finance Ministry for submission to the Economic Coordination Committee (ECC), requesting the release of the advance subsidy. However, the Finance Division responded that sufficient funds—amounting to Rs633 billion—had already been allocated under various budgetary heads in line with the Power Division's requirements.
According to the Finance Ministry, a sum of Rs509 billion has also been allocated under Finance Division's Demand No 45 of CFY 2024-25 as per the requirement shared by Power Division during the budgetary process, as per the following break-up; (i) TDS-KE (arrears) Rs88 billion; (ii) Fata (arrears) Rs86 billion; (iii) additional subsidy Rs120 billion; and (iv) GPPs/IPPs (equity) Rs215 billion.
The Finance Ministry further stated that as is clear, ample funds are available in the budget for the liquidity requirements of the power sector. The Finance Ministry, however, has recommended that the funds be utilised in the same manner as allocated in the budget. Therefore, the Finance Ministry has not supported release of funds of Rs171 billion in the form of either advance subsidy or equity as proposed in the summary.
Alternatively, the sum of Rs174 billion could be released on account of 'arrears of subsidy in respect of TDS-KE (Rs88 billion) and Fata (Rs86 billion)' against verified claims.
The sources said, the Finance Ministry's recommendation is based on the following factors: an amount of Rs264 billion, released as advance subsidy for TDS-Discos in the previous years, still remains to be adjusted against actual claims, as per the following details;(i) stimulus package Covid-19/TDS Discos: advance Rs106.890 billion - claims Rs91.107 billion- balance Rs15.783 billion;(ii) PM Relief Package/TDS-Discos: advance Rs69.225 billion- claims Rs60.437 billion- balance Rs8.788 billion;(iii) future claims FY 2021-22/TDS Discos- Rs100 billion – claims Rs o - balance Rs100 billion;(iv) future claims FY 2021-22/TDS Discos: advance Rs50 billion - claims 0- balance Rs50 billion;(v) flood relief package/TDS Discos: advance Rs24 billion- claims 0- balance Rs24 billion;(vi) flood relief package/TDS Discos: Rs10.340 billion- claims Rs 0 – balance Rs10.340 billion; and (v) revised claims for the period of November 2020 to October 2023/TDS Discos: Rs55.487 billion - claims Rs 0 – balance Rs55.487 billion.
This shows that the amount of total advances were Rs415.942 billion, of which, claims were of Rs151.544 billion and balance of Rs264.398 billion.
The Finance Ministry has further stated that advance subsidy amount to Rs170 billion, released on account of TDS-KE till December 2024, also remained to be adjusted.
ECC in its decisions of October 15, 2020 and July 16, 2021 had directed that reconciliation of subsidy claims be carried out, which is still pending.
During the audit of FY2023-24 the AGP has raised observations that the previous advances provided against KE-TDS have not been adjusted before authorizing new/fresh advances.
The sources said, Finance Ministry has recently suggested to Power Division to consider reconciliation through third party to establish the exact payables/receivables position, which is also important in the context of the upcoming privatisation of certain entities.
'The relief extended to the protected categories for first three months of FY 2024-25 was required to be funded through savings of PSDP 2024-25 as per the Cabinet's decision, 'Finance Ministry said supporting Technical Supplementary Grant (TSG) for subsidy for subsidy from PSDP to Power Division.
The Finance Ministry was also of the view that funds may be utilized against actual verified claims of Discos and K-Electric after completion of all codal formalities as provision of advance subsidy on that account is not required.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Anti-digital, pro-realty sector budget
Anti-digital, pro-realty sector budget

Express Tribune

time4 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

Anti-digital, pro-realty sector budget

Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb on Tuesday unveiled a Rs17.6 trillion budget, which attempted to limit fiscal expansion but taxation measures were clearly self-contradictory that on one hand would promote cash economy and fossil fuels but discourage these too on the other. The government of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif also introduced new taxes on the digital economy, pensioners and clean energy. Some of these measures were contradictory to the stated policy to discourage the cash economy. However, the Finance Bill 2025-26, also gave incentives for clean energy by taxing the internal combustion engine cars and fossil fuels. Despite high poverty and high unemployment, the government proposed to drastically reduce import duties from raw materials to finished goods, which the industry feared would lead to de-industrialisation of Pakistan. The economy has been opened for the foreign competition by lowering protection available to local industries. The finance minister said that the maximum custom duty slab has been reduced to 15% while a five-year plan had been given to abolish additional and regulatory duties. The inaudible budget speech, which Aurangzeb, delivered in the midst of rowdy opposition, clearly lacked in giving any policy direction. While the Finance Division tried to meet the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) requirement to meet fiscal targets, the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) was not able to come up with the clear taxation policy. The Finance Bill 2025-26 appeared to be the most confusing document that any government produced in years. It revolved around going after the economy of the youth and the 21st century business practices. The government has proposed 18% sales tax on import of solar panels but it imposed Rs2.5 per litre carbon levy on use of petrol, diesel and furnace oil, showing the lack of clarity on the part of the government. Likewise, it increased the tax on cash withdrawals from banks from 0.6% to 0.8% to discourage cash economy and generate more easy money but it also imposed a new tax on digital services platforms in the range of 0.25% to 5%. The government also increased sales tax on 850 cc cars of the middle class from 12.5% to 18%. A new tax has been introduced on pensioners where the monthly pension of Rs833,000 has been taxed at the rate of 5%. The FBR was once again lacking in determining the policy, whether the government wanted to promote digital economy or cash economy. FBR Chairman Rashid Langrial cancelled the media briefing on the Finance Bill 2025-26, which was tantamount to compromising transparency and the right of the people to know about the measures that impact their futures. In his budget speech, the finance minister surprisingly stated that the "rapid growth in the online business and digital market places was creating problems for traditional businesses, therefore, it is proposed that e-commerce platforms, couriers and logistic services should be taxed at the rate of 18%. A tax official told The Express Tribune that the FBR would earn Rs64 billion by taxing the digital economy. The Finance Bill 2025-26 showed that the economic managers preferred the 19th century economy by providing some relief on purchase of properties but taxed the digital platforms of the 21st century. It has also proposed to ban economic transactions of ineligible persons, which include ban on purchase of properties, cars and investment in securities by persons whose assets do not match these purchases. Through the Finance Bill, the government also amended a host of other non-tax laws besides introducing two new legislations, the Digital Presence Proceeds Act 2025 and the New Energy Vehicles Adoption Levy Act, 2025. There might be constitutional questions, whether the new laws can be introduced through the Finance Bill. The government has proposed a total of over Rs415 billion worth of tax measures in the budget, said the senior tax official. These include Rs292 billion worth of FBR-related measures, Rs111 billion additional earnings by imposing Rs2.5 per litre carbon levy on petrol, diesel and furnace oil and Rs9 billion worth levy on conventional cars. Finance Minister Aurangzeb said that the IMF had also accepted the Rs389 billion worth enforcement measures. But he admitted that the FBR's tax-to-GDP ratio would remain below the IMF target of 10.6% in this fiscal year. The government has proposed these measures to extract a minimum Rs2.2 trillion from the sluggish economy in a bid to achieve next fiscal year's Rs14.13 trillion tax target. The petroleum and carbon levy target has been set at Rs1.47 trillion for the next fiscal year on the back of Rs80 per litre levy. The finance minister also announced some respite for the lower to middle income group salaried persons. He said that on the annual income of Rs1.2 million, the tax rate will be 2.5%, down from 5%. In the cabinet meeting earlier, there was an exchange of words between the finance minister and the Communication Minister Abdul Alaeem Khan, who had asked the prime minister to further increase the salaries for the government employees. On that the finance minister stated that this would require additional resources, prompting Khan to say that he was not a street vendor, who did not know that this required additional money, said a member of the cabinet on condition of anonymity. The prime minister decided that in order to give a 10% increase in the salaries, the tax rate for the lower middle income group should be increased from the proposed 1% to 2.5%, said the sources. On annual income of up to Rs2.2 million, the government has proposed to reduce the rate from 15% to 11%, on annual income of Rs3.2 million, the rate is reduced from 25% to 23%. There is no relief for the annual salaried income earners of over Rs4.1 million. However, the fine on highest income earners has been reduced from 10% to just 9%, which the finance minister called was necessary to stop "brain drain". Advance tax on sale or transfer of immovable property has been increased from 3% to 4.5% on the value of Rs50 million property. The rate is jacked up to 5% from 3% on Rs100 million property while it is further increased to 5.5% from 4%, if the value exceeds Rs100 million. However, on the purchase of the property the rate is reduced from 3% to 1.5%, from 3.5% to 2% and from 4% to 2.5%, depending upon the value of the property. The economic transactions by the ineligible persons have been banned, if the value of the new purchases is more than 130% of the value of the total assets. Tight fiscal path In order to stay in the IMF programme, the government has proposed a fiscally tight budget, although it created room for political spending too. The government has proposed a budget deficit of Rs6.5 trillion or 5% of the size of the economy. The total size of the budget is Rs17.6 trillion, which is 7.3% less than this year's original budget due to relatively lower allocations for the interest payments in fiscal year 2025-26. The proposed budget deficit is 1.8% of the GDP or Rs2.4 trillion less than the original estimates of this fiscal year. The deficit may still be appearing large in absolute terms. But it is, for the first time, lower than this year's gap, both in terms of size of the economy and in absolute numbers. The defence budget has been proposed at Rs2.55 trillion, which is 21% or Rs436 billion higher than this fiscal year due to war with India. The armed forces development programme has been marginally increased to Rs300 billion, which is far lower than what the military had demanded. The government is projecting gross federal revenues at record Rs19.3 trillion for next fiscal year, higher by Rs1.5 trillion. The gross revenues are based on the FBR's tax target of Rs14.13 trillion and Rs5.2 trillion non-tax revenues. The non-tax income will mainly come from the Petroleum Levy where the government wants to collect nearly Rs1.5 trillion and the Rs2.4 trillion profit by the State Bank of Pakistan. Out of the Rs14.1 trillion FBR tax collections, the provinces will get Rs8.2 trillion as their shares in the federal taxes under the National Finance Commission (NFC) Award. This leaves the federal government with Rs11 trillion net revenues for next fiscal year, which will not be sufficient to meet the interest payments and inclusive of all defence spending. The government will borrow Rs6.5 trillion in the next fiscal year to finance the Rs17.6 trillion total federal budget. Under the IMF programme, the four provinces are also required to save Rs1.46 trillion from their revenues as cash surplus to bring down the national budget deficit to Rs5 trillion or 3.9% of GDP. This is steeper fiscal consolidation and would require all the five governments to meet all their revenue and expenditures related targets. The interest payments will eat 47% of the budget and the federal government's net income —after paying the provincial shares — will be Rs2.8 trillion more than interest payments. The next year's interest payments are estimated at Rs8.2 trillion, which is lower than this fiscal year due to substantial reduction in the interest rates. The finance minister announced a Rs716 billion BISP programme aimed at expanding the net to over 10 million beneficiaries and adding more children in the conditional cash transfer programmes.

Corporate tax rate issue: OICCI disappointed over limited govt progress
Corporate tax rate issue: OICCI disappointed over limited govt progress

Business Recorder

time5 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Corporate tax rate issue: OICCI disappointed over limited govt progress

KARACHI: The Overseas Investors Chamber of Commerce and Industry (OICCI) has expressed disappointment over the government's limited progress in addressing inequitable corporate tax rate in the recent budget. It said while the marginal reduction in Super Tax rates is acknowledged, OICCI reiterates the urgent need for a comprehensive overhaul of tax structures to enhance Pakistan's competitiveness and attract foreign investment. The Chamber also notes the absence of meaningful reductions in government expenditure, which could have helped narrow the budget deficit. Fiscal discipline remains critical to ensuring macroeconomic stability, and OICCI urges the government to prioritize expenditure rationalisation in its budgetary measures. OICCI regrets the government's missed opportunity to broaden the tax base in the current budget, particularly the absence of any concrete strategy to document Pakistan's substantial Rs. 9 trillion cash-based informal economy - a critical measure for meaningful revenue enhancement and economic formalization that the Chamber has consistently advocated for OICCI welcomes several positive reforms, including simplified tax returns for salaried individuals and small businesses, the nationwide rollout of e-invoicing, and the expansion of POS systems, all measures long advocated by the Chamber. However, their success hinges on effective implementation, and OICCI stresses the need for transparency and consistency in execution. The increase in the tax exemption threshold for salaried individuals (from Rs. 0.6 million to Rs. 1.2 million) and the reduction in their tax rate (from 5 percent to 1 percent) are commendable steps that align with OICCI's recommendations but still fall short of providing impactful and necessary relief to reduce ongoing brain drain in the country. OICCI also acknowledges the government's gradual phasing out of tax exemption on FATA and PATA and the government's stricter measures against non-compliant taxpayers, including restrictions on property and vehicle purchases, asset transfers abroad, and enhanced penalties. Such actions are crucial for improving tax compliance and broadening the revenue base. Despite these advancements, the budget falls short of introducing transformative policies for the corporate sector. OICCI emphasises that gradually rationalising tax slabs and reducing the overall tax burden on businesses are essential to promoting a more investment-friendly environment. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Key economic sectors: LCCI disappointed over lack of broader relief
Key economic sectors: LCCI disappointed over lack of broader relief

Business Recorder

time6 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Key economic sectors: LCCI disappointed over lack of broader relief

LAHORE: The Lahore Chamber of Commerce and Industry (LCCI) acknowledged some positive measures in the federal budget 2025-26 but expressed disappointment over the lack of broader relief for key economic sectors. Following Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb's budget speech, LCCI leaders addressed a press conference, stating that while some of their demands were met, the business community had expected more substantial measures to stimulate investment, industrial growth, small and medium enterprises (SMEs), and agriculture. LCCI President Mian Abuzar Shad, along with Senior Vice President Engineer Khalid Usman, Vice President Shahid Nazir Chaudhry, and former office-bearers including Mian Anjum Nisar, Muhammad Ali Mian, Ali Hussam Asghar, and Faheem ur Rehman Sahgal, shared their insights on the budget. A significant number of executive committee members and market association presidents also attended the conference. Mian Abuzar Shad noted that the increased defense budget was a necessary step but argued that further increments should have been made. He welcomed relief measures for the construction sector and appreciated the higher allocation for water projects, though he stressed that even greater funding was needed given current challenges. Shad highlighted that the LCCI's long-standing demand for simplified tax returns had been accepted. While the super tax was reduced, he described the cut as insignificant and called for a more substantial reduction. He praised the imposition of taxes on the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) and Provincially Administered Tribal Areas (PATA), a measure the LCCI had long advocated for. He pointed out that 45 government entities are being merged or abolished but emphasized the need to divest all loss-making public sector enterprises. Other positive steps included tax reductions in the real estate sector, lower duties on property transactions, the establishment of Daanish University, and measures to curb sales tax evasion. Bringing e-commerce into the tax net was also commended as a good decision. However, Shad expressed concern over under-invoicing and Afghan trade, which he claimed had cost Pakistan Rs. 25 trillion over the past 15 years. He also criticized unchecked petroleum imports for negatively impacting foreign exchange reserves. Additionally, he voiced disappointment over the absence of specific measures to support SMEs. Engineer Khalid Usman criticized the budget for lacking a clear growth strategy. He stated that the minor tax relief for salaried individuals was insufficient and called for further reductions. He also argued that taxing petroleum products would discourage the documented economy. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store