Trump's tariffs to face major court test brought by US small business owners
Trump has underpinned his tariff policy with an emergency power that is now being challenged as unlawful in the federal courts. On Thursday the US court of appeals for the federal circuit will hear oral arguments in the case, VOS Selections v Trump.
A group of small business owners are suing the US president on grounds that he lacks legal authority from Congress to impose severe tariffs that could damage their bottom line. The Trump administration has invoked a 1977 law, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), claiming that various national emergencies – including US trade deficits with trading partners and the scourge of fentanyl trafficking – demand urgent action.
But the plaintiffs have countered that the IEEPA does not give the president the power to impose tariffs, and has never been used in such a way in its almost half a century on the statute books.
The case has the potential to derail Trump's most significant tariff deals and negotiations, which he has made a centrepiece of his second presidency. Given how much is riding on it, the suit is likely eventually to be settled by the US supreme court under its current 6-3 supermajority of hard-right justices.
In the short term, the challenge under the IEEPA looms as a black cloud over Trump's desire to claim victory on the tariff front, as his controversial strategy of slapping hefty import duties on major trading partners continues to roil global trade and markets. On Sunday, Trump struck a deal at his golf club in Scotland with the European Commission chief, Ursula von der Leyen, that will see 15% import tariffs on most EU goods entering the US.
Then on Friday, a day after the appeals court hears oral arguments, Trump's latest round of potentially destabilizing import duties is set to kick in. The targeted countries include some of the biggest suppliers of US imports, including Canada and Mexico.
Trump's tariff gamble has already been deemed to be illegal by a federal court which ruled in May that the president had overshot his powers under trade laws. That ruling was paused by the appeals court that will be hearing the case on Thursday, pending its decision.
Sign up to This Week in Trumpland
A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration
after newsletter promotion
The IEEPA gives the president the authority to regulate transactions with foreign countries, but only under a narrow set of circumstances. In particular, the power can only be wielded where there is an 'unusual and extraordinary threat with respect to which a national emergency has been declared'.
The small businesses leading the suit claim that Trump has not met such a rigorous standard, and that his tariffs are thus unlawful.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
17 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Smithsonian removed Trump from impeachment exhibit over 'appearance'
"The placard, which was meant to be a temporary addition to a 25-year-old exhibition, did not meet the museum's standards in appearance, location, timeline, and overall presentation," the post reads. "It was not consistent with other sections in the exhibit and moreover blocked the view of the objects inside its case. For these reasons, we removed the placard." The museum added that the impeachment placard will be "updated in the coming weeks to reflect all impeachment proceedings in our nation's history." Confusion over the exhibit began on July 31 when The Washington Post first reported that references to both of President Donald Trump's impeachments were removed. Why were Donald Trump's impeachments removed from exhibit? The museum explained on Aug. 1 in a statement to USA TODAY that the references to Donald Trump's impeachments, which occurred in 2019 and again in 2021, were part of a "temporary label." In September 2021, a "temporary label on content concerning the impeachments of Donald J. Trump" was added, according to the Smithsonian's statement, with the museum adding that "it was intended to be a short-term measure to address current events at the time, however, the label remained in place until July 2025." For now, the display currently appears how it did nearly 20 years ago, according to the Smithsonian statement and the Washington Post's report, which also noted that the exhibit now reads, "only three presidents have seriously faced removal," omitting Trump. "In reviewing our legacy content recently, it became clear that the 'Limits of Presidential Power' section in 'The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden' exhibition needed to be addressed," the museum's statement reads. "Because the other topics in this section had not been updated since 2008, the decision was made to restore the 'Impeachment' case back to its 2008 appearance." Where is the impeachment placard located at the Smithsonian? The "impeachment" placard is housed within an exhibition called "The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden," which opened in 2000, according to the emailed statement from the Smithsonian. The placard is part of a display featuring information and artifacts about Andrew Johnson, Bill Clinton and Richard Nixon, the display's companion website says. Nixon resigned before he could be formally impeached. Other impeached presidents featured on Smithsonian website The display's companion website does not include a dedicated section for the Trump impeachments, but does note in an introductory sentence, "The House of Representatives impeached Andrew Johnson in 1868, William J. Clinton in 1998, and Donald Trump in 2019 and again in 2021. In all four cases the Senate voted to acquit." Additionally, the website features sections about Johnson's impeachment, including tickets and newspaper clips from the time; Nixon's Senate hearing and resignation, including testimony papers and photos from the proceedings; and Clinton's trial, with tickets and Senate question cards.
The Herald Scotland
17 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Why it just got harder to become a doctor or lawyer
For people like her, navigating that maze just became far more challenging. Major changes are coming to higher education in the United States after President Donald Trump signed his major domestic policy bill into law. Among them is an end to Grad PLUS loans, a program that helps people pay for medical school and law school. Since Congress created the loans, direct from the federal government, in 2006, they have covered the full cost of attending graduate and professional school for nearly 2 million students. Beginning July 1, 2026, that won't be an option anymore. Trump's tax and spending law will eliminate the Grad PLUS program for new borrowers (students who take out loans before that date will be grandfathered in for up to three years). The measure imposes new borrowing caps - $50,000 annually and $200,000 overall - on the amount of federal direct loans students can take out for degrees in law and medicine. And it limits their repayment options after they graduate. Read more: Trump just made it harder to close the Education Department All those technicalities mean that some students like Tran may have fewer options for law school or medical school - or could be steered down a different career path altogether. "There's no way I can graduate early enough to avoid the Grad PLUS change," she said. The reforms represent the culmination of years of conservative efforts to rein in student lending. However, there has been bipartisan consensus about the causes of the underlying problem Republicans are trying to solve. Left-leaning groups and policymakers have also been highly critical in recent years of the crippling debt that some graduate programs impose on students. Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy, a doctor from Louisiana and chairman of the Senate education committee, said the new legislation will put a stop to a vicious cycle that has kept college costs too high. "The increasing availability of federal loans has resulted in skyrocketing tuition prices, trapping students in a cycle of overwhelming debt that they can't pay back," he said in a statement to USA TODAY. "By capping inflationary graduate loan programs, we prevent students from overborrowing and put downward pressure on rising college costs." Read more: Is grad school worth the investment? Our exclusive data shows some surprising answers. In 2024, the average annual law school tuition at a private university was nearly $60,000, according to American Bar Association data analyzed by the Law School Admission Council. For in-state residents attending public institutions, it was roughly $32,000. It's hard to know exactly how the loan limits will impact law schools, said Austen Parrish, dean of the University of California, Irvine School of Law. It's likely, in his view, that higher-ranked, more expensive schools will enroll a greater number of wealthy students who won't be as reliant on loans. Other, less privileged students may have to trade prestige for cost, he said. "You're going to see students having to make difficult decisions," he said. Medical schools brace for shift Watching from north-central Montana as Congress passed Trump's spending bill, Julianna Lindquist was happy she started medical school when she did. The 23-year-old, originally from Connecticut, is in her second year at Touro College of Osteopathic Medicine in Montana. (Of the two types of medical schools, osteopathic programs are the less-common version; their coursework is similar to that of other medical schools, but instead emphasizes a more holistic approach to patient care.) This semester, Lindquist is taking out the full amount of Grad PLUS loans she's eligible for - roughly $24,000. "I would not be anywhere without student loans," she said. "There's financial aid, but it's not enough." About half of all medical students rely on the Grad PLUS program, borrowing more than $1 billion annually, according to the Association of American Medical Colleges. Graduates of osteopathic schools, the vast majority of which take on Grad PLUS loans, often go on to serve rural areas or become primary care providers. With federal support disappearing, it'll be up to the private lending market to make up the difference, said Jane Carreiro, dean of the College of Osteopathic Medicine at the University of New England in Portland, Maine. "How are students going to navigate that?" she said. "That's a question that we're all asking." Zachary Schermele is an education reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach him by email at zschermele@ Follow him on X at @ZachSchermele and Bluesky at @
Daily Mail
36 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Quiet retirement beach town becomes luxury haven... and it started with Whole Foods
Florida 's Pompano Beach used to be a quiet retirement community, devoid of the bustle and the glamor of southern neighbors, Miami and Fort Lauderdale. That was ten years ago. But then Whole Foods arrived, suggesting the area's fortunes were about to improve markedly. And since the pandemic, the area has exploded with new residents. The buyers are flocking to the enclave not only for the sprawling beaches and crystal clear waters, but to buy into one of Pompano's 'branded' residences. Big names such as The W, Ritz-Carlton, and Waldorf Astoria, have opened, or intending to open, premiere branded residences in the area, an idea that was completely unheard of just 10 years ago. Braded residences are billed as 'luxury for less', combining the convenience of five-star hotel amenities with design-driven style and usually beachfront access. Isaac Toledano, the founder of the BH Group, told the Daily Mail: 'If you told someone 10 years ago [there would be branded residences] they'd probably think you were crazy.' His Southern Florida development company built the W Pompano Beach Hotel and Residences, one of the most notable changes at the forefront of the evolving city. A spec of the Ritz-Carlton Residences on Pompano Beach is seen above He said as places like Miami and Fort Lauderdale got more and more crowded, moving north to start developing was the obvious choice. 'The next natural area was Pompano Beach. The city is doing a magnificent job at improving the city and infrastructure.' Pompano Beach sits an hour or so north of Miami and just 30 minutes north of Fort Lauderdale. Its crystal clear waters, sprawling beaches, and proximity to the Intracoastal Waterway and Atlantic Ocean make it an attractive location. Realtor and Pompano Beach native Roxanne Hall said she knew people were catching on to the city's appeal when the first Whole Foods opened there. 'Pompano has been considered a sleepy retiree town for many years. I'd say about 10 or 11 years ago we got a Whole Foods. 'When Whole Foods comes to town it knows what it's doing. It does its market research.' She said in the years that followed people from all over North America began slowly but surely trickling into Pompano Beach. However, statistics show that the population has been growing steadily since 2000 when the 25 square-mile city boasted 70,000 residents. In 2023, 113,000 people called it home. But Hall said that the growth has come with difficulties. She explained that during the Covid pandemic the real estate market in the area was a disaster. 'We saw a huge influx. 'I mean it was a nightmare. People were overbidding, we couldn't find homes for everyone and my buyers were crying. Everything was going for a lot of money.' Buyers can get more bang for their buck than they would in Miami or Fort Lauderdale and the area also has far more space on its beaches for beachfront properties. 'You go south, you're getting massive congestion and much higher prices,' said Hall. 'The price point in Pompano was very desirable.' David Marder, an agent in South Florida, Fort Lauderdale, told Mansion Global that buyers pay around $2,000 per square foot for luxury developments. In Pompano Beach, it would be between $1,200 and $1,500 for the same development. Nowadays, luxury is the name of the game in Pompano. 'There's tons of them,' said Hall of branded luxury developments. 'So the appeal is that you buy branded luxury and you protect your purchase. Branded luxuries are there, they're beautiful. 'I mean you don't have to fix anything. There's no assessment so we see a lot of desire for our ultra luxury.' Toledano said when people are investing in these luxury properties they're being sold a brand, and all of the amenities that come with it. The brand recognition of a company that people already know and trust and the luxury of 24/7 hotel living are attractive to buyers, especially when they can get it for around the same price point. 'People want to be affiliated with a brand,' he said. 'They want to make sure that you will deliver a quality product.' And brand recognition is the best way to deliver the amenities and luxury that buyers want to see. Realtor Roxanne Hall, said its difficult to buy or sell a desirable home for less than $700,000. This 3 Bed 2 Bath home is listed with Pompano Beach Realty for $1.5 million Spaces like the W Residences offer award-winning dining, sprawling pool decks, fitness centers, and a concierge on call whenever residents need them. Hall said it's hard to get a desirable single family condo in the area for less than $700,000. Nearby Miami has been at the epicenter of a condo crisis after the 2021 collapse of a condo building in Surfside led to a new law that requires condo buildings to undergo structural inspections and shore up reserves. This has meant that many HOAs have been hiking fees and doling out hefty special assessments to comply with the new rules, which has reduced demand for condos. 'People are staying away from condos that are 40 years or older. They really want 10 years or less and there's only a handful of those,' Hall said. Most people are hoping for one or two bedrooms with a pool or easy beach and water access. Florida in general may be known for Snowbirds and retirees but Hall said buyers and people looking to move there are gradually getting younger. 'You go to a restaurant here and it's the 50s and 60s crowd and the 20s and 30s altogether. It's a real mix,' she said. Toledano said that despite the rapid growth, the city seems to be keeping up. 'Pompano Beach has a lot of places for growth,' he said. Many old buildings and developments are being swapped out for new ones and Pompano Beach has even spent $2 billion on public green spaces, piers, shopping, dining, and walkable streets. A local herself, Hall said natives are open to the changes. 'Pompano Beach is a wonderful town. It's three miles of sandy beaches. We have 18 wreck sites for diving. We have this beautiful pier that they just renovated with new restaurants. 'It's a water town. It's for boating. It's for beach lovers.'
