F1 Is So American Now It Even Has Its Own KFC Meal
The latest car news, reviews, and features.
I remember people asking me about my favorite sport when I was a kid. I'd just say 'car racing,' never bothering to specify it was Formula 1 because no one in the U.S. knew what the hell that was back then. Nine out of 10 times, people would say, 'Oh, you like NASCAR!' That's not the case anymore, as F1 has officially broken into American culture.
The Liberty Media-owned racing series is as recognizable across the country as the NFL, and I don't need any silly studies or viewership statistics to prove this. All I need to validate this theory is the KFC commercial embedded below, promoting the KFC Fill Up Box Box Box. Get it? Box box box.
What's more American than KFC? Oh, what's that—McDonald's, you say? Well, rumor has it the Golden Arches is also coming out with an F1-themed Happy Meal.
I know what you're thinking: the KFC commercial is promoting the F1 movie and not exactly the F1 series. Okay, sure, but that's pretty much the same thing, given that the film was intended to serve as a marketing tool for the series from day one.
The Joseph Kosinski-directed movie features Brad Pitt and Damson Idris as headliners, and took two years to finish, while an '11th F1 team' traveled the world for 16 months filming real on-track scenes during actual racing weekends. Some reports peg the total cost of the movie at around $300 million.
As someone who grew up with F1 since the late '80s and has witnessed its incredible growth in the U.S. thanks to Netflix's Drive to Survive, these advertisements are a finish line of sorts. F1 has made it into mainstream media, and now into the marketing-hungry fast food industry. It simply doesn't get more American than that.
F1, you've arrived.
Got a tip? Email us at tips@thedrive.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Motor Trend
13 minutes ago
- Motor Trend
The Ringer: 1985 Honda Civic CRX Si
[This story first appeared in the Fall 2010 issue of MotorTrend Classic] If you're too young to understand the appeal of the first Honda Civic CRX, consider the first Apple iPod. It put out five to 10 gigabytes, came only in snow white with a chrome silver backing, and held 1000 to 2000 songs. It inspired industrial designers working on various projects to try and capture the essence of its cool design in cars and other products. Even if the original iPod is mostly forgotten, it taught the PC world something important about Apple's irresistible design aesthetic. Eighteen years earlier, the 76-horsepower 1984 Honda Civic CRX was a revelation in a world in which the epitome of affordable performance was the 190-horsepower, Chevy Camaro Z/28. On paper, the CRX—Civic Renaissance Model X—with its 12-valve, 1488cc single-overhead-cam aluminum four, compound vortex combustion chamber, and Keihin three-barrel carburetor, was no more impressive than a 10 GB iPod. There are more important numbers. For the iPod, it was: You're holding 2000 of your favorite songs in your hand. For the CRX, it was: The car weighs 1800 pounds, following Colin Chapman's philosophy: 'Adding power makes you faster in the straights. Subtracting weight makes you faster everywhere.' MotorTrend's first road test in the December 1983 issue bench-raced a natural competitor, the new Pontiac Fiero. 'As it stands, the Fiero is heavier, not quite as quick, less economical, and a lot more expensive than the CRX 1.5,' Kevin Smith wrote on his way to becoming one of several journos to buy a CRX. What really impressed the automotive press is that the 1984 CRX was one of four new Civics Honda introduced at once, all of which were segment leaders: the ultra-modern hatchback, the extra-versatile wagon, and the preternatural premium small car, the sedan. Honda and the uninformed masses called the CRX a commuter car and focused in on the $6100 HF. With a 58-horse CVCC, eight-valve 1.3-liter and five-speed manual, the HF was the most fuel-efficient vehicle sold in the U.S., rated 51/67 mpg at the time, 38/47 mpg using current EPA standards. The CRX was really a sports car. Front suspension consisted of struts—sprung with torsion bars instead of coils—and an anti-roll bar. The innovative rear suspension worked like a beam-axle but a bearing in the center makes it semi-independent. There was also an anti-roll bar. It was perfect for slicing and dicing through urban traffic, with unassisted steering offering great feel and feedback. Turning radius was an amazing 28.2 feet, good for quick U-turns when that space in front of the coffee shop suddenly opened. EPA fuel mileage was 36/49 mpg according to our spec sheet. The modern numbers are 28/35 mpg for the standard 1.5-liter and five-speed manual (slightly less for California or the three-speed automatic). The flip side is a dearth of sound insulation to keep out road, wind, and engine noise. That flips it back to its sports car appeal. Steering, handling, brakes, all feel direct, an extension of the driver. The urbanite owner could let loose on weekends and take it out to the country and look for twisty roads. In MotorTrend's 1984 Import Car of the Year contest, the Honda CRX and Civic scored just behind the BMW 318i in roadholding and beat it in the slalom: CRX at 6.62 seconds, Civic S at 6.65, and 318i at 6.81 seconds. We gave the award to the CRX, with the Civic scoring second and the Prelude third. For 1985, Honda added the CRX Si, with programmed fuel injection replacing the single downdraft carb. Horsepower increased by 15 to 91 in the Si and peaked 500 rpm lower, at 5500. Wheels were a half-inch wider to accommodate new 175/70R13 tires, though in the March 1985 issue, MT found the Michelins 'woefully inadequate to handle the torque of the responsive four-banger'—now, 93 pound-feet at 4500 rpm, up from 84 pound-feet at 3500. MT's skidpad figure dropped to 0.80 g from 0.82. The CRX's 0-to-60-mph time vastly improved, though, from 10.2 seconds for the '84 to 8.2 seconds for the '85 Si. Just as the carbureted CRX 1.5 was quicker than the four-cylinder Pontiac Fiero, the fuel-injected 1.5 was quicker than the new Fiero V-6. From 1985 on, the CRX came with three trim levels, HF, DX ( still carbureted), and Si. For 1986 and 1987, Honda replaced the Civic line's recessed sealed-beam headlamps with flush, aerodynamic lenses. The DX's optional automatic was now a four-speed with lockup torque converter, and the HF got a cleaner, 1.5-liter eight-valve engine. Inside, the Si, DX, and HF got new door panel inserts with fabric to match the two seats. Outside, the Si got new body-color lower panels and 185/60R14 Yokohamas. This mid-cycle refresh came with a weight gain. The DX, which was the 1802-pound '84 model, crept up to 1866 pounds by '87. The Si was up 123 pounds for '86, to 1953 and then to 1978 for '87. Mark Wanzel's first CRX was an '84 1.5; his second was an '85 Si; and now, so is his third. At 37, Wanzel might relate to the iPod metaphor, if not for his father, who took him to club races at Atlantic Motorsport Park in Shubenacadie, Nova Scotia, in the mid-'80s. 'You'd see fleets of CRXs racing, along with MR2s, RX-7s, Fieros, Rabbit GTIs, and Sciroccos,' Wanzel recalls. The CRXs have been his daily drivers, though he also owns a '92 Acura Integra. Canada didn't get the Si until '87, and Wanzel prefers the lighter-weight, recessed-headlamp '85. He bought this red Arizona car for US$2500 and uses his previous Si, a black '85, for parts. We like original cars in Classic, but Wanzel's CRX has some period-correct modifications. In place of his '85 Si's U.S.-spec D16 SOHC engine, this car has Honda's ZC engine, a 16-valve, 1.6-liter DOHC four, also with programmed fuel injection, the 130-horsepower European-market CRX Si engine also used in the CRX-based 1986-89 Acura Integra. Rated 113 horsepower in the Integra, it's available as a remanufactured engine from Japan. Wanzel spent 15 years trying to find his car's Mugen Power CF 48 wheel rims. His red CRX also has a Mugen Power paint-matched rear lip spoiler and three-spoke steering wheel. Finally, Wanzel's CRX has adjustable Koni shocks, 'because OEM shocks are no longer available.' He takes advantage of the adjustable torsion bars to lower his Honda. Wanzel and his fiancé, Julie, drove it from Barrie, Ontario, to Ann Arbor, Michigan, in the lowest setting and never bottomed out. After Wanzel raised the suspension for our photography, he noticed his car had a better ride with no handling degradation. Steering feels heavier than my '87 DX, and the five-speed gearbox is notchier. The clutch is light and progressive. The CRX launches like most Hondas, bereft of low-end torque, but progresses very quickly, courtesy of maybe 13.9 pounds per horsepower, and you find yourself reaching the 7000-rpm redline easily. Steering is as advertised. Simple, intuitive controls with ball-bearing feel are user-friendly, and unlike a modern Mini Cooper or Mazda Miata, there's no traction or stability control to shut off. The car makes quick, sharp left-right transitions, good for city traffic slaloms and canyon roads. Turn-in is sharp, and you can go from mild front-drive understeer to tucking in the tail by lifting throttle mid-turn. Get back into the throttle, and the CRX maintains its momentum, as you'd expect from a car that doesn't tip a ton. 'The car really likes late braking,' Wanzel notes. The all-new Mark II '88 CRX (with corresponding Civic sedan, hatch, and wagon) featured control-arm front and rear suspension and steel front fenders. The '88 Si weighed 2017 pounds, and powered by a 105-horse 1.6-liter SOHC four, it started at $10,195. It won Motor Trend's Import Car of the Year, again. Honda followed that up with the 1993 Civic Del Sol, badged CRX in other markets. Appropriately, it won nothing. Honda's cars grew and, by virtue of safety and convenience features, gained weight. The new CR-Z is about the right size, but as a hybrid-only car, it doesn't rev like the original CRX. It's made for HF devotees. There are faster, quicker, more powerful, better-handling sports cars. There has never been a 'commuter car' that proved Colin Chapman's ideals quite like the Honda CRX. Thanks to modern consumers' demands for safety and convenience, there never will be again. Ask The Man Who Owns One Mark Wanzel (above, with fiancé, Julie Ward) is a photographer who shoots freelance and for The Barrie Examiner in Ontario, Canada. Why I like it: 'Without even discussing its innovations, for me, the Mark I CRX will always be great because of its light weight and sporty feel, useable practicality, and boy-racer looks. Few cars in history deliver like the CRX, and when you consider the Si, it becomes a full-package car. It's way too much fun for a road car.' Why It's Collectible: Most Mark I CRXs were driven hard and allowed to rust, and there won't be a modern sports car this light, efficient, and affordable again. Restoring/Maintaining: Engines are bulletproof if maintained. Most other parts are unavailable without a parts car. Replacement plastic front fenders and hood headers are available from China and European/Japanese-spec engines are available from Japan. Beware: You'll find examples that haven't rusted away only from California and Southern states, so watch for faded and damaged interior/exterior plastics. Shocks, struts, and boots went quickly and must be replaced regularly, now only with aftermarket parts. Timing belts must be replaced every 60,000 miles to avoid valve damage. Expect to pay: Concours-ready: $2450; solid driver: $1200; tired runner: $575 Join the club: CRX Owners Group, Club Si, Northern California CRX Club, Red Pepper Racing, Our Take Then: 'Honda's all-new Civic CRX 1.5 suggests the term 'Rollerskate GT.' Not only is it roomy and neatly done inside, it's a delight in motion. Running around town, blitzing a mountain road, or cruising cross-country, you have a responsive, well-balanced performance automobile under your command.'—Kevin Smith, MotorTrend, November 1983. Now: What the enthusiast world needs is a car this light and this much fun, one that delivers equal helpings of performance and efficiency. If only Honda had kept developing the car, like BMW with the Mini, instead of replacing it with the Dull Sol. My CRX I test-drove a white 1984 Honda CRX five-speed at a dealership in Brookfield, Wisconsin, figuring the payments on a $6600 car wouldn't be much more than what I spent on parts in an average month on my 1977 Triumph Spitfire. I didn't buy one until three years later, after leaving the Quad-City Times for the San Diego Business Journal. California dealers were still getting close to sticker on CRXs (and most other Hondas). Insurance rates were especially high on the Si for twentysomething single guys, so in September 1987, on the day after my 29th birthday, I bought a red DX five-speed with no A/C for, I think, $8125. I ran it up and down Highway 1 between San Luis Obispo and San Francisco whenever I could. I drove it fast and hard, was meticulous with service, got 33 mpg in the city and about 40 mpg highway, and moved to Washington, D.C., in it. In February 1994, a lawyer with a medical condition who shouldn't have been driving his 1981 Olds 98 passed out on a boulevard outside Georgetown, plowing into oncoming traffic and taking out my CRX at low, constant speed. I had only a sore wrist from clenching the wheel. I still miss that car.
Motor Trend
13 minutes ago
- Motor Trend
Hiding in Plain Sight: 10 of the Coolest Sleeper Wagons of All Time
Looking back, the IS300 SportCross might be one of the weirdest Lexuses ever made. It felt like it was caught in between a hatchback and a wagon, as it was neither square nor sloped enough to be definitively either. But because it was based on the sedan, we'll classify it as a wagon. Plus, it just gives us an excuse to write about it. From the rear doors forward, it was basically indistinguishable from its sedan counterpart and came with all the IS goodies of the day, including what is arguably one of the coolest analog driver gauges ever designed. 'At our test facility, we expected a wagon based on an already great compact sedan to be good, but not this good—nor this close to the sedan,' Walton wrote. 'A 0–60-mph blast takes just 0.2 second longer (at 7.6 seconds), and the quarter-mile run of 15.6 sec at 89.7 mph is closer still. As if that weren't enough, its slalom speed of 66.5 mph is a breath away from the sedan's 67.6-mph best. Brakes? Just 5 feet farther from 60 mph at 118 feet.' Practically speaking, the SportCross rode and handled like a sports car, which was just an added sleeper bonus.
Motor Trend
13 minutes ago
- Motor Trend
Rad! 2026 Ford Mustang FX Package Remasters 1980s-Era Fox Body
The so-called "Fox body" Ford Mustangs, the third-generation cars built from 1979 through 1993, are enjoying a sort of nostalgia-driven renaissance in interest these days. Unsurprisingly, this is because those who were young when the Fox bodies were on sale are now older, maybe with some extra cash and spare garage space to start collecting these Mustangs off-lawn, so to speak. How "in" are Fox bodies these days? Ford is even getting in on the action with a new FX package that celebrates the Mustang defined by the 1980s. This isn't the first time Ford has dipped into Fox-body lore lately, either—when the current Mustang arrived for 2024, its digital gauge cluster even included a setting that recreates the Fox body's old-school analog gauge pack. The FX package takes the nostalgia a lot further, of course, with white badges, white wheels, retro "Mustang" lettering, and more. It's available only on the Mustang GT Premium trim level, on both the coupe and convertible, and with or without the Performance package. It Ain't Real If It Ain't Teal Ford doesn't choose just any white paint for the FX package; since all things Mustang must treat time like a flat circle, everything you see painted white is, specifically, painted Oxford White, a hue that was available on the original Mustang. It's used for the "GT" badges, wheels, retro "Mustang" sticker on the rear glass (coupe only), and the "nostrils" in the grille on Performance package variants. There are two wheel designs and both evoke classic Fox body designs, with the version you see here adopting a slick turbofan style. The other version—for non-Performance-pack cars—is a classic five-spoke. Both wear color-matched center caps bearing "Mustang GT" lettering in what Ford says is a new font (that happens to look like an old, Fox-body font, but who's keeping close track?). Oh, and speaking of paint, the FX package introduces a new-for-2026 paint color (which also will be available on other '26 Mustangs): Adriatic Blue Metallic. Put simply, it's a rad teal color (pictured here)—what could be more Fox-body-era than that? Another new paint color this year is Orange Fury Metallic. It has no specific history linked to the Fox body, it's just worth mentioning since it hasn't been offered on the Mustang since 2019. Pivotal Digital Setting aside how blown peoples' minds would have been if, in the 1980s, their Fox body Mustangs came with the sort of digitized dashboard that today's Mustang gets (FX package included), Ford has put some effort into backdating the FX's interior. Plaid-like seat inserts do a lot of the heavy lifting here, but remember, there's always that Fox body gauge cluster option. Less obvious is the Dark Alley interior trim borrowed from the Mustang Dark Horse model, as well as subtle blue stitching and a "Mustang GT" badge on the passenger-side dash. Ford hasn't outlined the FX package's price yet, but mentions that order books for the 2026 Mustang lineup overall open in later in June 2025. We'll surely find out then how much this retro FX package (and the Mustang overall) costs. But if you want to rock out with your 1980s out in a new-generation Mustang, you should definitely peep this one.
