&w=3840&q=100)
Trial starts over Trump admin's deployment of National Guard to Los Angeles
AP San Francisco
A deputy commanding general testified Monday that military forces called in to assist with immigration raids in Los Angeles were allowed to take some law enforcement actions despite a federal law that prohibits the president from using the military as a domestic police force.
Maj. Gen. Scott Sherman said military tapped to assist with domestic operations can protect federal property and federal agents in their mission carrying out federal operations. He said they could take certain law enforcement actions, such as setting up a security perimeter outside of federal facilities, if a commander on the ground felt unsafe. Sherman testified at the start of a three-day trial over whether President Donald Trump's administration violated the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act when it deployed National Guard soldiers and US Marines to Los Angeles following June protests over immigration raids.
On Monday, Trump said he was deploying the National Guard across Washington, DC, and taking over the city's police department in the hopes of reducing crime, even as the mayor has noted that crime is falling in the nation's capital.
The trial in San Francisco could set a precedent for how Trump can deploy the guard in the future in California or other states.
The Trump administration federalised California National Guard members and sent them to the second-largest US city over the objections of Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom and city leaders after protests erupted on June 7 when Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers arrested people at multiple locations.
The Department of Defense ordered the deployment of roughly 4,000 California National Guard troops and 700 Marines to Los Angeles. Most of the troops have since left, but 250 National Guard members remain, according to the latest figures provided by the Pentagon.
California is asking Judge Charles Breyer to order the Trump administration to return control of the remaining troops to the state and to stop the federal government from using military troops in California to execute or assist in the execution of federal law or any civilian law enforcement functions by any federal agent or officer.
Newsom won an early victory from Breyer, who found the Trump administration violated the Constitution's 10th Amendment, which defines power between federal and state governments, and exceeded its authority.
The Trump administration immediately appealed, arguing that courts can't second-guess the president's decisions. It secured a temporary halt, allowing control of the California National Guard to stay in federal hands as the lawsuit unfolds.
After their deployment, the guard members accompanied federal immigration officers on raids in Los Angeles and at two marijuana farm sites in Ventura County while Marines mostly stood guard around a federal building in downtown Los Angeles that includes a detention centre at the core of protests.
Trump federalised members of the California National Guard under a law allows the president to call the National Guard into federal service when the country is invaded, when there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government, or when the president is otherwise unable to execute the laws of the United States.
Breyer found the protests in Los Angeles fall far short of rebellion.' Since June, federal agents have rounded up immigrants without legal status to be in the US from Home Depots, car washes, bus stops, and farms. Some US citizens have also been detained.
Ernesto Santacruz Jr., the field office director for the Department of Homeland Security in Los Angeles, said in court documents that the troops were needed because local law enforcement was slow to respond when a crowd gathered outside the federal building to protest the June 7 immigration arrests.
The presence of the National Guard and Marines has played an essential role in protecting federal property and personnel from the violent mobs, Santacruz said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
15 minutes ago
- Mint
Elon Musk's AI chatbot Grok stirs controversy after calling Donald Trump 'Most Notorious Criminal'
Elon Musk's AI chatbot, Grok, has come under sharp scrutiny after referring to US President Donald Trump as 'the most notorious criminal' in Washington, DC. The remark was made during exchanges on Musk's social media platform, X, where users had asked the bot about crime in the US capital. Grok pointed to Trump's 34 felony convictions in New York, related to falsifying business records, as the basis for the description. The comments surfaced just as Trump claimed that crime in Washington, D.C., was 'out of control' and outlined his plan to federalise the city's police and deploy National Guard units if re-elected. The AI-generated statement has sparked intense political debate online. Trump supporters criticised the chatbot for bias, while others highlighted growing concerns over the role of artificial intelligence in shaping political narratives. Meanwhile, Trump on Monday claimed that the tariffs on India for buying Russian oil have delivered a 'big blow' to Moscow's economy. In his latest remarks ahead of his meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin next week in Alaska, President Trump called New Delhi one of Russia's 'largest or second-largest oil buyers'. 'Doesn't help when the President of the United States tells their largest or second-largest oil buyer that we're putting a 50 per cent tariff on you if you buy oil from Russia. That was a big blow,' Trump said in what appeared to be a reference to India. Last week, the US President Trump doubled India's tariffs to 50 per cent, citing Russian oil purchases. Trump imposed the 50 per cent tariff on India in two phases: a 25 per cent levy was first announced on 30 July, and the additional 25 per cent was announced on Wednesday, 7 August.
Hindustan Times
18 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Who is EJ Antoni? Trump names Conservative economist to head Bureau of Labor Statistics
President Donald Trump named EJ Antoni, chief economist of the conservative Heritage Foundation, to lead the Bureau of Labor Statistics after firing the former head of the agency earlier this month. Trump appointed Antoni, who has been vocal about his concerns with BLS jobs data and revisions, in a Truth Social post Monday. Trump appointed Antoni, who has been vocal about his concerns with BLS jobs data and revisions, in a Truth Social post Monday. The position is subject to Senate confirmation. 'Our Economy is booming, and E.J. will ensure that the Numbers released are HONEST and ACCURATE,' Trump wrote. Antoni didn't immediately respond to a request for comment after the announcement. Antoni would succeed Erika McEntarfer, whom Trump abruptly fired Aug. 1 after a BLS report showed weak job growth in July and substantial downward revisions to the prior two months. He accused her, without evidence, of manipulating the numbers for political purposes, while noting that she was appointed by former President Joe Biden. Trump's firing of McEntarfer shocked economists across the political spectrum, who immediately came to her defense and BLS as an institution. The agency's work, in addition to that of other US statistical offices, has a 'gold standard' reputation globally for being free of political influence — a status which many now fear is at risk. BLS routinely revises its data in an effort to make it more accurate in the long run. But the latest revisions, which trimmed 258,000 jobs from May and June, were particularly eye-catching — marking the largest downward adjustment since the pandemic. Steve Bannon, a senior adviser to Trump in his first term and an influential voice in conservative circles, had pushed Antoni for the role, calling him 'the perfect guy at the perfect time to run the BLS.' Antoni came on Bannon's podcast shortly after the latest jobs report was released, where he was asked if there was a 'MAGA Republican' in charge of BLS. Antoni responded, 'No, unfortunately.' Antoni added that the absence of a Trump pick running the agency is 'part of the reason why we continue to have all of these different data problems.' He contributed to the Project 2025 policy rubric, which, in part, called for maximizing hiring of political appointees at the Labor Department, which oversees BLS. Initial Reaction 'So far, what worries me is that the nominee and his work are not well known in the business, academic or public service communities,' said Erica Groshen, who served as BLS commissioner during the Obama administration and co-chairs an advocacy group for the agency. A candidate needs to be able to effectively interact with both Congress and senior Labor Department staff as well as show a record of understanding that trust and data integrity are 'mission-critical' for BLS, among other qualifications, to garner bipartisan support, she said. William Beach, whom Trump appointed to the role in his first term and co-chairs the Friends of BLS group with Groshen, agreed the candidate would need those characteristics, as well as others like deep expertise in economic statistics, extensive engagement with the federal statistical agencies and visibility in the statistical community. Beach said Antoni possesses 'many' of those, adding he doesn't know if anyone has them all. Antoni, who has a Ph.D. in economics, is a senior fellow at Unleash Prosperity, a group that counts Steve Forbes, Arthur Laffer and Stephen Moore among its leaders and is one of the entities regularly bringing policy ideas to Trump. 'EJ will be outstanding,' Moore, also an economist at the Heritage Foundation, said in a text to Bloomberg News. 'Great economist and statistician.' Jason Furman, who chaired President Barack Obama's Council of Economic Advisers, disapproved of Trump's pick. Antoni is 'completely unqualified' to lead BLS, Furman said in a post on X. 'He is an extreme partisan and does not have any relevant expertise.' McEntarfer Firing Commissioners serve four-year terms, often spanning both Republican and Democratic administrations. Beach, who preceded McEntarfer, criticized her firing. He said it is 'damaging' and 'undermines credibility in BLS.' William Wiatrowski, who was McEntarfer's deputy, has served as acting commissioner in the interim. Those appointed to the commissioner role typically have years of experience as economists or statisticians within the agency, government or related institutions. Effective January 2025, the pay for the role of BLS commissioner was $195,200. The latest employment report showed job growth averaged just 35,000 in the past three months, fundamentally shifting perceptions of the labor market from solid to near-stalling. The new data also called into question the Fed's decision to keep interest rates steady at their meeting just a few days prior, following repeated pressure from Trump to lower borrowing costs. Trump said the numbers were 'RIGGED' to make him and Republicans look bad. BLS said the revisions were largely a result of seasonal adjustment and incorporating more data. BLS will release July inflation figures Tuesday. 'Top to Bottom' Review Antoni has called for a 'top to bottom' review of all the agency's data collection, data processing, analytics and dissemination. He also said the BLS should post even more information on its website to increase transparency. McEntarfer was confirmed as commissioner in early 2024 with bipartisan support. She arrived at the agency with over 20 years of experience in the federal government, including roles at the Census Bureau and Treasury Department. She previously served as a senior economist at the White House Council of Economic Advisers under Biden. BLS is responsible for publishing some of the foremost statistics on US employment and inflation, which are used to inform an array of business and policy decisions from setting wages to adjusting Social Security benefits. It's housed within the Labor Department but largely functions as an independent institution. Trump's 2026 budget proposal suggested moving BLS under the Commerce Department, where other economic statistical agencies like the Census Bureau and Bureau of Economic Analysis reside. The proposal would also reduce BLS's budget and staffing, adding to funding challenges that predate Trump but have grown more acute in his second term.
Hindustan Times
18 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
What deal might emerge from Trump-Putin summit and could it hold?
Aug 12 - U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin will discuss a possible deal to end the war in Ukraine when they meet on Friday in Alaska for a summit that is also likely to affect wider European security. What deal might emerge from Trump-Putin summit and could it hold? European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy plan to speak with Trump on Wednesday amid fears that Washington, hitherto Ukraine's leading arms supplier, may seek to dictate unfavourable peace terms to Kyiv. WHAT KIND OF DEAL COULD EMERGE FROM SUMMIT? Trump said last Friday that there would be "some swapping of territories to the betterment of both". This prompted consternation in Kyiv and European capitals that Russia could be rewarded for 11 years of efforts - the last three in full-blown war - to seize Ukrainian land. It occupies about 19% of Ukraine. Ukraine controls no Russian territory. "It's a reasonable concern to think that Trump will be bamboozled by Putin and cut a terrible deal at Ukraine's expense," said Daniel Fried, a former senior U.S. diplomat now with the Atlantic Council think-tank. But "better outcomes" for Ukraine were possible if Trump and his team "wake up to the fact that Putin is still playing them". One could entail agreeing an "armistice line" instead of a transfer of territory, with only de facto - not legal - recognition of Russia's current gains. Any sustainable peace deal would also have to tackle such issues as future security guarantees for Ukraine, its aspirations to join NATO, the restrictions demanded by Moscow on the size of its military, and the future of Western sanctions on Russia. Trump has not commented on those issues since announcing the summit with Putin, though his administration has said Ukraine cannot join NATO. Diplomats say there is an outside possibility that Trump might instead strike a unilateral deal with Putin, prioritising lucrative energy contracts and potential arms control accords. Trump himself has said he might conclude in Alaska that a Ukraine peace deal cannot be done. The White House did not respond to a request for comment on the possibility of Trump clinching a unilateral deal with Putin. WHAT IF UKRAINE OBJECTS TO ANY TRUMP-PUTIN DEAL? Trump would face strong resistance from Zelenskiy and his European allies if any deal expected Ukraine to cede territory. Zelenskiy says Ukraine's constitution prohibits such an outcome unless there is a referendum to change it. Trump could try to coerce Kyiv to accept such a deal by threatening to stop arms supplies and intelligence sharing. But analysts say there is more chance Ukraine might accept a freezing of battlelines and an unstable, legally non-binding partition. One European official told Reuters that, even if Trump did renege on recent promises to resume arms supplies to Ukraine, he was likely to continue allowing Europe to buy U.S. weapons on Ukraine's behalf. "The loss of U.S. intelligence capabilities would be the hardest element to replace. Europe can't even come close to providing that support," said the official, speaking on condition of anonymity. HOW MIGHT A DEAL AFFECT TRUMP'S SUPPORT AT HOME? There would be big political risks in the U.S. for Trump in abandoning Ukraine, said John Herbst, a former U.S. ambassador to Kyiv, now with the Atlantic Council. This would portray him as "an accomplice in Putin's rape of Ukraine ... I don't think Trump wants to be seen that way, for sure", he said. Despite his strong political position at home, Trump would also come under fire even from parts of the American right if he were to be seen as caving in to Russia. "To reward Putin ... would be to send the exact opposite message that we must be sending to dictators, and would-be-dictators, across the globe," Brian Fitzpatrick, a Republican lawmaker and former FBI agent, said on X last week. HOW MIGHT UKRAINE'S EUROPEAN ALLIES RESPOND? EU member states said on Tuesday that Ukraine must be free to decide its own future and that they were ready to contribute further to security guarantees for Kyiv. Oana Lungescu, a former NATO spokesperson now with the RUSI think-tank, said European states must move much faster to arm Ukraine, and start EU accession talks in September. Jana Kobzova, senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, said that "... if an unacceptable deal emerges from Alaska, European capitals will go into yet another diplomatic and charm offensive vis-a-vis Trump". "European leaders are increasingly aware that the future of Ukraine's security is inseparable from that of the rest of Europe - and they can't let Putin alone decide its future shape and form." This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
