logo
Republican Rips Key Vote on Trump Bill as 'Power Move'

Republican Rips Key Vote on Trump Bill as 'Power Move'

Newsweek2 days ago
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Republican Representative Keith Self of Texas ripped a procedural vote taking place on the much-debated financial package dubbed the "big, beautiful bill" by President Donald Trump Wednesday night, saying he's a "no," as more talks are vital.
Newsweek reached out to House Speaker Mike Johnson's office via email for comment.
Why It Matters
The attempted passage of Trump's fiscal initiative—the centerpiece of his legislative efforts—agonized party traditionalists and grassroots activists who have long campaigned on promises of fiscal restraint.
Clashes over the bill also underscore significant fractures within the Republican Party as it aims to hold control of Congress amid mounting pressure from both establishment leaders and populist outsiders.
The outcome of the final House vote on the bill will ultimately determine whether Trump's comprehensive policy package—including tax cuts, border security initiatives, and major spending realignments—becomes law, shaping his legacy and affecting millions of Americans.
GOP Representative Keith Self of Texas is pictured as the House votes on a speaker during the first day of the 119th Congress, in the U.S. Capitol on January 3 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by...
GOP Representative Keith Self of Texas is pictured as the House votes on a speaker during the first day of the 119th Congress, in the U.S. Capitol on January 3 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by) More
What To Know
According to PBS NewsHour Correspondent Lisa Desjardins on X, formerly Twitter, Self said while speaking to Newsmax that the procedural vote late Wednesday night is a "power move," adding its "a pressure move," as lawmakers "are still in the middle" of critical negotiations and compromise.
Self posted on X Wednesday night during the procedural vote, writing, "I came to Washington to help rein in our national debt. In negotiations with House leadership, commitments were made to ensure the One Big Beautiful Bill would include key provisions, such as:
- Matching every $1 of tax cuts with $1 of spending cuts.
- Terminating Biden's Green New Scam.
- Prohibiting taxpayer-funded experimental gender transition procedures."
The Texas lawmaker added, "Senate broke the House framework, and then they stomped all over it. Now, House leadership wants to cram this broken bill down our throats by rushing it to the floor while in the middle of discussions, completely disregarding their promises."
"The only way of making this right is by leadership adhering to their commitments and restoring, at a minimum, these three important issues from the House version," Self added. "While honoring one's commitment may be a rare commodity in Washington, each member of Congress is obligated to return home and explain their actions to the constituents they serve."
Concluding, Self said, "Ultimately, this is an issue of morality. Abiding by our word is the only thing we have; therefore, as the bill currently stands, I voted against the rule. We have an incredibly rare opportunity to extend President Trump's tax cuts, begin restoring fiscal sanity by reducing spending to pre-COVID numbers and truly leave our country better than we found it."
As House margins are razor thin, Republicans can only afford to lose three votes if all Democrats vote no, as expected. NBC News reports that lawmakers can switch their votes up until the last moment.
With the GOP's narrow majority and key defections among both fiscal conservatives and moderates, the bill's fate reflects broader fractures inside the party over fiscal strategy and social spending.
As the July Fourth self-imposed deadline by Trump looms, failure to pass the legislation could stall the president's second-term agenda and fuel ongoing leadership debates within the party.
What People Are Saying
Trump posted to Truth Social on Wednesday: "It looks like the House is ready to vote tonight. We had GREAT conversations all day, and the Republican House Majority is UNITED, for the Good of our Country, delivering the Biggest Tax Cuts in History and MASSIVE Growth. Let's go Republicans, and everyone else - MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!"
Johnson, on X before the key vote: "President Trump KEPT HIS PROMISE to secure the border. Now Congress MUST do its part. The only way we keep the border secure and the American people safe is by passing the One Big Beautiful Bill. @HouseGOP, time to get it done."
Vice President JD Vance posted to X on Wednesday: "The Big Beautiful Bill gives the president the resources and the power to undo the Biden border invasion. It must pass."
What Happens Next
The bill's fate remains uncertain Wednesday night, as the House is divided on the legislation. Should the bill pass, it would mark a major victory for Trump's policy agenda; if it fails, internal party strife and questions over leadership authority are likely to intensify, analysts speculate.
If the procedural vote passes, Republicans can then debate the bill and bring it to the floor for a final vote.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Some Social Security Recipients Will See Wage Garnishment in Just Weeks
Some Social Security Recipients Will See Wage Garnishment in Just Weeks

Newsweek

time2 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Some Social Security Recipients Will See Wage Garnishment in Just Weeks

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. In roughly 20 days, some Social Security recipients could experience wage garnishment as a higher Social Security claw back rate returns. Roughly 2 million Americans owed money to the Social Security Administration due to overpayments in 2023, according to KFF and Cox Media group. Starting July 24, the higher wage garnishments will go into effect until the full overpayment has been resolved. Why It Matters President Donald Trump has implemented a wide range of changes to the Social Security Administration (SSA). In addition to ending the use of paper checks by October, Trump also appointed former Fiserv CEO Frank Bisignano as the new SSA commissioner. The Department of Government Efficiency also instructed the agency to cut 7,000 SSA jobs. For beneficiaries who have been mistakenly overpaid, losing Social Security benefits could have severe consequences on their ability to pay for basic necessities. Roughly 21 percent of married couples and 45 percent of single recipients rely on Social Security for 90 percent or more of their income, according to SSA estimates. A sign is seen outside a US Social Security Administration building, November 5, 2020, in Burbank, California. A sign is seen outside a US Social Security Administration building, November 5, 2020, in Burbank, California. VALERIE MACON/AFP via Getty Images What To Know In some circumstances, the SSA overpays Social Security recipients due to either miscalculations on their part or the recipient failing to update their earnings information. In March, the SSA said it would be bringing back its 100 percent claw back rate for Social Security recipients who were mistakenly overpaid by the government. During Joe Biden's presidency, that rate was set at 10 percent to allow seniors more breathing room to pay for their basic necessities. However, the SSA updated that garnishment rate to 50 percent in April. "When we determine an individual receiving Title II benefits is overpaid, we send them a notice requesting a full and immediate refund and inform them of their right to request reconsideration or a waiver of recovery," the SSA said in April. "We usually provide 90 days for the individual to request a lower rate of withholding, a reconsideration, or waiver." The 90-day period from the SSA's statement on April 25 ends July 24, meaning more than a million recipients could see their payments impacted. However, those who have been overpaid can file for an overpayment waiver. Form SSA-632BK asks for forgiveness for the overpayment if it was not your fault and it would create financial hardship. To get this approved, you'll need proof that repaying the money would create a significant hardship. Beneficiaries can also file Form SSA-561 to appeal the claim you were overpaid. Newsweek reached out to the SSA for comment via email. What People Are Saying Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek: "Most recipients don't realize they've been overpaid until they receive a letter from the SSA. Without regularly reviewing your earnings history and benefit statements, overpayments can go unnoticed. Even if the error wasn't your fault, you're still responsible for repayment—unless you appeal, request a waiver, or set up a payment plan within the 90-day period." What Happens Next The loss of income could be dire for many Social Security recipients who rely on the benefits for most if not all of their income. A recent report from Gallup found 86 percent rely on Social Security as a "major" or "minor" income source. "The consequences can be significant, especially for retirees living on a fixed income. With inflation still elevated, a 50 percent reduction in benefits could severely impact housing, food, and healthcare," Thompson said. "For many, Social Security is their only source of income—making these garnishments potentially devastating."

Valadao supports Trump megabill set to disrupt healthcare for many of his constituents
Valadao supports Trump megabill set to disrupt healthcare for many of his constituents

Los Angeles Times

time2 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Valadao supports Trump megabill set to disrupt healthcare for many of his constituents

Already a ripe target for Democrats in the next election, Central Valley Rep. David Valadao put his political future in deeper peril this week by voting in favor of legislation that slashes the Medicaid coverage essential to roughly two-thirds of his Republican dairy farmer from Hanford said that despite his concerns about President Trump's megabill, he voted to support it because of concessions he helped negotiate that will help his district, such as an additional $25 billion for rural hospitals, $1 billion for Western water infrastructure and agricultural preserving tax breaks benefiting the wealthy, the bill passed by narrow Republican majorities in both the House and Senate would reduce federal Medicaid spending by $1.04 trillion over 10 years, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store