&w=3840&q=100)
Aakash seeks to implead EY in Byju's case, cites conflict, misconduct
The dispute between Aakash Educational Services Ltd (AESL) and edtech firm Byju's has escalated, with Aakash filing a sharply worded petition before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in Bengaluru, alleging conflict of interest and professional misconduct by global consulting firm Ernst & Young (EY), according to court filings reviewed by Business Standard.
In an impleadment application filed on 1 June, AESL has asked the tribunal to either dismiss the company petition filed by Byju's—under sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, alleging oppression and mismanagement—or make EY LLP and its partner Ajay Shah respondents to the case.
AESL alleges that EY, which has been involved in a wide range of strategic, financial and compliance-related advisory services for the company, is now acting against it through Shailendra Ajmera, the Resolution Professional (RP) of Byju's, who is also a senior EY functionary.
'This is a classic case of conflict of interest and abuse of process,' said the application. 'The very transactions now being challenged in the petition—such as the issuance and conversion of non-convertible debentures (NCDs), equity restructuring and internal governance matters—were structured and overseen by EY.'
According to the filing, EY advised on the valuation and structuring of NCDs issued to Davidson Kempner. It also advised on tax and regulatory aspects of equity conversion to the Manipal Group. Additionally, EY was involved in internal board-level decisions and corporate strategy at AESL as recently as October 2024.
'The RP has suppressed material facts, has no locus standi to file this petition under the Companies Act, and is acting in excess of his powers under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code,' AESL said in the filing.
AESL has also warned that it may escalate the matter to regulators, including the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) and the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, alleging that Ajmera's position as RP is 'severely compromised'.
The move comes just days after the RP wrote to the AESL board seeking clarity on the independence and nomination status of its directors, signalling a broader governance challenge in the ongoing tussle.
What's at stake
The fight over Aakash, which Byju's acquired in a $1 billion deal in 2021, has become a flashpoint in the edtech giant's ongoing financial and legal troubles. Manipal Group, which took over a significant stake by converting debt into equity, now controls the board of AESL.
With this filing, AESL is preparing for a full-blown legal and reputational offensive—challenging both the admissibility of Byju's petition and the professional neutrality of the advisers involved. Both EY and the Resolution Professional are yet to file a formal reply to the impleadment request.
"The matter is sub-judice, and therefore we cannot offer any further comment at this time. However, we refute the allegations and will defend any such legal action vigorously," an EY spokesperson told Business Standard on Tuesday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Is IBC an effective resolution tool?
The story so far: More than eight years have passed since the enactment of India's Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). According to data from the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI), creditors have realised ₹3.89 lakh crore under the framework, with a recovery rate of over 32.8% against admitted claims. Why was the IBC enacted? India enacted the IBC, its first comprehensive bankruptcy law, in 2016 to improve the overall corporate insolvency resolution process. Shifting control from debtors to creditors, the IBC introduced a time-bound resolution mechanism to streamline bankruptcy proceedings, reduce judicial delays, and improve creditor recoveries. According to current provisions, a maximum timeline of 330 days is allowed to find a resolution for a company admitted into the insolvency resolution process. Otherwise, the company goes into liquidation. So far, the Code has rescued 1,194 companies through resolution plans. Is IBC a preferred route for debt recovery? As per the Reserve Bank of India report on Trend and Progress of Banking in India released in December 2024, the IBC emerged as the dominant recovery route, accounting for 48% of all recoveries made by banks followed by the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (SARFAESI) Act (32%), Debt Recovery Tribunals (17%), and Lok Adalats (3%) in the Financial Year 2023-24. The realisation under IBC is more than 170.1% as against the liquidation value. Resolution plans, on average, are yielding 93.41% of the fair value of the Corporate Debtors (CDs), IBBI said. Further, 1,276 cases have been settled through appeal, review, or settlement, and 1,154 cases have been withdrawn under section 12A. The Code has referred 2,758 companies for liquidation, as per IBBI data. Nearly 10 companies are being resolved against five going into liquidation. Has IBC been an effective recovery mechanism? Akshat Khetan, Founder, AU Corporate Advisory and Legal Services, pointed out that IBC has changed the underlying credit culture. As the Supreme Court once observed, 'the defaulter's paradise is lost' and the Code has created a credible threat that ensures timely repayment. On the recovery rate of 32.8%, Mr. Khetan pointed out that it must be interpreted in light of the distressed nature of the assets that come into the IBC process, often after years of erosion. As the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal has rightly remarked in one of its rulings, 'IBC is not a recovery mechanism; it is a resolution framework.' Compared to legacy systems, where recovery rates were often below 20% with timelines extending into decades, a 32.8% realisation is a leap forward, he said. Mr. Khetan also stated that the statistic does not capture qualitative gains, such as job preservation, improved enterprise value, and restored investor confidence. In a framework designed to balance resolution over liquidation, the broader economic impact of IBC far outweighs numerical recovery alone, he said. The provisions of the IBC have prompted debtors to take early action in distress situations, marking a shift in their behaviour. National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) data show that 30,310 cases were settled prior to admission, covering underlying defaults worth ₹13.78 lakh crore till December 2024. A study by the Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore, submitted to IBBI, said IBC has injected discipline in the credit allocation process and has prompted borrowers to adhere to stipulated payment schedules. The gross non-performing assets of the scheduled commercial banks have declined from a peak of 11.2% in March 2018 to 2.8% in March 2024. A part of that reduction is attributable to resolution processes enabled under IBC, it said. The study also indicated a 3% reduction in the cost of debt for distressed firms post-IBC, compared to non-distressed firms , indicating an improved credit environment for distressed firms. The IBC has had a positive impact on corporate governance, reflected in the increased proportion of independent directors on the boards of companies resolved under the Code. What are the major challenges? In a recent report, India Ratings and Research said that judicial delays and post-resolution uncertainties continue to affect confidence in the IBC framework. Even when resolution applicants are ready and the Committee of Creditors has granted approval, delays at the NCLT continue to push recovery timelines. In several cases, such delays result in extended litigation or failed implementation, increasing the risk of liquidation for a viable asset that requires timely execution, it said. The future insolvencies also raise questions about the Code's readiness to handle non-traditional enterprise defaults. While the IBC is legally broad enough to accommodate various resolution strategies, key commercial elements such as intellectual property valuation, treatment of employee dues, and tech continuity require a clearer treatment under the framework to make it future-ready, India Ratings said. To enhance its effectiveness, India must invest in strengthening tribunal infrastructure, allow for pre-packaged insolvency, and establish jurisprudential guardrails to protect bona fide commercial decisions from post-resolution uncertainty, Mr. Khetan said. While challenges persist, including process delays and recovery rates below expectations, the Code's foundational structure remains sound. As implementation matures and jurisprudence evolves, the IBC is well-positioned to overcome these hurdles and fully realise its transformative potential in India's financial ecosystem, IBBI Chairman Ravi Mital said in the recent quarterly newsletter. Does the SC verdict on Bhushan Steel pose a challenge to IBC? The recent developments in the Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd. case have reignited concerns around the finality of resolution outcomes and the predictability of the framework. While the decision upholds compliance standards, its timing and implications highlight the need for judicial clarity and faster adjudication to sustain investor confidence in the process in the long term, India Ratings said. By questioning a transaction that had been closed and operational for years, it risks unsettling the core principle of commercial certainty. If resolution applicants fear judicial reversals even after significant investment, they may hesitate to bid, undermining the IBC's very purpose. The Bhushan verdict thus underscores the need for legal sanctity once a resolution plan is approved and implemented, Mr. Khetan said. The IBC is not merely a piece of economic legislation, it is the backbone of India's credit ecosystem. Its future lies in striking a fine balance between judicial oversight and economic pragmatism. As India aspires to become a $5 trillion economy, robust and predictable insolvency mechanisms are indispensable. The Code must remain nimble, continually evolving to meet emerging realities while ensuring that commercial wisdom is not second-guessed endlessly, he said. Almost 78% of the ongoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) cases have exceeded 270 days, post-admission by the NCLT, as on March 31, 2025, ratings agency ICRA said. A sustained momentum would be needed to minimise haircuts for lenders, which remain high at 67%, it said. Nevertheless, some of the recent judgments reinforce the need for timely and transparent resolution, thereby putting greater onus on the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and NCLT. However, such rulings may also impact investor confidence in stressed assets setting precedents that the decision made by the CoC and the NCLT may be challenged and overturned by the judicial system, thus impacting the effectiveness of the resolution process, ICRA said.
Time of India
9 hours ago
- Time of India
Vedanta to use Rs 5,000 cr NCD funds to cut high-cost debt, save Rs 350 crore in interest
Vedanta Ltd plans to save ₹350 crore in interest by using ₹5,000 crore raised through unsecured NCDs to retire high-cost debt. The NCD issue was oversubscribed by 60%, attracting diverse investors like mutual funds and insurance companies. A portion of the funds will also be allocated to growth capex and other corporate purposes. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Mining Major Vedanta Ltd plans to utilise Rs 5,000 crore raised through its unsecured non-convertible debenture ( NCD ) to retire high-cost debt, that will save an estimated Rs 350 crore in interest outgo, sources will also use a part of the proceeds to fund its growth capex, sources conglomerate Vedanta Ltd had last week said the committee of directors has approved raising up to Rs 5,000 crore via issuance of mining major plans to deploy funds from the Rs 5,000 crore raised through its unsecured NCD issue to pay down a high-cost private credit facility of Rs 3,400 crore, potentially reducing its annual interest burden by at least Rs 350 crore, sources remaining funds will likely be used for ongoing capex requirements, general corporate purposes, and repayment or prepayment of existing debts, sources NCD offering, which closed on Wednesday, was oversubscribed with bids worth Rs 6,555 crore, indicating a 60 per cent oversubscription over its base issue size of Rs 4,100 prompted the company to exercise its greenshoe option of Rs 900 crore, raising a total of Rs 5,000 issuance attracted heavy demand from all categories of investors, including mutual funds, insurance companies, infrastructure finance companies, corporates, and the key investors who were ICICI Prudential MF, Aditya Birla Sun Life MF, Kotak Mahindra MF, HSBC MF, Axis MF, Star Health Insurance, Reliance Insurance, Aseem Infrastructure Finance, Alpha Alternatives and Larsen and Toubro among others, sources said, adding that the unsecured NCDs have a coupon rate of 9.31 per cent for the 2.5 years series, 9.45 per cent for the 3 year series and 8.95 per cent for the 2 year is the second unsecured NCD issuance by the company in 2025. In February, the company raised Rs 2,600 crore via unsecured non-convertible debentures at a 9.40-9.50 per cent coupon rate, attracting institutional investors, including ICICI Prudential, Kotak, Nippon, Aditya Birla Sun Life, and company's net debt stood at Rs 53,251 crore as on March 31, 2025. Vedanta Group one of the world's leading natural resources, critical minerals, energy and technology companies spanning across India, South Africa, Namibia, Liberia, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Korea, Taiwan and Japan with significant operations in oil and gas, zinc, lead, silver, copper, iron ore, steel, nickel, aluminium, power and glass substrate and foraying into electronics and display glass manufacturing.
Mint
12 hours ago
- Mint
Registrars of Companies turn up the heat on Nidhi companies for company law violations
New Delhi: Registrars of Companies (RoCs) across the country have turned up the heat on Nidhi companies and their directors for violations of company law, signalling close regulatory scrutiny over these non-bank lenders. So far this year, 63 penalty orders have been issued against these companies and their directors for violations, against 33 over the same period a year ago, official data showed. These account for nearly a fourth of all adjudication orders issued by RoCs this year. Breaches by Nidhi companies include not maintaining a registered office, not appointing a statutory auditor or filing audit reports, not reporting board resolutions to the RoCs, and operating without securing Nidhi company status from the government, the penalty orders issued by RoCs showed. A Nidhi company is a non-banking finance company that accepts deposits from its members and lends only to them. Operating under Section 406 of the Companies Act, it must have at least 200 members within a year of its incorporation and maintain a certain ratio of capital base to deposits to prevent excessive leverage. RoCs have been keeping a close eye on these companies as they accept public funds and many of them operate in rural areas, making members of the community vulnerable to any failure or wrongdoing, said a person informed about the development. 'There are various other forms of mutual benefit and lending institutions in the country, including micro-finance companies, chit funds, cooperative societies and small non-bank lenders to address the financial needs of people,' said this person, who did not wish to be named. These entities are subject to oversight from state governments, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the ministry of cooperation. 'After the revamping of the statutory filing processes of companies, RoCs are now more focused on enforcement activities rather than spending their time and resources taking on record the statutory filings. This is leading to enhanced oversight of corporate governance,' the person added. In 2023 the ministry set up a centralised agency for voluntary closure, allowing businesses keen to down shutters anywhere in the country to approach the Centre for Processing Accelerated Corporate Exit (CPACE) in Manesar. It also integrated its statutory filing portal MCA21 with the National Single Window System (NSWS), which offers various central and state approvals in one place, for registering new businesses. Besides, several statutory filings now require only an online acknowledgement, not approvals from RoCs, which allows them to focus on enforcement and adjudication. Queries emailed to the ministry of corporate affairs spokesperson on Wednesday remained unanswered at the time of publishing.
