IBBI amends CPE norms; in-person training mandatory for insolvency professionals from 2026
Continuing Professional Education
(CPE) guidelines for insolvency professionals, introducing mandatory in-person learning requirements from 2026.
As per the revised framework, IPs must complete a minimum of 30 credit hours of CPE every calendar year, except in the year of their registration.
Finance
Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 4
By CA Himanshu Jain
View Program
Artificial Intelligence
AI For Business Professionals Batch 2
By Ansh Mehra
View Program
Finance
Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 3
By CA Himanshu Jain
View Program
Artificial Intelligence
AI For Business Professionals
By Vaibhav Sisinity
View Program
Finance
Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 2
By CA Himanshu Jain
View Program
Finance
Value and Valuation Masterclass Batch-1
By CA Himanshu Jain
View Program
The amendments prescribe that at least 40 per cent of total CPE credits be obtained through in-person programmes in 2026, rising to 50 per cent in 2027 and 60 per cent from 2028 onwards.
The obligation will apply even if an "IP will undertake CPE even when his registration is suspended, or he has ceased to have an authorisation for assignment".
CPE credits can be earned through various activities such as workshops, conferences, seminars, training programmes, refresher courses, certificate programmes, conventions, and symposia organised by IBBI, Insolvency Professional Agencies (IPAs) or other approved bodies.
Live Events
Additional credits may be obtained by publishing articles, delivering lectures, authoring books, or completing higher academic qualifications in relevant areas.
The guidelines also mandate prior approval from the respective IPA before enrolling in CPE programmes conducted by entities other than IBBI or IPAs. IPAs have been directed to process such approvals diligently and in a time-bound manner.
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI), a key institution in implementing the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, comes under the Ministry of Corporate Affairs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
5 hours ago
- Mint
IBC amendments to allow partial asset sales, second shot at revival
New Delhi: Apart from speeding up the disposal of distressed companies as going concerns, the proposed amendments to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) tabled in Lok Sabha on Tuesday also makes it easier for splitting up such firms so that lenders could consider sale of individual assets when they are unable to find takers for the whole business, two persons informed about the government's deliberations on insolvency reforms said. The proposed amendments will also prevent orders for liquidation of a distressed company just because the 330-day window available for debt resolution under IBC has expired. This is meant to avoid situations like the Bhushan Power & Steel Ltd., the resolution plan for which was annulled by the Supreme Court in its now-recalled 2 May order. The apex court had then said that approving the corporate turnaround plan after the 330-day window was 'a grave error of law', setting aside JSW Steel's ₹ 19,700 crore resolution plan for Bhushan Power and ordering its liquidation. The proposed amendments specifically allow insolvency tribunals to grant a 120-day fresh opportunity to consider a new resolution plan before finally sending the company to liquidation, explained one of the two persons cited earlier, both of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity. 'The second attempt will benefit from the wealth of experience from the first effort,' said this person. Queries emailed on Thursday to the ministry of corporate affairs and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) seeking comments for the story remained unanswered till press time. To be sure, stakeholders can request tribunals to grant extra time even under the current system, but formally writing into the Code that there is a second official chance available for reviving a distressed company will boslter the view that IBC's main goal is to rescue a struggling business, instead of just shutting it down, experts said. A second chance at insolvency resolution within a maximum period of 120 days even when grounds of liquidation are met after the 330-day period is sought to be allowed by inserting a new sub-section 1A in Section 33 of IBC, which deals with liquidation proceedings. For such second chance, 66% of creditors have to consent. 'In certain circumstances, the amendment empowers the adjudicating authority to allow the recommencement of the corporate insolvency resolution (CIR) proceedings despite prior expiry of the CIR process period,' explained Anoop Rawat, national practice head (insolvency and restructuring) at law firm Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co. Experts are also of the view that the flexibility to dispose of individual assets will be useful in the resolution of businesses with operations in multiple sectors. 'Explicitly incorporating in the Code that a resolution plan can include sale of one or more assets of the corporate debtor recognises the need for this flexibility and to avoid legal challenges. In May this year, IBBI had introduced this provision through regulations. But specifying this in the Code itself gives greater comfort to stakeholders in opting for this,' said Rawat.
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman on AI in India: If there is one large society in the world that seems ...
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has expressed admiration for India's embrace of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology, predicting the nation could soon become the company's largest market globally. Speaking on Zerodha co-founder Nikhil Kamath 's 'People by WTF' podcast, Altman lauded India's proactive approach to AI, highlighting its potential to drive societal and economic benefits. Responding to Kamath's query about AI's opportunities for India, Altman underscored the 'incredible energy' and willingness of the Indian populace to integrate AI into various aspects of life. 'The excitement, the embrace of AI in India , and the ability for Indian people to use AI to just, sort of, leapfrog into the future, and invent a totally new and better way of doing things, and the economic benefits that come from that, the societal benefits, if there is one large society in the world that seems most enthusiastic to transform with AI right now, it's India,' Altman remarked. Sam Altman is 'coming soon' to India Altman emphasised that India's 'momentum is unmatched anywhere in the world', adding, 'I think India may be our largest market in the world, at some point, in the not very distant future.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Most Beautiful Female Athletes Right Now Undo He added that the 'energy is incredible' and he is 'looking forward to coming soon.' He further elaborated on the shift from being merely a consumer to a producer in the AI space. 'I feel like the question really is, how do we transition from being a consumer to be a producer, where we can build something that other people use outside of India? That was what I meant. I mean, there's lots of things happening there, but that was the thing I meant. I think that's really happening already in a big way,' Altman said. The OpenAI chief particularly praised the entrepreneurial energy dedicated to building with AI in India, expressing hope for its continued growth. Goodbye, Frequent FASTag Recharges! NHAI Launches Annual Pass for Rs 3,000 AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Mint
13 hours ago
- Mint
IBC amendments plug a major gap in the insolvency process
MUMBAI , NEW DELHI : The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Bill, 2025, tabled in the Lok Sabha on 12 August, closes a key exit route, making it harder for companies to quit insolvency proceedings for an early out-of-court settlement. The amendment makes the Committee of Creditors' (CoC) approval mandatory for an applicant to withdraw from bankruptcy proceedings under Section 12A of the IBC. A CoC—a group of financial creditors—is set up by the interim resolution professional (IRP) after the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) is initiated. As of now, companies can withdraw the CIRP application even before the CoC is formed by securing approval from 90% of the creditors. However, the proposed Clause 8 in Section 12A permits only the IRP to seek withdrawal—and only within a narrow window after the CoC is formed but before the first call for resolution plans. Early or late withdrawals would be barred, and the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) must rule within 30 days. 'The ban on withdrawals before CoC formation and after the first plan invitation will likely discourage early, informal settlements that were sometimes reached between the debtor and a few creditors,"said Mohit Adatiya, director at NPV Insolvency Professionals Pvt. Ltd. 'It will push stakeholders to resolve disputes within the formal CoC framework, reducing scope for back-channel deals but potentially prolonging timelines," he added. The popular loophole To be sure, many firms in high-profile bankruptcy cases have attempted to exit at an early stage—before the CoC is formed—by offering quick settlements to lenders. One prominent example is the edtech major Buyu's. In 2024, edtech major Byju's sought to quit the legal proceedings after settling dues with its lead operational creditor Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI). The Supreme Court, however, stayed the bid, noting that the CoC had already been formed. The case is still being heard before multiple forums. On Wednesday, in SKIL Infrastructure Ltd's matter, the NCLT rejected the IRP's request to withdraw from the insolvency was admitted into insolvency in February 2024 after its financial creditor, Amluckie Investment Co. Ltd, filed for bankruptcy in February 2020. Other creditors blocked attempts to settle outside the formal process, underscoring the practical challenges of reaching consensus. Similarly, in March 2025, the NCLT rejected Syska LED Lights' bid to withdraw from insolvency proceedings initiated by operational creditor Sunstar Industries. Even after a settlement, financial creditors, including IDFC First Bank and State Bank of India, opposed the withdrawal. A mixed bag Though experts fear the proposal will give dissenting creditors more leverage, they also believe it will prevent the filing of frivolous applications under Section 12A. 'Even a small minority holding more than 10% of the voting share can now effectively veto settlements, as seen in high-profile matters like the one involving Byju's. This could lead to prolonged proceedings unless a broader consensus is built early," Adatiya pointed out. The amendment will facilitate discussion between all financial creditors at a very early stage prior to admission, considering that 90% CoC approval will anyway be required for post-admission withdrawal, added Siddharth Srivasta, partner, Khaitan and Co. Experts also said the ban on withdrawals before the formation of the CoC and after the first invitation for resolution plans will fundamentally change settlement behaviour. Srivasta said the change would also 'inculcate discipline in the CoC members and will reduce any complacent behaviour to consider settling at an advanced stage". He said this will nudge debt-laden companies' promoters to submit and finalize proposals before the first request for resolution plans rather than at a fairly advanced stage, wherein the corporate debtor's assets have already depleted, and there would be no option of withdrawal. According to law firms, while the amendment could be challenging, another area of concern is the criteria for the 90% voting threshold from the CoC, which is often difficult to achieve. 'The amendment is expected to bring a behavioural shift in cases where there is potential for early settlement and creditor exit. It will also help curb frivolous litigation, where proposals are submitted merely to derail the resolution plan process," said Surbhi Pareek, partner, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas. Besides, now companies will have to undergo the CIRP right from the beginning. 'Many cases will have no alternative but to undergo the entire process. This may prolong cases and add costs, but will also ensure a comprehensive and transparent process, reducing the risk of collusive or side deals. Parties aiming for settlement must now design far more inclusive and robust proposals to win broad-based approval," said Alay Razvi, managing partner, Accord Juris. Lawyers also noted that the amendment changes who will be in charge of filing a withdrawal application. Earlier, such applications were generally filed by an operational or a financial creditor. Now, the IRP must file the application. 'As the IRP acts on the instructions of the CoC, the CoC will deliberate on whether such an application should be filed at all, rather than deciding whether to approve an application that has already been submitted," said Durgesh Khanapurkar, partner at Desai & Diwanji.
