logo
From dossier to designation: How India's diplomacy exposed TRF's Pakistan nexus

From dossier to designation: How India's diplomacy exposed TRF's Pakistan nexus

Hans India5 days ago
Bengaluru: The Resistance Front was quick to claim responsibility following the Pahalgam attack in which 26 persons lost their lives. However, in no time, it was the Pakistan establishment that made the TRF withdraw responsibility, and this was out of fear that India might move the Financial Action Task Force (FATF).
Pakistan has, with great difficulty, wriggled out of the Grey list of the FATF and in the current economic situation, the country finds itself in, it cannot afford to be on that list once more.
Before the TRF was declared a global terror entity by the United States, there was lobbying at the highest levels by Pakistan to prevent this move. Any indication of a TRF involvement in the attacks would be a direct implication for Pakistan.
Having this outfit declared a global terror outfit by the United States was important for India, especially in the aftermath of the ghastly Pahalgam attack.
In May, China helped Pakistan and ensured that the TRF is not named in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). While Pakistan continued to lobby, India indulged in some high-level diplomacy, which eventually led to the decision by the US.
Since the birth of this outfit, which is a proxy of the Lashkar-e-Tayiba, India began preparing a detailed dossier. The outfit posed as a home-grown one and initially only deployed the locals of Jammu and Kashmir in attacks.
It spoke about the banes behind the decision to revoke Article 370 and also swore to protect local interests. However, in the Pahalgam attack, the gloves were off, and the investigation by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) managed to establish that there were three terrorists of Pakistan origin involved in the attack.
This explains the reason why the Pakistanis were panicky about having this outfit declared a global terror group. The diplomatic charge was led by Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri, who provided detailed dossiers on the outfit prepared by the NIA, Intelligence Bureau, Research and Analysis Wing and Jammu and Kashmir police.
The dossiers were presented before the United States and the 1267 Committee of the United Nations. Misri, during his visit to the US on May 27-29, presented the dossier to the US State Department. The same dossier was also submitted to the UN in New York.
The dossier said that Sheikh Sajjad Gul alias Sajjad Ahmed Sheikh, the Kashmiri face of the Lashkar-e-Tayiba, was chosen by the ISI to lead this outfit. The TRF has been involved in a series of attacks, including targeted killings in 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 and 2024. The attacks were concentrated mainly in central and south Kashmir.
In 2023, it carried out a grenade attack in Central Kashmir in which a Jammu and Kashmir police party was ambushed. Similar such attacks have been quoted in the dossier. The dossier was updated with the details relating to the Pahalgam attack.
Coming to the funding part of it, the dossier speaks about Parvez Ahmed Sheikh, a former doctor and brother of Gul. He had moved to Saudi Arabia before settling in Pakistan. Since then, he has been a primary fundraiser for the Lashkar-e-Tayiba in Jammu and Kashmir.
Following the US decision, External Affairs Minister Dr S Jaishankar thanked the Trump administration. 'Today, the Department of State is adding The Resistance Front (TRF) as a designated Foreign Terrorist Organisation (FTO) and Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT)," US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement on Friday.
'These actions taken by the Department of State demonstrate the Trump Administration's commitment to protecting our national security interests, countering terrorism, and enforcing President Trump's call for justice for the Pahalgam attack," Jaishankar said.
The next move by India would be at the FATF. The investigations have revealed several details about Pakistan's involvement in not just providing logistic and material support to The Resistance Front, but financial assistance as well.
Pakistan's over-insistence that it wants the TRF mention being avoided at the UNSC, in itself, is suspicious. While it may have managed to dodge the issue at the UNSC, thanks to China, it may not have a free run at the FATF.
Officials in New Delhi are likely to take up the issue in October. The plenary meetings of the FATF are usually held every year in October, February and June.
Pakistan was removed from the Grey List in October 2022 after being on it since 2018. India will continue to raise concerns about Pakistan's failure to take adequate action against cross-border terrorism.
The October meeting would be challenging for Pakistan as there are indications that the country may face renewed scrutiny and a potential return to the Grey List.
India is set to present evidence during the next plenary about Pakistan's continued support for terrorist groups. Armed with a dossier, a designation by the United States and India's slick diplomacy, Pakistan may soon face the heat at the Financial Action Task Force again.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘No Assessment Made' on Impact of Pahalgam Attack on Locals Dependent on Tourism: Govt
‘No Assessment Made' on Impact of Pahalgam Attack on Locals Dependent on Tourism: Govt

The Wire

time38 minutes ago

  • The Wire

‘No Assessment Made' on Impact of Pahalgam Attack on Locals Dependent on Tourism: Govt

Union tourism minister Gajendra Shekhawat was answering a question posed in the Lok Sabha. New Delhi: The Union tourism ministry has not assessed the economic impact of the Pahalgam terror attack on locals dependent on the tourism industry, minister Gajendra Shekhawat said in parliament. In an unstarred question, Lok Sabha MP Asaduddin Owaisi asked whether the government is aware of the decline in tourist visits and the subsequent losses suffered in Jammu and Kashmir following the terrorist attack, which he noted occurred during peak tourist season. To this, Shekhawat on Monday (July 28) tabled the number of domestic and foreign tourists the Jammu and Kashmir tourism department recorded in the Union territory from 2020 to 2024 as well as between January and June this year. Asked if the government had prepared an assessment on the attack's 'economic impact on local tourism-dependent stakeholders', Shekhawat answered in the negative. 'No such assessment has been made by the Ministry of Tourism on economic impact on local tourism-dependent stakeholders in Jammu and Kashmir,' he wrote. Owaisi also asked for details of specific measures the government has taken to 'restore tourist confidence and promote tourism in the region' following the April 22 attack. While Shekhawat listed various official tourism-related initiatives applying across the country, including to Jammu and Kashmir, he did not characterise any steps as having been undertaken specifically in light of the terrorist attack. Terrorists singled out and killed 25 tourists – one of them a Nepali national – in the Baisaran meadow near south Kashmir's Pahalgam on April 22, sparking an exodus of tourists from the resort town during peak visiting season. They also killed a local man who offered pony rides to tourists. India blamed Pakistan for the attack and launched its 'Operation Sindoor' against nine sites identified as terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan as well as Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir on May 7, sparking a four-day-long military conflict that ended with a ceasefire and numerous casualties on both sides. According to the data tabled by Shekhawat, 96,12,234 tourists – 95,92,664 of them from India and 19,570 from abroad – visited Jammu and Kashmir in the first six months of this year. In all of the previous year 2,35,90,081 tourists visited the Union territory. Data obtained via RTI has also suggested that only 10% of the purported tourist footfall in the territory since Article 370 was read down in 2019 went to the Kashmir valley. The activist who obtained the data has however claimed that the number of tourists going to the valley may have been inflated by poor methodology. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.

Jaishankar Bursts Trump's 'Bubble' on Indo-Pak Truce, Tears Into Cong's Track Record Against Terror
Jaishankar Bursts Trump's 'Bubble' on Indo-Pak Truce, Tears Into Cong's Track Record Against Terror

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Jaishankar Bursts Trump's 'Bubble' on Indo-Pak Truce, Tears Into Cong's Track Record Against Terror

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar shattered all speculation in the Lok Sabha, making it clear: 'There was no phone call between PM Modi and US President Donald Trump between April 22 and June 17.' The message? Trump's claim that he used trade deal to strike ceasefire deal between India and Pakistan is false. In a fiery statement in the Lok Sabha, Jaishankar laid out India's sharp, strategic and uncompromising foreign policy after the deadly Pahalgam terror attack. 'Our red lines were crossed,' he said, announcing a series of unprecedented steps: Suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty, expulsion of Pakistani military advisors, closure of the Attari check post, and a freeze on SAARC visa exemptions. Jaishankar revealed how India retaliated militarily, and diplomatically isolated Pakistan. He disclosed that Pakistan tried backchannel peace, but India demanded official requests through DGMO. The global fallout? TRF, the group behind the attack, was designated a global terrorist organisation, thanks to India's push with the US and UNSC.#operationsindoor #moditrump #pmmodi #donaldtrump #moditrumpphonecall #jaishankar #pahalgamattack #indiaforeignpolicy #pakistan #terrorism #unsupport #trf #induswaterstreaty #loksabha #opsindoordebate #toi #toibharat #bharat #trending #breakingnews #indianews Read More

After Pahalgam, Operation Sindoor was a clear message against terror: 10 things Jaishankar said in LS
After Pahalgam, Operation Sindoor was a clear message against terror: 10 things Jaishankar said in LS

First Post

time2 hours ago

  • First Post

After Pahalgam, Operation Sindoor was a clear message against terror: 10 things Jaishankar said in LS

External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, speaking in the Lok Sabha during the Operation Sindoor debate, said India's response to the Pahalgam attack combined restraint, resolve, and international outreach. read more External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar described India's strategic, diplomatic, and military reaction to the Pahalgam terror assault during a Lok Sabha discussion on Operation Sindoor on Monday. Here are 10 key points from his address: 1.'Terror and talks cannot go together': Jaishankar reiterated India's longstanding position that there can be no dialogue with terrorism. 'Blood and water cannot flow together,' he said, refering to the government's firm response to the April 22 Pahalgam attack. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 2. Suspension of bilateral mechanisms: Jaishankar confirmed that India had suspended the Indus Waters Treaty, revoked the SAARC visa exemption, and closed the Attari border as part of immediate countermeasures. 3. No call between PM Modi and US President Trump: Dismissing speculation, Jaishankar said there was no phone call between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump between April 22 and June 17. 4. JD Vance alert on planned attack: In his speech, Jaishankar also mentioned that US Vice President JD Vance had informed PM Modi of a planned large-scale Pakistan-based attack on May 9, which India pre-emptively thwarted. 5. Global support and condemnation of the attack: Jaishankar noted that major powers including the US, France, Germany, and groups like the Quad and BRICS condemned the Pahalgam attack and supported India's right to self-defence. 6. TRF declared a global terrorist group: Jaishakar credited India's diplomatic efforts for the successful designation of The Resistance Front (TRF), the group that claimed the Pahalgam attack, as a global terrorist organisation. 7. UNSC statement despite India not being a member: Jaishankar pointed out that although India is not currently on the UN Security Council, it still secured a strong UNSC statement on April 25 condemning the Pahalgam terror attack. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 8. 'Who imagined Bahawalpur and Muridke would go down like this?': Jaishankar highlighted the precision of India's strikes, referring to known terror hubs in Pakistan and challenging critics on the effectiveness of the operation. 9. International delegations received with honour: Jaishankar said that parliamentary delegations sent abroad, including members from across party lines, to explain Operation Sindoor were welcomed with honour and respect. 10. Strategic use of diplomacy and defence: Concluding his remarks, Jaishankar said the government's approach combined measured military action and strong diplomacy, sending a decisive message without escalation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store