logo
Explainer: Why the Strait of Hormuz matters to India's energy security — and what happens if it closes

Explainer: Why the Strait of Hormuz matters to India's energy security — and what happens if it closes

Time of India23-06-2025
New Delhi: The
Strait of Hormuz
— a narrow passage between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman — has again come into focus after the Iranian Parliament approved a possible closure of the strategic waterway following US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. While the move signals growing geopolitical tensions in West Asia, its ripple effects could be felt thousands of kilometres away — including in India, which depends heavily on crude oil and natural gas imports routed through
Hormuz
.
So, what happens if the
strait
is closed, even temporarily? How vulnerable is India's energy system to such a shock, and what measures can be taken in response? Here's a detailed explainer.
What is the Strait of Hormuz, and why is it critical?
The Strait of Hormuz connects the Persian Gulf with the Arabian Sea and is one of the busiest oil shipping routes in the world. Around 20 million barrels per day (mb/d) of oil and 290 million standard cubic metres per day (mmscmd) of LNG pass through it.
According to
Prashant Vasisht
, Senior Vice President and Co-Group Head, Corporate Ratings, ICRA Ltd., 45–50% of India's crude oil imports and 54% of its LNG imports move through this strait.
'About 20% of the global oil and gas/LNG consumption passes through the Strait of Hormuz. About 45–50% of India's crude oil imports and 54% of natural gas imports pass through the Strait. In case there is a closure of the same, there would be an increase in prices of both crude oil and gas and India would have to look for alternate sources,' he said.
What would be the immediate impact on India's energy security and pricing?
A closure or blockade of the strait would significantly disrupt oil and LNG supply chains, especially for India's refineries and gas utilities dependent on West Asian producers. This includes imports from Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and others.
Rohit Chaturvedi
, Partner at Forvis Mazars in India, estimates that more than 30% of India's crude oil imports pass through Hormuz.
'A Hormuz blockade would have very serious short-term effects. A disruption would cause massive increases in freight rates, insurance rates, and re-routing of tankers through the Cape of Good Hope, which would take 10–14 days and involve massive cost overruns,' he said.
Such a disruption could trigger:
1. Immediate increase in energy prices
2. Shipping delays and extended transit times
3. Inflationary pressure across sectors due to higher fuel costs
4. Container shortages and supply chain backlogs beyond the energy sector
How vulnerable is India's energy system to this kind of disruption?
India imports around 89% of its crude oil needs and about 50% of its natural gas requirements. This level of dependency makes it one of the most vulnerable major economies to global oil price swings or supply route disruptions.
According to Vasisht, India's strategic petroleum reserves (SPRs) and commercial inventories combined account for only about 74 days of oil consumption.
'The
SPR
and domestic oil companies have only about 74 days of oil inventory combined. While there are other sources of oil such as Russia, Nigeria, Brazil, US etc., a 20% reduction in global oil and gas supply would impact prices and restrict options,' he added.
Chaturvedi adds that a blockade would also expose gaps in India's energy logistics:
'India's energy supply chain is highly susceptible to geopolitical threats due to its over-reliance on Gulf imports. A blockade would expose weaknesses in crude procurement and also in freight, including tanker shortages and container imbalances.'
What are India's options if the crisis persists?
Experts agree that immediate alternatives are limited and would largely involve sourcing from other geographies. However, long-term strategies will require broader structural changes.
Short-term mitigation:
1. Import from non-Gulf regions: Countries such as Russia, the US, Nigeria, and Brazil are alternative crude suppliers that do not require passage through Hormuz.
2. Use of strategic reserves: SPRs can help temporarily meet shortfalls in case of a sudden supply cut.
3. Rerouting of shipping: Crude and LNG could be re-routed via Cape of Good Hope, although this involves longer transit times and higher freight costs.
Longer-term strategies:
1. Boost domestic exploration and refining
'The options such as boosting domestic production and expanding green energy would take months to years to implement,' said Vasisht.
2. Expand green energy and substitutes
Invest in solar, wind, green hydrogen, and biofuels to reduce long-term fossil fuel dependency.
3. Strengthen logistics and port infrastructure
Chaturvedi suggests firms must prepare for rerouting, longer lead times, and port congestion:
'Strategic freight planning, inventory stocking, and alternative port access become critical for energy as well as non-energy trade flows.'
4. Demand-side management
Encourage energy-efficient transport, adopt fuel rationing if needed, and monitor product pricing to manage inflation.
What is the likelihood of the strait being fully closed?
While Iran's Parliament has approved the measure, the final decision rests with the
Supreme National Security Council
. A complete and prolonged closure remains unlikely given the potential economic consequences for Iran itself—especially its own oil exports and trade ties with countries like China.
Nonetheless, even short-term disruptions of 24–72 hours could push up Brent prices, raise freight rates, and lead to short-term shortages.
Conclusion
The Strait of Hormuz represents a critical vulnerability in India's energy supply chain. A prolonged disruption could test the resilience of India's import infrastructure, pricing strategy, and diplomatic relations. While buffers like SPRs and diversified sourcing offer some protection, longer-term security will depend on structural reforms in exploration, energy diversification, and logistics preparedness.
India's evolving import strategy, combined with a sharper focus on domestic capacity and renewables, may offer a path forward—but for now, the global energy system remains on alert.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Uneasy coalition': After busy first 100 days, Germany's Merz faces discord at home
'Uneasy coalition': After busy first 100 days, Germany's Merz faces discord at home

New Indian Express

time4 hours ago

  • New Indian Express

'Uneasy coalition': After busy first 100 days, Germany's Merz faces discord at home

BERLIN: German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has driven sweeping changes in security, economic and migration policy during his first 100 days in office, but faces widening cracks in his uneasy coalition. On election night in February, a jubilant Merz promised to bring a bit of "rambo zambo" to the post -- using a colloquialism that can evoke a wild and joyous ride, or chaos and mayhem. Having achieved his life's ambition at age 69 to run Europe's top economy, Merz lost no time to push change, mostly in response to transatlantic turbulence sparked by US President Donald Trump. "Germany is back," Merz said, vowing to revive the economy, the military and Berlin's international standing after what he labelled three lacklustre years under his centre-left predecessor Olaf Scholz. Even before taking office, Merz's Christian Democrats (CDU/CSU) and their governing partners from Scholz's Social Democratic party (SPD) loosened debt rules and unlocked hundreds of billions of euros for Germany's armed forces and its crumbling infrastructure. Merz vowed to build "Europe's largest conventional army" in the face of a hostile Russia and keep up strong support for Ukraine in lockstep with Paris and London. A promise to ramp up NATO spending endeared Merz to Trump, who greeted him warmly at a White House meeting in June, only weeks after a jarring Oval Office showdown with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. When Israel bombed Iranian targets, Merz, with a penchant for strong and often controversial one-liners, praised it for doing the "dirty work" -- but last Friday he took the bold step of freezing arms exports to Israel over its Gaza campaign.

Iran accused of mass Afghan deportations without verifying legal status
Iran accused of mass Afghan deportations without verifying legal status

News18

time8 hours ago

  • News18

Iran accused of mass Afghan deportations without verifying legal status

Tehran [Iran], August 10 (ANI): Iranian social workers have alleged that authorities are deporting Afghan migrants without verifying their legal status, leading to cases of mistaken identity, family separation and alleged abuse during mass expulsions, Khaama Press head of Iran's Association of Social Workers, Hassan Mousavi Chelik, said officials have failed to distinguish between 'legal" and 'illegal" Afghan migrants during recent cited the case of an Iranian child mistakenly deported as an Afghan, whose identity was confirmed only after fingerprinting at the Iranian consulate, resulting in his return, Khaama Press added that some families were expelled because one member lacked residency papers, while in other cases fathers were deported while their children remained in governor Mohammad Sadeq Motamedian said that in the past 100 days, more than one million Afghans have been deported, including 400,000 from Tehran province, according to Khaama also suggest some deportations involved violence, including a July incident in which an Afghan family alleged that Baqer Rezaei died under torture by Iranian officials at a Zabol detention camp, Khaama Press advocates have warned that such practices risk separating families, violating human rights and further straining relations between Iran and Afghanistan. Calls have been made for international monitoring to ensure deportations are conducted lawfully and humanely, with safeguards for vulnerable groups, especially these concerns, the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality (UN Women) has warned that Afghan women and girls returning from Iran and Pakistan urgently require humanitarian aid to rebuild their lives in communities already strained by economic hardship and environmental challenges, Khaama Press a statement released Friday, August 8, the agency said that over two million undocumented Afghans have returned from Iran and Pakistan since September 2023. 'Many of these returnees are arriving in a country they have never lived in before," Khaama Press quoted UN Women as report noted that returnees often lack shelter, income, access to healthcare, and educational opportunities. 'For women and girls, the risks are compounded by poverty, early marriage, gender-based violence, and harsh restrictions on their rights and freedoms," it to Khaama Press, UN Women highlighted that only 10 per cent of female-headed households have permanent shelter, while humanitarian organisations are struggling to respond as international funding continues to decline. 'Aid workers, particularly women at border areas, are also facing immense pressure," the agency agency warned that 'without immediate support, the conditions for women and girls will deteriorate further," adding that the reduction in aid is severely limiting the capacity of organisations to meet even the most basic Press reported that UN officials and humanitarian groups are calling for greater international investment in support programs tailored for returning women and girls. 'Strengthening these programs… is essential for helping vulnerable populations survive and adapt to the harsh realities on the ground," the agency said. (ANI)

Trump's Armenia–Azerbaijan peace deal sparks geopolitical rift as Russia hesitates, Iran pushes back
Trump's Armenia–Azerbaijan peace deal sparks geopolitical rift as Russia hesitates, Iran pushes back

First Post

time15 hours ago

  • First Post

Trump's Armenia–Azerbaijan peace deal sparks geopolitical rift as Russia hesitates, Iran pushes back

Russia cautiously welcomed a US-brokered draft deal between Armenia and Azerbaijan on Saturday, but Moscow's regional ally Iran rejected the idea of a new border corridor backed by President Donald Trump. read more Russia offered a guarded response on Saturday to a US-brokered draft peace deal between Armenia and Azerbaijan, while its regional ally Iran rejected a proposed border corridor championed by US President Donald Trump. The two ex-Soviet neighbours signed the agreement in Washington on Friday, aiming to end decades of conflict, though the specifics and legal force of the deal remain uncertain. A key element of the plan is a transit corridor through Armenia linking Azerbaijan to its exclave of Nakhchivan, a long-standing demand of Baku. Under the agreement, the United States would gain development rights for the route, dubbed the 'Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity,' in the strategically important, resource-rich region. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Tehran, however, dismissed the proposal outright, vowing not to allow a corridor along the Iranian border. 'With the implementation of this plot, the security of the South Caucasus will be endangered,' said Akbar Velayati, an adviser to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, as quoted by Tasnim news agency. He called the plan 'an impossible notion' and warned it would become 'a graveyard for Trump's mercenaries.' 'With the implementation of this plot, the security of the South Caucasus will be endangered,' Akbar Velayati, an advisor to supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei told the Tasnim news agency. The planned corridor was 'an impossible notion and will not happen', while the area would become 'a graveyard for Trump's mercenaries', he added. In a similar tone, Moscow said it would 'further analyze' the corridor clause, noting there were trilateral agreements in place between Russia, Armenia and Azerbaijan, from which no one had yet withdrawn. 'It should not be ignored that Armenia's border with Iran is guarded by Russian border guards,' said Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova. Moscow, previously a key backer of Armenia, still has a military base there. Embroiled in its Ukraine operation, launched in 2022, it did not intervene in the latest conflict. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This has strained the historically warm ties between Yerevan and Moscow, home to a large and influential Armenian diaspora, triggering Armenia's drift towards the West. Waning influence Christian-majority Armenia and Muslim-majority Azerbaijan went to war twice over their border and the status of ethnic enclaves within each other's territories. Moscow, once the main power broker in the Caucasus, is now bogged down in its more than three-year offensive in Ukraine, diverting political and military resources into the grinding conflict of attrition. Both Armenia and Azerbaijan praised the US efforts in settling the conflict. Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev even said he would back President Donald Trump's nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize. The US-led NATO alliance welcomed the deal as a 'significant step forward'. But in Moscow, Zakharova refrained from even calling it a deal, referring to it merely as 'the meeting of the leaders of the South Caucasus republics in Washington' – adding, however, that it still deserved 'a positive assessment'. Repackaging for Trump? Analysts also sounded a note of caution, with the International Crisis Group pointing out that the deal left 'a lot of questions unanswered'. The two countries went to war twice over the disputed Karabakh region, which Azerbaijan recaptured from Armenian forces in a lightning 2023 offensive, sparking the exodus of more than 100,000 ethnic Armenians. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Azerbaijan and Armenia agreed on the text of a comprehensive peace deal in March. Much of the White House agreement was a 'repackaging' of that, which helped both countries get on Trump's good side 'by giving him a role,' the Crisis Group's senior South Caucasus analyst Joshua Kucera said. Azerbaijan later added a host of demands to that March deal, including amendments to Armenia's constitution to drop territorial claims for Karabakh, before signing the document. Pashinyan has announced plans for a constitutional referendum in 2027, but the issue remains deeply divisive among Armenians, with Kucera warning that this could yet derail the process. Kucera called the corridor 'one potentially significant development' from the White House meeting, but added that missing key details could prove 'serious stumbling blocks'. The US-brokered deal was 'definitely a testament to the fact that Russia has been losing its influence' as its Ukraine operation had 'diverted its attention and resources from some other areas of its traditional interest', Olesya Vardanyan, an independent analyst on the South Caucasus, told AFP. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Nevertheless, she added, even if many details were still missing and nothing was guaranteed, the deal still gave Armenians 'a promise of a better life and then maybe even more peace in the region'. With inputs from agencies

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store