Toyota's New Engine Family: Here's Why Rivals Should Worry
Many of today's powertrain developments are in the electric vehicle (EV) realm, but Toyota is expanding the limits of gas-powered engines. The automaker's next-gen engine lineup includes 1.5-liter and 2.0-liter sizes, which are entirely different from its previous internal combustion engines (ICE), leveraging more lightweight and compact designs. Toyota's new 1.5-liter achieves a 10% weight and volume reduction compared to the company's current 1.5-liter, while the new 2.0-liter offers similar gains to the existing 2.4-liter. In turn, Toyota is able to increase fuel economy and lower emissions without sacrificing power. Still, this next-gen engine family's efficiency extends beyond increased mileage and reduced emissions into areas like vehicle segment versatility. Let's take a closer look at how Toyota is giving its rivals increased competition with the innovation of its latest engine lineup.
Flexibility is a focal point of Toyota's next-gen engine family, with the ability to mount longitudinally or transversely and be placed at a vehicle's front or rear. This flexibility supports the development of future, sportier Toyotas, plus the seamless implementation of all-wheel drive (AWD), RWD, and FWD layouts. Toyota can utilize the 1.5-liter engine to suit classes such as compact cars and hybrids, while the 2.0-liter turbo could fit larger trucks, SUVs, and sports models.
'With these engines, each of the three companies [Toyota, Subaru, Mazda] will aim to optimize the integration with motors, batteries, and other electric drive units,' Toyota said in a statement, according to The Daily Star. Toyota, which owns about a fifth of Subaru and roughly 5% of Mazda, added that its next-generation ICE engine lineup will help decarbonize ICEs by making them compatible with alternative fuel sources, such as e-fuels (synthetic fuels) and biofuels.
While smaller engines often evoke thoughts of slower cars, their installation in upcoming Toyotas enables lower hoods, which enhances crucial performance factors such as aerodynamics and contributes to improved fuel economy. The engines' design flexibility also opens the door to Toyota reviving fan-favorite performance vehicles like the MR2 and streamlining the development of the upcoming Celica. American drivers could even see the engines in Gazoo Racing models like the GR Corolla and GR86. According to Toyota engineers who spoke with German publication Auto Motor und Sport, the 2.0-liter is easily capable of exceeding the 400-450-horsepower figure of the mid-engine GR Yaris M concept, or over 600 horsepower with a larger turbocharger.
Toyota's desire to expand the limits of ICEs arrives at a time when many automakers are reducing their investment in the technology. This decision from Toyota, along with its collaborators Subaru and Mazda, could pay off in a significant way by appealing to drivers who are not yet ready for full electrification, whether for reasons like lack of charging infrastructure or personal taste, but still seek improved efficiency. Drivers can also look forward to this ICE technology offering the ability to increase sports car mileage and reduce emissions while enhancing power. Many automakers have decided to stretch ICE production into the 2030s, but Toyota and its partners appear to have a leg up on competitors with this next-gen engine lineup offering innovation in the areas that matter most.
Toyota's New Engine Family: Here's Why Rivals Should Worry first appeared on Autoblog on Jul 6, 2025
This story was originally reported by Autoblog on Jul 6, 2025, where it first appeared.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Car and Driver
4 hours ago
- Car and Driver
How Does Speed Affect EV Range?
We ran two EVs, along with a gas-powered compact SUV, around a test track to measure how cruising speed affects range. The difference between 55 mph and 75 mph was a drop of 88 miles of range in the Lucid Air sedan and 109 miles in the Kia EV9 SUV. As speeds rise, range decreases at an increasing rate; when traveling at speeds of 75 mph or above, you're unlikely to achieve the range figure on the window sticker in an EV. Welcome to Car and Driver's Testing Hub, where we zoom in on the test numbers. We've been pushing vehicles to their limits since 1956 to provide objective data to bolster our subjective impressions (you can see how we test here). Vehicles, whether electric or gas, have to work harder against the passing air as speeds rise, as aerodynamic resistance increases dramatically (with the square of speed). But to see how that plays out in the real world, we gathered two very different EVs—a low-slung Lucid Air Pure sedan and a blocky Kia EV9 three-row SUV. We also included a Subaru Forester as a mainstream gas-powered compact SUV for comparison purposes. To minimize any effects of elevation, wind, or traffic, we used the 4.7-mile oval test track at Stellantis's Chelsea Proving Grounds. We ran each car at four speeds: 35 mph, 55 mph, 75 mph, and 95 mph, and used each vehicle's indicated consumption or fuel economy to calculate an estimated range figure. (While a vehicle's onboard computer may not be perfectly accurate, we trust the differences in consumption between the test speeds to be precise, and the figures at 75 mph during this test are in line with our in-depth highway range testing.) Car and Driver Steady-state driving in an EV is the worst-case scenario for range, because there's no ability to coast or use regenerative braking to harvest energy and boost consumption. This is part of the reason EVs tend to get much lower range figures on our 75-mph highway range test than their EPA range figures, because even the EPA highway cycle includes a lot of speed changes that EVs can use to recoup energy. View Photos Andi Hedrick | Car and Driver It's all downhill for range as speed increases, as the difference between 35 mph and 55 mph was a 22 percent drop in range for the Air (485 miles to 378) and 26 percent worse in the EV9 (459 miles to 339). Interestingly, the Forester's range only dropped 9 percent between those speeds, likely due to its additional gearing that can keep the engine operating in an efficient zone. Each additional 20-mph increment reduces range at an increasing rate. No surprise that the more aerodynamic Air does better at higher speeds, with a 23 percent drop between 55 and 75 mph and a 24 percent drop between 75 and 95 mph. The EV9, on the other hand, plummets more than 30 percent between each of those increments. But the EV9 doesn't frown on high-speed driving, as it was the only vehicle that still allowed us to set the cruise control at 95 mph. We fit a cubic equation to our data, which is a good match with aero loading, to be able to estimate what steady-state cruising speed aligns with each vehicle's EPA range figures. For the Lucid Air, it's a mere 47 mph to achieve its 419-mile range figure. But the window-sticker number is a combined figure, and—although it doesn't appear on the label—there's also an EPA highway figure. For the Lucid, its 410-mile EPA highway range matches a marginally higher cruising speed of 49 mph. Based on our previous highway range tests on Lucids, we already knew the company is very aggressive in its label values for its vehicles, and this is further evidence. The Kia EV9's range figures are much more highway-friendly, with 66 mph equating to its 280-mile EPA combined figure and 71 mph to match its 253-mile EPA highway number. Meanwhile, you can equal the Forester's 465-mile EPA combined range (28 mpg) cruising at 77 mph. View Photos Marc Urbano | Car and Driver Steady-State Cruising Speed That Equates to EPA Combined Range Lucid Air Pure: 47 mph Kia EV9: 66 mph Subaru Forester: 77 mph This vast discrepancy in the real-world performance of gas-powered versus electric cars compared with their window-sticker values could cause first-time EV buyers to be unpleasantly surprised by their vehicle's range in certain scenarios. Noticing this trend in our 75-mph highway fuel-economy and range testing data is what caused us to write an SAE technical paper on the topic. When talking about highway speeds, the difference between 55 mph and 75 mph is a loss of 88 miles of range in the Lucid Air and 109 miles in the Kia EV9. Bumping up the cruising speed from 70 to 80 mph reduces the Air's range by about 40 miles and the EV9's by roughly 45. Then again, the same 10-mph increase in the Subaru Forester drops the range even more, about 100 miles. But part of the issue is that EVs start with less range to begin with; at 80 mph, the Forester still has more than double the range of the EV9 and about 175 miles more range than the Air. Dave VanderWerp Director, Vehicle Testing Dave VanderWerp has spent more than 20 years in the automotive industry, in varied roles from engineering to product consulting, and now leading Car and Driver's vehicle-testing efforts. Dave got his very lucky start at C/D by happening to submit an unsolicited resume at just the right time to land a part-time road warrior job when he was a student at the University of Michigan, where he immediately became enthralled with the world of automotive journalism. Read full bio
Miami Herald
5 hours ago
- Miami Herald
2025 Subaru Forester vs. Nissan Rogue: 5 Major Differences
When it comes to Japanese crossovers, Toyota and Honda tend to be at the top of the pack with one of the most intense rivalries in the industry, but they aren't the only models on the market. The Subaru Forester and Nissan Rogue are fairly popular as well, but they're often overlooked in favor of their Japanese rivals. That said, there are several major differences between the two that could make one the better option for some consumers. The Nissan Rogue comes equipped with a 1.5-liter turbocharged three-cylinder engine and front-wheel drive, a combination that produces 201 horsepower and 225 lb-ft of torque. Thanks to its small engine size, the Rogue offers impressive fuel economy, up to 30 mpg in the city and 37 mpg on the highway, while delivering respectable performance. With all-wheel drive, the Rogue sees its fuel economy drop by two miles per gallon in both categories. Comparatively, the Subaru Forester comes equipped with a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine paired with all-wheel drive, producing 180 horsepower and 178 lb-ft of torque in most models. With that performance, the Forester is rated for up to 26 mpg in the city and 33 mpg on the highway. The Wilderness Edition comes with a slightly different powertrain that produces 182 horsepower and 176 lb-ft of torque. That model is rated for 25 mpg in the city and 28 mpg on the highway. Notably, the Subaru Forester comes in a more efficient hybrid form that puts it in closer competition with the Nissan Rogue. The hybrid Forester comes stocked with a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine assisted by an electric motor, delivering a combined 194 horsepower. Hybrid Subaru Forester models earn up to 35 mpg in the city and 34 mpg on the highway. Nissan doesn't currently offer the Rogue with a hybrid powertrain, but rumor has it that's going to change next year. More and more vehicles are coming stock with all-wheel drive, especially once you get into the realm of crossovers and SUVs. Subaru has been ahead of the game for years, with all-wheel drive making the list of standard equipment across most of its lineup. The Forester is no exception, with both gas and hybrid models coming with a standard all-wheel drivetrain. The Nissan Rogue is a different story, with almost all models coming equipped with front-wheel drive. The Rock Creek edition is an outlier. In addition to its off-road aesthetic, the special edition Rogue comes with standard all-wheel drive. Notably, every Rogue model is available with all-wheel drive - to the tune of $1,400. The crossover segment is one of the most competitive in the industry, but the Nissan Rogue has an advantage when it comes to price at the base, off-road, and top-tier trim levels. The base 2025 Rogue S starts at $28,590, while the 2025 Forester Base is priced from $29,995. Notably, however, the Rogue doesn't come with all-wheel drive, and adding it increases its price to $29,990, making it just $5 cheaper than the Forester. The Nissan Rogue Rock Creek offers a more rugged aesthetic. Priced from $33,490, the Rock Creek model comes with standard all-wheel drive, exclusive leatherette-appointed seats, and four driving modes, including snow and off-road. The Subaru Forester Wilderness, available from $36,285, gets a higher ground clearance, 182-horsepower engine, and CVT with seven-speed manual mode. It can also tow up to 3,000 lbs., topping the Rogue's 1,500 lbs. capacity. At the top of the range, the Rogue Platinum starts at $38,590, while the Forester Touring is priced from $41,595. Both models ride on 19-inch wheels, with a panoramic moonroof, heated front seats, and a full suite of safety systems, all making the list of standard equipment in both top-spec crossovers. The Nissan Rogue's wheelbase is a touch longer than that of the Subaru Forester, measuring 106.5 and 105.1 inches, respectively. That extra 1.4 inches helps the Rogue top its Japanese rival when it comes to cargo space, and by a fairly significant amount at that. The Rogue offers up to 36.5 cu ft. with the rear seats in their upright position. Folding the rear seats down increases cargo space to an impressive 74.1 cu ft. The Subaru Forester is fairly roomy as well, but it doesn't quite match the Rogue. With the rear seats in their set position, the Forester offers just 27.5 cu ft of cargo space. Setting the rear seats down brings cargo space to 69.1 cu ft. The story changes when it comes to passenger space, though. The Subaru Forester offers 106.6 cu ft., just barely edging out the Nissan Rogue's 105.4 cu ft. of passenger space. Subaru offers a pretty substantial model range, and the Forester is no exception, with six gas and four hybrid trim levels to choose from. Ranging from the Base trim to the Touring model, there's a whole host of packages, options, and standard equipment to consider. The 2025 Nissan Rogue is available in five trim levels, all of which are powered by a standard internal combustion engine (ICE). The base Subaru Forester model rolls out on 17-inch wheels, with LED steering-responsive headlights, roof spoiler, roof rails, and black side mirrors. Inside, the Forester comes stocked with a seven-inch touchscreen display, four-speaker audio system, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto integration, and dual-zone automatic climate control. The base Nissan Rogue rides on 17-inch wheels, with LED lighting and a rear spoiler. The interior of the Rogue is fairly standard for the price. Front bucket seats wrapped in cloth upholstery, an eight-inch touchscreen display, and Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity are all on the docket. On the other end of the range, the Rogue Platinum comes with upscale design elements and a plush interior. The top-spec model sports 19-inch wheels, roof rails, and a dual-panel panoramic moonroof. Inside, the Nissan Rogue Platinum features quilted semi-aniline leather-appointed seats, a 12.3-inch touchscreen display, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto compatibility, and a 10-speaker Bose premium sound system. The Subaru Forester Touring comes similarly equipped, with 19-inch wheels, a panoramic moonroof, leather-trimmed upholstery, and a foot-activated power rear liftgate. In terms of tech, the Touring model features an 11.6-inch touchscreen display, an 11-speaker Harman Kardon audio system, and wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity. While they may be overlooked compared to their Japanese rivals, the Subaru Forester and Nissan Rogue are worth taking for a test drive. Their standard equipment and pricing make them fairly close rivals, especially when the Rogue is equipped with all-wheel drive. The Rogue's efficiency is tough to beat, though. If Nissan brings a hybrid version of the Rogue to market for the 2026 model year, it could give the automaker a significant advantage over the Subaru Forester. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Miami Herald
5 hours ago
- Miami Herald
2025 Hyundai Sonata vs. Toyota Camry: 5 Major Differences
Once the backbone of American driveways, midsize sedans have steadily lost ground to crossovers and SUVs. With the exits of the Chevy Malibu and Subaru Legacy after 2025, only a handful of contenders remain. But the Hyundai Sonata and Toyota Camry are still standing-and both received major overhauls for 2025. Toyota went all-in on hybridization and all-wheel drive, while Hyundai doubled down on value, tech, and design. If you're still in the market for a well-equipped sedan that delivers strong fuel economy, excellent ride quality, and surprising tech, these two deserve a look. Which one fits your needs best? Here are five key differences that help separate them. Perhaps the most talked-about change for the 2025 Toyota Camry is what's under the hood-or rather, what isn't. Toyota has ditched its traditional gas-only drivetrains entirely, making the 2025 Camry a hybrid-only sedan. It's available with a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine and two electric motors up front, producing 225 horsepower. All-wheel-drive variants add a third electric motor at the rear, bumping total system output to 232 hp. That makes the Camry one of the few hybrid sedans on the market to offer all-wheel drive-and the only one in its class to make hybrid the default, not the upgrade. Hyundai took a different approach with the 2025 Sonata. You can still buy one with a traditional gas engine-specifically, a naturally aspirated 2.5-liter four-cylinder good for 191 horsepower and 181 lb-ft of torque. For buyers looking for electrified efficiency, the Sonata Hybrid pairs a 2.0-liter engine with an electric motor to deliver 192 hp. The base hybrid system is a bit less powerful than Toyota's, but it's smooth, refined, and very fuel-efficient. Bottom line: Camry buyers must go hybrid, but Hyundai gives you a choice. At the entry level, the 2025 Hyundai Sonata SE starts at $26,900, while the SEL comes in at around $28,000. That's cheaper than the base 2025 Camry LE Hybrid, which starts at $28,700 with front-wheel drive and $30,225 with all-wheel drive. The most efficient Sonata Hybrid-the Blue trim-isn't listed for 2025 yet, but the mid-tier SEL Hybrid starts at $31,250, while the top-tier Limited Hybrid comes in at $37,700. The Camry's upper trims are priced similarly, with the XLE Hybrid AWD priced at $35,125 and the range-topping XSE AWD Hybrid starting at $36,425. When comparing apples to apples (i.e., hybrids), pricing is close, within a few hundred dollars, in most cases. The Camry offers standard hybrid power and available AWD. The Sonata costs slightly less in its mid-tier trims, but tops out around the same price once you spec it similarly. It's worth noting that real-world incentives and dealer pricing can swing these numbers significantly, especially for Hyundai, which often includes additional discounts. One of the Camry's most significant advantages for 2025 is its electric all-wheel-drive system. It's not just a gimmick-it adds real capability, especially for drivers in snowy climates. Instead of using a mechanical driveshaft, the AWD Camry uses an electric motor to power the rear wheels independently. It's seamless in operation and doesn't significantly impact fuel economy. No version of the 2025 Sonata offers all-wheel drive, gas or hybrid. That might not matter for drivers in dry or temperate climates, but it's a notable disadvantage in the Northeast, Midwest, or Mountain West, where AWD is often considered essential. This marks a real differentiation point between the two. If AWD is a must-have, the Camry is your only option in this match-up. Inside, both sedans have made big strides, but the Sonata's cabin feels more futuristic and premium. Hyundai now offers a twin 12.3-inch display setup-one screen for the digital gauge cluster and one for the central infotainment-merged under a single piece of curved glass. The layout is clean, upscale, and intuitive, especially on higher trims. Even the base trims feel modern thanks to Hyundai's slick user interface and standard wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. The 2025 Camry improves significantly over its predecessor, but not all trims come with the same level of tech. LE and SE models come with an 8-inch touchscreen and a 7-inch digital gauge display. Step up to the XLE or XSE, and you'll get the dual 12.3-inch setup. Like the Sonata, Toyota supports wireless smartphone mirroring and offers a premium JBL sound system on upper trims. In terms of standard features and presentation, Hyundai has the edge. The Sonata Limited Hybrid even includes ventilated front seats, a head-up display, and Highway Driving Assist-Hyundai's semi-automated driving tech-which is not available on the Camry. With up to 232 horsepower and AWD available, the Camry is the better performer on paper. It accelerates briskly for a hybrid sedan and handles well in XSE trim, thanks to firmer suspension and sportier tuning. Toyota has clearly tried to retain some of the enthusiast appeal once offered by its now-discontinued V6. The Sonata Hybrid isn't as quick, and its 192-hp system feels more tuned for smoothness than speed. But Hyundai's focus on comfort pays off with a quieter cabin, a softer ride, and less harshness over broken pavement. It's a car designed to make commutes and long drives feel easy, not edgy. Fuel economy is neck and neck. The Camry LE Hybrid returns up to 51 mpg combined, while AWD drops that to 47–48 mpg. The Sonata Hybrid gets between 47 and 52 mpg, depending on the trim and wheel size. If you're comparing efficiency, it's a wash. Both the 2025 Toyota Camry and Hyundai Sonata are excellent midsize sedans-but they aim for slightly different buyers. If you want a hybrid-only powertrain, available all-wheel drive, and more power, the Camry is your best bet. It's also a smart pick for buyers in colder climates who need extra traction. But you're probably better off choosing the Sonata if you value sleek tech, a more comfortable ride, and the option of a gas-only engine. It also tends to offer slightly better value at most trim levels. Either way, these two are standouts in a segment that's been all but abandoned by other automakers. With thoughtful redesigns, impressive fuel economy, and plenty of standard tech, the Sonata and Camry prove that the midsize sedan still has a lot of life left. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
