
Amazon remains in great peril and should top Cop30 agenda
largest tropical forest on earth
stretches more than 3,500km – more than the distance from Galway to Moscow – before spilling into the Atlantic Ocean. It took Spaniard Franciso de Orellana more than eight months to descend the full length of the great river when his party became the first Europeans to do so in 1542.
The accounts of Orellana's improbable adventure chronicled a jungle that was then inhabited by a large population, possibly as many as five million in total, according to modern scholars. These included advanced agricultural societies that had lived along the rivers of the Amazon basin for perhaps as long as 13,000 years.
But the forest stretches deep into time as well as across space. Geological studies suggest it has existed for at least 25 million years, making human history of any kind in the region a very recent affair.
In this time, a wondrous diversity of life has evolved so that despite covering only half a per cent of the earth's surface, it accounts for ten per cent of all named plants and vertebrate animals. A full accounting of its true biodiversity remains a work in progress. The Amazon has also been described as a 'critical component' of the Earth's climate system, 'strongly regulating global carbon and water cycles',
a study
published in the journal Science in 2023 concluded.
READ MORE
Orellana's tales of this vast jungle, hinting it contained troves of silver and gold equal to those his fellow conquistadors found in Mexico or Peru, fired a lust for conquest that brought misery and death to the indigenous peoples and a destructive force that, 500 years later, shows no signs of abating.
Enslavement and disease wiped out whole populations; the rubber trade of the late 1800s immiserated those who remained. By the 1970s, the paranoid military dictatorship in Brazil encouraged a wave of settlers to colonise the jungle to bring 'people without land' to a 'land without people', as they saw it.
Fires along the Trans-Amazonian Highway near the Aripuana National Forest, in the state of Amazonas. Photograph:The aforementioned Science paper concluded human impacts are outpacing natural processes and 'the Amazon is now perched to transition rapidly from a largely forested to a nonforested landscape, and the changes are happening much too rapidly for Amazonian species, peoples, and ecosystems to respond adaptively'.
Even since this sentence was written, events have accelerated. During the presidency of Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil from 2019 to 2023, tacit approval was given to land grabbers and ranchers to clear land, driving a spike in rates of deforestation. The leftist Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (Lula, as he is better known) succeeded him with a promise to reverse this trend. His efforts have met some success and data published in May showed deforestation rates across the country had dropped by one-third in 2024 compared to a year previously.
Good news. However, this fall in land clearance is being swamped by losses of forest due to fires. The year 2024 was the hottest on record, while the drought that afflicted the Amazon basin was the worst in seven decades. According to
new data
from the World Resources Institute (WRI), 2024 marked a 'record-shattering' level of primary forest loss globally, with more than half of that in Brazil and its neighbour, Bolivia.
During a webinar in May, Rod Taylor, global director of the Forests Programme at the WRI warned we are entering 'a new phase ... a climate/fire feedback loop' that is entirely down to deliberate land clearance for agriculture, since fires are not a natural phenomenon in the rainforest. In Bolivia, far from this being beyond the reach of authorities, it is the result of deliberate policies designed to increase agricultural exports from its Amazon region.
The 3.1 gigatonnes
of greenhouse gas emissions released by the fires globally were greater than the entire emissions from India for one year. Marina Silva, Lula's respected environment minister,
told Time magazine
in May that 'even if we can nullify deforestation, with climate change, if we don't reduce carbon from fossil fuel emissions, the forest will be destroyed anyway'.
Lula has staked his reputation as a climate leader by going out of his way to host the Cop30 climate summit, to be held in the Amazonian city of Belem this November.
Fernanda Wenzel is an investigative journalist based in Brazil for Mongabay, a news outlet dedicated to nature conservation. She agrees that Lula's policies have resulted in 'some good news ... but there are contradictions as well'.
She hails Marina Silva as 'very competent ... she knows what has to be done. We have environmental agents back on the ground and there have been several raids on indigenous lands to expel invaders – land grabbers, illegal loggers and miners – and we have an increase in remote monitoring using satellite imagery. We have clear signs that things have changed.'
However, even with these successes, 'seven trees are knocked down every second ... deforestation is still advancing, we are far from zero deforestation', something that many tropical countries, including Brazil, have committed to achieving by 2030.
Wenzel points to Lula's close relationships with big business, including the powerful livestock industry, mining and fossil fuel interests, including in the Amazon basin. She is sceptical that deforestation can be brought to a halt, partly because Lula is not in a politically strong position. 'We have a very conservative congress that has never been so strong and is backing agribusiness interests. They are making it difficult to demarcate new indigenous lands, and we know that those territories [are managed by] those who most protect the forest.'
She also notes how the effects of climate change are being felt: 'I think it's going to be really hard to reach zero deforestation by 2030.'
All of the commodities coming from the Amazon, particularly soy and beef, are not being produced to satisfy demand in Brazil. Rather, they are heading north, to countries like Ireland, and concerns have been raised that new trade deals, such as the one between the EU and the Mercosur regional trade block, will make matters worse. 'Everything that boosts Brazilian agribusiness production has an impact in the Amazon,' says Wenzel.
Deforestation to provide for livestock. Photograph: Getty Images
This point is echoed by Natalie Unterstell, president of the Talona Institute, a think tank dedicated to Brazilian climate policy. She says the 'EU-Mercosur deal could either support or undermine forest protection. Without strong safeguards and accountability, increased trade risks accelerating deforestation, as scientific research has repeatedly shown.'
As part of the Green Deal, the EU agreed to a deforestation regulation that would ban products, such as beef and soy, from any land deforested from December 2020.
However, this has met resistance from countries in the EU as well as Brazil itself, and its implementation has been delayed for one year. 'The real challenge is to align trade with both the EU and China, to zero-deforestation goals,' adds Unterstell.
And what of Cop30 in Belem? According to Unterstell, Lula's 'climate leadership will only be confirmed if he sustains the Amazon turnaround [in deforestation] and commits to curb ongoing fossil fuel expansion across Brazil'. He plans to launch the Tropical Forests Forever Facility at the Belem gathering to finance forest preservation and restoration. Greenpeace has described the need for this initiative as 'urgent and clear'.
Yet, the willingness to act with the ambition required has not been apparent. 'Right now, countries like the US and Brazil are still doubling down on investments in oil, coal, and gas as if time were on our side. It's not,' says Unterstell.
In 1658, with the European invasion of the Amazon well under way, a Jesuit priest from Co Waterford, Richard Carew, witnessed the forced displacement of thousands of people, among them women, children and the sick, from the jungle to work the plantations around Belem, the city of Cop30. Two thousand people had just arrived in the city, many to face enslavement and hard labour, but the plantation owners wanted more. Carew wrote at the time: 'Even though the rivers of these lands are the biggest in the world, the greed of the colonists is greater than all the water.'
There is scarcely any sign that it has yet to abate.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Agriland
18 hours ago
- Agriland
Jeremy Clarkson confirms Diddly Squat farm is down with TB
Jeremy Clarkson has said everyone at Diddly Squat is "absolutely devastated" after confirmation of bovine TB on the farm. The star of the hit Amazon TV show shared details of the TB outbreak on his social media channels today (Thursday, July 31). According to Clarkson "the offending animal is pregnant with twins". Source: X The tv star received thousands of messages of support from fans on social media sympathising with him over the TB confirmation. Clarkson also shared that "Endgame" the prize bull which featured in the last series of the Amazon show has tested inconclusive for TB. "I couldn't bear it if we lost him," Clarkson told his followers on social media. Separately the National Farmers' Union (NFU) today announced that a new research project is underway on the impact of TB vaccination among badgers on rates of infection. According to the NFU the three-year project has been driven by farmers in Cornwall who want to "better understand" the impact badger vaccination may have, both in preventing TB in the badger population and in cattle herds. The joint NFU and Zoological Society of London (ZSL) has been awarded financial backing of £1.4 million from the Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). An earlier project, on a small scale by ZSL and the Cornwall Wildlife Trust, found that the number of badgers testing positive for exposure to TB dropped from 16% to 0% over four years of vaccination. The latest project will pilot three different vaccination approaches to determine which delivery model works best at scale in a cost-effective way: Standard approach – Annual vaccination over four years, following the current badger vaccination guidelines; Intermittent – Vaccinate every other year (year one and three) with the aim of reducing delivery costs and enabling faster expansion; Targeted – Reactive vaccination based on TB breakdown holdings and nearby farms. Martin Howlett, who is an NFU member and livestock member, is taking part in the project. He said: 'My farm was repeatedly hit by TB over a 15-year period. Losing cattle, even if it's only a few each time, takes a massive toll on the family and the business, which was essentially frozen. What I remember most from that time was a constant sense of dread. 'Wildlife control played a key part in helping us to eradicate TB on our farm and we've been TB-free for five years now, but we know this measure won't be available forever. "It's vital we look at other tools to ensure we can continue to reduce cases.


Irish Times
19-07-2025
- Irish Times
Ireland's only protected insect the marsh fritillary to star in new comic championing cause of insects
The marsh fritillary – a beautiful butterfly and Ireland's only protected insect species – is about to become a star, featuring in a comic series and delivering the message that us humans unfairly give insects a hard time. Beo, Raja and the Butterfly Effect is the creation of teams from several Irish universities, and is designed to engage younger audiences on biodiversity , while also showing its place in our history, culture and the Irish language. It comes with a serious message too on the critical importance of pollination and the bioeconomy. Beo, Raja and the Butterfly Effect rallies to the cause of many insects that are vilified or at best ignored. Its creators hope it will benefit from the 'butterfly effect', where a seemingly small change in a complex system that can kick-start large, unpredictable but ultimately beneficial impacts. In lead character – the marsh fritillary – meets other insects such as the common wasp, who retorts: 'The bee gets the glory. The wasp gets the swat. I'm not pretty enough. I'm not cute. I work so hard at pest control and pollination all day long and what thanks do I get?' READ MORE The marsh fritillary is classified by the National Biodiversity Data Centre as 'vulnerable' and at risk of extinction The butterfly helps to spread the word within their ranks as to their environmental importance, reminding them of their power and of how 'each tiny wingbeat keeps ecosystems alive'. 'Insects are the most diverse group of animals on the planet, and yet their importance in ecosystems is vastly underappreciated,' said Prof Jane Stout, vice-president for biodiversity and climate at Trinity College Dublin . 'They use various methods of communication, from visual and chemical to tactile and audio and while we can't always see or hear them, they are important to healthy ecosystems that underpin the bioeconomy, which uses nature's cycle – not fossil fuels – to create food, materials and energy,' she added. Prof Tom Curran, Prof Catherine Farrell, Dr Máire Nic an Bhaird, Prof Jane Stout and Dr Laoise Ní Chléirigh reading the comic defending insects and highlighting biodiversity in Trinity College's Front Square at the launch Beo, Raja and the Butterfly Effect Only a handful of species are problematic to people and many play crucial, beneficial roles. 'Plenty of us have an inkling as to their importance as pollinators, but they are also key pest controllers and nutrient cyclers, and provide food for wild birds and other animals.' said Prof Stout, who specialises in pollination ecology. The marsh fritillary is classified by the National Biodiversity Data Centre as 'vulnerable' and at risk of extinction. It has a wide but patchy distribution; more common in the midlands and western half of the country. It has experienced population decline due to a decrease in suitable habitat. The downloadable comic was a collaboration between TCD; UCD , Maynooth University , the Royal Entomological Society and the BiOrbic Research Ireland Centre for the Bioeconomy. It was part of a 'restoring biodiversity challenge', aiming to strengthen and integrate education and public engagement on the issue. TCD assistant professor of business and nature Dr Catherine Farrell said: 'Insects are essential to so many business supply chains, most obvious in terms of crops and food production, but with multiple contributions to so many aspects of our daily lives. The Butterfly Effect highlights this in a simple way: the small things really matter for the future of our society and economy.' A graphic representation of Ireland's bioeconomy, featured in the comic series Beo, Raja and the Butterfly Effect. Illustration: Nathan T Wright The layers in the comic are powerful and tie in elements of Irish history, said Dr Máire Nic an Bhaird of Maynooth University. Ireland's first president, Douglas Hyde, showed how language, heritage and land were deeply connected; 'Just as he used that connection to revive Irish, we must now foster a love of the land to inspire young climate stewards and support bioeconomy solutions', she added. Dr Laoise Ní Chléirigh, also based at Maynooth, underlined the importance of the Irish language in the series – 'a minority language where traditional ecological knowledge is deeply rooted, supporting both cultural and environmental continuity'. It was a very enjoyable collaboration between ecology, education and engineering, integrating different perspectives on the importance of insects, said Dr Tom Curran of UCD School of Biosystems and Food Engineering.


Irish Times
17-07-2025
- Irish Times
Amazon remains in great peril and should top Cop30 agenda
From the foothills of the Andes in Ecuador the largest tropical forest on earth stretches more than 3,500km – more than the distance from Galway to Moscow – before spilling into the Atlantic Ocean. It took Spaniard Franciso de Orellana more than eight months to descend the full length of the great river when his party became the first Europeans to do so in 1542. The accounts of Orellana's improbable adventure chronicled a jungle that was then inhabited by a large population, possibly as many as five million in total, according to modern scholars. These included advanced agricultural societies that had lived along the rivers of the Amazon basin for perhaps as long as 13,000 years. But the forest stretches deep into time as well as across space. Geological studies suggest it has existed for at least 25 million years, making human history of any kind in the region a very recent affair. In this time, a wondrous diversity of life has evolved so that despite covering only half a per cent of the earth's surface, it accounts for ten per cent of all named plants and vertebrate animals. A full accounting of its true biodiversity remains a work in progress. The Amazon has also been described as a 'critical component' of the Earth's climate system, 'strongly regulating global carbon and water cycles', a study published in the journal Science in 2023 concluded. READ MORE Orellana's tales of this vast jungle, hinting it contained troves of silver and gold equal to those his fellow conquistadors found in Mexico or Peru, fired a lust for conquest that brought misery and death to the indigenous peoples and a destructive force that, 500 years later, shows no signs of abating. Enslavement and disease wiped out whole populations; the rubber trade of the late 1800s immiserated those who remained. By the 1970s, the paranoid military dictatorship in Brazil encouraged a wave of settlers to colonise the jungle to bring 'people without land' to a 'land without people', as they saw it. Fires along the Trans-Amazonian Highway near the Aripuana National Forest, in the state of Amazonas. Photograph:The aforementioned Science paper concluded human impacts are outpacing natural processes and 'the Amazon is now perched to transition rapidly from a largely forested to a nonforested landscape, and the changes are happening much too rapidly for Amazonian species, peoples, and ecosystems to respond adaptively'. Even since this sentence was written, events have accelerated. During the presidency of Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil from 2019 to 2023, tacit approval was given to land grabbers and ranchers to clear land, driving a spike in rates of deforestation. The leftist Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (Lula, as he is better known) succeeded him with a promise to reverse this trend. His efforts have met some success and data published in May showed deforestation rates across the country had dropped by one-third in 2024 compared to a year previously. Good news. However, this fall in land clearance is being swamped by losses of forest due to fires. The year 2024 was the hottest on record, while the drought that afflicted the Amazon basin was the worst in seven decades. According to new data from the World Resources Institute (WRI), 2024 marked a 'record-shattering' level of primary forest loss globally, with more than half of that in Brazil and its neighbour, Bolivia. During a webinar in May, Rod Taylor, global director of the Forests Programme at the WRI warned we are entering 'a new phase ... a climate/fire feedback loop' that is entirely down to deliberate land clearance for agriculture, since fires are not a natural phenomenon in the rainforest. In Bolivia, far from this being beyond the reach of authorities, it is the result of deliberate policies designed to increase agricultural exports from its Amazon region. The 3.1 gigatonnes of greenhouse gas emissions released by the fires globally were greater than the entire emissions from India for one year. Marina Silva, Lula's respected environment minister, told Time magazine in May that 'even if we can nullify deforestation, with climate change, if we don't reduce carbon from fossil fuel emissions, the forest will be destroyed anyway'. Lula has staked his reputation as a climate leader by going out of his way to host the Cop30 climate summit, to be held in the Amazonian city of Belem this November. Fernanda Wenzel is an investigative journalist based in Brazil for Mongabay, a news outlet dedicated to nature conservation. She agrees that Lula's policies have resulted in 'some good news ... but there are contradictions as well'. She hails Marina Silva as 'very competent ... she knows what has to be done. We have environmental agents back on the ground and there have been several raids on indigenous lands to expel invaders – land grabbers, illegal loggers and miners – and we have an increase in remote monitoring using satellite imagery. We have clear signs that things have changed.' However, even with these successes, 'seven trees are knocked down every second ... deforestation is still advancing, we are far from zero deforestation', something that many tropical countries, including Brazil, have committed to achieving by 2030. Wenzel points to Lula's close relationships with big business, including the powerful livestock industry, mining and fossil fuel interests, including in the Amazon basin. She is sceptical that deforestation can be brought to a halt, partly because Lula is not in a politically strong position. 'We have a very conservative congress that has never been so strong and is backing agribusiness interests. They are making it difficult to demarcate new indigenous lands, and we know that those territories [are managed by] those who most protect the forest.' She also notes how the effects of climate change are being felt: 'I think it's going to be really hard to reach zero deforestation by 2030.' All of the commodities coming from the Amazon, particularly soy and beef, are not being produced to satisfy demand in Brazil. Rather, they are heading north, to countries like Ireland, and concerns have been raised that new trade deals, such as the one between the EU and the Mercosur regional trade block, will make matters worse. 'Everything that boosts Brazilian agribusiness production has an impact in the Amazon,' says Wenzel. Deforestation to provide for livestock. Photograph: Getty Images This point is echoed by Natalie Unterstell, president of the Talona Institute, a think tank dedicated to Brazilian climate policy. She says the 'EU-Mercosur deal could either support or undermine forest protection. Without strong safeguards and accountability, increased trade risks accelerating deforestation, as scientific research has repeatedly shown.' As part of the Green Deal, the EU agreed to a deforestation regulation that would ban products, such as beef and soy, from any land deforested from December 2020. However, this has met resistance from countries in the EU as well as Brazil itself, and its implementation has been delayed for one year. 'The real challenge is to align trade with both the EU and China, to zero-deforestation goals,' adds Unterstell. And what of Cop30 in Belem? According to Unterstell, Lula's 'climate leadership will only be confirmed if he sustains the Amazon turnaround [in deforestation] and commits to curb ongoing fossil fuel expansion across Brazil'. He plans to launch the Tropical Forests Forever Facility at the Belem gathering to finance forest preservation and restoration. Greenpeace has described the need for this initiative as 'urgent and clear'. Yet, the willingness to act with the ambition required has not been apparent. 'Right now, countries like the US and Brazil are still doubling down on investments in oil, coal, and gas as if time were on our side. It's not,' says Unterstell. In 1658, with the European invasion of the Amazon well under way, a Jesuit priest from Co Waterford, Richard Carew, witnessed the forced displacement of thousands of people, among them women, children and the sick, from the jungle to work the plantations around Belem, the city of Cop30. Two thousand people had just arrived in the city, many to face enslavement and hard labour, but the plantation owners wanted more. Carew wrote at the time: 'Even though the rivers of these lands are the biggest in the world, the greed of the colonists is greater than all the water.' There is scarcely any sign that it has yet to abate.