Scottish government minister says UK welfare reforms should be abandoned
Ahead of the crunch vote, Sir Keir Starmer ditched a mainstay of his welfare reform agenda as he battled to get the draft laws through the House of Commons.
In a major concession as MPs prepared to vote, the Prime Minister shelved plans to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), with any changes now only coming after a review of the benefit.
Under Scotland's devolved social security system, Pip is currently being replaced by the Adult Disability Payment.
Reacting to events at Westminster, Ms Somerville reiterated the Scottish Government's pledge not to cut that benefit.
'Despite the panicked, last-minute concessions they have made, if the UK Government presses ahead with cuts to disability support they will plunge more people into poverty,' said the SNP MSP.
'That is unconscionable.
'Their approach also risks creating a deeply unfair two-tier system, pushing the impact of cuts onto future applicants for disability benefits.
'The UK Government needs to stop balancing the books on the backs of some of the most vulnerable people in society.
'They need to properly listen to the overwhelming criticism their proposals have generated and do the right thing by disabled people by abandoning this bill entirely.
'I want to reassure disabled people in Scotland, that the Scottish Government will not cut Scotland's Adult Disability Payment, we will not let disabled people down as the UK Government has done.'
The decision to remove the Pip changes from the Bill was announced just 90 minutes before MPs voted.
The legislation passed by 335 votes to 260, majority 75.
Despite the late concession, there were 49 Labour rebels, the largest revolt so far of Sir Keir's premiership.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
35 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Starmer's second year is now guaranteed to be worse than his first
Voters are traditionally seen as fickle beings. They are prone to change their minds at the drop of a hat or the reversal of a policy. This perception is particularly held strongly by politicians themselves, who constantly bemoan the inconstancy of the electorate. But they've got it wrong. Voters, in fact, tend to be more reliable in their loyalties than they're given credit for. This is not good news for Keir Starmer: one key aspect of voter behaviour is that once they have decided that a particular political leader has become a disappointment, they rarely, if ever, change their minds. When Margaret Thatcher incurred the wrath of a previously adoring electorate by her support for the poll tax, her MPs knew that victory at the next election depended on her being replaced. When Tony Blair's popularity began a downward spiral, after his third general election victory in 2005, even the Great Helmsman knew his time was up. Gordon Brown imagined, for reasons best known to himself, that he could buck the trend of history by winning the 2010 general election despite the voters having lost faith in him years earlier. Keir Starmer is in even more of a desperate position than any of those three predecessors because he never managed to gain the respect or popularity that any of them enjoyed in their heydays. Power reveals. After a year in office, no one has any doubt about the leadership skills Starmer has brought to Number 10. He has proved himself every bit as competent a leader as any former lawyer with little political experience or instinct could have. Had the Prime Minister established his governing credentials early on in his time in Downing Street, the public would have proved itself more tolerant of the occasional stumble. But when stumbling and falling over into vats of custard have all but defined this Government, voters cannot be expected to have an endless supply of patience. There is further bad news for any Labour MP determined to maintain a spark of optimism in his soul: things are not going to get better. There will, of course, be a relaunch. Perhaps even a modest change in personnel, either in Government or in Starmer's team at Number 10. But at the risk of over-using Titanic-related metaphors, moving the deckchairs around won't be nearly enough to restore what faith the voters used to have in this Government or in Starmer himself. His weaknesses as a leader have been cruelly exposed and there's no putting that toothpaste back into the tube. The might of rebel MPs has been established by their ruthlessness in exploiting the Prime Minister's vulnerabilities. They have earned the respect of their own constituency parties, much of the media and of large sections of the public. What on earth would possess them to hold back now? The next year could therefore prove even more difficult for the Government. Those who complain that Starmer has not enjoyed the traditional honeymoon period that all new Governments have are wrong: what you've seen in the last few months was the honeymoon. The last year was as good as it's ever going to get; the next year will be worse. Now the honeymoon is over and the 'happy' couple must face the realities of wedded life. Just think: in another year, Labour ministers might even hark back with longing to those halcyon days when the Government was just a year old.
The National
36 minutes ago
- The National
Chancellor 'going nowhere', says No 10 after tears in the Commons
The Prime Minister failed to guarantee the Chancellor would keep her job and tears could be seen running down her face as Starmer was speaking. Her sister Ellie Reeves, also an MP, was seen holding her hand as she left the chamber on Wednesday. No 10 has been forced to confirm the Chancellor still enjoys the Prime Minister's backing, despite chaotic scenes in Parliament the previous day – as the Government tore up its flagship welfare policy mid-debate. (Image: PA) Reeves (above) is the focus of much anger from backbench Labour MPs who believe her self-imposed fiscal rules have hamstrung Government policy-making. Asked why Starmer did not confirm that he had faith in Reeves, the Prime Minister's press secretary said: 'He has done so repeatedly. 'The Chancellor is going nowhere. She has the Prime Minister's full backing. READ MORE: Here's how the 37 Scottish Labour MPs voted on welfare reform 'He has said it plenty of times, he doesn't need to repeat it every time the Leader of the Opposition speculates about Labour politicians.' She added: 'The Chancellor and the Prime Minister are focused entirely on delivering for working people. 'It's thanks to the Chancellor's management of the economy that we managed to restore stability, which has led to four interest rate cuts, wages rising faster than inflation and she recently delivered a spending review that invested in Britain's national renewal.' Asked whether the Prime Minister still had confidence in Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall (above), the press secretary said: 'Yes.' A Treasury spokesperson said: 'It's a personal matter, which, as you would expect, we are not going to get into. 'The Chancellor will be working out of Downing Street this afternoon.'
Telegraph
36 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Rayner ‘instrumental' in forcing welfare U-turn
Angela Rayner was 'instrumental' in pushing Sir Keir Starmer to water down his flagship welfare Bill, The Telegraph understands. The Deputy Prime Minister held hours of crunch talks with Labour MPs who were poised to vote against the legislation before a last-minute climbdown by Sir Keir. A crackdown on the personal independence payment (Pip) has now been scrapped. It will only be considered after a wider welfare review by Sir Stephen Timms, the disability minister. Two well-placed sources told The Telegraph that Ms Rayner masterminded the about-turn, as first reported by Bloomberg. One source had conversations with the Deputy Prime Minister and Sir Alan Campbell, the Chief Whip, in the hours before the vote. They said: 'They were both definitely in listening mode and instrumental in getting a solution that was palatable to me and others.' The Bill cleared its first big hurdle in the House of Commons yesterday evening as MPs supported it by 335 votes to 260. It will face more scrutiny next week. But 49 Labour MPs still opposed the legislation despite Sir Keir giving ground, raising major questions about his authority. Ms Rayner declared on Wednesday that the welfare Bill was now in a 'better place' after the Prime Minister significantly watered down his proposals. Asked about the chaos of the past week, she told ITV's Lorraine: 'I would say that to be fair to my colleagues, many of them have been raising concerns privately. 'Some have not raised them privately, some have. It's fair that the process of Parliament can look argy-bargy, like everybody's falling out, but that's the way you get to a consensus, and when the crunch comes to a vote, that's like a pinch point, a flash point in the Commons, and what happens. 'So people might see that overall it's chaos, but actually we've got to a better place now, and we've got the bill through Parliament at its second reading. And now we'll get into the detail.' She also insisted that the reforms had to happen 'in the right order' and admitted changes to the benefits system were always going to be 'difficult'. Ms Rayner continued: 'So some of the concessions that people have said, all the work that we did with MPs, was to make sure that, first of all, anyone listening to your show today, they know that there will be no changes to their welfare. 'And I want to make sure people are reassured by that because a lot of people have been scared by what's going to happen. 'And then the future will be co-designed with disability groups… The Timms review, that had to happen before the changes came in and that's what everybody was really concerned about, making sure we did things in the right order, supportively.' The Government's original welfare reforms were designed to save approximately £5 billion by 2030. The Institute for Fiscal Studies said the result of Sir Keir's concessions will be that the Government now saves nothing. That means there is a £5 billion hole in Sir Keir's spending plans which will have to be filled either through cuts elsewhere, more borrowing or tax increases. Ministers are resistant to increasing borrowing because of Labour's fiscal rules, while the welfare debacle has shown how difficult it is for the Government to reduce public spending – potentially leaving tax rises as Sir Keir 's only option. Pat McFadden, the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, hinted at tax rises on Wednesday morning when he said the welfare concessions would have 'financial consequences'. It came as Rachael Maskell, a leading Labour welfare rebel, said the debacle on the Bill saw a 'change in power' away from Sir Keir as the legislation 'disintegrated before our eyes'. Ms Maskell tabled an amendment on Tuesday aimed at killing off the Bill altogether. It was defeated in the Commons but won support from 149 MPs including dozens of Labour backers.
