
Rayner ‘instrumental' in forcing welfare U-turn
The Deputy Prime Minister held hours of crunch talks with Labour MPs who were poised to vote against the legislation before a last-minute climbdown by Sir Keir.
A crackdown on the personal independence payment (Pip) has now been scrapped. It will only be considered after a wider welfare review by Sir Stephen Timms, the disability minister.
Two well-placed sources told The Telegraph that Ms Rayner masterminded the about-turn, as first reported by Bloomberg.
One source had conversations with the Deputy Prime Minister and Sir Alan Campbell, the Chief Whip, in the hours before the vote.
They said: 'They were both definitely in listening mode and instrumental in getting a solution that was palatable to me and others.'
The Bill cleared its first big hurdle in the House of Commons yesterday evening as MPs supported it by 335 votes to 260. It will face more scrutiny next week.
But 49 Labour MPs still opposed the legislation despite Sir Keir giving ground, raising major questions about his authority.
Ms Rayner declared on Wednesday that the welfare Bill was now in a 'better place' after the Prime Minister significantly watered down his proposals.
Asked about the chaos of the past week, she told ITV's Lorraine: 'I would say that to be fair to my colleagues, many of them have been raising concerns privately.
'Some have not raised them privately, some have. It's fair that the process of Parliament can look argy-bargy, like everybody's falling out, but that's the way you get to a consensus, and when the crunch comes to a vote, that's like a pinch point, a flash point in the Commons, and what happens.
'So people might see that overall it's chaos, but actually we've got to a better place now, and we've got the bill through Parliament at its second reading. And now we'll get into the detail.'
She also insisted that the reforms had to happen 'in the right order' and admitted changes to the benefits system were always going to be 'difficult'.
Ms Rayner continued: 'So some of the concessions that people have said, all the work that we did with MPs, was to make sure that, first of all, anyone listening to your show today, they know that there will be no changes to their welfare.
'And I want to make sure people are reassured by that because a lot of people have been scared by what's going to happen.
'And then the future will be co-designed with disability groups… The Timms review, that had to happen before the changes came in and that's what everybody was really concerned about, making sure we did things in the right order, supportively.'
The Government's original welfare reforms were designed to save approximately £5 billion by 2030. The Institute for Fiscal Studies said the result of Sir Keir's concessions will be that the Government now saves nothing.
That means there is a £5 billion hole in Sir Keir's spending plans which will have to be filled either through cuts elsewhere, more borrowing or tax increases.
Ministers are resistant to increasing borrowing because of Labour's fiscal rules, while the welfare debacle has shown how difficult it is for the Government to reduce public spending – potentially leaving tax rises as Sir Keir 's only option.
Pat McFadden, the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, hinted at tax rises on Wednesday morning when he said the welfare concessions would have 'financial consequences'.
It came as Rachael Maskell, a leading Labour welfare rebel, said the debacle on the Bill saw a 'change in power' away from Sir Keir as the legislation 'disintegrated before our eyes'.
Ms Maskell tabled an amendment on Tuesday aimed at killing off the Bill altogether. It was defeated in the Commons but won support from 149 MPs including dozens of Labour backers.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
34 minutes ago
- Reuters
Instant view: UK markets see 2022-style selloff as worries build over finance minister
LONDON, July 2 (Reuters) - British government bond prices fell by the most since October 2022 and the pound tumbled on Wednesday, after finance minister Rachel Reeves appeared visibly distressed in parliament, a day after the government sharply scaled back plans to cut benefits. The yield on the 10-year government bond, or gilt, rose as much as 22 basis points on the day at one point to around 4.68% , as investors ditched UK debt. That would be the largest one-day jump in the British benchmark yield since October 2022, in the aftermath of then-Prime Minister Liz Truss' mini-budget that cost her premiership. The pound dropped by over 1% to $1.3589 , while domestic mid-cap stocks tumbled (.FTMC), opens new tab. COMMENTS: LINDSAY JAMES, INVESTMENT STRATEGIST, QUILTER, LONDON: "The spike in gilt yields is seemingly a response to signals that have been taken by some to suggest that Rachel Reeves' job may be at risk – though the government has since said her tearful appearance in this afternoon's PMQ's was due to a personal matter. The rise in yields implies investors would be nervous if she were to go. Despite the regular criticism levied in her direction, unwavering commitment to her fiscal rules have generally been welcomed - in sharp contrast to the unfunded pledges from the Truss government. A sudden departure would be likely to prompt questions about the government's commitment to this approach, particularly in light of the recent U turn on planned cuts to welfare spending." MOHIT KUMAR, CHIEF FINANCIAL ECONOMIST EUROPE, JEFFERIES, LONDON: "The UK government faces a difficult choice. We have a negative view on the UK fiscal picture. Our view of growth is much lower than the official OBR forecasts (we are looking at 1-1.2% growth in the UK for the next three years, vs 1.7-1.9% which is the OBR forecasts). Lower growth will make the Chancellor's fiscal plans unrealistic. Even if we get higher taxes, we do not think that raising taxes will give as much revenue as the government would be hoping for. Thus the government would need hard choices in order to bring the deficit picture in line. Recent market reaction reflects the market concerns on the credibility of the government to bring down fiscal deficits." GORDON SHANNON, PORTFOLIO MANAGER, TWENTYFOUR ASSET MANAGEMENT, LONDON: "(The welfare U-turn) is signalling that the Labour Party is a lot less concerned about what the gilt market thinks." "I would have thought it was seared into politicians' memories what happened to Liz Truss." "I continue to view it as you've breached your own commitments and that sets fire to your credibility in a world where there is increasing focus on the solvency positions of governments." CHRIS SCICLUNA, HEAD OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH, DAIWA CAPITAL MARKETS, LONDON: "Clearly the market is revaluating the outlook for fiscal policy and hence the significant steepening in the gilt curve. The vote in the House of Commons gives reason to think again about the likely outlook for public borrowing. "The market has understood for some time that the government was off track on borrowing and was anticipating corrective measures in the budget but if markets continue to move in the direction we see today, it might have to make some announcements on the revenue side than on public expenditure cuts. "The BoE is obviously reviewing QT and they will probably bring an end to asset sales in the autumn." JANE FOLEY, SENIOR FX STRATEGIST, RABOBANK, LONDON: "Since the savings from welfare reform that Chancellor Reeves had pencilled in have now evaporated, UK budget issues are back in the fore. The gilt curve steepened at the open this morning as concerns about supply returned. In addition, the UK press is speculating that a cabinet reshuffle could be in the pipeline. Some of this has hinted that Starmer could even replace Reeves as Chancellor." NEIL WILSON, UK INVESTOR STRATEGIST AT SAXOBANK, LONDON: "Gilt yields were moving up but started to spike during (Prime Minister's Questions) as Reeves looked utterly shaken." KATHLEEN BROOKS, RESEARCH DIRECTOR, XTB, LONDON: "The prospect of political turmoil is causing bond yields to rise. The market is pricing in the possibility of a replacement chancellor with a more left-leaning agenda, which is spooking the bond market and waking up the bond vigilantes from their slumber." DANNI HEWSON, HEAD OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, AJ BELL, LONDON: "It's about Rachel Reeves finding herself in a very difficult situation following a series of U-turns, which means that the savings that had been anticipated from the winter fuel payments and from the disabilities changes - well, they're not going to be had. And that leaves her with another black hole and the question now is, how does she deal with that? And of course, there's an awful lot of speculation that she will have to increase taxes, but if she were to do that after saying that she wasn't going to, then that is politically difficult for the Labour government. What's gone on in Parliament today has absolutely unsettled (investors)"


Daily Mail
42 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Migrants who cross the Channel into the UK 'are 24 times more likely to go to prison than Brits'
Channel migrants are 24 times more likely to be in prison than Brits, analysis by the Conservative party has revealed. A whopping 3.4 per cent - one in 30 - small boat migrants end up behind bars, according to official data for nationalities who make up the largest portion of arrivals, including Somalians, Afghans, Iraqis, Albanians and Iranians. This is a dramatically larger share than the average for Brits, which comes to just 0.14 per cent. It is also 18 times higher than the ratio of the total migrant population that is in prison, which is 0.18 per cent. As the number of channel migrants who have arrived in the country this year soars past 20,000, the Conservatives have used these findings to suggest an alarmingly high portion of them will end up in custody, The Times reports. When the statistics are applied to this year's arrivals, it is estimated that 700 of the 20,422 who have entered the UK so far will go to prison. The data is based on 10,838 foreign criminals held in prisons in England and Wales at the end of March. Those with dual British nationality are not included in the Ministry of Justice numbers, which recorded 5.9 million people as living in the UK with a foreign passport as of the last census in 2021. Some 12 per cent of Somalians living in the UK were behind bars at the end of March, a total of 258 prisoners in total. For Albanians, the figure is 6 per cent, among Iraqis it is 2.7 per cent, while 1.6 per cent of Iranians are in prison. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: 'This data shows the government's loss of border control is putting the public at risk. Those from the main nationalities arriving are far more likely to commit crime and end up in prison than the general population. 'The illegal immigrants crossing the Channel are unvetted, unknown and uncontrolled. And now it is clear they are much more likely to commit serious crime. They are therefore a danger to the public. 'The government must remove those arriving immediately and without court process to a location outside Europe. The crossings would then soon end. This flood of illegal immigration has to stop.' The Home Office suggested the data was skewed given that the majority of those arriving on small boats were young men in their 20s and 30s, a demographic more likely to commit crime. The analysis also did not include foreigners who had committed crimes while in the UK on holiday. A spokesman for the Home Office said: 'The comparison of these two data sets is completely unfounded. It is inappropriate to apply foreign imprisonment rates to small boat arrival data as these consist of very different groups of people.'


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Arsenal transfer news: Target date for Gunners to sign a striker, what's going on with Eberechi Eze and Rodrygo deals and which FIVE stars are set to leave
Arsenal's transfer business is underway - at last. The £5million arrival of Kepa Arrizabalaga from Chelsea is their first incoming of the summer, under new sporting director Andrea Berta. But, of course, this won't be enough to finally get over the hump in the Premier League.