Instant view: UK markets see 2022-style selloff as worries build over finance minister
The yield on the 10-year government bond, or gilt, rose as much as 22 basis points on the day at one point to around 4.68% , as investors ditched UK debt.
That would be the largest one-day jump in the British benchmark yield since October 2022, in the aftermath of then-Prime Minister Liz Truss' mini-budget that cost her premiership.
The pound dropped by over 1% to $1.3589 , while domestic mid-cap stocks tumbled (.FTMC), opens new tab.
COMMENTS:
LINDSAY JAMES, INVESTMENT STRATEGIST, QUILTER, LONDON:
"The spike in gilt yields is seemingly a response to signals that have been taken by some to suggest that Rachel Reeves' job may be at risk – though the government has since said her tearful appearance in this afternoon's PMQ's was due to a personal matter. The rise in yields implies investors would be nervous if she were to go. Despite the regular criticism levied in her direction, unwavering commitment to her fiscal rules have generally been welcomed - in sharp contrast to the unfunded pledges from the Truss government.
A sudden departure would be likely to prompt questions about the government's commitment to this approach, particularly in light of the recent U turn on planned cuts to welfare spending."
MOHIT KUMAR, CHIEF FINANCIAL ECONOMIST EUROPE, JEFFERIES, LONDON:
"The UK government faces a difficult choice. We have a negative view on the UK fiscal picture. Our view of growth is much lower than the official OBR forecasts (we are looking at 1-1.2% growth in the UK for the next three years, vs 1.7-1.9% which is the OBR forecasts). Lower growth will make the Chancellor's fiscal plans unrealistic. Even if we get higher taxes, we do not think that raising taxes will give as much revenue as the government would be hoping for.
Thus the government would need hard choices in order to bring the deficit picture in line. Recent market reaction reflects the market concerns on the credibility of the government to bring down fiscal deficits."
GORDON SHANNON, PORTFOLIO MANAGER, TWENTYFOUR ASSET MANAGEMENT, LONDON:
"(The welfare U-turn) is signalling that the Labour Party is a lot less concerned about what the gilt market thinks."
"I would have thought it was seared into politicians' memories what happened to Liz Truss."
"I continue to view it as you've breached your own commitments and that sets fire to your credibility in a world where there is increasing focus on the solvency positions of governments."
CHRIS SCICLUNA, HEAD OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH, DAIWA CAPITAL MARKETS, LONDON:
"Clearly the market is revaluating the outlook for fiscal policy and hence the significant steepening in the gilt curve. The vote in the House of Commons gives reason to think again about the likely outlook for public borrowing.
"The market has understood for some time that the government was off track on borrowing and was anticipating corrective measures in the budget but if markets continue to move in the direction we see today, it might have to make some announcements on the revenue side than on public expenditure cuts.
"The BoE is obviously reviewing QT and they will probably bring an end to asset sales in the autumn."
JANE FOLEY, SENIOR FX STRATEGIST, RABOBANK, LONDON:
"Since the savings from welfare reform that Chancellor Reeves had pencilled in have now evaporated, UK budget issues are back in the fore. The gilt curve steepened at the open this morning as concerns about supply returned. In addition, the UK press is speculating that a cabinet reshuffle could be in the pipeline. Some of this has hinted that Starmer could even replace Reeves as Chancellor."
NEIL WILSON, UK INVESTOR STRATEGIST AT SAXOBANK, LONDON:
"Gilt yields were moving up but started to spike during (Prime Minister's Questions) as Reeves looked utterly shaken."
KATHLEEN BROOKS, RESEARCH DIRECTOR, XTB, LONDON:
"The prospect of political turmoil is causing bond yields to rise. The market is pricing in the possibility of a replacement chancellor with a more left-leaning agenda, which is spooking the bond market and waking up the bond vigilantes from their slumber."
DANNI HEWSON, HEAD OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, AJ BELL, LONDON:
"It's about Rachel Reeves finding herself in a very difficult situation following a series of U-turns, which means that the savings that had been anticipated from the winter fuel payments and from the disabilities changes - well, they're not going to be had.
And that leaves her with another black hole and the question now is, how does she deal with that? And of course, there's an awful lot of speculation that she will have to increase taxes, but if she were to do that after saying that she wasn't going to, then that is politically difficult for the Labour government.
What's gone on in Parliament today has absolutely unsettled (investors)"
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Cash Isa bickering masks the real crisis for savers
The debate about whether Rachel Reeves should or should not limit the amount that people can save into a cash Isa has been heated. A good argument can be made that too much money has sat in low-yielding cash accounts that could be working harder in the stock market. But many people still feel, with some justification, that this is just another raid on prudent people trying to do the right thing. The problem with this debate is that most people expressing an opinion have a dog in the race. The Chancellor says she wants people to earn more on their savings – of course she does. But she also has her eye on £300bn of idle cash that would provide a useful boost to the growth promise on which she was elected if it were redirected towards UK-listed companies. That cash would also raise a useful amount of fresh revenue if, as is more likely, it simply moves from a tax-free cash account to a taxable one. You may not be surprised to learn that banks and building societies view that same money as a funding source for the mortgages and other loans they offer. They, therefore, make the case for precautionary saving, and they highlight the danger of putting money to work in the market that you might need soon to pay for a wedding, school fees or a house move. It is no surprise that their counterparts in the asset management and investment platform industry (full disclosure: that's me) prefer to focus on the historical outperformance of stock market investments over cash. We warn that holding too much cash for too long poses a different kind of threat to your financial security. We are all right, of course. There is a place for both cash and investments in our financial lives. The bigger problem is that most people don't understand financial risk. So they don't know how much importance to attach to the arguments on either side of this debate. Or what the right balance of cash and shares should be for them. Reeves highlights one risk of holding too much cash. Doing so usually means you are paying too high a price for certainty. You prefer a return of your money to a return on it. Which is reasonable for some of your savings, but not for all of them. Everyone should set aside a cash buffer before they start to think about investing in the stock market. But once they have done that, there is no reason to park any more in cash. How big that cushion should be is harder to say – it will vary according to your age, your ability to find new work if you lose your job and many other factors. Most people don't know how much cash they should sensibly hold. Consequently, some will hold too little and others far too much. But there is a long list of other risks over which they don't have a good grasp either. And, until they do, tweaking contribution limits may make less of a difference than the Chancellor hopes. You can lead a horse to water, as they say. There are a few things we, as an industry, have not done a great job of explaining. The first is the difference between volatility and risk. Volatility is the natural ups and downs of the market. This is only ever a risk if we sell our investments in response to a fall in their value and crystallise the loss. The stock market fell 20pc between February and April. But unless you sold at the bottom, you won't care now because it quickly recovered. Another point of the cash buffer is to prevent the next risk – being a forced seller. You should always have enough cash in the bank to be able to ignore short-term market volatility. Or to actively desire it as a chance to buy assets at a discount to their real value. Holding that cash is a first step towards avoiding another poorly understood risk: putting our eggs in too few baskets. One of the reasons I have been able to shrug off the market's change of heart on US assets this year is that America is only a part of my portfolio. Yes, there have been times in the past 10 years when I wished it was a bigger part than it was, but broad diversification has felt like a pretty good strategy in the first half of 2025. The biggest risk for most people when it comes to investing (or saving, come to that) is to put it off. I often tell a story about twin sisters, one who starts saving young and one who for too long finds other things to spend her money on. The prudent sister gets to a point in mid-life when she has so much capital that further saving is largely pointless. The other, meanwhile, can never catch up, no matter how long she keeps putting money aside. The point rightly made by the pro-investment lobby is that achieving the first sister's happy state is really only possible by tapping into the stock market's superior returns. The final risk that very few people properly understand is the ravage of inflation. Even those of us who think about how much we might need to fund our retirement fall into the trap of thinking about this in today's money. What we need to understand is that even at the Bank of England's 2pc target for inflation, the pot we manage to accumulate will buy us half as much in 36 years' time as it does today. At 3pc inflation, our purchasing power will halve in just 24 years. This is the strongest argument for shares over cash, which in the long run tends only to match, not beat, inflation. So while I support the Chancellor's desire to get people more focused on their investment returns than the return of their investments, this is just the start of it. Informing people how to save and invest sensibly is more important than bickering over whether they should do so via cash or the stock market.
The Herald Scotland
30 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
New four-day working week trial has perfect success rate
All of the companies that took part have decided to continue working a shorter working week at the end of the trial. One chief executive praised the pilot and said they "expect that most organisations will be doing this in the next 10 years". New four-day working week trial has perfect success rate The six-month trial began last November and was organised by the 4 Day Week Foundation. According to a report on the trial, organisations involved were able to maintain service levels and key performance indicators whilst observing several benefits for employee wellbeing. It added that almost two-thirds of workers registered a reduction in how often they experienced burnout. Meanwhile, two in five found an improvement in their mental health and almost half said they felt more satisfied with life. Joe Ryle, campaign director of the 4 Day Week Foundation, said: 'With greater knowledge, expertise and experience of what it takes to successfully implement a four-day week, we're really pleased to see such a high success rate. 'People are happier, businesses are thriving, and there's no turning back. 🚨NEW PILOT LAUNCH🚨 This Autumn, join the movement that's redefining the future of work. Start date: Thursday 25th September 🗓️ Our annual UK Four-Day Week Pilot has successfully supported hundreds of companies to move to a four-day week. Find out more via the link below ⬇️ — 4 Day Week Foundation (@4Day_Week) June 2, 2025 'We've proved it again and again: a four-day week works and should now be implemented more widely across the economy.' Bron Afon Community Housing has 420 staff and is extending its pilot further. Chief executive Alan Brunt said: 'Almost as soon as we started talking about it, our teams got together to set about making it work, which was brilliant. 'We've closely monitored our performance and customer satisfaction. We're happy with the results so far and will continue to make sure we're delivering for our customers. 'I expect that most organisations will be doing this in the next 10 years or so.' Will the UK have a four-day work week? Ongoing discussions and trials surrounding the four-day work week in the UK are continuing; however, the Government has previously ruled out immediate plans for a nationwide, mandated four-day work week. The Department for Business and Trade said last year: "We have no plans to impose a four-day working week on employers or employees." Despite this, Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner has voiced support for a four-day working week. The 4 Day Week Foundation is a group that leads the UK's national campaign for a four-day working week. They are pushing for a four-day, 32-hour working week, meaning no loss of pay for workers. Would you like to see a four-day working week? Let us know in the comments.
Telegraph
40 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Pound falls despite Starmer's reassurances over Reeves's future
The value of the pound slipped further despite Sir Keir Starmer's assurances that Rachel Reeves will remain as Chancellor 'into the next election'. Sterling dropped nearly 1pc on Wednesday and government borrowing costs surged after the Chancellor shed tears in the Commons and the Prime Minister failed to back her when questioned at the depatch box. He later backed her but the pound and gilt yields – the return the government promises to buyers of its debt – failed to recover from one of the sharpest moves since the Liz Truss mini-Budget crisis. Mohamed El-Erian, chief economic adviser at Allianz, said: 'The concern in markets is that a new chancellor may not be as committed to the fiscal rules.' In early trading, the pound was last down around 0.1pc against the dollar at $1.364 and was 0.2pc lower versus the euro, which was worth 86.5p. Asked about Ms Reeves's emotional state on Wednesday, Sir Keir Starmer told the BBC: 'It was a personal matter for the Chancellor and I've been absolutely clear with you it has got nothing to do with politics, nothing to do with any discussion between me and Rachel, nothing to do with the matters of this week. 'She will be the Chancellor for a very long time to come. She is going to be the chancellor into the next election and for many years afterwards.'
