Italian American group says Chicago Columbus statues need to be reinstalled as expressions of art
For all the time since, Italian American groups in the city have been fighting to put them back. They continue to do so, and now call the removal of the statues "selective censorship."
A few weeks ago, there was an uproar at City Hall over a piece of art on display at the Chicago Cultural Center. The display, titled "U.S-Israel War Machine," is part of an exhibit on puppets, and a group of alderpeople have called it antisemitic and want it removed.
At a City Council committee meeting earlier this month, "U.S.-Israel War Machine" sparked a heated debate about what should or should not be allowed on city property. But Ron Onesti of the Joint Civic Committee of Italian Americans said there was no such debate about the Columbus statues.
"There was no outrage by City Council back in 2020," he said.
On July 17, 2020, a group of protesters clashed with police officers at the Christopher Columbus statue in Chicago's Grant Park. Some of the protesters tried to wrap a rope around the statue and tear it down.
A week later, the Grant Park Columbus statue was removed, to the cheers of people who said monuments to Columbus are insults to Indigenous Americans. A Columbus statue in Arrigo Park at Polk and Loomis streets in Little Italy, and a third statue that was part of a fountain at 92nd Street and Exchange Avenue followed soon afterward.
Ron Onestim, president of the Joint Civic Committee of Italian Americans, was infuriated.
"How can you just flippantly remove something without any discussion?" he said.
Onesti said it troubles him to see the site of the Grant Park Columbus statue still left as an empty pedestal five years later.
"This is owned by the citizens, and this is artwork, and this is free speech," he said.
The controversial puppet art at the Cultural Center was kept up in the name of art.
This week, 10 aldermen supported an order that would get the Grant Park Columbus statue out of storage. The Columbus statue and other monuments would also get reinstalled for "expression of art."
"The order put forth by Alderman [Anthony] Napolitano (41st) today really extends our emotions about this whole thing," Onesti said. "We're giving them 60 days to replace the statues based on the comments from the commissioner of DCASE [the Department of Cultural Affairs and Special Events] — the fact that controversial art should be protected by the city, and the government shouldn't get involved in any of this free speech stuff."
Onesti argued the Columbus statue may be controversial to some, but for that reason, it falls under art protection.
His organization has been fighting since 2020 with attorneys.
"I think actually what we did back then kind of set the tone for what's going on now," Onesti said.
Onesti said Italian Americans are long overdue to correct what he called a wrong, and said it is time for Mayor Brandon Johnson to take a stance.
"He's been very specific about dodging it, frankly," Onesti said of the mayor.
In August 2022, a panel created by Mayor Lightfoot called the Chicago Monuments Project recommended that the three Columbus statues should be removed permanently — along with several other public monuments they deemed as "problematic" on the grounds that they honor white supremacy or disrespect Indigenous people. No other monuments have been removed in the years since.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Black America Web
6 hours ago
- Black America Web
This The New PBS?! Viral Kids Cartoon Teaches Slavery As ‘No Big Deal', Company's Co-Founder Wants To Indoctrinate Children With Right-Wing Ideology
A right-wing nonprofit media company called PragerU is facing backlash after a resurfaced video downplayed slavery amid talks that it could become the new PBS. Source: Moussa81 / Getty The clip, featuring a cartoon version of Christopher Columbus, suggests the institution of slavery was 'as old as time and has taken place in every corner of the world.' In the video, Columbus goes further, stating: 'Being taken as a slave is better than being killed, no? Before you judge, you must ask yourself, 'What did the culture and the society of the time treat as no big deal?'' This framing, packaged in a colorful cartoon format for kids, is part of PragerU's library of 'educational' videos. The Grio reports that PragerU co-founder Dennis Prager has been blunt about his mission, admitting the goal of the programming is to indoctrinate children into right-wing ideology. MSNBC adds that PragerU said in its 2022 annual report that it openly said it wanted to battle it out with PBS and Disney. 'Arming parents and educators with the pro-America content they are craving — we are going toe-to-toe with massive youth media companies like PBS Kids and Disney,' While the videos mimic the style of regular children's programming, the messaging has drawn heavy criticism. According to The Grio, previous PragerU clips have denied Native American history, dismissed Indigenous Peoples' Day as 'designed to make Americans feel guilt,' denied climate change, and pushed Islamophobic rhetoric. Ew. Despite the controversy, PragerU has gained official partnerships in states like Alaska, Louisiana, and South Carolina, with The Grio confirming Florida became the first state in 2023 to approve PragerU content for public school curricula. The biggest endorsement yet has come from the Trump administration. On July 24, President Trump signed a bill slashing $1.1 billion in funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting — a move that threatens PBS, NPR, and more than 1,500 local stations. Just one day later, PragerU joined forces with the Department of Education to unveil a White House museum exhibit titled 'The Road to Liberty.' The exhibit even used AI-generated 'commentary' from the Founding Fathers that leaned heavily into conservative talking points. This is a continuation of Trump's wider cultural push. Previously reported by BOSSIP, his administration has launched a 'comprehensive review' of Smithsonian museums — including the National Museum of African American History and Culture — with the stated aim to 'celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions.' The impact is already being felt. The National Museum of American History temporarily removed references to Trump's two impeachments, while National Portrait Gallery director Kim Sajet resigned after Trump claimed he had fired her. Let's be clear: a cartoon Columbus trying to convince kids that slavery was 'no big deal' is not only disgusting — it's dangerous revisionist history. With PragerU circling as a possible replacement for PBS and Trump actively reshaping museums, we're seeing an attempt to rebrand America's darkest truths under the banner of 'exceptionalism.' If slavery can be brushed off as a minor inconvenience, what else might be 'erased' next? #BanPragerU The post This The New PBS?! Viral Kids Cartoon Teaches Slavery As 'No Big Deal', Company's Co-Founder Wants To Indoctrinate Children With Right-Wing Ideology appeared first on Bossip. SEE ALSO This The New PBS?! Viral Kids Cartoon Teaches Slavery As 'No Big Deal', Company's Co-Founder Wants To Indoctrinate Children With Right-Wing Ideology was originally published on
Los Angeles Times
6 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Newsom's redistricting plan is a power grab. But the GOP objections are rubbish
SACRAMENTO — One accusation hurled at Gov. Gavin Newsom for his retaliatory redistricting move against President Trump and Texas Republicans is that he's overriding the will of California voters. Rubbish. The flawed argument goes like this: Californians — once upon a time — voted overwhelmingly to ban partisan gerrymandering and strip the task of drawing congressional seats from self-interested legislators. In a historic political reform, redistricting was turned over to an independent citizens' commission. Now, Newsom is trying to subvert the voters' edict. 'It is really a calculated power grab that dismantles the very safeguards voters put in place,' California Republican Party Chairwoman Corrin Rankin said in a statement last week, echoing other party members. 'This is Gavin the Gaslighter overturning the will of the voters and telling you it's for your own good.' Again, baloney. Power grab? Sure. Overturning the voters' will? Hardly. Newsom is asking voters to express a new will–seeking permission to fight back against Trump's underhanded attempt to redraw congressional districts in Texas and other red states so Republicans can retain control of the U.S. House of Representatives after next year's midterm elections. First of all, that anti-gerrymandering vote creating the citizens' commission was 15 years ago. It was a wise decision and badly needed, and still a wonderful concept in the abstract. But that was then, this is now. Just because a ballot measure was passed one or two decades ago doesn't mean it has been cast in stone. Would Californians still vote to ban same-sex marriage or deny public schooling to undocumented children? Doubtful. Circumstances and views change. Second, that 2010 electorate no longer exists. Today's electorate is substantially different. And it shouldn't necessarily be tied to the past. Consider: PPIC researchers recently reported that 'partisanship now shapes the state's migration — with those moving out of the state more likely to be Republican and those moving in more likely to be Democrat. … This process makes California more Democratic than it would otherwise be.' So, Newsom and Democratic legislators are not thumbing their noses at the voters' will. They're asking today's voters to suspend the ban on gerrymandering and adopt a partisan redistricting plan at a Nov. 4 special election. The good government process of map drawing by the citizen's commission would return after the 2030 decennial census. The heavily Democratic Legislature will pass a state constitutional amendment containing Newsom's plan and put it on the ballot, probably this week. It would take effect only if Texas or other red states bow to Trump's demand to gerrymander their congressional districts to rig them for Republicans. Trump is seeking five more GOP seats from Texas and Gov. Greg Abbott is trying to oblige. Republicans already hold 25 of the 38 seats. Newsom's plan, released Friday, counters Texas' scheme with a blatant gerrymander of his own. It would gain five Democratic seats. Democrats already outnumber Republicans on the California House delegation 43 to 9. Neither the governor nor any Democrats are defending gerrymandering. They agree it's evil politics. They support redistricting by the citizens' commission and believe this high-road process should be required in every state. But that's not about to happen. And to stand by meekly without matching the red states' election rigging would amount to unilateral disarmament, they contend correctly. 'It's not good enough to just hold hands, have a candlelight vigil and talk about the way the world should be,' Newsom declared at a campaign kickoff last week. 'We have got to recognize the cards that have been dealt. And we have got to meet fire with fire.' But polling indicates it could be a tough sell to voters. A large majority believe the bipartisan citizens commission should draw congressional districts, not the politicians who they don't particularly trust. 'It'll be complicated to explain to voters why two wrongs make a right,' says Republican strategist Rob Stutzman, a GOP never-Trumper. Former GOP redistricting consultant Tony Quinn says: 'There is no way to 'educate' voters on district line drawing. And Californians vote 'no' on ballot measures they do not understand. … It's sort of like trying to explain the basketball playoffs to me.' But veteran Democratic strategist Garry South doesn't see a problem. 'The messaging here is clear: 'Screw Trump',' South says. 'If the object is to stick it to Trump, [voter] turnout won't be a problem.' Gerrymandering may not be the voters' will in California. But they may well jump at the chance to thwart Trump. The must-read: Newsom's decision to fight fire with fire could have profound political consequences The TK: Trial in National Guard lawsuit tests whether Trump will let courts limit authority The L.A. Times Special: Hundreds of Californians have been paid $10,000 to relocate to Oklahoma. Did they find paradise? Until next week,George Skelton —Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Sign up here to get it in your inbox.
Washington Post
7 hours ago
- Washington Post
Ohio Democrat Sherrod Brown makes it official. He'll vie to unseat Trump-backed Sen. Jon Husted
COLUMBUS, Ohio — Ohio Democrat Sherrod Brown officially launched his campaign Monday to return to the U.S. Senate next year, brushing aside his bitter loss to Republican Bernie Moreno last fall and expressing confidence his pro-working class message can continue to resonate with the state's voters. The state's best-known Democrat, Brown is seeking the seat held by Republican U.S. Sen. Jon Husted, a former Ohio lieutenant governor, state senator and secretary of state who's already landed President Donald Trump's endorsement. Husted was appointed to the seat in January to succeed JD Vance when he was elected vice president. Next year's election is for the final two years of the six-year term. In an Associated Press interview, Brown said he was not planning a political return until he watched with his wife, Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Connie Schultz, as the Senate passed Trump's big tax breaks and spending cuts bill last month. He said the bill perpetuates a 'rigged system' he's been fighting against throughout his career, by offering tax breaks to the wealthy while cutting programs for lower-income Americans, such as Medicaid . 'We just couldn't stay on the sideline,' Brown said. 'And I know I can fight back. Nobody in the Senate is speaking out for Ohio workers, nobody. And that's my job to do. It's what I've done my whole life, and it's what I'm going to continue to do.' Brown, 72, is viewed as one of Democrats' most formidable Senate candidates in next year's midterms, as they try to take control of the chamber in the face of a daunting map . He and former Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper in North Carolina are two well-known names the party's recruited to run in high-profile races, while Republicans have struggled to line up candidates in some key battlegrounds. That includes Georgia, where Democratic incumbent Sen. Jon Ossoff is Republicans' top target of the cycle. Brown said he was encouraged by the many everyday Ohioans who stopped him on the street or at a coffee shop to ask him to return to politics. Among dozens of others he spoke to as he weighed whether Senate or governor was the best fit was Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York, who's leading the uphill fight to win control of the chamber . Some Ohio labor leaders told the AP they'd have preferred if Brown had chosen governor. They're concerned about the impacts on the movement if biotech entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy — the well-funded, Trump- and state party-endorsed Republican front-runner — wins the open seat next year. Brown, who launched a pro-worker nonprofit under his 'Dignity of Work' slogan in March, acknowledged 'a little bit of disappointment' with his choice of office among some. But he said he anticipates 'close to 100% support' from union leadership now that he's launched his campaign. 'What labor will tell me is they don't have any strong voice for labor in the United States Senate — for union and non-union labor alike,' he said. 'And I was that, and I will be that.' He said he isn't ready to make an endorsement in the governor's race, in which Dr. Amy Acton, a former state health director who helped lead the state through the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, is running as a Democrat . After Brown's decision to run for the Senate became public last week, Husted's campaign said Brown will be 'starting in the biggest hole of his political career.' 'Brown's slogans will ring hollow as his coalition walks away, tired of the radical policies he's forced to support to appease his coastal bosses in California and New York,' Husted spokesperson Tyson Shepard said in a statement. Brown volleys back: 'My career has been about workers. His career has been about special interests.' He cites unresolved ties Husted, 57, has to the energy company at the heart of a $60 million bribery scheme that has enveloped the state over the past five years and put a former House speaker behind bars for 20 years. Husted has never been charged with any civil or criminal wrongdoing. In an Aug. 12 strategy memo, the National Republican Senatorial Campaign said Brown, Democrats and the political press are underestimating how firmly red Ohio — once a reliable political bellwether — has turned after 10 years of Trump. The memo said Brown was defeated last cycle by a political newcomer and will face 'an even steeper climb against a well-known incumbent' like Husted, who's spent the past 20 years in state politics and posted $2.9 million in fundraising last quarter. Last year's Brown-Moreno match-up was the most expensive Senate race in U.S. history.
