Govt approves TAFRC recommendations
The State government orders said that the 'Telangana Admissions and Fee Regulation Committee, in its meeting on June 18, had flagged highlighting that the proposals made by the Private Unaided Professional Colleges before it for the block period of 2025-28 are at variance with the parameters, terms and conditions of the relevant order of the Supreme Court and High Court. The TAFRC had suggested that the state government may appoint a committee of officers to examine the parameters. This is for fee fixation by formulating revised parameters for Private Unaided Professional Colleges. The TAFRC recommended that the officer's committee appointed duly study the process followed by other states and consider various Supreme Court and high court orders.
Further, till then, the TAFRC recommended that the fees fixed earlier for the block period of 2022-25 continue to be applicable. Against this backdrop and invoking the relevant sections of the Telangana Admission and Fee Regulation Committee Rules, the State government issued orders notifying that the existing fee structure of the Diploma, UG and PG courses for the academic year 2025-26 will continue as fixed for the block period of 2022,2025.
Meanwhile, in another order, the state government appointed State Education Secretary Dr Yogita Rana as the in-change Vice Chancellor for the newly established Earth Sciences University of Telangana, in Kothagudem.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
9 minutes ago
- Economic Times
‘If you are a true Indian…': Supreme Court rebukes Rahul Gandhi over remarks on Army, stays further proceedings
Synopsis The Supreme Court questioned Rahul Gandhi, a Lok Sabha member, regarding his comments about the Indian Army. This followed a clash between Indian and Chinese forces in December 2022. The court inquired how Gandhi knew about the alleged occupation of 2000 km of land by China. ANI Congress leader Rahul Gandhi The Supreme Court on Monday pulled up Congress MP and Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, over his alleged remarks on the Indian Army following the Indo-China clash in Arunachal Pradesh's Tawang sector on December 9, expressing concern over the nature of the statements, the Supreme Court granted interim relief to Gandhi and stayed further proceedings pending before the trial court in the case.A bench of the apex court questioned the basis of Gandhi's public claim that China had occupied 2,000 km of Indian territory, asking, 'How did you get to know that 2,000 km land was occupied by Chinese?'The court further observed, 'If you are a true Indian, you will not say these things.'The remarks came while the bench was hearing a plea seeking to quash criminal proceedings initiated against Rahul Gandhi in connection with his comments on the armed forces. The court also advised the Congress leader to use appropriate parliamentary platforms for such statements. 'You are Leader of Opposition; say things in Parliament, not on social media,' the bench told the leader.
New Indian Express
9 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
SC stays proceedings against Rahul Gandhi over alleged remarks on Indian Army
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday stayed proceedings against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi in connection with alleged derogatory remarks made about the Indian Army during his Bharat Jodo Yatra in December 2022. While granting relief, a bench comprising Justices Dipankar Datta and Augustine George Masih issued notices to the Uttar Pradesh government and the complainant, Udai Shanker Srivastava, in the case. The bench, however, expressed strong disapproval of Gandhi's comments, saying, 'If you are a true Indian, you wouldn't say such a thing.' 'You are the Leader of the Opposition. Say things in Parliament, why do you have to post them on social media?' the court asked. The bench also questioned Gandhi's assertion that 2,000 sq km of land had been occupied by China, calling the statement inappropriate. The Allahabad High Court had earlier, on May 29, dismissed Gandhi's plea seeking quashing of the summoning order issued by a Lucknow court. Gandhi had argued that the complaint was politically motivated and filed with mala fide intent. Srivastava, the complainant, had alleged that Gandhi's comments during the Yatra were defamatory and disrespected the armed forces in the context of the India-China border standoff.
New Indian Express
9 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
If you are true Indian, you wouldn't say such thing: SC raps Rahul over China claim, stays proceedings
NEW DELHI: If you are a true Indian, you wouldn't say such a thing, the Supreme Court remarked on Monday while slamming Congress leader Rahul Gandhi over his alleged derogatory remarks about the Indian Army during his Bharat Jodo Yatra. The top court, however, stayed proceedings against Gandhi before a Lucknow court in the matter. A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Augustine George Masih issued notice to the Uttar Pradesh government and the complainant in the case. "You are Leader of Opposition. Say things in Parliament, why do you have say it on social media? "How do you get to know that 2000 sq km land was occupied by Chinese, if you are true indian, you wouldn't say such a thing," the bench observed.
