After 54 Years, Fires In The ‘Gates To Hell' May Finally Burn Out
During an international conference on hydrocarbon resources in Turkmenistan's capital Ashgabat earlier this month, Irina Luryeva, head of the scientific research institute in the state-owned energy company Turkmengaz, announced that the fires feed by natural methane seepage in the 'Gateway to Hell' are slowly burning out.
"Whereas before a huge glow from the blaze was visible from several kilometers away, hence the name 'Gateway to Hell', today only a faint source of combustion remains," says Luryeva in a quote published by france24.com.
In January 2022, former president Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedow appeared on state television announcing plans to 'close' the "Gates of Hell," a giant natural gas crater in the middle of the Karakum Desert, about 260 kilometers (160 miles) north of Ashgabat, citing pollution, health concerns and a loss of 'valuable natural resources.'
The crater was (supposedly, as there are no official documents available) created in 1971 during a Soviet drilling accident that hit a gas cavern, causing the rig to fall in and the ground to collapse around it. The Soviets decided to burn off the gas by setting it on fire to prevent the dangerous fumes from spreading. Unfortunately, tapping into a vast natural reservoir of flammable methane gas, the pit has been burning since then, even growing in size over time.
The now 70 meters (229 feet) wide and 20 meters (65 feet) deep crater was a popular tourist attraction, especially at night time. Officially named the "Shining of Karakum," the crater is also known as the Darvaza Crater, after the nearby village of Darvaza, and online as the 'Door to Hell', 'Gateway to Hell' or 'Gates of Hell' thanks to the boiling mud and roaring, red burning flames covering the crater floor.
According to Luryeva, numerous wells have been drilled around the crater to release the methane in a controlled way and cut off the the flame's fuel supply.
Turkmenistan possesses the world's fourth largest reserves of natural gas in its underground, exporting gas to countries such as Pakistan, China, India, Iran and Russia.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Turkey starts supplying Azerbaijani gas to boost Syria's power output
Turkey on Saturday began supplying natural gas from Azerbaijan to Syria, whose infrastructure has been ravaged by a long civil war, with annual deliveries expected to reach up to two billion cubic metres. Syria's Islamist authorities, who toppled Bashar al-Assad in December, are seeking to rebuild the battered country where power cuts can last for more than 20 hours a day. Speaking at a ceremony attended by Syria's energy minister and Azerbaijan's economy minister as well as the head of Qatar's development fund, Turkish Energy Minister Alparslan Bayraktar said the initiative would help Syria get back to normal. "In the initial phase, up to two billion cubic metres of natural gas per year could be exported to Syria," Bayraktar said in the southern province of Kilis near the Syrian border. Damascus has said the gas would be used to generate electricity. "The gas will help activate a power plant with a capacity of around 1,200 megawatts, meeting the electricity needs of approximately five million households, and making a significant contribution to the normalisation of daily life in Syria," Bayraktar said. "We will transport natural gas to Aleppo and from Aleppo to Homs. This will enable the power plants there to be put into operation in the near future," he added. A first phase of the Qatari scheme to fund gas supplies for power generation in Syria rolled out in March via Jordan and provided 400 megawatts of electricity per day. fo/ach
Associated Press
3 days ago
- Associated Press
How Mississippians can intervene in natural gas pipeline proposal
Mississippians have until Tuesday to intervene in a proposal for a natural gas pipeline that would span nearly the full width of the state. The pipeline, called the 'Mississippi Crossing Project,' would start in Greenville, cross through Humphreys, Holmes, Attala, Leake, Neshoba, Newton, Lauderdale and Clarke counties and end near Butler, Alabama, stretching nearly 208 miles. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., a subsidiary of Kinder Morgan, sent an application for the project to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on June 30. The company hopes the pipeline, which would transfer up to 12 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day, will address a rising energy demand by increasing its transportation capacity. Kinder Morgan says on its website that, should it receive approval, construction would begin at the end of 2027 and the pipeline would begin service in November 2028. The company says the project would cost $1.7 billion and create 750 temporary jobs as well as 15 permanent positions. The project would also include new compressor stations in Humphreys, Attala and Lauderdale counties, although exact locations haven't been set. Singleton Schreiber, a national law firm that focuses on environmental justice, is looking to spread awareness of the public's ability to participate in the approval process, whether or not they support the proposal. 'We're just trying to raise awareness to make sure that people know this is happening,' said Laura Singleton, an attorney with the firm. 'They're going to have to dig and construct new pipelines, so it's going to pass through sensitive ecosystems like wetlands, private property, farmland, things like that. So you can have issues that come up like soil degradation, water contamination, and then after the pipeline is built you could potentially have leaks, spills.' Singleton added while such issues with pipelines are rare, when 'things go bad, they go pretty bad.' To comment, protest, or file a motion to intervene, the public can go to FERC's website (new users have to create an account, and then use the docket number 'CP25-514-000'). The exact deadline is 4 p.m. on Aug. 5. More instructions can also be found here. In addition to FERC, the proposal will also face review from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service and the state environmental agencies in Mississippi and Alabama. Mississippians have seen multiple incidents related to gas leaks in recent years. In March, three workers were injured after accidentally rupturing an Atmos Energy pipeline doing routine maintenance in Lee County, leaving thousands without service. Then last year, the National Transportation Safety Board found that Atmos discovered gas leaks over a month prior to two explosions in Jackson, one of which claimed the life of an 82-year-old woman. ___ This story was originally published by Mississippi Today and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Forbes
4 days ago
- Forbes
Natural Gas Is No Mirage — It's Triage
There is broad scientific consensus: man-made climate change is real, dangerous, and accelerating. Addressing it demands urgency and pragmatism. The viable resources available—natural gas, nuclear power, and renewables—must be deployed strategically. Triage, not idealism, must guide the response. In his Financial Times article, Stanford Professor Bård Harstad contends that natural gas, although cleaner than coal, risks confining the world to extended hydrocarbon dependence. However, by dismissing gas as just a short-term solution, Harstad misses the fundamental principle of triage: stabilizing the patient before recommending long-term treatment. Natural Gas is Key to the Energy Transition Natural gas emits about half the carbon dioxide of coal per unit of energy. A global shift from coal to gas could cut emissions by roughly 10%. Replacing oil with natural gas would result in an additional 9% reduction. These aren't just hypotheticals; they are scalable gains that buy valuable time for broader energy transitions. In the United States, unsubsidized wind and solar are now the cheapest sources of electricity. Natural gas remains competitive—especially when paired with firm capacity requirements. The market is not choosing between gas and renewables in zero-sum terms. Rather, both coexist in a dynamic mix. For gas to displace renewables, one must assume investors will irrationally ignore the most affordable options, even as renewables become cheaper. In Europe and elsewhere, gas (and LNG) plays a critical role in stabilizing electricity grids due to the intermittency of renewables. Gas-fired generators provide the flexibility needed to back up weather-dependent energy sources, Benjamin Lakatos, the CEO of MET Group, tells Forbes. He also underscores the importance of gas to Europe's energy security strategy, with LNG helping diversify supply and maintaining affordability and reliability. This became crystal clear with U.S. President Trump announcing the $750 billion energy purchase deal with the EU, which we discussed in Forbes recently. Meeting Energy Needs Abroad The gas vs. renewables debate often reflects the priorities of the developed world. For the 1.18 billion people living in energy poverty—mostly in the Global South—short-term solutions are existential. These communities lack refrigeration, computers, and air conditioning. Electricity costs impede their economic development. For many, energy poverty isn't just a policy issue but a life-threatening problem. Ignoring their needs as 'short-term' is ethically wrong, especially since these populations have contributed the least to overall emissions. In much of the developing world, renewables face limits due to cost, grid infrastructure, and intermittency. Policymakers must choose between a small amount of green energy and a dependable supply of affordable—though carbon-heavy—power. For these governments, tackling poverty often takes priority over environmental goals set in distant capital cities of the developed world. Geopolitics adds another layer of complexity. Natural gas is now a core instrument of U.S. foreign policy. American LNG offers Europe an alternative to the Russian supply, giving Washington greater flexibility in confronting geopolitical rivals. If the West retreats from gas, producers like Russia and Qatar will not. A Comprehensive Energy Strategy Must Include Natural Gas This isn't an argument against renewables or nuclear power—it's a call for realism. Every energy source has trade-offs. Solar and wind generate no emissions but are intermittent and land intensive. Natural gas releases more carbon, but it is plentiful, dispatchable, and scalable. A mature global infrastructure makes it an essential bridging fuel. Nuclear, for its part, remains the lowest-carbon large-scale energy source and the second safest after solar. It is technologically mature, with robust supply chains, markets, and regulations. France's nuclear fleet helped drive decades of low-emission growth, and China is now investing heavily in nuclear expansion. Energy strategy requires balancing climate goals with economic and geopolitical realities. Governments must use every available tool—gas, nuclear, and renewables—to fight both energy poverty and global warming. We cannot let luxury beliefs cloud our judgment when it comes to the futures of billions of people. To dismiss any energy source is to let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Humanity cannot afford this kind of dogmatism. The clock is ticking.
