logo
Picking your battles. Novaya Europe analysed almost 40,000 protests to see how Russia's war in Ukraine has changed civil society — Novaya Gazeta Europe

Picking your battles. Novaya Europe analysed almost 40,000 protests to see how Russia's war in Ukraine has changed civil society — Novaya Gazeta Europe

Three's a crowd
The Russian constitution guarantees the right to peaceful assembly, rallies, demonstrations, marches and pickets. In practice, street protests are prohibited. No wonder, then, that their number has declined sharply in the past three years. But other, safer ways — petitions, legal appeals, video messages — are gaining in popularity.
The authorities usually find a far-fetched reason to stop protests going ahead, such as a rally risking the spread of the coronavirus, according to OVD-Info.
Yet people continue to take to the streets to solve non-political issues in the areas of housing and utilities, urban development and the environment.
Petitions and appeals to the authorities are a safe alternative to street protests.
'Although petitions aren't direct action, they are currently the most readily available tool of pressure,' a former local councillor and teacher explains. 'Of course, people would make a greater statement if they came out onto the streets. But that's fairly unrealistic now.'
One expert calls this 'petitioning the tsar'. People complaining to the authorities means they recognise their legitimacy. A member of PS Lab, an autonomous research group focusing on politics and society in Russia and post-Soviet regions, says that in autocracies, appeals and petitions remain one of the few legal and relatively safe ways for people to fight for their rights.
'Ultra-patriots' and communists
Before the war, Alexey Navalny's Anti-Corruption Foundation (FBK) was the main instigator of protests in the country. The movement unleashed the largest protest of the 2010s. In January 2021, Russia declared the foundation extremist, meaning it was banned from taking part in elections or protests, and three years later Navalny died in a penal colony in the Arctic Circle.
Over the past three years, political parties and other movements have only organised 15% of protests.
Mainstream political forces cannot now criticise Putin or the war, though parties such as the Communist Party and the Liberal Democratic Party can still speak out on local problems such as housing, utilities, education, healthcare and urban planning.
Ultra-patriotic sentiments are also much more noticeable in the regions. They form 6% of all protests. Their main mouthpiece is the National Liberation Movement (NLM), whose members petition for 'emergency powers for Putin' or to 'annul Gorbachev's decisions'. They protest in support of the war and against 'foreign agents'. They hand out their newspaper The National Course and call for nuclear weapons to be aimed at the US. In some cities, such as Irkutsk, NLM activists protest every week and are never detained.
But the vast majority of protests are organised and carried out by local people. Over the past three years, political parties and other movements have only organised 15% of protests.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Poland scrambles jets as Russian attacks reach western Ukraine — Novaya Gazeta Europe
Poland scrambles jets as Russian attacks reach western Ukraine — Novaya Gazeta Europe

Novaya Gazeta Europe

time25 minutes ago

  • Novaya Gazeta Europe

Poland scrambles jets as Russian attacks reach western Ukraine — Novaya Gazeta Europe

The aftermath of the attack on Lviv. Photo: Lviv Mayor Andriy Sadovyi At least two people were killed in a fresh barrage of Russian drones and missiles on Ukraine, with Poland scrambling fighter jets as a drone attack was recorded on the western city of Lviv in the early hours of Saturday. The Polish Operational Command stated on X that it had scrambled a standby pair of fighter jets to respond to the potential threat, adding that it was 'monitoring the current situation' with its forces remaining 'in full readiness for immediate response'. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said on Telegram that Russia had used 26 missiles and 597 drones in the overnight attack, targeting several Ukrainian regions at once, including the Kharkiv and Sumy regions in the east and Chernivtsi and Lviv regions in the west. Two people were killed in Chernivtsi, Zelensky said, and around 20 people were injured across Ukraine. The pace of Russian attacks on Ukraine requires 'quick decisions', Zelensky added, urging the international community to introduce additional sanctions against Russia, including 'tough secondary sanctions against anyone who helps the Russians produce drones and make money from oil'. 'The war can only be stopped by force,' Zelensky wrote 'We expect not just signals from our partners, but actions that will save lives.' Russia has ramped up its aerial assaults on Ukraine in recent months, with barrages of several hundred drones becoming increasingly common. On Wednesday, Russia launched its largest single airstrike of the war so far, attacking Ukraine with 728 drones, seven cruise missiles and six Kinzhal ballistic missiles.

Three British men found guilty of Wagner-linked arson attack in London — Novaya Gazeta Europe
Three British men found guilty of Wagner-linked arson attack in London — Novaya Gazeta Europe

Novaya Gazeta Europe

time2 days ago

  • Novaya Gazeta Europe

Three British men found guilty of Wagner-linked arson attack in London — Novaya Gazeta Europe

Three British men have been found guilty of committing an arson attack on behalf of the Russian Wagner Group on a warehouse in London being used to supply humanitarian aid and satellite to Ukraine, BBC News reported on Tuesday. Jakeem Rose, 23, Ugnius Asmena, 20, and Nii Mensah, 23, were all found guilty on Tuesday at the Old Bailey court in London of aggravated arson with intent to endanger life. The attack, which caused around £1 million (€860,000) in damages in March 2024, was orchestrated by two other men, Dylan Earl, 20, and Jake Reeves, 23, who had already admitted to committing aggravated arson on behalf of the Wagner Group of Russian mercenaries. The men are the first to be convicted under the UK's National Security Act 2023 for such foreign-directed hostile activity. According to The Guardian, the court heard that Earl had told a Wagner Group operative he met on Telegram he wanted to carry out further 'missions' for the mercenaries following the warehouse fire. Further plots, the BBC reported, involved additional arson attacks on a west London restaurant and wine shop owned by Yevgeny Chichvarkin, a multi-millionaire and Russian dissident who was named a 'foreign agent' by Russia's Justice Ministry in June 2022, and a plot to abduct him. 'This case is a clear example of an organisation linked to the Russian state using 'proxies', in this case British men, to carry out very serious criminal activity in this country on their behalf,' Commander Dominic Murphy, head of London's Metropolitan Police Counter Terrorism Command, said on Tuesday. 'Seemingly motivated by the promise of money, they were prepared to commit criminal acts on behalf of Russia,' he said. 'I hope these convictions send a strong warning of the very serious consequences of committing offences on behalf of a foreign country.' In late May, The Financial Times reported that British security officials were looking into whether Russia was behind three arson attacks on properties linked to UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer perpetrated by two Ukrainian men and a Romanian national. In early June, Schemes, the investigative unit of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty's Ukrainian-language service, discovered that one of the men, Roman Lavrynovych, had posted in a job recruitment chat on Telegram that he was seeking employment. Such group chats are reportedly commonly used by Russian intelligence agencies to hire proxies, RFE/RL reported. In the last year, Moscow has been accused of carrying out numerous acts of sabotage and arson attacks on public buildings, transport networks and other infrastructure in several European countries, including Poland and Lithuania, as part of what experts believe is a hybrid warfare strategy designed to destabilise the West.

Ripple effect. The arrest of Russian scientist Ksenia Petrova in the US has sent shockwaves through the scientific community — Novaya Gazeta Europe
Ripple effect. The arrest of Russian scientist Ksenia Petrova in the US has sent shockwaves through the scientific community — Novaya Gazeta Europe

Novaya Gazeta Europe

time2 days ago

  • Novaya Gazeta Europe

Ripple effect. The arrest of Russian scientist Ksenia Petrova in the US has sent shockwaves through the scientific community — Novaya Gazeta Europe

Ksenia Petrova, a 31-year-old Russian scientist, faces a potential prison sentence of 20 years for taking a box of frog embryo samples into the country. Petrova was returning from a vacation in France when US agents arrested her for failing to declare the samples. She has been indicted by a federal grand jury on three criminal counts, including criminal smuggling and making false statements. Petrova fled Russia after protesting the war in Ukraine in 2022, to pursue her dream of being a scientist. If she were to be deported to Russia, as President Donald Trump's administration has threatened to do, Petrova says her life would be in danger. The case has rattled foreign scientists in the US. Many are now afraid to carry research samples from abroad and some are wiping their phones at the border, fearful that an innocent mistake might result in criminal charges, or worse. A passion for science Before moving to the US, Petrova studied in Moscow. A close friend of Petrova's family told The New York Times (NYT) that she was a 'passionate scientist' and 'one of those people who are truly interested in obtaining new knowledge'. Even on vacation, the family friend recalled, Petrova brought her laptop with her to meals to work. At the onset of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Petrova joined the street protests in Moscow. She was also openly critical on social media, posting multiple links online to anti-war videos and a petition calling on Vladimir Putin to resign. She left Russia that year, she told the NYT, because she knew that if she wanted to be a scientist, she had to leave. 'I think in each country, scientists are opposed to autocratic government,' she said. Petrova brought her highly sought-after skills in biology and computer science to Harvard Medical School, where her research focused on cell development and fighting the effects of cellular damage due to ageing. Petrova and her lawyers outside court, Boston, 12 June 2025. Photo: Leah Willingham / AP Photo / Scanpix / LETA Border chaos On 16 February, Petrova flew into Boston's Logan International Airport. Upon her arrival, Customs and Border Protection officers pulled her aside into a secondary screening area. They found a box with clawed frogs' embryos in her bag, which she had not declared. She had brought the samples at the request of her boss, Leon Peshkin. Peshkin collaborates with a laboratory in Paris, where scientists have developed a method for obtaining ultra-thin slices of frog embryos, using a method the Harvard researchers hadn't mastered; obtaining the samples, Peshkin told the NYT, would significantly speed up their work. Speaking with Novaya Europe, Peshkin said that the Paris laboratory's method had not been published in any scientific journal. Their French colleagues had tried to mail samples of embryos on multiple occasions, but they had thawed out en route and were then too damaged to be of any use. American investigators say Petrova failed to disclose the embryos and had lied to investigators about it. Later, Petrova admitted to her mistake and said that she didn't know whether they had to be declared. The criminal case against Petrova is largely based on text messages that a customs officer found on her phone. Petrova made clear that she would face imprisonment if she returned to Russia. According to the US Department of Justice, the correspondence shows that Petrova had discussed whether or not to declare the embryos with a colleague. The colleague told her that the embryos had to be declared. Petrova's colleague asked her how she expected to get through customs, and, according to court records, she joked: 'No plan yet. I won't be able to swallow them.' Petrova is facing up to 20 years in prison. Already, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) revoked her visa and initiated deportation proceedings against her. Petrova made clear that she would face imprisonment if she returned to Russia. But ICE continued shuffling Petrova through the US detention system — first in Vermont and then in Louisiana, where she was held alongside about 90 other detainees, most of them undocumented immigrants from Central and South America. As Petrova awaited her hearings, she read books on evolution, cell development, and meiosis. In June, after almost four months in ICE custody, Petrova was released on bail. Two weeks later, a federal grand jury in Boston indicted her with one count of concealment of a material fact and one count of false statement. If found guilty of those charges, she could face an additional five years in prison. Petrova is now awaiting trial in Boston. Novaya Europe spoke to Petrova's lawyer Grigory Romanovsky, who believes the charges are tinged by politics. 'Smuggling usually means a person has either knowingly imported a proscribed item, such as drugs, or has tried to evade customs duties. Neither applies in Ksenia's case. Even if we accept that she technically violated the rules by not declaring research samples, the maximum penalty should be a fine similar to one you'd get for not declaring an apple in your luggage. Launching a criminal case several months later, immediately after a federal court admitted that the customs officer had acted improperly, doesn't make sense,' he said. The devil is in the details Allegations that Petrova transported frog embryos to the US are misleading, the biotechnologist and virologist Michael West, who testified in Petrova's defence in court, told Novaya Europe. 'In the same way shoe leather shouldn't be labelled a 'cow' and a paperback book shouldn't be considered a 'tree', the samples Ms Petrova was bringing to Harvard for critically important medical research clearly in the interest of the people of the US and indeed the world, were inert, chemically inactivated samples, properly prepared to be safely transported and viewed on microscope slides in an effort to discover causes of ageing and age-related disease,' he said. The smuggling charge does not withstand scrutiny, West's colleague, Professor Lev Yampolsky, who attended the preliminary hearing in Petrova's case, agrees. 'Smuggling entails either an intention to sell the goods, which wasn't the case here, or bringing in a product that requires a special permit. But no federal agency regulating the import of biomaterials requires permission for anyone to import frog embryos,' he told Novaya Europe. With even serious declaration errors, the punishment is usually a fine of about $500 (€430). Harvard graduates leave a graduation ceremony in support of students who were unable to graduate due to participating in pro-Palestinian protests, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 23 May 2024. Photo: Brian Snyder / Reuters / Scanpix / LETA The anti-Harvard crusade The Trump administration has exerted significant pressure on American universities in recent months. The government has made extraordinary demands of Harvard that go against the university's commitment to academic independence. The Trump administration wants Harvard to implement reforms, supposedly aimed at combating anti-Semitism, under government supervision and it wants to change Harvard's admissions policy. The university has resisted, and stands to lose over $2 billion (€1.7 billion) in government funding. Yampolsky believes the case against Petrova is just another way to exert pressure on Harvard. 'Ksenia's case fits clearly into a more global crusade against universities and science, which is already leading to an outflow of talent from the US.' 'I don't know if this is due to the open warfare between the Trump administration and Harvard. Petrova was detained in February, before that conflict was public. Perhaps customs officials had received instructions to inspect the luggage of Harvard employees? It could be a coincidence, but I am personally in no doubt that it's all connected,' he said. The withholding of federal grants will cripple the university's medical research, which is a global hub of innovation. West said that such a loss was unjustifiable, because delays in research and development would almost certainly lead to unnecessary human suffering and death. Romanovsky believes the Trump administration's aggressive stance is most likely connected with a broader war against Harvard and the scientific community as a whole. 'Ksenia's case fits clearly into a more global crusade against universities and science, which is already leading to an outflow of talent from the US,' he said. The arrivals area at Logan International Airport, Boston, Massachusetts, 30 January 2017. Photo: Brian Snyder / Reuters / Scanpix / LETA Imprisoning Einstein The news of Petrova's case has caused alarm amongst the vast community of overseas scientists living in the US. Panic and fear of persecution are widespread. Work at the Harvard laboratory has stalled, Peshkin told the NYT. He says that when he asked colleagues to support Petrova, many admitted that they were afraid to, because they are also in the country on temporary visas. Yampolsky said that scientists have always brought biological materials into the US: sometimes it requires permission and sometimes it doesn't. But 'now, of course, no one will,' he said. He had not heard of cases of people's phones being checked at the border, let alone criminal cases being opened on the basis of what they found. 'There should be anger that the US is ignorant of the role people such as Ksenia Petrova play in building a better tomorrow.' 'It's like Russia. But that never used to happen in America! Even if customs officers do have the right to inspect a device and the files on it, they don't,' Yampolsky said. Now, 'many people, especially non-US citizens, thoroughly wipe their phones before entering the country,' he said. Prosecuting Petrova goes against the interests of the American people, West told Novaya Europe, calling it 'foolish and shameful to imprison young medical researchers aspiring to conquer some of the most devastating of human diseases'. In the US, immigrants have been integral to the country's scientific and technological innovation; many have received Nobel Prizes for their work, West noted. 'Just as there would have been outrage at the imprisonment of Albert Einstein,' West said, 'there should be anger that the US is ignorant of the role people such as Ksenia Petrova play in building a better tomorrow.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store