logo
Direct funding could solve schools' dirty toilet issue

Direct funding could solve schools' dirty toilet issue

The Stara day ago
Datin Noor Azimah Abdul Rahim
PETALING JAYA: Despite the education sector receiving the highest allocation from Budget 2025, filthy and broken school toilets remain a daily ordeal for students prompting calls by stakeholders for school administrations to buck up.
Educationists and parents said some children even risked dehydration and infections to avoid having to use the toilets.
Datin Noor Azimah Abdul Rahim, chairman of the Parent Action Group for Education (PAGE), said the responsibility lies with the school administration, supported by the Education Ministry's maintenance budget.
'When toilets are dirty, smelly or lack basic necessities like water, soap and toilet paper, students often avoid using them altogether.
'Sometimes, the funds allocated are insufficient for regular deep cleaning or repairs. Other times, it's an issue of poor monitoring, lack of accountability or even misuse of funds,' said Azimah.
There's also the problem of shared responsibility when everyone is 'somewhat responsible,' no one takes full ownership.' 'I have indeed received complaints from both parents and students that some children try to 'hold it in' the entire school day,' she said, adding that situations like this cause dehydration and urinary tract infections.
Azimah said that schools should have a clear cleaning schedule and there should be designated staff for sanitation and fixing facilities.
She suggested schools have a simple feedback system like a logbook or even a 'toilet condition' chart to address issues quickly.
Meanwhile, Melaka Action Group for Parents in Education chairman Mak Chee Kin highlighted that the maintenance of toilets remains the biggest headache for schools.
'Schools cannot repair broken toilets or pumps immediately because they don't have their own repair funds. Instead, they must file a report to the District Education Office (PPD) and wait for approval or action.'
He said the prolonged waiting time makes students have to bear the bad conditions of toilets, adding that the Education Ministry should channel allocations directly to parents teachers associations (PTA) to solve these issues.
He also said schools should be cleaned after recess breaks and toilet ethics should be part of the school culture.
Meanwhile, Malaysian Asso­ciation for Education secretary Hamidi Mookkaiyah Abdullah said allocation of funds should prioritise toilet maintenance instead of just beautifying the school and its compound.
He suggested cross-training janitors to handle minor plumbing or pump issues.
'When public toilets are managed by private cleaning companies there should be a clear contract service-level agreement (SLA) and cleaners should follow a schedule,' Hamidi added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Direct funding could solve schools' dirty toilet issue
Direct funding could solve schools' dirty toilet issue

The Star

timea day ago

  • The Star

Direct funding could solve schools' dirty toilet issue

Datin Noor Azimah Abdul Rahim PETALING JAYA: Despite the education sector receiving the highest allocation from Budget 2025, filthy and broken school toilets remain a daily ordeal for students prompting calls by stakeholders for school administrations to buck up. Educationists and parents said some children even risked dehydration and infections to avoid having to use the toilets. Datin Noor Azimah Abdul Rahim, chairman of the Parent Action Group for Education (PAGE), said the responsibility lies with the school administration, supported by the Education Ministry's maintenance budget. 'When toilets are dirty, smelly or lack basic necessities like water, soap and toilet paper, students often avoid using them altogether. 'Sometimes, the funds allocated are insufficient for regular deep cleaning or repairs. Other times, it's an issue of poor monitoring, lack of accountability or even misuse of funds,' said Azimah. There's also the problem of shared responsibility when everyone is 'somewhat responsible,' no one takes full ownership.' 'I have indeed received complaints from both parents and students that some children try to 'hold it in' the entire school day,' she said, adding that situations like this cause dehydration and urinary tract infections. Azimah said that schools should have a clear cleaning schedule and there should be designated staff for sanitation and fixing facilities. She suggested schools have a simple feedback system like a logbook or even a 'toilet condition' chart to address issues quickly. Meanwhile, Melaka Action Group for Parents in Education chairman Mak Chee Kin highlighted that the maintenance of toilets remains the biggest headache for schools. 'Schools cannot repair broken toilets or pumps immediately because they don't have their own repair funds. Instead, they must file a report to the District Education Office (PPD) and wait for approval or action.' He said the prolonged waiting time makes students have to bear the bad conditions of toilets, adding that the Education Ministry should channel allocations directly to parents teachers associations (PTA) to solve these issues. He also said schools should be cleaned after recess breaks and toilet ethics should be part of the school culture. Meanwhile, Malaysian Asso­ciation for Education secretary Hamidi Mookkaiyah Abdullah said allocation of funds should prioritise toilet maintenance instead of just beautifying the school and its compound. He suggested cross-training janitors to handle minor plumbing or pump issues. 'When public toilets are managed by private cleaning companies there should be a clear contract service-level agreement (SLA) and cleaners should follow a schedule,' Hamidi added.

‘Symbolic gestures not enough to tackle bully issues'
‘Symbolic gestures not enough to tackle bully issues'

The Sun

time3 days ago

  • The Sun

‘Symbolic gestures not enough to tackle bully issues'

PETALING JAYA: The Education Ministry directive for schools to recite daily chants of 'Kami Benci Buli' (We Hate Bullying) has drawn mixed reactions from experts, who warn that symbolic gestures alone may not be enough to address the deep-rooted problem. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia education expert Dr Anuar Ahmad described the move as reactive. 'From an educational perspective, this is not effective. We're not talking about chanting after a bullying incident and then forgetting about it. 'Will these chants continue for years? If bullying is not managed properly, it will persist. Chanting is not a sustainable approach,' he said. Anuar added that chants may serve as an immediate, visible action but cannot replace comprehensive measures. He said weak enforcement and inconsistent monitoring often allow bullying to continue. 'I prefer sustainable action that builds a culture in which students truly understand bullying is wrong, not just because of a chant,' he said. He recommended installing CCTVs at all schools, especially in hidden areas, hiring full-time wardens in hostels and creating a School Well-Being Index to track safety, student health and facilities. Malaysia could learn from Australia's evidence-based approach, which combines clear rules, guidelines and modules to reduce bullying rates, he added. Parents Action Group for Education chairman Datin Noor Azimah Abdul Rahim agreed chants alone could be counterproductive. 'A daily chant on its own won't reduce bullying in a durable way. Done clumsily, it can trivialise the problem or trigger pushback,' she said. Noor Azimah added that slogans and pledges rarely work unless they are part of a whole-school programme with trained staff, clear procedures and data tracking. 'A rote call-and-response can become a joke, signalling that the adults are 'doing something' while nothing changes. 'Mandated moral messaging can provoke resistance, especially among older students,' she said. Instead of symbolic gestures, she urged schools to have clear playbooks for staff, students and parents, activate bystanders and embed routines to encourage intervention and ensure safe reporting systems with rapid response. She also called for targeted measures in boarding schools, such as audits, wardens and hotspot mapping, as well as coaching for staff to better detect and respond to bullying. University of Nottingham Malaysia associate professor Dr Siti Khadijah Zainal Badri said from a psychological perspective, chants have very limited effect in preventing or changing student behaviour, particularly in extreme cases causing serious physical or psychological harm. 'It may serve as a symbolic kickstart or a daily reminder, but chants alone rarely solve entrenched bullying problems or extreme individual behaviour,' she said. She warned that without strong messaging and proper systems to address or punish actual bullying, chants could even have unintended consequences. 'There is a possibility that chants can turn into teasing or mockery, especially if not backed by strong measures,' she said. On whether repetitive chanting could cause 'compassion fatigue' or desensitisation, she said it depends on how well the message is reinforced. Siti Khadijah stressed that anti-bullying efforts must address underlying causes such as family environment, peer influence and self-esteem rather than relying on public declarations. She called for stronger policies, accessible interventions for those showing early signs of bullying tendencies, clear reporting and handling procedures, and harsher consequences for offenders. The Education Ministry has yet to outline how chants will be integrated with other anti-bullying measures.

NST Leader: The preschool mandate
NST Leader: The preschool mandate

New Straits Times

time01-08-2025

  • New Straits Times

NST Leader: The preschool mandate

HERE'S why preschool will soon be compulsory: In 2021, a total of 286,861 Malaysian children between 4 and 6 years old did not attend one before starting Year 1. These children, representing about 27 per cent of that age group, reportedly lacked "school-readiness skills". Still, attending any preschool — whether government-run or private — is widely considered as vital to quickly teach children to read, write and count. Children's "3R" skills are also complemented by parental guidance, pop culture TV and social media programming. The contrast in these formative cognitive skills between children who attend preschool and those who don't can be glaring. A simple yardstick to appraise preschoolers is their ability to read and grasp age-appropriate books by authors like Enid Blyton. Children who skip preschool may take years of primary school education to become adept at reading such books, if at all English is their primary language of instruction. While not yet compulsory, the government intends to make preschool education mandatory after it addresses existing disparities. Pre-school unavailability in rural areas, low parental awareness, affordability and below-average teacher quality have to be worked out. Despite these issues, preschool enrolment, according to some studies, has hit 90 per cent coverage, although the Education Ministry estimates it is closer to 80 per cent and, hence, the aim to legislate early education. To understand the 10-20 per cent of parents who did not enrol their children, their reasoning may have merit. They prefer to homeschool their "unprepared" children for better nurturing and bonding. Some are motivated by religious beliefs or special needs, feeling that kindergartens are ill-equipped for that purpose. Unfortunately, a segment of parents who want preschool education for their children face financial barriers, particularly if childcare is also required. Despite these concerns, the government believes a mandatory law would reinforce the message that early education is crucial. It also aligns with the goal of achieving 98 per cent enrolment, exceeding the world average. However, caution is advised: to serve rural communities, the Community Development Department's (Kemas) early education centres have to be expanded. Preschool education is a complex issue, with the main impetus stemming from the impact on child cognitive development, social equity and feasibility. The benefits include enhanced academic and social skills, reduced educational gaps and better preparation for primary school. However, critics will point to cost, capacity, long-term effects and parental involvement. Whatever the challenges, the move to make preschool mandatory must not be hasty, but neither should it be delayed. The profound, long-term impact of preschool makes it the foundation of our nation's future.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store