logo
Delhi HC seeks police response to Tahir Hussain's bail plea

Delhi HC seeks police response to Tahir Hussain's bail plea

Hindustan Times06-05-2025
The Delhi high court on Monday sought the response of the Delhi Police to a bail plea filed by former councillor Tahir Hussain in a 2020 murder case connected to the northeast Delhi riots.
Hussain is one of the accused in the murder case of Intelligence Bureau (IB) staffer Ankit Sharma during the riots. At the time of the incident, he was an Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) councillor.
A bench of justice Neena Bansal Krishna issued notice to the Delhi Police and fixed July 17 as the next date of hearing. The Delhi Police, represented by advocate Dhruv Pande, accepted notice on behalf of the police.
The former councillor approached the Delhi high court against a city court order dated March 12, rejecting his bail. In its 10-page order, a bench of judge Pulastya Pramachala opined that the failure of three public witnesses to identify Hussain did not wash away or mellow down the evidence of other witnesses, including public witnesses.
'Thus, I am not convinced with the plea of the applicant that there is such a material change in the circumstances, so as to favour the applicant and to mellow down the evidence against him...Hence, application is rejected,' judge Pramachala noted in his order.
Hussain's petition in the high court painted a picture that the trial court disregarded the aspect of eight co-accused being released on bail and failed to consider the account of eyewitnesses who have absolved him from the prosecution's allegations. It went on to add that he has already spent almost five years in jail, and the three public witnesses categorically exonerated him stating that they did not see Hussain at the relevant time, even as the father of the deceased — the complainant on whose basis the FIR was filed — had failed to identify him. The petition further said that the prosecution had examined all public witnesses in the case.
Sharma's body was found in a drain near his home in northeast Delhi's Chand Bagh on February 26, 2020, a day after he had gone missing after the riots broke out.
Following a probe, the police charged Hussain under sections of murder, rioting, criminal conspiracy, dacoity, promoting religious enmity and the Arms Act. A charge sheet was filed in June 2020 and in March 2023, a city court framed charges against Hussain and 10 other people.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mangolpuri tree felling: NGT holds Delhi Police accountable, orders compensatory plantation
Mangolpuri tree felling: NGT holds Delhi Police accountable, orders compensatory plantation

Time of India

time6 hours ago

  • Time of India

Mangolpuri tree felling: NGT holds Delhi Police accountable, orders compensatory plantation

New Delhi: National Green Tribunal (NGT) has directed Delhi Police to carry out and maintain compensatory plantation for the illegal felling of a peepal tree and unauthorised pruning of two neem trees in the Mangolpuri area. Police have also been instructed to ensure the survival of the saplings for at least five years. The order follows a complaint filed by a local resident, alleging tree damage during renovation work at the Mangolpuri police station complex, carried out through a private contractor. A bench headed by NGT chairperson Justice Prakash Shrivastava had earlier, in March 2024, directed Delhi Forest Department to inspect the site. In its affidavit filed in March 2025, the department confirmed violations under the Delhi Preservation of Trees Act (DPTA), 1994. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi | Gold Rates Today in Delhi | Silver Rates Today in Delhi "During inspection, it was observed that the offence of illegal pruning and felling had been committed without the required permission of the tree officer under the DPTA," the department stated, adding that a fine of Rs 1 lakh had been imposed and paid by the contractor involved. In its reply, Delhi Police asserted that the old police station complex in Mangolpuri was undergoing certain changes and thus remained vacant under the care of the caretaker. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like These 11 Everyday Foods Might Be the Key to Knee Pain Relief Undo . The reply further stated that the work order for changes and repair of the broken tin shed on the premises was given to a contractor, and the labourers of the contractor pruned the trees obstructing the repair work of the tin shed without obtaining any permission. The reply also reveals that the police issued an explanation notice to the caretaker, who failed to prevent unauthorised pruning of branches of the trees. The tribunal noted that 25 saplings of peepal and pilkhan trees have since been planted as part of compensatory afforestation. In its order dated Aug 14, the NGT stated: "We are of the opinion that the requisite action under the DPTA has been taken, and the compensatory plantation has been carried out. Police officials are directed to ensure the survival of the planted saplings for a period of five years." Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Happy Independence Day wishes , messages , and quotes !

Delhi Police files 4 FIRs over protests ‘without nod' against SC's stray dogs order
Delhi Police files 4 FIRs over protests ‘without nod' against SC's stray dogs order

Hindustan Times

time12 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Delhi Police files 4 FIRs over protests ‘without nod' against SC's stray dogs order

Four FIRs have reportedly been filed in connection with protests in multiple places against Supreme Court's recent order on stray dogs in the Delhi-NCR region. The Delhi Police has filed the cases saying dog lovers staged the protests without prior permission. Activists protesting against the SC's order outside the India Gate. (HT Photo)(HT_PRINT) The protests were staged on August 11 and 12 against the Supreme Court's order that directed the relocation of stray dogs from localities in Delhi, Noida, Ghaziabad, Gurugram and Faridabad, to shelter homes within eight weeks, asserting that no animal be released back to the streets. However, according to Delhi Police officials, the protestors did not abide by the prohibitory orders under Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), that were in place due to security arrangements ahead of Independence Day, , according to news agency ANI. Some clashes were reported at some sites as animal activists and dog lovers clashed with cops, who were trying to disperse them, officials said. "Those who refused to leave the protest sites despite repeated requests were detained. Legal action will be taken against all those found violating the law," said the Delhi police. Hundreds of people gathered at the India Gate to protest against the Supreme Court order on August 11, and a similar number gathered in the Connaught Place area a day later. While cops alleged that protestors did not cooperate, some protestors had alleged police brutality and said that a police officer could be seen slapping a protester in a video, the authenticity of which HT couldn't independently verify. A senior police officer had earlier said that protestors were asked to move to Jantar Mantar for the stir, alleging they did not have permission to congregate where they did. 'We gave them repeated warnings and even asked them to shift to Jantar Mantar, but they did not listen to us. They did not even seek permission for the protest. Since it was an illegal gathering, police had to remove them. While we were trying to put them in buses, men and women started fighting with our staff. Police staff had to use minimal force to control the protesters," the officer had said. Following the protests, pleas seeking a stay on the Supreme Court's stray dogs' relocation order was heard by the top court on Thursday. During the hearing, Solicitor General of India Tushar Mehta, backing the order and representing the Delhi government, argued, "In a democracy, there is a vocal majority and one who silently suffers. We had seen videos of people eating chicken, eggs, etc., and then claiming to be animal lovers. It was an issue to be resolved. Children were dying... Sterilisation did not stop rabies; even if you immunised them, that did not stop mutilation of children," the Solicitor General submitted. In contrast, the advocates representing the petitioners argued that there weren't enough shelter homes, making the implementation of the order difficult. A three-judge bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta and NV Anjaria heard the arguments and has reserved an order. (With ANI inputs)

27-year-old shot multiple times in Delhi ahead of Independence Day celebrations
27-year-old shot multiple times in Delhi ahead of Independence Day celebrations

India Today

time13 hours ago

  • India Today

27-year-old shot multiple times in Delhi ahead of Independence Day celebrations

Just hours before Independence Day, a 27-year-old man was shot multiple times behind a police station in New Delhi in the early hours of Friday. The incident occurred near Tikona Park in Shahdara at around 1.07 am on the intervening night of August 14-15, to police, the man, identified as Akhil Panwar, sustained four bullet injuries in the alleged attack. A PCR call was received at Shahdara Police Station at 1.43 am reporting that two brothers, Saurav and Gaurav Nagar, had lured the survivour's friend to the spot and opened fire. The injured person was immediately rushed to Max Hospital for treatment. Sources told India Today TV that Akhil is now out of said the alleged motive behind the attack was a trivial dispute over abusive words exchanged between the Akhil and the accused brothers. Saurav and Gaurav Nagar are currently absconding. The case has been registered under Sections 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS) and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act. A police team has been deployed to trace the investigation into the matter is a similar incident earlier this week, a 25-year-old man was shot by three men after a scuffle over a monetary dispute in Delhi's Geeta Colony area. The complainant, Shivam Sharma, told police that he had lent money to a couple — Sheetal and her husband Sonu — who live in Kundan Nagar. However, despite repeated requests, they did not return the money. The dispute escalated near Jagatpuri red light in the morning. Later, when Sharma, accompanied by his friend Jatin Nagpal, went to Taj Enclave to resolve the matter, three men — Shadab, Harshu, and Raman — confronted them. A scuffle broke out, during which Shadab allegedly opened fire, hitting Sharma with two three accused fled the scene, and police launched a hunt to apprehend them.- EndsMust Watch

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store