
Elders' legal bid to save homes, culture coming to end
Their Country on the outer islands of Zenadth Kes (Torres Strait), less than 10 kilometres off Papua New Guinea, is under siege from the impacts of climate change.
The two men fear the loss of their islands, their culture and their way of life, forcing their families and communities to become Australia's first climate refugees.
The Uncles have taken the federal government to court in the Australian Climate Case, seeking orders which would require the Commonwealth to undertake steps to prevent further harm to their communities.
This would include cutting greenhouse gas emissions in line with the best available science.
The Commonwealth has argued it is not legally required to consider the best available science or the impacts of climate change when setting emissions reduction targets.
On Tuesday, the Federal Court is due to make a decision in the case and the men hold hope that their fight might safeguard the future of their people.
Mr Pabai and Mr Kabai launched the action against the federal government in 2021.
They are arguing that the Commonwealth owes a duty of care to Torres Strait Islanders to take reasonable steps to protect them from harm.
During on-country hearings in 2023, witnesses described how devastating their loss of culture due to climate change had been.
"We don't want to be climate refugees," Pabai Pabai, who has spent his life on the low-lying island of Boigu, tells AAP.
Paul Kabai remembers a time when his family would hunt, fish and eat produce from gardens grown by the community.
But that has all changed, he says.
The beaches on his island - Saibai - have receded, turning to mud and mangroves.
Its river system is inundated with saltwater and, alarmingly, even the island's cemetery has been impacted by flooding.
"Even our cultural sites are being destroyed by rising seas," he laments.
"We're both very worried about what we are losing, our hunting grounds are being destroyed by strong currents.
"Where can we show our culture to the younger generation?" he asks.
"In this way we are losing our culture, everything that belongs to our ancestors."
Drawing closer to a decision in the case is a significant milestone for Mr Pabai and Mr Kabai.
It has been an emotional journey for them, their communities and supporters but as the Uncles approach the end of this battle, they hold close the reasons they began such a long fight.
Pointing to the example of fellow Torres Strait Islander Eddie Mabo whose lifetime of campaigning resulted in a landmark High Court ruling, recognising the rights of First Nations people to their lands, countering the idea of 'terra nullius' asserted by the British at colonisation, Mr Pabai says the battle has been waged for his ancestors.
"I'm standing firm on his shoulders," he says.
"If we come to winning this case, this is a victory for my family and communities on Boigu and all the community around the country and around the world."
As much as this is about the people who came before and protecting what they've left, Mr Pabai says his two-year-old son and the generations to come, in the Torres Strait and further afield, are front of mind.
"My main focus is on the new generation," he says.
"This is why I'm doing it - for the love of my son, for all the people in my community in the Torres Strait, for bushfire and flood survivors, for the farmers and the children and grandchildren."
No matter the legal outcome, Mr Kabai says he believes the action he and Mr Pabai have taken will make a difference.
"We will be very proud, even if we win or if we lose," he says.
"The government is listening now, they know what is happening and they must do something about climate change."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Advertiser
an hour ago
- The Advertiser
Controversial MP to defend homosexual vilification case
An outspoken MP is set to defend claims of homosexual vilification against a fellow parliamentarian. Former federal Labor leader Mark Latham is due to give evidence at a civil tribunal on Wednesday, a day after NSW independent MP Alex Greenwich accused him of having an "abusive obsession" with him. The case relates to a sexually explicit tweet the Federal Court has previously ruled as defamatory and subsequent media appearances made by Mr Latham, who sits as an independent in the state parliament. Mr Greenwich has sued Mr Latham for homosexual vilification and workplace harassment in the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal. The online sparring match between the two politicians followed violent protests outside a church in Sydney's southwest, where Mr Latham was giving a pre-election speech in March 2023. About 250 mostly male counter-protesters violently attacked police and 15 LGBTQI protesters. Outside the tribunal on Tuesday, Mr Latham accused his rival of lying under oath by suggesting he had ignored police instructions regarding the church incident, leading to an act of political violence. "He's falsely accused me of a crime, it's a crime in NSW to incite violence," Mr Latham told reporters. "I got there after the event, I listened to the police request and correctly made a judgment the meeting could proceed, which it did totally peacefully." Mr Greenwich earlier told the tribunal he believed he was relying on information from NSW Police, provided to him via a journalist. He also outlined to the tribunal the "hatred and ridicule" the tweet had exposed him to. "I have never been so diminished, demeaned, dehumanised by someone ... this was the first time in my political career I'd been so fundamentally attacked for who I am and my sexuality," Mr Greenwich said. Mr Greenwich, who is a vocal advocate for the LGBTQI community, received $140,000 in damages in the Federal Court suit against Mr Latham in 2024. He had sued the former NSW One Nation leader over the tweet sent days after the state election, describing a sex act in explicit terms. It came in response to a post quoting Mr Greenwich describing him as a "disgusting human being". Mr Latham has been embroiled in several recent scandals, including taking photos of women MPs without their knowledge, for which he has already apologised. Lifeline 13 11 14 Fullstop Australia 1800 385 578 An outspoken MP is set to defend claims of homosexual vilification against a fellow parliamentarian. Former federal Labor leader Mark Latham is due to give evidence at a civil tribunal on Wednesday, a day after NSW independent MP Alex Greenwich accused him of having an "abusive obsession" with him. The case relates to a sexually explicit tweet the Federal Court has previously ruled as defamatory and subsequent media appearances made by Mr Latham, who sits as an independent in the state parliament. Mr Greenwich has sued Mr Latham for homosexual vilification and workplace harassment in the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal. The online sparring match between the two politicians followed violent protests outside a church in Sydney's southwest, where Mr Latham was giving a pre-election speech in March 2023. About 250 mostly male counter-protesters violently attacked police and 15 LGBTQI protesters. Outside the tribunal on Tuesday, Mr Latham accused his rival of lying under oath by suggesting he had ignored police instructions regarding the church incident, leading to an act of political violence. "He's falsely accused me of a crime, it's a crime in NSW to incite violence," Mr Latham told reporters. "I got there after the event, I listened to the police request and correctly made a judgment the meeting could proceed, which it did totally peacefully." Mr Greenwich earlier told the tribunal he believed he was relying on information from NSW Police, provided to him via a journalist. He also outlined to the tribunal the "hatred and ridicule" the tweet had exposed him to. "I have never been so diminished, demeaned, dehumanised by someone ... this was the first time in my political career I'd been so fundamentally attacked for who I am and my sexuality," Mr Greenwich said. Mr Greenwich, who is a vocal advocate for the LGBTQI community, received $140,000 in damages in the Federal Court suit against Mr Latham in 2024. He had sued the former NSW One Nation leader over the tweet sent days after the state election, describing a sex act in explicit terms. It came in response to a post quoting Mr Greenwich describing him as a "disgusting human being". Mr Latham has been embroiled in several recent scandals, including taking photos of women MPs without their knowledge, for which he has already apologised. Lifeline 13 11 14 Fullstop Australia 1800 385 578 An outspoken MP is set to defend claims of homosexual vilification against a fellow parliamentarian. Former federal Labor leader Mark Latham is due to give evidence at a civil tribunal on Wednesday, a day after NSW independent MP Alex Greenwich accused him of having an "abusive obsession" with him. The case relates to a sexually explicit tweet the Federal Court has previously ruled as defamatory and subsequent media appearances made by Mr Latham, who sits as an independent in the state parliament. Mr Greenwich has sued Mr Latham for homosexual vilification and workplace harassment in the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal. The online sparring match between the two politicians followed violent protests outside a church in Sydney's southwest, where Mr Latham was giving a pre-election speech in March 2023. About 250 mostly male counter-protesters violently attacked police and 15 LGBTQI protesters. Outside the tribunal on Tuesday, Mr Latham accused his rival of lying under oath by suggesting he had ignored police instructions regarding the church incident, leading to an act of political violence. "He's falsely accused me of a crime, it's a crime in NSW to incite violence," Mr Latham told reporters. "I got there after the event, I listened to the police request and correctly made a judgment the meeting could proceed, which it did totally peacefully." Mr Greenwich earlier told the tribunal he believed he was relying on information from NSW Police, provided to him via a journalist. He also outlined to the tribunal the "hatred and ridicule" the tweet had exposed him to. "I have never been so diminished, demeaned, dehumanised by someone ... this was the first time in my political career I'd been so fundamentally attacked for who I am and my sexuality," Mr Greenwich said. Mr Greenwich, who is a vocal advocate for the LGBTQI community, received $140,000 in damages in the Federal Court suit against Mr Latham in 2024. He had sued the former NSW One Nation leader over the tweet sent days after the state election, describing a sex act in explicit terms. It came in response to a post quoting Mr Greenwich describing him as a "disgusting human being". Mr Latham has been embroiled in several recent scandals, including taking photos of women MPs without their knowledge, for which he has already apologised. Lifeline 13 11 14 Fullstop Australia 1800 385 578 An outspoken MP is set to defend claims of homosexual vilification against a fellow parliamentarian. Former federal Labor leader Mark Latham is due to give evidence at a civil tribunal on Wednesday, a day after NSW independent MP Alex Greenwich accused him of having an "abusive obsession" with him. The case relates to a sexually explicit tweet the Federal Court has previously ruled as defamatory and subsequent media appearances made by Mr Latham, who sits as an independent in the state parliament. Mr Greenwich has sued Mr Latham for homosexual vilification and workplace harassment in the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal. The online sparring match between the two politicians followed violent protests outside a church in Sydney's southwest, where Mr Latham was giving a pre-election speech in March 2023. About 250 mostly male counter-protesters violently attacked police and 15 LGBTQI protesters. Outside the tribunal on Tuesday, Mr Latham accused his rival of lying under oath by suggesting he had ignored police instructions regarding the church incident, leading to an act of political violence. "He's falsely accused me of a crime, it's a crime in NSW to incite violence," Mr Latham told reporters. "I got there after the event, I listened to the police request and correctly made a judgment the meeting could proceed, which it did totally peacefully." Mr Greenwich earlier told the tribunal he believed he was relying on information from NSW Police, provided to him via a journalist. He also outlined to the tribunal the "hatred and ridicule" the tweet had exposed him to. "I have never been so diminished, demeaned, dehumanised by someone ... this was the first time in my political career I'd been so fundamentally attacked for who I am and my sexuality," Mr Greenwich said. Mr Greenwich, who is a vocal advocate for the LGBTQI community, received $140,000 in damages in the Federal Court suit against Mr Latham in 2024. He had sued the former NSW One Nation leader over the tweet sent days after the state election, describing a sex act in explicit terms. It came in response to a post quoting Mr Greenwich describing him as a "disgusting human being". Mr Latham has been embroiled in several recent scandals, including taking photos of women MPs without their knowledge, for which he has already apologised. Lifeline 13 11 14 Fullstop Australia 1800 385 578


West Australian
2 hours ago
- West Australian
Australia risks US ire with Palestine recognition move
A decision to announce Palestinian recognition after its allies might have allowed Australia to escape backlash from the US. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese revealed Australia will join the UK, Canada and France in recognising Palestinian statehood at a United Nations General Assembly meeting in September, after mounting pressure to alleviate civilian suffering in Gaza. The US has long been one of Australia's most important allies, but for decades it has remained staunchly opposed to the recognition of Palestine. While some have argued Australia's decision to break from the US could imperil the bilateral relationship, Flinders University international relations lecturer Jessica Genauer says the federal government's diplomatic calculus has helped dampen any impact. "Because Australia waited until other important countries all said they're planning to recognise Palestine ... I don't think it will be singled out by the US," Dr Genauer told AAP. "The Trump administration is opposed to countries recognising Palestine, but I think that they would put Australia in with a whole group of other countries and it wouldn't particularly be detrimental to Australia's relationship." Since US President Donald Trump began his second term, the Labor government has intentionally opted not to align too closely with his policy directions. Instead, Australia has worked closely with European nations and other partners to ensure it is part of a strong network of middle powers. This approach has been used to navigate a response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine, and now with Palestinian recognition, Dr Genauer said. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said Australia's announcement on statehood was "disrespectful" of its relationship with the US and could jeopardise peace as any ceasefire would be brokered by America. But the prime minister defended his decision. "President Trump has made it very clear he wants to see peace in the region. Australia wants to see peace in the region," he said. "We make our sovereign decisions as a nation state in Australia's national interest and we are aligning ourselves with like-minded countries." While recognising Palestine would not immediately change anything for the two million people in Gaza the UN projects are facing severe food insecurity, Dr Genauer said the move was important because it showed countries were looking for any possible way to shift the situation. More than 140 out of the 193 United Nations member states already recognise Palestine, but the addition of Australia - a strong middle power - alongside the UK and France, which have veto power in the UN Security Council, will add significant pressure. "The United States is now quite isolated in their position blocking that recognition," she said.


Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
Controversial MP to defend homosexual vilification case
An outspoken MP is set to defend claims of homosexual vilification against a fellow parliamentarian. Former federal Labor leader Mark Latham is due to give evidence at a civil tribunal on Wednesday, a day after NSW independent MP Alex Greenwich accused him of having an "abusive obsession" with him. The case relates to a sexually explicit tweet the Federal Court has previously ruled as defamatory and subsequent media appearances made by Mr Latham, who sits as an independent in the state parliament. Mr Greenwich has sued Mr Latham for homosexual vilification and workplace harassment in the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal. The online sparring match between the two politicians followed violent protests outside a church in Sydney's southwest, where Mr Latham was giving a pre-election speech in March 2023. About 250 mostly male counter-protesters violently attacked police and 15 LGBTQI protesters. Outside the tribunal on Tuesday, Mr Latham accused his rival of lying under oath by suggesting he had ignored police instructions regarding the church incident, leading to an act of political violence. "He's falsely accused me of a crime, it's a crime in NSW to incite violence," Mr Latham told reporters. "I got there after the event, I listened to the police request and correctly made a judgment the meeting could proceed, which it did totally peacefully." Mr Greenwich earlier told the tribunal he believed he was relying on information from NSW Police, provided to him via a journalist. He also outlined to the tribunal the "hatred and ridicule" the tweet had exposed him to. "I have never been so diminished, demeaned, dehumanised by someone ... this was the first time in my political career I'd been so fundamentally attacked for who I am and my sexuality," Mr Greenwich said. Mr Greenwich, who is a vocal advocate for the LGBTQI community, received $140,000 in damages in the Federal Court suit against Mr Latham in 2024. He had sued the former NSW One Nation leader over the tweet sent days after the state election, describing a sex act in explicit terms. It came in response to a post quoting Mr Greenwich describing him as a "disgusting human being". Mr Latham has been embroiled in several recent scandals, including taking photos of women MPs without their knowledge, for which he has already apologised. Lifeline 13 11 14 Fullstop Australia 1800 385 578