Plastics Industry Rising Stars Honoured At Plastics NZ Awards
He's not a doctor, a nurse, or even a police officer but Rajeneel Kumar helps to save lives.
Named 2025 Competenz Plastics Apprentice of the Year at the annual Plastics NZ Awards on Thursday night, the Manurewa local produces critical components for lifesaving technologies – from ventilators for premature babies to sleep apnoea devices and hospital masks.
'It's pretty cool how the components we make are used to save lives – it makes the job rewarding,' says Rajeneel, who has spent over a decade at Fisher & Paykel Healthcare and last year completed his New Zealand Certificate in Plastics Processing (Level 4) with strands Injection Moulding through work based training organisation, Competenz.
'I'd worked for Fisher & Paykel Healthcare for many years before starting my apprenticeship and I thought I knew everything, but my apprenticeship challenged me to dig so much deeper. I learned so much about plastics technology.'
The accolade is a 'huge thrill' for the 32 year old, who has worked tirelessly to achieve his goal.
'It hasn't been easy, especially working in the healthcare industry during Covid when we were running 24/7. I've also got two young kids, and my wife works in the afternoons so juggling the book work with family life was a big challenge. Winning Apprentice of the Year means so much to me. In 2023 I was named runner-up for Competenz Plastics Trainee of the Year, so to actually win this year is a huge thrill. It shows that all the research, all the work and all the support I was given was worth it.'
Rajeneel saw gaining his apprenticeship 'as an opportunity to improve myself,' and it's a move that has certainly paid off. Now he has been promoted to Plastics Team Leader, and soon he'll be mentoring some of the young apprentices following in his footsteps.
Competenz Training Advisor Alan Smith couldn't be prouder.
'Rajeneel stands out from the rest,' says Alan. 'He performs well, shows willingness to learn and is always eager to learn new technologies. He has an ambitious mindset and is keen to explore further avenues to grow in his career.'
Rajeneel's future at Fisher & Paykel Healthcare is bright. Operations Engineering Manager Shijoy Sam says he is a huge asset for the business.
'Rajeneel is ambitious, keen to take on new challenges and always goes above and beyond expectations. He leads the team by example, is diligent and gives 100 percent to everything he commits to,' says Shijoy.
'Continuous improvement is part of the culture at Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, and Rajeneel always seeks ways to improve himself and his team.'
The annual Plastics NZ Awards salutes those in the industry who are making their mark and Rajeneel is a stellar example. So too is Henderson resident Faleono (Junior) Esekia who stepped up to the podium alongside Rajeneel to take out Competenz Trainee of the Year, the top award for people training in New Zealand Certificate Level 3 qualifications. A plastics technician at product development and manufacturing company Adept Ltd, Junior completed his Level 3 injection moulding qualification last September and is now on the fast track to gaining his apprenticeship.
'I'm shocked and speechless to be named Trainee of the Year,' says Junior (33). 'Having spent over ten years in the plastics industry, receiving this accolade means so much to me, and is the first step towards achieving my goal of gaining my apprenticeship and one day becoming the 'Dr. Murphy' of plastics and injection moulding!'
The father of four was inspired to forge a career in plastics after studying science at the University of Auckland.
'Seeing senior plastics technicians being able to mould and fix any issues with injection moulding made me want to be at that level of skill and knowledge. What I love most is that feeling I get when I solve an injection moulding issue and I'm able to get a product to run perfectly – that and getting to try out the new automation being introduced with new products.'
Junior's Competenz Training Advisor Jonathan Newsome describes the plastics technician as 'deserving, super helpful, polite and self-driven.'
'Junior completed all his assessments to a high standard, met all his deadlines and drove his qualification himself. The fact that he has now advanced into Level 4 demonstrates the drive he has to better himself,' says Jonathan.
Employer Patrick McElhannan has been equally impressed and can't wait to see Junior continue to flourish in the organisation and the industry.
'Junior is the quiet achiever, he consistently demonstrates his ability as a plastics technician. He never seeks recognition but his work ethic and the high standard of work he produces is testament to the calibre of technician he has become. Because of this we as a business can see just how much value he adds daily within the workspace,' says Patrick.
'Junior is now recognised as an equal amongst his peers, and sometimes other more seasoned veterans within the plastics world seek advice from him. His ability to troubleshoot and diagnose root causes in plastics faults, his wide processing knowledge of a large catalogue of polymers, along with his extensive knowledge of programming and processing of automation cells including six axis robots, demonstrates just how far he has come through this apprenticeship.'
Patrick says he couldn't think of a more deserving candidate for Competenz Trainee of the Year, adding, 'Junior's attitude towards working in a team, along with his displayed aptitude amongst his peers, really sets the tone for what an incredible individual he is. Any moulding shop in New Zealand would be better off for having him around.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
14 minutes ago
- Scoop
Dangers Of Excessive Spending Highlighted
Minister of Finance Treasury's latest report highlights the dangers of excessive government spending, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. The Treasury's Long-term Insights Briefing released today explores the role of fiscal policy in economic shocks and crises including the way government finances were used during and after the Covid-19 pandemic. It says the response, which wound up costing $66 billion, about twice the cost of the Canterbury earthquakes (as a proportion of GDP) also shows the challenges of using big spending measures to respond to one-off shocks. 'Treasury's language is spare and polite, but its conclusions are damning,' Nicola Willis says. 'The report makes clear significant errors were made in the fiscal response to Covid. Treasury is urging policy makers not to repeat those mistakes. Our Government will not. 'The briefing notes that the COVID-19 Response and Recovery Fund was established in May 2020 to 'support a timely economic response and public confidence' but as the economy recovered, the then-government was advised against further stimulating in favour of more targeted support. 'Unfortunately, the Labour government ignored that advice. The consequence was undisciplined spending that pushed up inflation, eroded New Zealand's previously low public debt position, and fuelled a cost-of-living crisis. 'The briefing makes particular mention of programmes 'not tied to the shock (that) had a lagged impact on the economy and proved difficult to unwind in later years'. 'That is a very diplomatic way of saying New Zealanders are still paying the price of the previous government extending a big-spending approach initially intended for a pandemic response. 'The lesson from Labour's mishandling of the Covid response is that while there are times when governments have to increase spending in response to major events the fiscal guardrails should be restored as soon as possible. 'Kiwis can take confidence from the current Government's commitment to strong and responsible fiscal and economic management.'
NZ Herald
3 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Government overcooked spending during pandemic, against official advice, harming economy
This year's is on how fiscal policy – taxing and spending – should be used to respond to economic shocks. Treasury's calculation of the size of the Covid response. Graph / Treasury Its main finding, learning from the Covid-19 pandemic, was that fiscal policy should be used sparingly, with the Reserve Bank taking the lead on managing the economic cycle using its monetary policy tools like the Official Cash Rate. 'Polite, but its conclusions are damning' – Willis The report lands in the midst of a protracted economic downturn, with both the Government and the Opposition pointing the finger at each other over who is responsible. The Government blames Labour for excessive, inflationary and unsustainable spending that prompted the Reserve Bank to plunge the economy into recession with high interest rates. Labour blames the Government for cutting spending and axing infrastructure projects. Finance Minister Nicola Willis said the report validated the Government's concerns about Labour's spending. 'Treasury's language is spare and polite, but its conclusions are damning,' Willis said. 'The report makes clear significant errors were made in the fiscal response to Covid.' Finance Minister Nicola Willis said the report validated her concerns. Photo / Mark Mitchell Willis pointed in particular to Treasury's criticism of the last Government for spending the Covid-19 fund on things that were only tangentially related to the Covid response, such as the school lunch programme. The report said the fund was established in May 2020 to 'support a timely economic response and public confidence'. However, it added that 'as the economy recovered, the then Government was advised against further stimulating, in favour of more targeted support'. Willis said the Government 'ignored' that advice, favouring 'undisciplined spending that pushed up inflation, eroded New Zealand's previously low public debt position, and fuelled a cost-of-living crisis that many families are still suffering from'. Labour has been approached for comment. Just ahead of Budget 2022, the then Finance Minister Grant Robertson said the Government struck the right 'balance'. 'There were and are no costless decisions. Doing less would have seen unemployment grow, or put people's health at risk,' Robertson said. Treasury told Govt to ease up on spending Treasury outlined a history of its advice during the pandemic. It said that initially, it had encouraged the Government to spend money to support the economy through things like the wage subsidy. However in late '2020 and into 2021 ... Treasury started to move away from recommending broad-based fiscal stimulus to support the economy towards more targeted and moderate fiscal support'. After the 2020 election, Treasury said it informed Robertson that there was 'adequate' fiscal space to support the economic recovery and space for 'further temporary support if the economic or public health situation deteriorated'. However, officials also 'highlighted the importance of controlling ongoing spending and ensuring it was high value to meet the medium-term fiscal challenge'. By August 2021, the beginning of Auckland's long lockdown, Treasury warned that any support to businesses should 'take account of macroeconomic trade-offs'. By Budget 2022, Treasury said it was recommending 'against any further stimulus'. The briefing noted that five years on from the beginning of the pandemic, spending is still close to its pandemic-era peak and has only been partly offset by higher revenue. Higher debt-servicing costs are weighing on the Government's balance sheet and lower GDP has 'contributed to the deficit both directly, by leading to a smaller tax base and lower revenue than anticipated, and indirectly, as spending plans were based on revenue expectations that did not eventuate'. The Covid fund was closed in 2022, ending that era of stimulus and Budget 2023 ended up being more stimulatory than planned thanks to the Auckland Floods and Cyclone Gabrielle. Unlikely comparison between Labour Govt and Ruth Richardson The briefing made an unlikely comparison between the Labour Government of Dame Jacinda Ardern and Chris Hipkins and the fiscal policy of National Finance Minister Ruth Richardson. Treasury noted that fiscal policy can be counter-cyclical, which means it tries to counter and blunt the business cycle by, for example, spending money during a downturn to stimulate an economy, or saving during an upswing to cool an overheating one; or fiscal policy can be pro-cyclical – this means exacerbating a business cycle by spending money when an economy is hot or cutting back when an economy is shrinking. Treasury noted that the responses to the Asian Financial Crisis and the GFC had been accidentally counter-cyclical thanks to pre-promised tax cuts, however, fiscal policy was 'pro-cyclical in the early 1990s and during 2021-2023″. It said in the 1990s, 'pressures on fiscal sustainability motivated fiscal consolidation even as the economy was in recession'. In the case of the Covid response, the Government thought it was engaged in a counter-cyclical response to a 'severe economic downturn', however 'from late 2020, the economy turned out to be much stronger than expected (perhaps, in part, caused by the strength of fiscal stimulus itself)'. 'Combined with expenditure that was enduring rather than temporary, this resulted in large fiscal deficits while the economy was overheating.' The current Government is facing similar criticism for being pro-cyclical. Much like the Governments of the 1990s, it is trying to pull back spending to rebuild the balance sheet at a time of economic weakness. The Government was criticised for spending Covid money on school lunches. Photo / Liam Clayton How much was spent? Of the 20% of GDP spent on the pandemic, about half was spent on direct pandemic economic and health initiatives. Thirty-five per cent was spent on wage subsidies 'and similar schemes during lockdowns' and a further 18% 'arose from health-system costs such as vaccination and contact tracing, along with managed isolation and quarantine (MIQ) costs'. The parties that now form the Government broadly agreed with this spending at the time – National, at some points, called for spending on wage subsidies to be even greater. The remainder of the response was 'made up of a wide range of initiatives with varied objectives', Treasury said. Some initiatives were 'aimed at more directly responding to the impacts of Covid-19 and others aimed at providing fiscal stimulus or achieving social or environmental objectives'. These included tax changes, training schemes, housing construction, shovel-ready infrastructure projects, increases to welfare benefits, the Small Business Cashflow Scheme, Jobs for Nature, additional public housing places and school lunches. The then Opposition disagreed with much of this spending. Lessons for next time In a foreword to the report, Treasury Secretary Iain Rennie noted that increased use of fiscal support during shocks had 'contributed to public debt ratcheting up over time'. Rennie warned that if nothing changes, 'this leaves future generations with less financial capacity to respond to shocks'. The recommendations from the report note the Government needs to get better at saving money when the economy is booming to ensure there is fiscal space to support the economy when times are grim. When times are grim, the Government should allow the 'automatic stabilisers' to kick in, spending money on increased benefit payments. Managing the ups and downs of the economy should mostly be left to the Reserve Bank – a conclusion reached in Treasury's draft report, published earlier. 'Monetary policy changes can be reversed more readily and can often be implemented faster. The Government's spending and taxation decisions should generally seek to optimise long-run value for money rather than moderating economic cycles,' Treasury said. This does not mean there is no role for the Government. If monetary policy is constrained or at extremes – as it was at points during the pandemic – Government spending can kick in. Or, if interest rates can fall further, the Government could restrain spending to 'help moderate booms that would otherwise result in interest rates or the exchange rate becoming extremely high'. Treasury also said fiscal policy could be used to ease some of the distributional impacts of monetary policy, which can be blunt. Monetary policy during the pandemic was largely responsible for the housing boom and bust.
Otago Daily Times
3 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Man jailed for six years for $1.7m Covid fraud
An Auckland man has been sentenced to almost six years in jail over a $1.7 million Covid-19 fraud. Luke Daniel Rivers, also known as Mai Qu, pleaded guilty to 29 charges including wage subsidy and small business cashflow scheme fraud, and money laundering. The schemes were set up to help businesses through the disruption of Covid-19 lockdowns. Rivers was sentenced in the Auckland District Court. Ministry of Social Development (MSD) group general manager of client service delivery George van Ooyen said the fraud was premeditated, sophisticated and solely for personal financial gain. It involved the use of forged documents. "The volume of fake documents and the repeated nature of the conduct, point to a significant degree of premeditation and sophistication. "What he did is an abuse of the Covid-19 relief schemes, solely for personal financial gain. "The wage subsidy was a high trust scheme providing rapid payments up front for businesses to keep their employees in their jobs and provide some form of financial security." Inland Revenue (IRD) spokesperson Bernadette Newman said he used forged documents to get IRD numbers for people who had never been to New Zealand. "Rivers used his specialist knowledge as an accountant to game the system. And he used the identities of more than 200 other people to carry out his scheme - all to maximise the amount of funds he could apply for," she said. "He abused both the public trust in the accounting profession and his clients' trust in him to keep their information private. "His tax offending is effectively ongoing as he hasn't remedied his failure to file GST and income tax returns for his four companies." Van Ooyen said MSD was still working to uphold the integrity of the wage subsidy scheme. "We have active investigations ongoing. Court outcomes and debt recovery will continue beyond this." "As of today, 46 people have now been sentenced with a further 49 people still before the courts. "We've also made civil recovery decisions in relation to 52 businesses. More than 25,000 repayments have been made, totalling $830.4 million." Newman said IRD had prosecuted 14 people for fraud involving Covid supports. "Eleven cases are progressing through the court system, five cases where defendants are awaiting sentence, and a number of active investigations around other Covid-19 support fraud cases. "Increased funding this year means IR can do more audits and debt collection work, and investigations into specific sectors can continue."
