South Korea counts on shipbuilding to ease U.S. tariff woes
Shipbuilding accounted for nearly four percent of South Korea's exports in 2024 and directly employs around one percent of the country's workforce
By Hieun SHIN
Asia's fourth largest economy South Korea is facing grueling tariffs by U.S. President Donald Trump, but its shipbuilding industry could prove a useful bargaining chip.
Already hit by sector levies on steel and car exports, Seoul is laser-focused on negotiations over a 25 percent country-specific tariff that has been suspended until July 8.
AFP takes a look at what's going on:
Why shipbuilding?
In the 1970s, South Korea's military leader president Park Chung-hee accelerated the country's heavy industry, designating sectors such as steel and shipbuilding "strategically important" and rolling out state subsidies.
At the same time, POSCO was founded -- now one of the world's largest steel producers -- and conglomerate Hyundai built its shipyard in southeastern Ulsan, which started to grow rapidly.
European rivals struggled to keep pace.
Sweden's Kockums Shipyard filed for bankruptcy in 1987 -- and in a symbolic shift of global shipbuilding power, Hyundai acquired its 140-meter Goliath crane for one dollar. It now towers over southern Ulsan.
In the 1990s and 2000s, South Korean shipbuilders such as Hyundai Heavy Industries and Samsung Heavy Industries ramped up investment in research and development, backed by generous government subsidies.
The country secured a competitive edge in high-value-added vessels, including LNG carriers, very large crude carriers, and offshore platforms.
Now, South Korea ranks as the world's second-largest shipbuilding nation, trailing only behind China.
Is it important?
South Korea's exports hit a record high in 2024, with analysts pointing to shipbuilding as one of the key drivers.
The sector accounted for nearly four percent of total exports and grew by almost 20 percent from the previous year -- reaching $25.6 billion.
Shipbuilding directly employs around 120,000 workers -- roughly one percent of the country's total workforce -- with indirect employment significantly higher in industrial hubs like Ulsan.
Industry data shows so far this year, new orders have exceeded 13 trillion won ($9.4 billion).
In March, Hanwha Ocean secured a landmark $1.6 billion contract to build LNG carriers for Taiwan's Evergreen Marine, one of the largest single orders in the sector this year.
Why is it a 'bargaining chip'?
Trump has showed "significant interest in South Korea-U.S. shipbuilding cooperation," said South Korea's trade, industry and energy minister Ahn Duk-geun in April.
Like the Europeans, the U.S. shipbuilding industry has lagged behind South Korea and China, and as a result, the sector is seen as a "highly important bargaining chip in trade negotiations," he added.
At an APEC finance ministers' meeting in South Korea in May, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer met Chung Ki-sun, vice chairman of HD Hyundai, the country's largest shipbuilder, before he met Seoul's top officials.
"South Korea's shipbuilding and defense industries see a window of opportunity," said Kim Dae-jong, a professor at Sejong University.
How does it help the U.S.?
Greer also met with the CEO of Hanwha Ocean, the first non-American company authorized to carry out a dry-dock maintenance of a US Navy vessel.
The move last September was seen as significant as it signaled that Washington sees South Korea, where it already has 28,000 U.S. troops stationed, as a strategic defense hub.
With worries growing about China's expanding naval fleet and potential conflict in the Taiwan Strait, the U.S. has begun seeking reliable overseas shipyards to support its operations in the Asia-Pacific region.
The global market for ship maintenance, repair, and overhaul is projected to exceed $60 billion annually, according to industry estimates.
Any problems?
Despite multi-billion-dollar contracts, data suggests South Korea's shipbuilding industry is losing ground in the global race.
China dominates with South Korea's market share dropping, according to industry data.
Demand for eco-friendly vessels is rising, and the government need to overhaul regulations "to support the development of next-generation eco-friendly vessels," Rhee Shin-hyung, a professor at Seoul National University, told AFP.
South Korea's woeful demographics also make staffing hard. In Geoje -– home to Samsung Heavy Industries -– the number of residents in their 20s and 30s has nearly halved in recent years.
Orders are down in 2025 which hints that "the shipbuilding boom may end sooner than the market anticipated," warned Rhee.
Global ship orders between January and April fell by almost half the volume recorded during the same period last year.
Shipbuilders have been enjoying a "supercycle" but unfortunately the "peak is expected to be lower and the boom shorter-lived compared to the past," Nam Chul, vice president at HD Hyundai Heavy Industries, told AFP.
© 2025 AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NHK
15 minutes ago
- NHK
Israel-Iran ceasefire apparently holding as both sides claim victory
The ceasefire between Israel and Iran appears to be holding, with no reports of major attacks or damage so far. US President Donald Trump announced on Monday that the two countries had agreed to a ceasefire. He wrote on his social media platform that "an Official END to THE 12 DAY WAR will be saluted by the World" on Wednesday. After the announcement, Israel attacked a radar site near the Iranian capital, Tehran. Israeli officials say the move was in response to missile launches from Iran. But Trump urged Israel to refrain from further attacks. No major attacks or damage have been reported since then. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz took to social media on Tuesday. He wrote that he emphasized to his US counterpart, Pete Hegseth, that "Israel will respect the ceasefire -- as long as the other side does." Both Israel and Iran have claimed a victory. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel has achieved a "historic victory." Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said all the glory of this historic victory belongs to the great and civilization-building nation of Iran. Attention is focused on whether the ceasefire will hold.
Yomiuri Shimbun
17 minutes ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Nippon Steel: Acquisition of Major U.S. Manufacturer Aimed at Regaining Top Spot
Can Nippon Steel Corp., once the world's largest steelmaker, regain the top spot? The Japanese steelmaker will be tested as to whether it will be able to work out an investment strategy in U.S. steel giant United States Steel Corp. and promptly reorganize the management of the U.S. manufacturer. Nippon Steel acquired all common shares of U.S. Steel for $14.1 billion (about ¥2 trillion), making the U.S. company a wholly owned subsidiary. Nippon Steel's crude steel production will increase to 58 million tons a year, almost on par with Chinese company Ansteel Group Corp., the third largest producer worldwide. Although there is a gap with the No. 1 producer, China's Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., Nippon Steel is nearing the No. 2 spot currently held by Europe's ArcelorMittal SA, which produces 65 million tons a year, and has the European firm in its sights. Its presence in the global market will certainly increase. Steel, which is a basic material indispensable for manufacturing automobiles, ships, home appliances and other products, has shored up the competitiveness of Japan's manufacturing industry. Nippon Steel has been expanding its global operations in cooperation with automakers and other companies. In addition to Japan, Nippon Steel has major plants in other countries, including India and Brazil. With the completion of the buyout of U.S. Steel, Nippon Steel will immediately put U.S. Steel production bases in the United States and Europe under its umbrella. It is significant that Nippon Steel will be able to strengthen its global production networks. It can be said that Nippon Steel's acquisition strategy is based on the global trend of emphasizing economic security. This is because, although free trade is important, the reality is that the United States, Europe and other countries are increasingly protecting their own industries from an economic security perspective to counter China's growing hegemonic activities. The issue for the future is how to obtain profits commensurate with the huge investment in U.S. Steel. Nippon Steel initially planned to invest $1.4 billion, but it added $1.3 billion to the amount in summer last year. The planned investment finally swelled to $11 billion in total as a result of negotiations with U.S. President Donald Trump's administration. It will be necessary to devise a way to procure funds so the investment rating will not be lowered. It is estimated that wages in the U.S. manufacturing industry are nearly double that of Japan. It is not easy to secure skilled workers in the United States, where the manufacturing industry is declining. It is good news that since U.S. Steel has been allowed to become a wholly owned subsidiary, Nippon Steel no longer needs to worry about technology being leaked outside. It is hoped that Nippon Steel will quickly provide its advanced technologies, such as high-tensile steel plates for automobiles, and quickly expand its production bases. In order to obtain approval for the acquisition, U.S. Steel agreed to issue a 'golden share' to the U.S. government. The U.S. government will be able to veto important issues, such as changing the company name, moving its headquarters and closing plants in the United States. U.S. Steel was protected by high tariffs, but its facilities became obsolete. To regain competitiveness, it is important to respect the autonomous management of the private sector. The U.S. government should exercise its golden share rights in a restrained manner. (From The Yomiuri Shimbun, June 25, 2025)
Yomiuri Shimbun
17 minutes ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Israel-Iran Ceasefire Agreement: Still a Long Way to Easing Tensions
Israel and Iran, which have been exchanging attacks, have agreed to a ceasefire, U.S. President Donald Trump has announced. If implemented, this would be an important step toward avoiding an all-out war between these two military powers in the Middle East. Both countries are strongly urged to exercise restraint, so as not to slide back into fighting. Trump said in a social media post that the two countries had agreed to a 'Complete and Total CEASEFIRE' and indicated that he expected the fighting would end as early as June 25. Iran's foreign minister also announced that Iran would not continue retaliating if Israel stopped its attacks. Prior to the announcement of the ceasefire, Iran launched a missile attack on Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, the largest U.S. base in the Middle East. Iran claimed the attack was in retaliation for the U.S. military's attack on Iranian nuclear facilities, but the United States and Qatar were notified in advance and no casualties were reported. By limiting the attack to a restrained one, Iran may have signaled that it did not want a further escalation in the fighting, while still saving face by having retaliated against the United States. The Israeli side also is believed to have accepted the ceasefire sought by the United States, as it has succeeded to a certain extent in destroying nuclear facilities and military bases in Iran with the support of the U.S. military. The hope is that the two countries will stop attacking each other, and the spread and intensification of warfare in the Middle East will be halted. However, while Trump was quick to announce the ceasefire, both countries were slow to express their positions. The situation does not warrant optimism, as there is no clear path toward the implementation of the ceasefire and the abandonment of Iran's nuclear development. There is no doubt that Trump led the way in this ceasefire. During an emergency meeting at the U.N. Security Council, the United States argued that the U.S. military attack on Iran constituted an exercise of the right of collective self-defense to protect its ally Israel. Although the U.N. Charter prohibits the use of force in principle, it approves of U.N. members exercising the right of self-defense as an exception. For that reason, Washington asserted that its action did not violate the charter. However, even though Iran was promoting nuclear development, may it be said that the threat was not so obvious and imminent that Israel and the United States would be forced to invoke the right of self-defense? They also did not call in advance for a resolution authorizing the use of force at the Security Council. Even if the method of wielding the U.S. military's overwhelming military power to bring the other side to its knees is temporarily effective, it will not lead to a long-term solution unless accompanied by diplomatic efforts. This could set a precedent for countries other than the United States to use the threat from another country as an excuse to use force. (From The Yomiuri Shimbun, June 25, 2025)
