Cave discovery reveals oldest community of animals living in European Arctic
The discovery, which includes polar bear, walrus, bowhead whale and Atlantic puffin, provides 'a rare snapshot of a vanished Arctic world', according to scientists.
Also found were the remains of collared lemmings which are now extinct in Europe and had not been found in Scandinavia before.
The team say the study, published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), will help show how wildlife has responded to dramatic climate shifts in the past as the animal community dates to a warmer period of the ice age.
DNA testing carried out for the research found that the lineages of the animals did not survive when colder conditions returned.
Sam Walker, of Bournemouth University, said: 'These discoveries provide a rare snapshot of a vanished Arctic world.
'They also underscore how vulnerable cold-adapted species can be under changing climate conditions, which can help us to understand their resilience and extinction risk in the present.'
The remains were found in the Arne Qvamgrotta cave which was first discovered in the 1990s when a local mining industry built a tunnel through the nearby mountain.
But it was large excavations carried out in 2021 and 2022 which led to the discovery of the animals which also included common eider, rock ptarmigan and Atlantic cod.
Professor Sanne Boessenkool, of the University of Oslo, said: 'We have very little evidence of what Arctic life was like in this period because of the lack of preserved remains over 10,000 years old.
'The cave has now revealed a diverse mix of animals in a coastal ecosystem representing both the marine and the terrestrial environment.'
The researchers state that the variety of animals including migratory reindeer suggest the habitat would have been mostly ice-free at the time and the presence of freshwater fish meant there would have been lakes and rivers within tundra.
There would also have been sea ice for the bowhead whales and walruses, although this would have been seasonal as the harbour porpoises found are known to avoid ice, the scientists say.
The study suggests that although the animals had managed to colonise the region after the glaciers melted, their whole populations had died out as they had been unable to migrate when the ice returned.
Dr Walker said: 'This highlights how cold-adapted species struggle to adapt to major climatic events.
'This has a direct link to the challenges they are facing in the Arctic today as the climate warms at a rapid pace.
'The habitats these animals in the region live in today are much more fractured than 75,000 years ago, so it is even harder for animal populations to move and adapt.'
Prof Boessenkool added: 'It is also important to note that this was a shift to a colder, not a period of warming that we are facing today.
'And these are cold-adapted species, so if they struggled to cope with colder periods in the past, it will be even harder for these species to adapt to a warming climate.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
The surprising friendship habit female gorillas share with humans
Socialising with a new group of people can be daunting – but research suggests it's not just humans that rely on a mutual friend to break the ice. Female gorillas also look out for friends they have lived with in the past before moving to a new social group. A study published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B monitored multiple groups of wild mountain gorillas in Rwanda for 20 years and found females do not disperse randomly. It's common for animals to leave their birth group to join another. In a smaller number of species, including humans and gorillas, individuals can change between groups multiple times. This process, known as dispersal, plays a key role in avoiding inbreeding, spreading gene diversity and shaping social relationships. Researchers looked at 152 dispersals from 56 females and found females avoid males they grew up with when moving and looked for females they already knew. "Because female mountain gorillas do not know with certainty who their fathers are, they might rely on a simple rule like 'avoid any group with males I grew up with' as the likelihood of them being related will be higher than with males they did not grow up with," said lead author Victoire Martignac, a PhD student from the University of Zurich. Researchers explained female gorillas can move multiple times and will become familiar with males in each group, but when they move what seemed to matter more was the presence of females they had lived with before. "Going into a new group could feel pretty scary, with individuals usually entering at the bottom of the social hierarchy. A familiar female might help reduce this, providing a social ally," said Dr Robin Morrison, senior author on the study. "It could also act like a recommendation from a friend – if a female they know has chosen to stay in this group it could indicate positive things about the group as a whole or the dominant male leading that group." The study also found female gorillas gravitated towards other females they had spent at least five years with and those they have seen in the last two years. Researchers say this movement shows gorillas relationships, like humans, extend beyond group boundaries. "This mirrors a key aspect of human societies: the existence of strong ties between different social groups," added Dr Martignac. "As humans, we're constantly moving across jobs, cities and social groups. We do it so effortlessly that we forget how unusual this flexibility actually is within the animal kingdom." "This is a reminder of the meaningfulness of social relationships kept across boundaries and how this extended network of relationships might have played a key role in the evolution of larger and more cooperative societies."
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Full-fat milk vs low-fat milk: Study finally reveals which is healthier for your heart
A decades-long study has finally revealed how healthy full-fat and low-fat milk are, with researchers concluding that one is safer for your heart. Experts analysed three decades of health data and found the fat level of milk influenced a person's risk of dying of heart disease. The study published in the The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition used data from three cardiovascular health screenings conducted between 1974 and 1988. Researchers in Norway tracked the data of 73,860 individuals, with an average age of 41, over 33 years and recorded 26,393 deaths, including 8,590 from cardiovascular disease. They found those who drank full-fat milk had a higher mortality risk in than those who drank low-fat milk. Researchers were able to make this comparison due to a unique historical context. In the 1970s, most people in Norway drank whole milk, but by the 1980s more people drank low-fat milk. This meant researchers were able to investigate the long-term health consequences of drinking both of these milk types. Those who drank the most milk in the study had a 22 per cent increased risk of all-cause mortality and a 12 per cent increased risk of death from cardiovascular disease in comparison to those who drank the least. But further analysis revealed whole milk in particular was driving this increased risk of death. When researchers compared full-fat and low-fat milk and adjusted for how much they drank, they found consuming low-fat milk was associated with a 11 per cent lower mortality risk and a 7 per cent lower risk of cardiovascular disease than consuming whole milk. The findings remained consistent even after excluding early deaths or participants with pre-existing conditions. However, low-fat milk drinkers tended to be females, have higher education and not smoke, in comparison to whole fat milk drinkers who frequently reported being current smokers. Study authors concluded: 'Associations between milk intake and cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality varied by type of milk, with positive associations found for whole milk and a modestly inverse association with ischemic heart disease and all-cause mortality was found for low-fat milk when compared with whole milk.' The results are in line with current NHS health advice. Most of the fat in milk and dairy foods is saturated fat which when eating in large amounts can contribute to weight gain, the NHS explains. A diet high in saturated fat can also lead to raised levels of cholesterol in the blood, increasing the risk of having a heart attack or a stroke.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Brits should only eat a burger once every 2 WEEKS to save the planet, climate scientist claims
Whether you have yours with pickles, extra cheese or covered in sauce, a burger can be one of the most satisfying meals to tuck into. But people should limit their intake to one every two weeks to help curb climate change, according to an expert. Paul Behrens, a British Academy Global Professor at the University of Oxford, claims Brits must cut down on their meat and dairy intake to help save the planet. He argued that long–term climate change could make it impossible to grow food in a third of current production areas. 'A shift to plant–rich diets in the UK would free an area almost the size of Scotland,' he wrote on The Conversation. Those who love chicken, pork and beef shouldn't worry though – as they'd still be able to enjoy their favourite meals. 'It's not even vegetarian, although it does include a reasonable – and healthier – amount of meat and dairy,' he said. 'For example, it still includes a hamburger every fortnight.' Professor Behrens explained that a shift to plant–rich diets would provide more space to grow crops and help curb rising food prices. He cited research by agricultural economists that found a third of UK food price increases in 2023 resulted from climate change. Other studies also predict significant food price increases every year in the coming decade. Consistent stress on the food system could even cause collapse, according to some experts, prompting civil unrest and riots. 'This trajectory of climate–driven food price hikes – leading to social unrest and political decay – is not inevitable,' Professor Behrens added. 'The scientific consensus shows that the biggest opportunity we have for reducing food's environmental impacts across many countries is increasing the amount of plants we eat and reducing meat and dairy intake.' A previous study, also carried out by academics at the University of Oxford, revealed that eating just 100g meat per day – less than a single burger – creates four times more greenhouse gases compared to a vegan diet. 'Our dietary choices have a big impact on the planet,' said lead author Peter Scarborough, professor of population health at Oxford's Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences. Why is meat bad for the planet? Meat–heavy diets risk the health of our planet, as livestock farming on a massive scale destroys habitats and generates greenhouse gases. Animal agriculture contributes to global warming because of the methane, nitrous oxide and carbon emissions of livestock and their supply chains. The clearing of trees to make way for grazing cattle also reduces carbon sequestration – the process of capturing and storing atmospheric carbon dioxide. 'Our results, which use data from over 38,000 farms in over 100 countries, show that high meat diets have the biggest impact for many important environmental indicators, including climate change and biodiversity loss. 'Cutting down the amount of meat and dairy in your diet can make a big difference to your dietary footprint.' Earlier this year, scientists claimed that Brits will need to curb their meat consumption if the government is to meet its net zero targets. The government's climate advisers said that the average amount of meat eaten by Brits each week equates to roughly eight kebabs, but that this needs to be reduced by a quarter to help meet emissions targets. They also suggested that Brits reduce their dairy consumption by 20 per cent by 2040. Labour's Climate Change Committee said this would allow for farmland to be freed up for increased tree planting to absorb carbon at greater rates. Separately, a report compiled by HelloFresh predicted that Brits will soon be eating the likes of kelp noodle stir fry, soybean spaghetti and dandelion salad in the fight against climate change. All dishes are free from any meat and very little cheese, which studies show are a big drivers of greenhouse gas emissions like carbon dioxide and methane. Meanwhile, a study published in 2022 suggested that a total elimination of meat production around the world by 2037 could slash global emissions by 68 per cent and save Earth from climate change. Researchers performed computer modelling scenarios of future greenhouse gas emissions up to the 22nd century using publicly available data from the UN. Eliminating all animal agriculture in the next 15 years would drastically reduce greenhouse gas emissions and pull carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, they found. Animal agriculture contributes to global warming because of the methane, nitrous oxide and carbon emissions of livestock and their supply chains. THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF FARMING COWS The livestock animals are notorious for creating large amounts of methane, which is a major contributor to global warming. Each of the farm animals produces the equivalent of three tonnes of carbon dioxide per year and the amount of the animals is increasing with the growing need to feed a booming population. Methane is one of the most potent greenhouse gases, trapping 30 times more heat than the same amount of carbon dioxide. Scientists are investigating how feeding them various diets can make cattle more climate-friendly. They believe feeding seaweed to dairy cows may help and are also using a herb-rich foodstuff called the Lindhof sample. Researchers found a cow's methane emissions were reduced by more than 30 per cent when they ate ocean algae. In research conducted by the University of California, in August, small amounts of it were mixed into the animals' feed and sweetened with molasses to disguise the salty taste. As a result, methane emissions dropped by almost a third. 'I was extremely surprised when I saw the results,' said Professor Ermias Kebreab, the animal scientist who led the study. 'I wasn't expecting it to be that dramatic with a small amount of seaweed.' The team now plans to conduct a further six-month study of a seaweed-infused diet in beef cattle, starting this month.
