BBC apologises to Jenrick over suggestions he is xenophobic in Radio 4 broadcast
While appearing on the radio on Wednesday, Krish Kandiah, a director of Sanctuary Foundation, claimed Mr Jenrick had increased 'fear of the stranger' among people.
It's extremely disappointing the BBC thought it was acceptable to smear millions of worried citizens as 'xenophobic' for their completely understandable fears about undocumented men entering illegally Robert Jenrick
Mr Kandiah added: 'The technical name for this is xenophobia.
'All phobias are by definition irrational. Nevertheless, they have a huge impact.
'Over the past year, xenophobia has fuelled angry protests outside hotels housing asylum seekers, deepening divisions in our communities.'
In a letter to the Conservative MP, the broadcaster's head of editorial standards Roger Mahony said the comments went 'well beyond' what is expected of its Thought For The Day segment.
Mr Mahony said: 'I have concluded that, while its reflection on fear in society from a faith perspective is broadly in line with expectations of Thought For The Day, some of the language it used went beyond that.
'I have asked for the two references to xenophobia to be edited from the programme on BBC Sounds. Please accept my apology for their original inclusion.'
The content has since been removed from the programme on BBC Sounds.
Mr Jenrick said: 'Illegal migration is obviously fuelling crime and the public are right to be concerned about it.
'It's extremely disappointing the BBC thought it was acceptable to smear millions of worried citizens as 'xenophobic' for their completely understandable fears about undocumented men entering illegally.'
Protesters outside the Bell Hotel in Epping (Yui Mok/PA)
A series of protests have been held outside the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex, over recent weeks after an asylum seeker was accused of attempting to kiss a 14-year-old girl.
Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, 38, denies the charges of sexual assault and is due to stand trial this month.
In a statement, the BBC said: 'During this episode of Thought For The Day, criticism was made of recent comments by shadow secretary of state for justice Robert Jenrick, about hotels housing asylum seekers.
'While the programme's reflection on fear in society from a faith perspective was broadly in line with expectations of Thought For The Day, some of the language used went beyond that and we apologise for its inclusion.
'It has been removed from the version on BBC Sounds.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
29 minutes ago
- Wales Online
BBC security manager fired after claims he spent 12 hours trawling CCTV for kitchen mess culprit
BBC security manager fired after claims he spent 12 hours trawling CCTV for kitchen mess culprit The sacked security manager has won an employment tribunal against BBC contractor Mitie BBC Wales HQ in Central Square, Cardiff (Image: Richard Williams/WalesOnline) A security manager at BBC Wales' headquarters was sacked following an allegation he spent 12 hours poring through CCTV to find out who made a mess in the kitchen. Mohammad Rakib was fired by the broadcaster's security contractor Mitie after an investigation found he did not have a licence to review CCTV — but he has now won a £31,637 payout after a judge ruled he was unfairly dismissed. Mr Rakib was a duty security manager for Mitie from April 2022 until his dismissal in September 2023. He managed a team of around five security officers at the BBC's Central Square building in Cardiff city centre. The employment tribunal centred on the events of May 8, 2023, when he was alleged to have breached data protection rules by looking through CCTV footage in the control room without a suitable SIA (Security Industry Authority) licence. According to Mitie's investigator Martyn Barrass, Mr Rakib gave multiple explanations — at one point saying he reviewed the CCTV because another member of staff had misplaced a bag, and at another point saying he could not remember the reason. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter . Mr Rakib said during an investigation meeting: "I don't know why. I don't really do CCTV reviews that often, but there was a reason why I was doing it." Another security officer claimed to have had a conversation in which Mr Rakib admitted going through the footage for 12 hours "to catch who had made a mess in the kitchen". Questioned on this allegation, Mr Rakib said he thought the "kitchen incident" happened on a different day. He denied spending 12 hours trying to find the culprit. Article continues below When Mr Barrass informed the BBC of the matter, the broadcaster's corporate security manager Joel Adlington described the alleged data protection breach as "unacceptable", adding: "I must put on record that it is a significant breach of trust between the staff member and the organisation, and you have my full support in your assessment of gross misconduct." Mitie held a disciplinary hearing over the alleged CCTV misuse as well as a claim that Mr Rakib had bullied a security officer. The bullying allegation was found "not proven on the evidence" but the firm did conclude Mr Rakib had reviewed footage without the correct licence — and that his explanations for doing so would not have been appropriate even if he did have a licence. Mitie's regional operations manager Marc Pearson took into account Mr Rakib's decade of service and that he had relocated from London to Cardiff for the job. But he said the damage to trust with the BBC was "so serious" he had to be sacked. He appealed but the decision was upheld by the deputy account director for the BBC contract, Lee Hill, who acknowledged Mr Rakib had a door supervisor licence entitling him to view live feeds but not to "review footage for any form of investigation without prior approval from the data controller". At the Cardiff employment tribunal, Judge Rachel Harfield found Mr Hill failed to check whether there was a pattern of other duty security managers reviewing CCTV. "Instead, all Lee Hill did in his appeal outcome letter was fudge the issue by saying if there was evidence of other duty security managers undertaking such activity then appropriate action would be taken to address it," she said. The judge noted Mr Pearson had failed to properly investigate Mr Rakib's claim that a former colleague had told him a licence was not needed for internal reviewing. Mr Pearson did not attempt to contact that ex-colleague and instead "presupposed" what he would say, the judge said. The judge also found Mitie had not given Mr Rakib any standard operating procedures on CCTV use. She concluded he had been unfairly and wrongfully dismissed. Judge Harfield said Mr Rakib was now only earning the minimum wage as a security officer at SGD Guarding. She added: "It took the claimant eight years and a move to Cardiff to get promoted. The claimant says he is now at back of the queue at SGD Guarding in terms of promotion opportunities. He says he thinks it will take another five years." Following Judge Harfield's ruling against Mitie, the parties agreed to a payout for Mr Rakib totalling £31,637. Article continues below
South Wales Guardian
40 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Housing asylum seekers in Essex hotel causing ‘very serious problem', court told
Epping Forest District Council is seeking an interim injunction stopping migrants from being accommodated at the Bell Hotel in Epping, which is owned by Somani Hotels Limited. It comes after a series of protests in recent weeks outside the hotel, after an asylum seeker was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. Barristers for the council claimed on Friday that Somani Hotels breached planning rules as the site is not being used for its intended purpose as a hotel, stating there was an 'overwhelming case for an injunction'. Somani Hotels is defending the claim, with its barristers telling the court in London that an injunction would cause asylum seekers 'hardship' and that the move would set 'a dangerous precedent that protests justify planning injunctions'. Opening the hearing in London, Philip Coppel KC, for the council, said: 'Epping Forest District Council comes to this court seeking an injunction because it has a very serious problem. 'It is a problem that is getting out of hand; it is a problem that is causing a great anxiety to those living in the district. 'The problem has arisen because of a breach of planning control by the defendant.' He continued: 'There is no agreement between (asylum seekers) and the hotel, they do not choose the duration of their stay… they do not choose the type of room. 'For them, the Bell Hotel is no more a hotel than a borstal to a young offender.' Mr Coppel told the court that the Bell Hotel had not been used as a hotel since the Covid-19 pandemic, and was now 'unrecognisable as a hotel, but for an old sign'. He added that Somani Hotels had not had 'the courage of conviction to seek a certificate of lawful use', which would have 'resolved the matter in its favour'. Mr Coppel also referenced the alleged sexual assault of a teenage girl by an asylum seeker who was placed in the hotel, which sparked a series of protests, and said several schools were in the nearby area. He said: 'Having this sort of thing go on in such a concentration of schools with no measures in place to stop a repetition is not acceptable.' He continued: 'It really could not be much worse than this.' In written submissions for the hearing, Mr Coppel said there was a 'preponderance of factors overwhelmingly in favour of granting an injunction'. He said these included removing 'the catalyst for violent protests in public places'. The barrister added: 'Allowing the status quo to continue is wholly unacceptable, providing a feeding ground for unrest.' He also told the court that the case has been brought against the hotel owner because it is the landowner, and had previously applied for planning permission. Piers Riley-Smith, representing Somani Hotels, told the court in written submissions that the Home Office's contracted service provider, Corporate Travel Management (North) Limited (CTM), should be involved in the case. He said that CTM should be included as it had 'booked the premises and manages and organises the movement and stay of asylum seekers', adding that the injunction bid should be delayed to a later date. He continued that the alleged planning breach was 'not flagrant', and that the 'defendant has not resumed the use knowing it is in breach of planning control and hiding the use from the council'. The barrister told the court that the hotel previously housed asylum seekers from May 2020 to March 2021, and from October 2022 to April 2024, and that the council 'never instigated any formal enforcement proceedings against this use'. He also said that while the company did apply for planning permission for a 'temporary change of use' in February 2023, this was a 'pragmatic attempt to address the claimant's concerns, rather than an acceptance that such a use required planning permission'. This application was later withdrawn as it had not been determined by April 2024, the barrister said. Asylum seekers then began being placed in the Bell Hotel again in April 2025, with Mr Riley-Smith stating that a planning application was not made 'having taken advice from the Home Office'. Mr Riley-Smith also said that the company accepted that since the Southport riots in summer 2024, 'where the perpetrator was mistaken to be an asylum seeker', and the alleged sexual assault in Epping, 'there has been public concern about the use as evidenced by highly publicised violent and disorderly protests'. He continued: 'However, the court should bear in mind – as recognised by the claimant – that these have spread far beyond locals who might have a genuine concern about their area to a wider group with more strategic national and ideological aims, but that does not necessarily mean the concerns are well-founded. 'Fears as to an increase of crime associated with asylum seekers or a danger to schools are common, but that does not make them well-founded.' The hearing before Mr Justice Eyre is due to conclude on Friday.
South Wales Guardian
40 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Healey hopes Trump-Putin summit could be ‘first step' on road to peace
John Healey said the end to any conflict 'must come from diplomacy', before Friday's meeting between the two leaders in Alaska. European leaders are braced for the meeting and have expressed hope about the prospect of a potential ceasefire after a joint call with US president Mr Trump earlier this week. Mr Healey was asked what lessons from VJ Day – being marked on Friday – could be applied in the present day as Mr Trump is set to meet the Russian leader. He told BBC Breakfast: 'The first lesson is that military and fighting solves nothing in the end, and that the end to war must come through talking, must come from diplomacy. 'So today in Alaska is what I hope, we all hope to see, a first step towards serious negotiations.' On Thursday, Mr Trump suggested European leaders could be invited to a second meeting if Friday's summit is successful. Speaking at the White House, he said: 'We have a meeting with President (Vladimir) Putin tomorrow, I think it's going to be a good meeting. 'But the more important meeting will be the second meeting that we're having. We're going to have a meeting with President Putin, (Ukrainian) President (Volodymyr) Zelensky, myself, and maybe we'll bring some of the European leaders along. Maybe not.' Mr Healey dismissed suggestions the UK's approach to the war is to 'watch and wait'. He told the BBC: 'The UK's role is to stand with Ukraine on the battlefield and in the negotiations, and prepare, as we have been, leading 30 other nations with military planning for a ceasefire and a secure peace through what we call the coalition of the willing. 'Our role is to lead the charge, as we have been, on more intensive diplomacy, to lead the charge on military aid to Ukraine so that we don't jeopardise the peace by forgetting about the current war, and being ready also to step-up economic pressure on Putin if he's not willing to take the talks seriously.' Sir Keir Starmer met with Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky on Thursday, and the pair expressed cautious optimism about the prospect of a truce 'as long as Putin takes action to prove he is serious' about ending the war, a Downing Street statement said. Concerns linger over the prospect of Kyiv being excluded from negotiations over its own future, and pressured to cede territory, after the US leader suggested any agreement may need to involve 'swapping of land'. Ukraine has already rejected any proposal that would compromise its borders.
