New euro banknotes spark Franco-Polish dispute over Marie Curie's name
Born in Warsaw in 1867, Skłodowska-Curie later moved to France, where she became the first woman to win a Nobel Prize, when she was honoured with the much-coveted award in 1903 for physics with her husband Pierre.
The acclaimed scientist also received the Nobel Prize for chemistry eight years later, making her the only person to win Nobels in two separate scientific fields.
She herself used different versions of her surname over the years — during her husband's lifetime, she signed her name as Skłodowska-Curie, but later increasingly as M. Curie.
Her personal history has been brought to the fore once again, following the European Central Bank's (ECB) plans to introduce a new series of banknotes, which could feature Skłodowska-Curie on the €20 note.
People in Poland have criticised the ECB for the way her name appears on its designs, with her Polish maiden name consigned to a bracket.
A contested name
In Poland, the decision has caused a wave of discontent.
For many Polish citizens, the omission of the Nobel Prize winner's maiden name — or the replacement of the Polish name by its French version — is not just a formal issue, but a symbolic one.
It is a reminder of the underestimation of Poland's contribution to European history, they feel.
The political dimension of the dispute became apparent when Polish media and commentators noted that other historical figures — including Miguel de Cervantes or Ludwig van Beethoven — retained their original names in each language version.
In response to complaints, the ECB has stressed that it is taking into account the complexity of the issue.
"We are consulting various historical and linguistic sources to determine the most appropriate notation," a spokesperson for the institution said.
The working form 'Marie Curie (née Skłodowska)' is intended to reflect the dual identity of the Nobel Prize winner, he added.
Exchanging old for new
The ECB Governing Council announced in January that the two final themes for the planned banknotes were "Rivers and Birds" and "European Culture".
The design theme that receives the most support from the public and the jury will be put into circulation.
If the "European Culture" theme wins, then the Skłodowska-Curie design, which currently shows her lecturing in a room full of books, could become a reality.
However, the ECB Governing Council will select the best designs in 2026.
After this decision, it will take several more years before the new banknotes can be put into circulation. The current euro banknotes will not immediately expire when the new ones are introduced.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
2 days ago
- Euronews
Almost 50% of Poles want Prime Minister Donald Tusk to resign
"In your opinion, should Donald Tusk resign and cease to serve as Prime Minister of the government?" asked a United Surveys poll for Polish news site Wirtualna Polska. 48.6% of respondents answered that Tusk should resign, while 43.8% said that he should remain in office. 7.6% were undecided or refused to take a position. The respondents were also strongly divided by party lines. Supporters of the ruling coalition, which includes Civic Platform, the Left, the Polish People's Party and Poland 2050, support Tusk. 85% of them are against the Prime Minister's resignation. However, 80% of voters supporting conservative opposition parties, including Law and Justice and the far-right Confederation, favor his departure. The poll was conducted between 25 and 27 July among a representative sample of 1,000 adults. Donald Tusk has come under increasing political pressure since the results of the presidential election were announced in June, after Karol Nawrocki, backed by Law and Justice, defeated the perceived favorite Rafal Trzaskowski, who is part of Tusk's Civic Platform. On 11 July, Tusk held a vote of confidence, telling the Sejm that it could not "turn a blind eye" to the fact that his government was facing "greater challenges" as a result of Nawrocki's election. At the end of July, Tusk carried out a government reshuffle, replacing several key ministers in his cabinet. While support for him among the coalition's voters remains strong, many criticise his government for failing to implement the announced changes promised ahead of the 2023 general election. These include issues such as the liberalisation of abortion rights and civil partnerships for LGBT+ couples, on which the various parties in the coalition do not agree. This situation is unlikely to change under Nawrocki's presidency, as even if Tusk's coalition can internally agree on policy changes, it does not have the majority to override a presidential veto. Karol Nawrocki will take office on 6 August at 10 a.m. That same day Andrzej Duda's 10-year presidency will end.
Euronews
4 days ago
- Euronews
There is no clear intent to commit genocide in Gaza, law expert says
A growing number of top government officials, NGOs and academics in the West are ready to claim that Israel's ongoing military operation in Gaza amounts to genocide. But some law experts have raised alarms about the risks of using the term, which is perceived as "the crime of crimes", without a proper definition or legal proof. They say there is so far no concrete evidence of Israel committing genocide as defined by the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, of which Israel is a signatory. 'Israel is committing the war crime of using hunger as a weapon of war, which is prohibited under international law,' said Stefan Talmon, a prominent international law professor at the University of Bonn. 'But there is a difference between war crime and the crime of genocide.' No clear genocide intent so far First coined by the Jewish-Polish lawyer Raphael Lemkin in 1944, the word 'genocide' is defined under the 1948 Convention as a set of five crimes 'committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group.' Those crimes include 'Killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group, deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group and forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.' The Israel-Hamas war in Gaza started after Hamas-led militants launched a surprise attack on 7 October 2023 in southern Israel, killing 1,200 people and taking hundreds hostage. Fifty hostages are still being held, although fewer than half of them are believed to be alive. Since then, UN agencies have warned that Israel's airstrikes on Gaza, along with a siege of the territory, have resulted in the deaths of more than 60,000 people, the forced displacement of tens of thousands and growing evidence of man-caused mass starvation. In December 2023, South Africa started proceedings at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) against Israel for alleged violations of the 1948 Convention, arguing that 'acts and omissions by Israel ... are genocidal in character, as they are committed with the requisite specific intent ... to destroy Palestinians in Gaza as a part of the broader Palestinian national, racial and ethnical group.' A year later, Amnesty International became one of the first international NGOs to conclude in a report that 'there is sufficient evidence to believe that Israel's conduct in Gaza following 7 October 2023 amounts to genocide.' More recently, B'Tselem, a prominent Israeli NGO also stated that Israel's policy in the Gaza Strip 'together with statements by senior Israeli politicians and military commanders about the goals of the attack,' led to the conclusion that 'Israel is taking coordinated, deliberate action to destroy Palestinian society in the Gaza Strip.' In a separate interview, genocide and Holocaust scholar Omer Bartov told Euronews that he had labelled Israel's military campaign a genocide in May 2024, when the Israeli army decided to flatten Rafah after ordering its residents to evacuate the city in the southern tip of the Gaza Strip, and moving them to Mawasi – a coastal area with almost no shelter. But for an international law expert and barrister like Talmon, there is no sufficient proof of a clear intent to commit genocide in Israel so far, and it will be 'very difficult' for South Africa or any other country to prove that Israel is committing genocide. 'It's not just that you are killing people as such and you deliberately kill someone,' Talmon said. 'You have to kill the person because you want to destroy the group he is a part of, in whole or in part.' 'That does not necessarily mean that you would have to kill the group in whole, or in part,' Talmon continued. 'We have seen convictions of individuals for genocide where just one person has been killed … You don't need 6 million people dead like the Holocaust to have genocide.' The proof is either 'direct evidence,' he said, like a decision of the Israeli security cabinet which would 'spell out that the cabinet wants to basically exterminate the Palestinian people.' But the ICJ can also require indirect evidence by which 'you may basically infer the intention to destroy in whole or in part from a certain pattern of action.' In addition, he said, there must be 'no other inference than can be drawn from the fact than the intention to destroy.' The example of Srebrenica Talmon pointed to the genocide in the eastern Bosnian town of Srebrenica in July 1995, which resulted in the systematic execution of more than 8,000 Bosniaks, mostly men and boys. Despite a number of cases of genocide brought against Bosnian Serb military and political leadership for crimes in different parts of the country, the ICJ ruled that it was committed only in Srebrenica. 'The (Bosnian) Serbs separated women and children from men and started, within a short period of time, to kill (thousands of) men of all ages, from 16 to basically 65 or 75, irrespective of whether these were soldiers or whether these were civilians,' he said. 'Now in that situation, the International Court of Justice said: what other explanation can you give for that mass killing within these kind of two days other than to destroy in whole or in part, the Bosnian Muslims in that area and exterminate them?' 'We haven't had any such situation in the Gaza Strip,' Talmon added. Crime against humanity versus genocide Without indisputable, direct or indirect evidence of the intention to destroy, Israel could be prosecuted on charges of war crimes or crimes against humanity, Talmon said. Under UN rules, the term 'war crimes' refers to violations of international humanitarian law 'committed against civilians or enemy combatants during an international or domestic armed conflict." A crime against humanity refers to a series of crimes 'committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack." 'The Israeli action, of course, could also be explained in many other ways,' Talmon said. 'Beginning from the fight against Hamas to rescuing the hostages, it could be by mere brutality, retaliation, vengeance, ethnic cleansing,' he explained. There is a multitude of other explanations for Israeli actions, so it will be very difficult to say because the Israelis are using excessive force, they are driving Palestinians to the south of the Gaza Strip, they are confining them to very specific areas, they are basically reducing the available food and water and medical supplies to them," Talmon continued. "That may all be explained by other motives.' Despite the absence of clear evidence or compliance with the high standards of genocide, Talmon concluded that such a verdict would carry devastating effects for the Israelis, many of whom are survivors or children of survivors of the Holocaust. 'If you find that Israel is committing genocide or that Germany committed genocide, It's not just the present government that will be seen as a génocidaire,' Talmon said, using the French word for perpetrator of genocide. 'It is the whole people," he stated. "The Israelis become perpetrators … The Germans have become perpetrators.' Founded in 1945, the ICJ has issued genocide verdicts in a handful of cases against individuals, and is yet to rule against any country for genocide. Genocide cases in front of international courts are an arduous endeavour, often taking over a decade to see through until a verdict is reached. Israel has vehemently rejected all allegations of a genocidal campaign in Gaza, in turn stating that its actions are meant to disempower and destroy Hamas. It has also repeatedly accused the militant group of intentionally endangering the lives of Palestinians by using them as human shields, while saying that it has done all in its power to prevent civilian losses.
Euronews
5 days ago
- Euronews
New euro banknotes spark Franco-Polish dispute over Marie Curie's name
A new euro banknote design has reignited a long-running controversy between France and Poland over the legacy of the Nobel Prize-winning scientist Marie Curie (née Skłodowska). Born in Warsaw in 1867, Skłodowska-Curie later moved to France, where she became the first woman to win a Nobel Prize, when she was honoured with the much-coveted award in 1903 for physics with her husband Pierre. The acclaimed scientist also received the Nobel Prize for chemistry eight years later, making her the only person to win Nobels in two separate scientific fields. She herself used different versions of her surname over the years — during her husband's lifetime, she signed her name as Skłodowska-Curie, but later increasingly as M. Curie. Her personal history has been brought to the fore once again, following the European Central Bank's (ECB) plans to introduce a new series of banknotes, which could feature Skłodowska-Curie on the €20 note. People in Poland have criticised the ECB for the way her name appears on its designs, with her Polish maiden name consigned to a bracket. A contested name In Poland, the decision has caused a wave of discontent. For many Polish citizens, the omission of the Nobel Prize winner's maiden name — or the replacement of the Polish name by its French version — is not just a formal issue, but a symbolic one. It is a reminder of the underestimation of Poland's contribution to European history, they feel. The political dimension of the dispute became apparent when Polish media and commentators noted that other historical figures — including Miguel de Cervantes or Ludwig van Beethoven — retained their original names in each language version. In response to complaints, the ECB has stressed that it is taking into account the complexity of the issue. "We are consulting various historical and linguistic sources to determine the most appropriate notation," a spokesperson for the institution said. The working form 'Marie Curie (née Skłodowska)' is intended to reflect the dual identity of the Nobel Prize winner, he added. Exchanging old for new The ECB Governing Council announced in January that the two final themes for the planned banknotes were "Rivers and Birds" and "European Culture". The design theme that receives the most support from the public and the jury will be put into circulation. If the "European Culture" theme wins, then the Skłodowska-Curie design, which currently shows her lecturing in a room full of books, could become a reality. However, the ECB Governing Council will select the best designs in 2026. After this decision, it will take several more years before the new banknotes can be put into circulation. The current euro banknotes will not immediately expire when the new ones are introduced.
