Germany proposes law to speed up geothermal and clean heat expansion
Germany possesses some of Europe's largest geothermal reserves, which could cover more than a quarter of its annual heating demand, a study by Fraunhofer Institute showed in 2023. But development has long been stalled by local resistance and regulatory red tape.
The new bill offers simplified approval procedures for geothermal facilities, heat pumps, heat storage, and heating pipelines.
It would legally designate these projects as being of "overriding public interest", similar to the status given to wind and solar energy, and push for accelerated permitting through changes in mining, water, and environmental laws.
It would also give government mining authorities fixed deadlines for project approval procedures and ease restrictions on geothermal exploration.
Under the bill, mining authorities would be able to waive a requirement for an operational plan for larger heat generation projects under certain conditions and would be required to respond within set deadlines when notified of planned drilling activities.
It also gives them the power to require geothermal companies to provide financial security against potential mining damages related to their projects.
The renewed interest in geothermal energy in Germany follows an energy price spike resulting from Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine that prompted major municipal utilities — as well as German and international fossil fuel firms — to explore new investment opportunities in the sector.
Germany's ambitions to cut greenhouse emissions in the building sector, where heating is the main emissions contributor, has also boosted interest in geothermal energy.
The new bill, which the economy ministry hopes will enter into force at the start of next year, must now be approved by Germany's cabinet as well as the lower and upper houses of parliament.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
7 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK lawmaker from Farage's Reform removes himself from the party
LONDON, July 5 (Reuters) - A British lawmaker from Nigel Farage's Reform UK party, James McMurdock, has removed himself from the party pending the outcome of an investigation into allegations relating to his business propriety, the right-wing party said on Saturday. McMurdock, one of five Reform lawmakers elected to join the UK's 650-strong parliament in the 2024 general election, will now sit as an independent, according to a statement on social media platform X from Reform's main enforcer of party discipline Lee Anderson. While the party - led by prominent Brexit campaigner Farage - has only a handful of lawmakers compared to the governing Labour Party's 403, it leads national opinion polls and gained noticeable ground from Labour in the local elections in May. "The allegations relate to business propriety during the pandemic and before (McMurdock) became an MP (Member of Parliament)," Anderson said in the statement. "At Reform UK we take these matters very seriously." McMurdock did not respond to a Reuters request for comment. The Reform statement said he has agreed to cooperate with any investigation following allegations which are likely to be published by a national newspaper.
The Sun
23 minutes ago
- The Sun
Top 10 Wimbledon star ‘BANNED by his sponsor' for selling broken racquets for £5,000 a pop
HOLGER RUNE has landed himself in hot water with a sponsor for flogging broken racquets at £5,000 a pop, according to reports. The Danish star, 22, recently raised eyebrows by launching a new online shop. The site allows fans to purchase various items worn and signed by Rune, with most priced at around £150. When the online shop launched, it also listed signed broken racquets for approximately £5,000 each. Rune is sponsored by racquet manufacturer Babolat. Per Clay Magazine, Babolat chief Marion Cornu said earlier this week: "It's not our intention to promote broken racquets. "We're in talks with his agent. Obviously, it's not our intention to promote broken racquets. "We have to be consistent with our values, so we're working on that issue with his representatives." Following Cornu's criticism, the broken racquets are no longer listed on Rune's online shop, although it's claimed that one was sold. SunSport has contacted Rune's team for comment. The online shop states that "part of the profits" earned go towards charities of Rune's choice. Several kits and caps remain on sale. Female Wimbledon star forced to lift up skirt as she is questioned over breaking all-white dress code Rune was beaten in round one of Wimbledon this week. The No8 seed surrendered a two-sets lead to lose 4-6 4-6 7-5 6-3 6-4 to qualifier Nicolas Jarry. Rune gave little credit to Jarry after the match, instead blaming his defeat on a knee injury. The former world No4 said: "If I play normal, I'm beating him nine out of 10 times, with all respect for Nicolas Jarry. "Obviously today didn't make it a lot easier with my knee, but yeah, it was not great." Rune subsequently added on social media: "Not a happy ending for me on the grass this year. Will have my knee checked and keep you updated. Good luck Jarry for the rest of Wimbledon." 3 Wimbledon 2025 LIVE - follow all the latest scores and updates from a thrilling fortnight at SW19
The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
Could Nigel Farage do worse as prime minister? You better believe it
Nigel Farage wants to be taken seriously as the leader of a potential party of government, so let us take him at his word: his ideas for government are terrible. He should be taken seriously because he has a good chance of being prime minister after the next election. It is no use saying, 'The election is probably four years away; anything can happen.' The things that might happen are just as likely to increase Farage's chances of winning as they are to decrease them. Incidentally, though, on the timing of the election, it was interesting that Morgan McSweeney, Keir Starmer's chief of staff, assumed it would be in 2028, four years after the last one. This was the normal pattern, before the Fixed-Term Parliaments Act that held sway between 2011 and 2022: if things were going well for a prime minister, they would go to the country a year before they had to. If things were going badly, they would run the full five years. Perhaps McSweeney had been so used to assuming a Starmer government would be gratefully acclaimed by the British people that, even when he wrote a memo last year about what could go wrong for Labour, he took 2028 as his target date for the election. The memo was leaked to Tim Shipman, political editor of The Spectator, who commented: 'I have had hints since that Starmer's team is already shifting its horizons to 2029 rather than 2028.' Anyway, the memo set out four issues on which Labour was vulnerable to Farage: being soft on net zero; immigration; failing to deliver change voters can feel; and becoming identified with a failed establishment. On each of those, McSweeney's warnings from last year have turned out to be 'prescient', as Shipman put it. It is, therefore, worth subjecting Farage's ideas to the kind of scrutiny that a potential party of government deserves. Last weekend, the Reform leader set out his plan to transform the parliamentary system. I say 'set out': what I mean is that he free-associated over lunch with a Sunday Times journalist, expounding a series of half-digested, contradictory 'radical' ideas of the kind usually found in below-the-line comments on the internet prefaced with, 'It's all perfectly simple…' He suggested that as prime minister he would appoint cabinet ministers from outside parliament, as in the US. 'The point about America is that you can have a senior cabinet position and you are held to account by a committee system that takes place on Capitol Hill and that is the equivalent of being in a court of law,' he said. 'That's accountability. Standing up in the House of Commons and telling a pack of lies, frankly, is not accountability.' He failed to explain how standing up in a committee and telling a pack of lies was any different. Then he contradicted himself, complaining that 'most' of the government's authority has been 'transferred to regulatory authorities and quangos'. This was quite wrong: 'The government has to be in the House of Commons. Why? I'll tell you why. Accountability.' Zigzagging from one fashionable nostrum to another, he said: 'We currently appoint cabinet ministers with zero experience of the areas. We swap them out after 18 months for somebody else with zero experience of the areas. None of it bloody works.' He said it was 'almost impossible for cabinet ministers to be good MPs anyway, because how could they be?', and said that it was 'interesting' that Gordon Brown made Digby Jones – 'a character that I like very much' – a business minister in the House of Lords. Yet he said, 'the make-up of the Lords is a bloody disgrace,' and he thought it should have 'an elected element based on the regions'. To sum up, then, he thinks cabinet ministers should be appointed from outside parliament, not even via the Lords, and should be accountable to the Commons through committee hearings – and that 'quangos' (I don't think he knows what a quango is) should be abolished. In other words, he has no idea. 'All of this needs to be thought through and debated more clearly,' he told The Sunday Times. His only workable argument – and it is admittedly a powerful one at the level of simplistic slogans – is: 'How could we do worse?' But that is a question that betrays a failure of the imagination. Voters only have to remember Liz Truss for a reminder that, dysfunctional as government may seem, it is always possible to do worse. Six weeks ago, Farage set out plans for huge tax cuts, raising the level at which people start to pay income tax to £20,000 a year. He claimed that this would be paid for by abandoning the net zero climate-change target, cutting the bill for asylum-seeker hotels, scrapping 'quangos' and tackling waste in public spending. None of those sources of revenue is credible: he was in effect proposing unfunded tax cuts comparable to those with which Truss blew up the financial markets. As McSweeney feared, the Labour government may not be a huge success, but could Farage do worse? You bet he could.
