logo
Tapping the frequent flyers: How Jet Airways set the standard in 1994

Tapping the frequent flyers: How Jet Airways set the standard in 1994

Business Standard15 hours ago
With Indians constantly on the move, hotel chains are deploying a common strategy: tap into the growing number of frequent air travellers,' said a story in this newspaper (Business Standard, July 28, 2025).
The concept of frequent-flyer programme (FFP) was pioneered by American Airlines with its AAdvantage Frequent Flyer programme, launched in May 1981. In India, we had Air India jumping on the bandwagon in 1994. As far as I am concerned, it was Jet Airways that set the standard. While most FFPs focused on providing free miles to be redeemed for future travel, Jet Airways did a lot more. It offered, in addition to mileage points, generous upgrade vouchers to its FFP programme members (Platinum tier); the airline also allowed flight changes without any extra fees — a feature I think about whenever I am made to pay an extra ₹1,700 to get on to an Indigo flight that departs 90 minutes earlier.
My first exposure to the linkage between air travel and hotel bookings was around the year 1998. I was flying from Mumbai to Kochi and as soon as my flight landed, I got an SMS alert on my mobile phone about a special offer from a Kochi hotel (this was before mobile internet became a part of our common currency). I was piqued and later found that BPL Mobile was partnering with hotels in various cities to alert them about potential customers.
All brands want to get a larger share of your wallet. Be it an airline or a hotel, or even a candy company. Recently in California, I discovered that the brand See's Candies ran a very interesting loyalty programme. Often loyalty programmes give you a straight 2 per cent or 3 per cent discount in the form of points. See's Candies offered a lot more. But the brand wanted you to work hard for it. The programme was administered through a loyalty card. The card had seven months indicated (May to November). When you bought candies worth $40 or more, you got a gold sticker on your card. If you bought $40 worth or more for three months, you got a $20 reward; if you did this for seven months, you got a $50 reward (a whopping 18 per cent reward). Interestingly, the programme takes a break during the peak candy-buying season of December/January. See's Candies is one of the gems that Warren Buffett spotted and invested in in 1972. Warren Buffett's investment in See's Candies has delivered great returns: since acquiring the company for about $25 million, See's Candies has generated over $2 billion in pre-tax earnings for Berkshire Hathaway. Outperforming the broader indices. I suppose the company is so successful because it is constantly trying to widen and deepen its customer base.
Airlines have been at the forefront of tapping the frequent flyers potential. But they also come under scrutiny for exploiting customers in uniquely different ways. I was given a window to this in an article that I read recently (Economist, July 26, 2025). The article says that some American airlines charge customers differential prices depending on the number of tickets they buy. Analysing 19,000 prices across 3,200 routes (in the US), it was found that the price you are offered may not be the same if you booked one or two tickets. A single traveller paid anything in the range of 5 per cent to 19 per cent more (depending on the sector). While Delta did not practise the variable pricing strategy, the article says that American Airlines and United were seen to charge more. However, this practice was abandoned after travel writers got wind of this. The worst thing happened. All airlines just hiked their two-ticket charges.
Hotels and airlines are perfectly positioned to work on each other's frequent-user lists. Travellers will be nudged by airlines to book at a hotel where the airline has a tie-up. In a reciprocal way, hotels will push airlines that are with them. In that sense, Air India and Taj Hotels could enjoy a vibrant partnership. But just pushing FFPs and offering discounts may not get you more profits (check out my article 'What is the price of loyalty', published in Business Standard on October 25, 2018). It is important to tailor your FFP and hotel loyalty programmes to ensure greater stickiness and interest in using additional value-added services. This way the customer will get something extra, and the travel sector, hotels and airlines (may be taxi companies, tour guides, etc.) will benefit more by reducing their cost of customer acquisition. Win Win Win.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Apple iPhone 17 series 'likely' to launch with higher prices; new leak claims
Apple iPhone 17 series 'likely' to launch with higher prices; new leak claims

Time of India

time38 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Apple iPhone 17 series 'likely' to launch with higher prices; new leak claims

Apple iPhone 17 series 'likely' to launch with higher prices; new leak claims Apple's next iPhone release, the iPhone 17 series , could mark a notable shift—for the first time in years, consumers may see higher prices at launch. Analyst Jeff Pu from GF Securities reports that US tariffs on devices from China and India could push prices up by $50 to $100 compared to the iPhone 16 models. At the same time, Apple may increase the base storage on the Pro model to 256GB, adding more value behind the higher price. As September approaches, buyers and analysts are watching closely. The coming decisions will influence not only budgets but also the broader discussion around trade, manufacturing, and consumer expectations in the tech world. iPhone 17 series 'expected' to get higher prices in 2025 According to MacRumors, market projections suggest that at least some iPhone 17 models will cost between $50 and $100 more than their predecessors. This would be the first price increase for the Pro model since the iPhone X in 2017. One way Apple may lessen the sting is by increasing the minimum storage on the Pro model from 128GB to 256GB. This aligns with existing practices and can help justify a higher base price with a tangible upgrade. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Tariffs and their impact on iPhone 17 series pricing According to Jeff Pu, new US tariffs on products imported from iPhone assembly hubs like China and India are expected to raise production costs. While imports from China carry a 20% tariff, devices made in India are currently exempt. However, since Apple now brings most of its US-sold iPhones from India, these cost pressures still affect pricing decisions. The unpredictable nature of US trade policy adds another layer of uncertainty to Apple's cost structure. Apple iPhone 17 release timeline and model breakdown Apple is expected to launch the iPhone 17 lineup, including standard, Pro, Pro Max, and possibly an 'Air' or 'Slim' model, on September 9, 2025. Pre-orders may begin on September 12, with shipments and retail availability starting September 19. Potential starting prices based on recent leaks: iPhone 17: around $850 iPhone 17 Pro: approximately $1,050 iPhone 17 Pro Max: near $1,250 Market outlook and broader effects According to Business Insider, Apple's Q3 earnings report revealed $94 billion in revenue, supported by strong iPhone sales. Despite this, the company incurred $800 million in tariff costs, expected to rise to $1.1 billion next quarter. Analysts warn that continued cost challenges may force Apple to raise prices more broadly, not just in the US, potentially affecting global retail pricing strategies. Also read | 7 powerful tips by Steve Jobs for increased creativity success AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

Tariffs, Trade, And Turbulence: India Must Diversify Exports Beyond The US
Tariffs, Trade, And Turbulence: India Must Diversify Exports Beyond The US

News18

time40 minutes ago

  • News18

Tariffs, Trade, And Turbulence: India Must Diversify Exports Beyond The US

A sharp increase in tariffs will make Indian exports significantly more expensive and drastically reduce their competitiveness in the American market. In a striking and aggressive maneuver that embodies hardball trade tactics, US President Donald Trump has imposed an average 50 per cent punitive tariff on Indian goods imports, effective August 27. This action has disrupted Indian export sectors, given that the US constitutes approximately 20 per cent of total Indian exports and represents 2 per cent of its GDP. Such drastic measures threaten the future of India-US trade relations, which had been on a strong upward trajectory until now. A sharp increase in tariffs will make Indian exports significantly more expensive and drastically reduce their competitiveness in the American market. The United States stands as India's largest trading partner, with total goods exports reaching $86.51 billion. Remarkably, around 44 per cent of these exports stem from pharmaceuticals ($10.5 billion), electronics including smart phones and semiconductors ($14.6 billion), engineering goods and auto components ($9.3 billion), and petroleum exports ($4.09 billion), all of which are currently exempt from these punitive tariffs. It's important to note that a 25 per cent base tariff on Indian imports was already in place, having previously ranged from 0 per cent to 10 per cent. This exemption provides a crucial lifeline to these sectors, which collectively account for a significant portion of $38.49 billion in merchandise destined for the US. While this exclusion offers some relief, it cannot mask the larger threat looming over other sectors. Key Sectors Affected With the Penal Tariff Agriculture & Food Processing: India currently exports $7 billion worth of agricultural produce to the US, with major items including shrimp, basmati and non-basmati rice, wheat, vegetable extracts, spices, and buffalo meat. These products together account for 60 per cent of India's agricultural trade with the US. Seafood, particularly shrimp, represents nearly 40 per cent of India's seafood exports to the US, valued at $2 billion annually. A proposed tariff of 50 per cent has been suggested, a significant increase from the previous 7 per cent. Spices worth $711 million and psyllium (isabgol) valued at $335 million are now facing this new 50 per cent levy. Additionally, processed foods, sugar, cocoa, and dairy products (including ghee and milk powder) are at risk due to steep tariff differentials—often exceeding 25% to 38%—which threaten the viability of these exports. Textiles and Apparel: India exports $8.4 billion worth of textiles and garments annually to the US. These are highly price-sensitive commodities, and steep duties of 59 per cent on textiles, 63.9 per cent on knitted clothes, 60.3 per cent on woven garments, and 52.9 per cent on carpets could render these exports non-viable, making them significantly more expensive than similar products from competitors like Vietnam, Bangladesh, and Mexico. Bangladesh, which benefits from duty-free access under the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) program, stands to gain the most from India's potential loss. Diamonds, Gems, and Gold Jewelry: With $10 billion worth of exports to the US for exceptionally cut and polished diamonds and gold jewelry, this sector will be significantly impacted by a 52.1 per cent tariff. Even a 10 per cent decline in export volume could cost India $1.5 billion. Countries like Belgium, Thailand, and Israel could quickly take advantage of this situation if Indian goods become unaffordable due to tariffs. Machinery and Mechanical Appliances: The engineering sector, often regarded as India's next major growth driver, is also vulnerable. This category includes pumps, compressors, industrial fans, and other electromechanical components worth $6.7 billion in exports. A 51.3 per cent tariff could drastically undermine India's competitive pricing in the U.S. market, which is already dominated by Germany, South Korea, and Japan. Leather and Footwear: With over $2 billion in annual exports to the US, these sectors are highly susceptible to tariff increases. Countries such as Vietnam and Indonesia, which are already major players, would likely capitalize on any struggles faced by Indian exporters. Chemicals and Dyes: This sector, valued at approximately $4.5 to $5 billion, is at risk, particularly given China's dominance and scale in industrial chemicals. Competitors Ready to Pounce Trump's tariff actions are not occurring in isolation. Countries with preferential access to the US, such as Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan, Thailand, and Bangladesh (which have tariffs of 15-20 per cent), could benefit as Indian exporters lose their competitiveness. Vietnam, in particular, has capitalised on its free trade agreements and low labour costs to become a favoured supplier for US importers, especially in garments, electronics, and footwear. Mexico also stands to benefit significantly due to its proximity to the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). Despite trade tensions, China may still undercut Indian suppliers because of its vast scale and resilient supply ecosystem. India's vulnerability is heightened by the absence of a comprehensive free trade agreement (FTA) with the US, leaving it exposed to unilateral tariff actions without any mechanisms for dispute resolution. Way Forward Historically, every crisis has catalysed transformative reforms in India. The food crisis of the 1960s sparked the Green Revolution, and now the recent steep tariff hike by the US demands urgent action. India must seize this opportunity to aggressively diversify its export destinations, strategically targeting emerging markets in Africa, Latin America, and the Middle East while decisively reducing its dependence on any single market. The impending ratification of the India-UK Free Trade Agreement presents a critical opportunity for boosting exports in high-end textiles, machinery, and professional services. We must fast-track negotiations for Free Trade Agreements with Canada, the EU, and Australia to capitalize on these opportunities without delay. Moreover, India must focus inward to fortify its domestic competitiveness. A robust strategy is essential—prioritizing logistics, simplifying compliance, reforming Special Economic Zones (SEZ), and enhancing infrastructure quality will make Indian goods more resilient to external shocks. We need bold, sector-specific export promotion strategies backed by Production Linked Incentive (PLI) schemes, dynamic branding support, temporary subsidies, and revitalized export financing. Logistical support for labour-intensive sectors such as textiles and gems is not just advisable; it is imperative. Implementing these measures will effectively cushion immediate disruptions and position India for sustained growth. The Author is Vice-Chairman of Sonalika ITL Group, Vice-Chairman (Cabinet minister rank) of the Punjab Economic Policy and Planning Board, and Chairman of ASSOCHAM Northern Region Development Council. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views. tags : India-US relations India-US trade deal view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: August 12, 2025, 17:41 IST News opinion Opinion | Tariffs, Trade, And Turbulence: India Must Diversify Exports Beyond The US Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Intel issues statement on CEO's meeting with US President Trump after he asked for his resignation; says: Mr. Tan had…
Intel issues statement on CEO's meeting with US President Trump after he asked for his resignation; says: Mr. Tan had…

Time of India

time43 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Intel issues statement on CEO's meeting with US President Trump after he asked for his resignation; says: Mr. Tan had…

Intel issued a conciliatory statement Monday following CEO Lip-Bu Tan 's White House visit, emphasizing the company's commitment to American technology leadership after President Trump 's recent call for the executive's resignation over alleged China ties . "Earlier today, Mr. Tan had the honor of meeting with President Trump for a candid and constructive discussion on Intel's commitment to strengthening US technology and manufacturing leadership," Intel said. "We appreciate the President's strong leadership to advance these critical priorities and look forward to working closely with him and his Administration as we restore this great American company." The corporate statement followed Trump 's own social media post describing the meeting as "very interesting" and calling Tan 's career rise "an amazing story." The president announced that Tan and cabinet members would continue discussions next week to "bring suggestions to me," signalling a collaborative approach after days of public tension. Intel responds to Presidential criticism with diplomatic messaging by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Khurd Users Prefers Toothsi Aligners Toothsi by MakeO Book Now Undo The company's measured response follows Trump's social media post declaring Tan "highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately." The president's criticism centered on concerns raised by Senator Tom Cotton about the CEO's previous business relationships with Chinese companies and his leadership history at Cadence Design Systems . Tan had previously served as CEO of Cadence until 2021, during which time the company recently admitted to unlawfully exporting semiconductor design software to a Chinese university involved in nuclear research. The Justice Department settlement required Cadence to pay nearly $118 million in criminal penalties for the violations. Intel's statement notably avoided addressing these specific allegations while positioning the company as aligned with Trump's America First technology agenda. American chipmaker seeks to protect federal funding and business relationships The diplomatic outreach reflects Intel's vulnerable position as a major recipient of federal CHIPS Act investments totalling $8.5 billion for domestic manufacturing expansion. The company has committed to building advanced semiconductor facilities in Arizona, Ohio, and New Mexico as part of the national security initiative. Tan assumed Intel's leadership in March after the board removed Pat Gelsinger, inheriting significant operational challenges including declining market share and intense competition from rivals like Nvidia in emerging AI chip markets. His White House meeting represents Intel's effort to maintain crucial government partnerships while addressing political concerns about foreign business connections in the increasingly sensitive semiconductor industry. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store