logo
IFAC on Apple tax: 'Spend it, save it or cut debt'

IFAC on Apple tax: 'Spend it, save it or cut debt'

Irish Examiner10 hours ago
Briefings for the Fiscal Advisory Council (IFAC) chair ahead of an Oireachtas appearance flagged likely questions on the Apple tax windfall, the budget impact of migration, and poor value from money in health spending.
Two Q&As were prepared for Séamus Coffey as he got ready to appear before a committee on budgetary oversight in early July.
One section highlighted issues that were likely to be 'pertinent now' while another looked at questions that arose 'consistently.' On what to do with the €13.8bn Apple tax windfall, a suggested answer for Mr Coffey said to remember the government 'is not stuck for cash.' It said: '[The state] is stuck for its capacity to spend it on things we all want. There are three broad options – spend it, save it, [or] cut debt.' The Q&A said spending it on housing was easier said than done as the biggest issues were 'construction sector capacity and planning bottlenecks' not the availability of cash.
If asked about the budgetary implications of migration, the briefing for Mr Coffey said there had been 'large increases' in numbers coming to Ireland in recent years.
It said: 'This has meant the labour force and employment has been able to grow as rapidly as it has in recent years.
'[Around] €2.1bn has been set aside for humanitarian assistance to refugees this year (€0.8bn of this is for Ukrainian refugees). In terms of future costs, these are uncertain.' The Q&A said that getting migrants integrated into employment and their own homes would reduce costs for the government.
'An increased supply of housing would mean some of the more expensive means of accommodation (hotels] may be replaced,' it said.
On cost-of-living supports, which have been a major feature of recent budgets, the IFAC briefings said these cost increases were now 'likely permanent.' The Q&A said: 'There is probably less of a case for once-off measures this winter. Permanent increases in social welfare could be targeted at specific groups. However, the measures have seldom been targeted.' Mr Coffey was also briefed on employment in construction and whether we needed more people working in that sector.
'Just over six per cent of all employment is in the construction sector. Over the period 2005 to 2007, this reached over ten per cent. This may have been unsustainable, however.' The briefing added: 'Mention productivity, can we get more output from the same workforce?' A Q&A on broader questions highlighted the challenges in creating a wealth tax that would be fair, not become an administrative burden, and collect enough money to make it worthwhile.
On how to fix repeated overruns in health spending, the briefing said that 'poor budgeting' was a problem but that there was also evidence of 'reduced productivity.' It also explained how Ireland's failure to meet its climate targets carried a very real 'fiscal risk.' The Q&A said the country had already foregone €500m from carbon credits it was entitled to sell and that costs of non-compliance were in the range of €8bn and €26bn.
The document said: 'While several [EU] member states are projected to fall short, the potential costs are significantly higher for Ireland relative to the size of its economy.' Asked about the records, IFAC said they had no further comment to make.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says he thinks Putin is ready to make deal for peace in Ukraine
Trump says he thinks Putin is ready to make deal for peace in Ukraine

Irish Independent

time24 minutes ago

  • Irish Independent

Trump says he thinks Putin is ready to make deal for peace in Ukraine

Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and his European allies have intensified their efforts this week to prevent any deal between the US and Russia emerging from Friday's summit in Alaska that leaves Ukraine vulnerable to future attack. 'I think President Putin will make peace, I think President Zelensky will make peace,' Mr Trump told reporters at the White House. 'We'll see if they get along.' Mr Trump has downplayed talk of a ceasefire emerging from the summit and speculated about a possible second meeting to come, involving more leaders. 'I think it's going to be a good meeting, but the more important meeting will be the second meeting that we're having. We're going to have a meeting with President Putin, President Zelensky, myself, and maybe we'll bring some of the European leaders along. Maybe not. I don't know that.' Putin earlier spoke to his most senior ministers and security officials as he prepared for a meeting with Mr Trump in Anchorage, Alaska, at 11.30am Alaskan time (8.30pm Irish time) that could shape the endgame to the largest war in Europe since World War II. In televised comments, Putin said the US was 'making, in my opinion, quite energetic and sincere efforts to stop the hostilities, stop the crisis and reach agreements that are of interest to all parties involved in this conflict'. This was happening, Putin said, 'to create long-term conditions for peace between our countries, and in Europe, and in the world as a whole – if, by the next stages, we reach agreements in the area of control over strategic offensive weapons'. His comments signalled that Russia will raise nuclear arms control as part of a wide-ranging discussion on security when he sits down with Mr Trump. A Kremlin aide said Putin and Mr Trump would also discuss the 'huge untapped potential' for Russia-US economic ties. A senior Eastern European official, who requested anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, said Putin would try to distract Mr Trump from Ukraine at the talks by offering him possible progress on nuclear arms control or something business-related. 'We hope Trump won't be fooled by the Russians; he understands all [these] dangerous things,' the official said, adding that Russia's only goal was to avoid any new sanctions and have existing sanctions lifted. Mr Trump said there would be a press conference after the talks, but that he did not know whether it would be joint. He also said in an earlier interview with Fox News that there would be 'a give and take' on boundaries and land. 'This meeting sets up like a chess game,' Mr Trump said. 'This meeting sets up a second meeting, but there is a 25pc chance that this meeting will not be a successful meeting.' Mr Trump said it would be up to Putin and Mr Zelensky to strike an agreement, saying: 'I'm not going to negotiate their deal.' Russia controls around a fifth of Ukraine, and Mr Zelensky and the Europeans worry that a deal could cement those gains, rewarding Putin for 11 years of efforts to seize Ukrainian land and emboldening him to expand further into Europe. An EU diplomat said it would be 'scary to see how it all unfolds in the coming hours. Trump had very good calls yesterday with Europe, but that was yesterday'. Mr Trump had shown willingness to join the security guarantees for Ukraine at a last-ditch virtual meeting with European leaders and Mr Zelensky on Wednesday, European leaders said, though he made no public mention of them afterwards. Today's summit, the first Russia-US summit since June 2021, comes at one of the toughest moments for Ukraine in a war that has killed tens of thousands and displaced millions since Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022. Speaking after Wednesday's meeting, French president Emmanuel Macron said Mr Trump had said the transatlantic Nato alliance should not be part of any security guarantees designed to protect Ukraine from future attacks in a post-war settlement. However, Mr Trump also said the US and all willing allies should be part of the security guarantees, Mr Macron added. Expanding on that, a European official told Reuters that Mr Trump said on the call he was willing to provide some security guarantees for Europe, without spelling out what they would be. On Wednesday, Mr Trump threatened 'severe consequences' if Putin does not agree to peace in Ukraine and has warned of economic sanctions if his meeting today proves fruitless.

Trump says he thinks Putin will make a deal on Ukraine
Trump says he thinks Putin will make a deal on Ukraine

Irish Examiner

time5 hours ago

  • Irish Examiner

Trump says he thinks Putin will make a deal on Ukraine

US president Donald Trump said on Thursday he thought Vladimir Putin was ready to make a deal on ending the war in Ukraine after the Russian president floated the prospect of a nuclear arms agreement on the eve of their summit in Alaska. Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy and his European allies have intensified their efforts this week to prevent any deal between the US and Russia emerging from Friday's summit that leaves Ukraine vulnerable to future attack. "I think he's going to make a deal," Trump said in a Fox News radio interview, adding that if the meeting went well he would call Zelenskyy and European leaders afterwards and that if it went badly he would not. The aim of Friday's talks with Putin is to set up a second meeting including Ukraine, Trump said, adding: "I don't know that we're going to get an immediate ceasefire." Putin earlier spoke to his most senior ministers and security officials as he prepared for the meeting with Trump in Anchorage, Alaska on Friday that could shape the endgame to the largest war in Europe since World War Two. In televised comments, Putin said that the US was "making, in my opinion, quite energetic and sincere efforts to stop the hostilities, stop the crisis and reach agreements that are of interest to all parties involved in this conflict". This was happening, Putin said, "in order to create long-term conditions for peace between our countries, and in Europe, and in the world as a whole - if, by the next stages, we reach agreements in the area of control over strategic offensive weapons." His comments signalled that Russia will raise the issue of nuclear arms control as part of a wide-ranging discussion on security when he sits down with Trump. A Kremlin aide said Putin and Trump would also discuss the "huge untapped potential" for Russia-US economic ties. A senior eastern European official, who requested anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, said Putin would try to distract Trump from Ukraine at the talks by offering him possible progress on nuclear arms control or something business-related. Activists dressed as Donald Trump (L) and Vladimir Putin pose after ripping up a map of Ukraine at a demonstration in front of the Brandenburg Gate. Picture: Sean Gallup/Getty "We hope Trump won't be fooled by the Russians, he understands all (these) dangerous things," the official said, adding that Russia's only goal was to avoid any new sanctions and have existing sanctions lifted. Trump said there would be a press conference after the talks but that he did not know whether it would be joint. He also said that there would be a give and take on boundaries and lands. Russia controls around a fifth of Ukraine and Zelenskyy and the Europeans worry that a deal could cement those gains, rewarding Putin for 11 years of efforts to seize Ukrainian land and emboldening him to expand further into Europe. An EU diplomat said it would be "scary to see how it all unfolds in the coming hours. Trump had very good calls yesterday with Europe but that was yesterday". Seeking clarity on security guarantees Trump had shown willingness to join the security guarantees for Ukraine at a last-ditch virtual meeting with European leaders and Zelenskyy on Wednesday, European leaders said, though he made no public mention of them afterwards. Zelenskyy said the security guarantees had been discussed in "considerable detail" in comments after a meeting in London on Thursday with British prime minister Keir Starmer. Friday's summit, the first Russia-US summit since June 2021, comes at one of the toughest moments for Ukraine in a war that has killed tens of thousands and displaced millions since Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022. Speaking after Wednesday's meeting, French president Emmanuel Macron said Trump insisted that the transatlantic NATO alliance should not be part of security guarantees that would be designed to protect Ukraine from future attacks in a post-war settlement. Macron said, however, that Trump had also said the United States and all willing allies should be part of the security guarantees. Expanding on that, a European official told Reuters that Trump said on the call he was willing to provide some security guarantees for Europe, without spelling out what they would be. It "felt like a big step forward", said the official, who did not want to be named. It was not immediately clear what such guarantees could mean in practice. On Wednesday, Trump threatened "severe consequences" if Putin does not agree to peace in Ukraine and has warned of economic sanctions if his meeting on Friday proves fruitless. Russia is likely to resist Ukraine and Europe's demands and has previously said its stance had not changed since it was first detailed by Putin in June 2024. — Reuters

Cash not the issue for Government but how to spend it wisely, Ifac boss briefed ahead of committee
Cash not the issue for Government but how to spend it wisely, Ifac boss briefed ahead of committee

Irish Times

time6 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Cash not the issue for Government but how to spend it wisely, Ifac boss briefed ahead of committee

The Apple tax windfall, the budgetary impact of migration and value for money in the health service were likely questions flagged to Irish Fiscal Advisory Council (Ifac) chairman Seamus Coffey in briefings by his officials in advance of an Oireachtas appearance. Two Q&A documents were prepared for Mr Coffey in advance of the meeting of the committee on budgetary oversight in early July – one highlighting issues likely to be 'pertinent now' while the other looked at questions that arose 'consistently. 'On what to do with the €13.8 billion Apple tax windfall, a suggested answer for Mr Coffey said to remember the Government 'is not stuck for cash.' It said: '[The State] is stuck for its capacity to spend it on things we all want. There are three broad options – spend it, save it, [or] cut debt.' READ MORE The Q&A said spending it on housing was easier said than done as the biggest issues were 'construction sector capacity and planning bottlenecks' not the availability of cash. If asked about the budgetary implications of migration, the briefing noted there had been 'large increases' in numbers coming to Ireland in recent years. 'This has meant the labour force and employment has been able to grow as rapidly as it has in recent years,' it said, before noting that around €2.1 billion 'has been set aside for humanitarian assistance to refugees this year (€800 million of this is for Ukrainian refugees). 'In terms of future costs, these are uncertain,' the briefing note added. The Q&A said that getting migrants integrated into employment and their own homes would reduce costs for the Government. 'An increased supply of housing would mean some of the more expensive means of accommodation [hotels] may be replaced,' it said. On cost-of-living supports, which have been a big feature of recent budgets, the Ifac briefings said these were now 'likely permanent'. 'There is probably less of a case for once-off measures this winter,' the briefing document said. 'Permanent increases in social welfare could be targeted at specific groups. However, the measures have seldom been targeted.' Mr Coffey was also briefed on employment in construction and whether we needed more people working in that sector. 'Just over 6 per cent of all employment is in the construction sector,' his Q&A document noted, adding that between 2005 and 2007, this had reached over 10 per cent. 'This may have been unsustainable, however,' the briefing added, advising Mr Coffey to 'mention productivity, can we get more output from the same workforce?'. A Q&A on broader questions highlighted the challenges in creating a wealth tax that would be fair, not become an administrative burden, and collect enough money to make it worthwhile. On how to fix repeated overruns in health spending, the briefing said that 'poor budgeting' was a problem but that there was also evidence of 'reduced productivity'. It also explained how Ireland's failure to meet its climate targets carried a very real 'fiscal risk'. The Q&A said the State had already forgone €500 million from carbon credits it was entitled to sell and that costs of noncompliance were in the range of €8 billion and €26 billion. 'While several [EU] member states are projected to fall short, the potential costs are significantly higher for Ireland relative to the size of its economy,' the briefing noted. Asked about the records, Ifac said they had no further comment to make.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store