
African investors pitch Trump tumult as potential turning point
BEVERLY HILLS, Calif. — African investors see opportunity in the chaos of President Trump's return to the White House, despite the pain caused by his foreign aid cuts and whiplash tariff decisions.
That was the message from Vice Adm. Issah Adam Yakubu, the former chief of staff of Ghana's navy, who spoke at the Milken Institute Conference in Los Angeles this week.
'I have coined a term: Acquired Aid Addiction Syndrome,' Yakubu told a packed room for the panel titled 'Securing Africa's Future.' He said foreign charity was not the answer to Africa's challenges.
'That never will help us. What we need is trade — fair trade. Aid does not make us resilient, it kills our resilience. … It's like a virus eating you up.'
While the continent is reeling from the termination of billions of dollars in U.S. assistance for health, education, social and life-sustaining programs, investors pitching the crowd at Milken tried to shift the narrative — talking about new partnerships and opportunities for growth.
Yakubu wants to educate the next generation of Africans about professional opportunities at sea, and as a first-time attendee to the conference, is looking to make connections to help grow his nonprofit think tank, the Gulf of Guinea Maritime Institute.
The Milken confab draws a tony crowd. Some access fees start at $25,000, in exchange for an opportunity to mingle among a group of high-powered CEOs, government officials, philanthropists, scientists, investors, nonprofit leaders — and members of the media.
'The most important is networking to be able to meet people, particularly those who can support our initiatives,' Yakubu told The Hill in a short interview.
'What I want to get from the conference is to have a global view of what to expect in the next 2-3 years so that we can prepare ourselves for that.'
The uncertainty surrounding the Trump administration's economic agenda was a center point of conversations at the conference.
Treasury Department Secretary Scott Bessent tried to calm nerves in the crowd Tuesday, explaining the administration's three goals — trade, tax cuts and deregulation — were mutually reinforcing and increase the strength of capital for American businesses.
Africa, like the rest of the world, is under Trump's 10 percent global tariff. But Lesotho, Madagascar and South Africa, in particular, are in the crosshairs of Trump's 'reciprocal' tariff policy, which is temporarily paused. Those countries are facing 50 percent, 47 percent and 30 percent tariffs, respectively, unless new trade deals are struck.
The mood at Milken was optimistic.
Chidi Blyden, who served as deputy assistant secretary of Defense for African affairs during the Biden administration, recently opened Culturally Bound, a strategic consulting firm advising on development, security and investment in Africa.
'We got the message that we can still go and invest in Africa, and I still will go and invest in Africa, from its talent to critical minerals,' Blyden said in an interview with The Hill on the sidelines of the summit. 'But what I've done now is I've created a small business to go out and provide advisory services in the private sector.'
Blyden was most recently the CEO of the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) — the U.S. government agency known for its infrastructure projects that promoted economic growth, which the Trump administration shut down.
She argued the MCC was one of the best tools to deepen U.S. ties with African countries with the potential to expand abroad, and box out China economically.
'It's not clear right now how the average small business can get into the spaces, I am optimistic that this administration will create funnels and opportunities,' she said.
There are 54 countries on the continent, all with distinct opportunities and challenges. It's also a massive and growing workforce and retail market — by 2050, 1 in 4 people on the planet will be African.
Yet there remain enormous barriers to entry for foreign businesses and investment, from corruption to lack of infrastructure, stalled or slow economic growth, violence and humanitarian crises.
Comfort Ero, president and CEO of the International Crisis Group, cautioned that economic dealmaking would not resolve some of the entrenched conflicts facing the continent.
'If I thought you could use a mineral deal to end decades of war, then there's lots of countries that I imagine would have been fixed already,' Ero said on the African panel at Milken.
She was referring to a potential deal between Washington and the Democratic Republic of Congo, looking to trade mineral wealth for security guarantees. Just last week, Washington inked the framework of a minerals deal with Ukraine, though avoided making any firm commitments on security.
The Congo deal is being formulated as a way to end fighting in eastern Congo with the M23 rebel militia, backed by Rwanda — although a mix of rebel groups are active in the region. Last month, Secretary of State Marco Rubio convened the foreign ministers of Congo and Rwanda to sign a declaration of principles expressing intent to come to a resolution.
Ero said the movement toward peace talks is an important step.
'What it doesn't address is why we've got excessive back-and-forth fighting in the east of the Congo. What it doesn't address is disarmament of militias. What it doesn't address is the insecurity concerns of Kinshasa. And it doesn't address the insecurity concerns of Kigali as well,' she said.
'So I think you can strike a deal that takes out the resources of the country, but if it doesn't deal with the fundamentals, then that's a problem.'
One executive attending the conference, who was granted anonymity to offer a personal view, described a 'disconnect' between developments in Washington and the tone in California.
'I found the voices at Milken to be very booster-ish and far more positive than the mood in Washington to me. There felt like a real disconnect,' the executive said.
'I don't discount what I was hearing at Milken. It was, to me, quite useful as a little bit of a level-set. … People are just, keeping on, keeping on.'
While U.S. aid may not be the answer for Africa's economic future, the executive noted there are 'a lot of lives depending' on continued humanitarian support. Rubio has insisted lifesaving programs will continue despite deep cuts to the United States Agency for International Development.
Trump's cuts to foreign aid for the continent — in particular for HIV/AIDS prevention programs, the suspension of the Prosper Africa initiative and the likely termination of the African Growth and Opportunity Act — are likely to strain ties with the continent. The U.S. also plans to cut $555 million in funding to the African Development Bank.
The administration has not signaled it's going to end support pledged during the Biden administration for the Lobito corridor — a major infrastructure project to move mined minerals from the Congo through Zambia to Angola's Atlantic coast.
One African investor, who asked for anonymity because he did not want to speak on behalf of his company, said the U.S. aid cuts were a gut punch to African leaders and communities.
'I spend a lot of time with authorities across Africa, what all of them were saying … every time they get in the room with the U.S., there was some sort of almost deference to the U.S. because of what the U.S. was doing in terms of programs. … Wll of them are now wondering how are they going to be able to fill the gap,' the investor said.
But the investor said a global economic downturn would be more damaging in terms of his work, which includes philanthropy.
'We know as trade goes down, then there's a chance that the global economy will also slow down, and that will have an implication on commodity prices, and Africa is seen as a commodity exporter,' they said.
'African assets might look less attractive just based on that.'
Laura Kelly received a complimentary press pass to the conference.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
7 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Most US adults say Trump's military parade is not a good use of money, a new poll finds
WASHINGTON (AP) — As Washington prepares for a military parade this weekend to honor the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army, a new survey finds that U.S. adults are more likely to approve than disapprove of President Donald Trump's decision to hold the festivities, which officials have said will cost tens of millions of taxpayer dollars. But about 6 in 10 Americans also say that Saturday's parade is 'not a good use' of government money, including the vast majority of people, 78%, who neither approve nor disapprove of the parade overall, according to the poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. The survey found that about 4 in 10 U.S. adults 'somewhat' or 'strongly' approve of the parade, while about 3 in 10 'somewhat' or 'strongly' disapprove. About 3 in 10 neither approve nor disapprove. Carol Sue Quillen, 69, of Live Oak, Florida, said she sees the parade as a way to honor the country's service members, who she said include her late father — an Air Force test pilot killed on a helicopter training mission when she was a baby — and her son-in-law, who serves in the special forces. 'I don't necessarily think we appreciate our military as much as we should,' said Quillen, a retiree who described herself as a Trump supporter — although she said the Republican president's personality 'can be a bit overwhelming.' 'All branches should be celebrated for what they do,' Quillen said. 'That just boosts morale.' Featuring hundreds of military vehicles and aircraft and thousands of soldiers, the celebration on Saturday, which also happens to be Trump's birthday, has grown extensively in scope and size since Army planners started working on a festival two years ago to mark the military branch's anniversary. Besides a military parade — which Trump had unsuccessfully pushed for during his first term — there will also be concerts, fireworks, NFL players, fitness competitions and displays all over the National Mall for daylong festivities. The Army expects as many as 200,000 people could attend and says putting on the celebration will cost an estimated $25 million to $45 million. Most Republicans, around two-thirds, approve of the event, and a similar share sees it as a good use of money, but about one-third say it's not a good use of government funds. Democrats overwhelmingly say the parade is not a good use of public money, as do independents. And while about half of Democrats disapprove of the parade, about half of independents neither approve nor disapprove, suggesting that they may have heard less about it or have less strong feelings about it generally. Matt Wheeler, 40, called the display 'extremely wasteful' and 'a bit of a performance' that 'just sends a bad message' in terms of the overt military display. 'The only other time I can think about this, it's been in old throwbacks to the USSR or things you see out of North Korea,' said Wheeler, who works in nonprofit fundraising in Los Angeles and described himself as a lifelong Democrat. 'It's a direction this administration is inclined to move in that isn't in line with what I thought our country really was.' Sam Walters, 45, who works in restaurants in Fort Worth, Texas, described himself as a former conservative who now has more libertarian leanings. Walters, who voted for Trump in last year's election, said he appreciated that Trump had 'really kind of stuck to his guns' concerning many of the issues on which he campaigned, assessing his second term so far as 'a pretty good job.' But when it comes to the military parade, Walters said he was concerned about why so much additional funding was needed for military-adjacent activities, given the country's overall defense spending price tag. 'When they're getting hundreds of billions a year for funding, more than for anything else, it seems kind of hard to justify them spending extra for that,' Walters said, referencing the parade. Americans are generally divided on whether the government is devoting too much money to the military. About 3 in 10 say the government is spending 'too much' on the military, while a similar share says the government is spending 'too little.' About 4 in 10 say the government is spending 'about the right amount.' Those numbers are largely unchanged from an AP-NORC poll conducted in January. About 4 in 10 Americans approve of the way Trump is handling his job as president, which is unchanged from an AP-NORC poll conducted last month. Approval of his handling of immigration, at 46%, continues to be higher than approval of his handling of the economy or trade negotiations with other countries, which both landed at 38%. (The poll was conducted from June 5-9.) Andrew Thomsen, 31, of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, said that he has voted for Trump in general elections and that he would 'generally approve' of the direction in which the country is headed. Thomsen, who works in education, said that, while he appreciates any intent of the parade and associated events 'to celebrate those who have given of themselves to the service of our protection,' he wasn't a fan of attempts to show off U.S. military might. 'If it is a march of rows and rows of members from our different branches while showboating our tanks, missile systems, and other equipment to show how strong we are, then I don't support that,' he said. ___ The AP-NORC poll of 1,158 adults was conducted June 5-9, using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 4 percentage points. ___

7 minutes ago
Innovation takes a backseat at small companies as tariffs become a full-time preoccupation
NEW YORK -- Toy robots that teach children to code. Sneakers made in America. Mold-resistant kitchen gadgets. The three items are among new products that have gotten stuck in the pipeline due to President Donald Trump's unpredictable trade policies, according to the brand founders behind the stalled items. They say that instead of fostering U.S. innovation, Trump's tariffs are stifling it with extra costs and unexpected work. At Learning Resources in Vernon Hills, Illinois, Made Plus in Annapolis, Maryland, and Dorai Home in Salt Lake City, research and development have taken a backseat to recalculating budgets, negotiating with vendors and tracking shipments in the shifting tariff environment. 'If we don't have enough cash to cover just the restocks of the things that we know we need, do we want to take a risk on this new thing when we don't know how well it will sell yet?' Dorai Home founder Kelsey O'Callaghan said. O'Callaghan started the eco-friendly home goods company with a stone bath mat and now offers about 50 kitchen and bathroom accessories, which are made in China with a non-toxic material that dries quickly. New launches are critical to increasing sales and attracting customers, she said. As Trump increased the tariff on Chinese goods to 20% and as high as 145% before reducing the import tax rate to 30% for 90 days, Dorai Home postponed introducing new merchandise. O'Callaghan said she had to lay off the CEO as well as the head of product development, who helped the company jump on new trends. 'I haven't really put the time or the emphasis on (innovation) because I'm covering too many other people's roles,' she said. The company paused shipments from China in early April but resumed some on a staggered basis after the president's rate reduction. On Wednesday, Trump touted progress in U.S.-China trade talks. With details still sketchy and a deal not finalized, entrepreneurs interviewed by The Associated Press said they viewed the tariffs war as an ongoing threat. The potential stunting of innovation follows an economic slowdown during the coronavirus pandemic, when companies also had to put projects on hold. Some experts think the on-again-off again tariffs may have more enduring consequences because they rewire markets and upend business strategies. 'When executive attention shifts from innovation to regulatory compliance, the innovation pipeline suffers. Companies end up optimizing for the political landscape rather than technological advancement,' economists J. Bradford Jensen, a nonresident senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, and Scott J. Wallsten, president of the Technology Policy Institute think tank, wrote in an April blog post. Trump has argued that curtailing foreign imports with tariffs would help revive the nation's diminished manufacturing base. Analysts and various trade groups have warned that fractured trade ties and supply chains may depress R&D activity of U.S. tech and health care companies that rely on international partnerships or foreign suppliers. Small companies, which often drive the innovations that create jobs and economic growth, already are under strain. With fewer people on staff and tighter budgets compared to large corporations, entrepreneurs say they are spending more time on cutting costs, suspending or arranging orders, and deciding how much of their tariff-related costs to charge customers. That means they're spending less time thinking of their next big ideas. Schylling Inc., a Massachusetts company that produces modern versions of Lava lamps, Sea-Monkeys, My Little Pony and other nostalgic toys, has its products made in China. As part of its strategy to account for tariffs, the company put a group of employees on temporary unpaid leave last month to reduce expenses. Marketing director Beth Muehlenkamp said she and other furloughed workers typically would have been planning products for the final months of 2026. But Schylling isn't focusing on designing new products given the unstable trade outlook. 'It's really hard to focus on innovation and creativity when you're consumed with this day-to-day of how we're just going to balance the books and deal with the changing rates,' Muehlenkamp said. Even some companies that do their manufacturing in the U.S. are scaling back investments in new products. Made Plus, a Maryland company that makes athletic shoes at a small factory in the state capital, put a planned golf line on hold because two key components — a foam insole and the tread for the bottom of the shoe — currently are made in China, founder Alan Guyan said. The company customizes its shoes on demand and charges $145 to $200 a pair. The footwear is made from recycled plastic bottles with advanced knitting, 3D printing and computerized stitching techniques. It's looking into getting components from Vietnam instead of China. Embracing new technology is essential to restoring manufacturing capability in the U.S. and competing with Asia, Guyan said. But given ongoing trade frictions, he said he does not want to invest time or money evaluating the latest embroidery and knitting machines, which come from Germany, Italy, China and the U.S. 'We're just battening down the hatches a little bit and just hoping that there's enough influence in the community of footwear that it will somewhat change and get resolved and we can move forward,' he said of the tariff roller coaster. In contrast, many big companies are forging on. Google parent Alphabet confirmed late last month that it still planned to spend $75 billion on capital expenditures this year, with most of the money going toward artificial intelligence technology. Sonia Lapinsky, a managing director at consulting firm AlixPartners, has advised her clients to limit tariff discussions to a small group of executives and to keep their product creation cycles in motion. Businesses have an even greater imperative to come up with attention-grabbing innovations when consumers may be reluctant to open their wallets, she said. Yet smaller companies may struggle to wall off tariff discussions from the rest of the business. Learning Resources CEO Rick Woldenberg said that roughly 25% to 30% of the 350 employees at the educational toy company's headquarters, including product developers, are working at least part-time on tariff-related tasks. The company usually develops 250 different products a year and expects to get half that many off the drawing board for 2026, Woldenberg said. While exploring factories in countries besides China, he said, Learning Resources is delaying the next generation of its interactive robots that help children develop computer programming skills through games and other activities. The family-run business and Woldenberg's other toy business, hand2Mind, are locked in a legal battle with the Trump administration. The jointly owned companies filed a lawsuit accusing the president of exceeding his authority by invoking an emergency powers law to impose tariffs. A federal judge ruled in favor of the two companies last month, and the administration has appealed the decision. Woldenberg said he's ready to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court. 'It's a win at the Supreme Court that we need,' he said. 'And so until then, there will be no certainty. Even then, if the government is bound and determined to keep us in an uncertain situation, they'll be able to do that.'


Boston Globe
13 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Most US adults say Trump's military parade is not a good use of money, a new poll finds
Advertisement Carol Sue Quillen, 69, of Live Oak, Florida, said she sees the parade as a way to honor the country's service members, who she said include her late father — an Air Force test pilot killed on a helicopter training mission when she was a baby — and her son-in-law, who serves in the special forces. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'I don't necessarily think we appreciate our military as much as we should,' said Quillen, a retiree who described herself as a Trump supporter — although she said the Republican president's personality 'can be a bit overwhelming.' 'All branches should be celebrated for what they do,' Quillen said. 'That just boosts morale.' Featuring hundreds of military vehicles and aircraft and thousands of soldiers, the celebration on Saturday, which also happens to be Trump's birthday, has grown extensively in scope and size since Army planners started working on a festival two years ago to mark the military branch's anniversary. Besides a military parade — which Trump had unsuccessfully pushed for during his first term — there will also be concerts, fireworks, NFL players, fitness competitions and displays all over the National Mall for daylong festivities. Advertisement The Army expects as many as 200,000 people could attend and says putting on the celebration will cost an estimated $25 million to $45 million. Most Republicans, around two-thirds, approve of the event, and a similar share sees it as a good use of money, but about one-third say it's not a good use of government funds. Democrats overwhelmingly say the parade is not a good use of public money, as do independents. And while about half of Democrats disapprove of the parade, about half of independents neither approve nor disapprove, suggesting that they may have heard less about it or have less strong feelings about it generally. Matt Wheeler, 40, called the display 'extremely wasteful' and 'a bit of a performance' that 'just sends a bad message' in terms of the overt military display. 'The only other time I can think about this, it's been in old throwbacks to the USSR or things you see out of North Korea,' said Wheeler, who works in nonprofit fundraising in Los Angeles and described himself as a lifelong Democrat. 'It's a direction this administration is inclined to move in that isn't in line with what I thought our country really was.' Sam Walters, 45, who works in restaurants in Fort Worth, Texas, described himself as a former conservative who now has more libertarian leanings. Walters, who voted for Trump in last year's election, said he appreciated that Trump had 'really kind of stuck to his guns' concerning many of the issues on which he campaigned, assessing his second term so far as 'a pretty good job.' Advertisement But when it comes to the military parade, Walters said he was concerned about why so much additional funding was needed for military-adjacent activities, given the country's overall defense spending price tag. 'When they're getting hundreds of billions a year for funding, more than for anything else, it seems kind of hard to justify them spending extra for that,' Walters said, referencing the parade. Americans are generally divided on whether the government is devoting too much money to the military. About 3 in 10 say the government is spending 'too much' on the military, while a similar share says the government is spending 'too little.' About 4 in 10 say the government is spending 'about the right amount.' Those numbers are largely unchanged from an AP-NORC poll conducted in January. About 4 in 10 Americans approve of the way Trump is handling his job as president, which is unchanged from an AP-NORC poll conducted last month. Approval of his handling of immigration, at 46%, continues to be higher than approval of his handling of the economy or trade negotiations with other countries, which both landed at 38%. (The poll was conducted from June 5-9.) Andrew Thomsen, 31, of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, said that he has voted for Trump in general elections and that he would 'generally approve' of the direction in which the country is headed. Thomsen, who works in education, said that, while he appreciates any intent of the parade and associated events 'to celebrate those who have given of themselves to the service of our protection,' he wasn't a fan of attempts to show off U.S. military might. Advertisement 'If it is a march of rows and rows of members from our different branches while showboating our tanks, missile systems, and other equipment to show how strong we are, then I don't support that,' he said. The AP-NORC poll of 1,158 adults was conducted June 5-9, using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 4 percentage points.